Correct parsing. Syntactic analysis of a complex sentence

Instructions

At the first stage, you need to parse the sentence into members and underline them: the subject - with one line, the predicate - with two, - with a wavy line, the complement - with a dotted line, and the adverbial - with alternating dashes and dots. Sometimes it is also necessary to indicate the connections between the members of the proposal and ask questions to each of them.

If the sentence is simple, indicate the type of predicate: simple (PGS), compound verb (CGS) or compound nominal (CIS). If there are several, indicate the type of each of them. If, however, number each of its parts and draw up a diagram of this sentence, indicating the means of communication (and allied words). In addition, indicate the types of clauses (definitive, explanatory or adverbial clauses: clauses of time, place, cause, effect, condition, purpose, concession, comparison, manner of action, measure and degree or connecting) and the types of relations between them (sequential, parallel or homogeneous ).

Next, describe the sentence, indicating its type by purpose of the statement (declarative, interrogative or motivating), by intonation (exclamatory or non-exclamatory) and by quantity (simple or complex: , complex, non-conjunctive). If the sentence is simple, continue the analysis, indicating the type by the number of main members (two-part or one-part: nominative, definite-personal, indefinite-personal, generalized-personal or impersonal), by the presence of members (widespread or non-extended), by the presence of missing main members ( complete or ), and also indicate how it is complicated (homogeneous members, isolated members, introductory or plug-in constructions, or not complicated by anything). If the sentence is complex, continue the analysis according to the same scheme, but for each of its parts separately.

Video on the topic

Related article

The proposal scheme is not just a faculty whim. It allows you to better understand the structure of a sentence, determine its specifics, and finally parse it faster. Any diagram is, first of all, visual; You will agree that when you are dealing, for example, with Lev Nikolaevich, clarity is very necessary for understanding the proposal.

Instructions

You need to start by determining which parts of the sentence are words. First, determine the subject and predicate - the grammatical basis. This way you will already have a well-defined “stove” from which you can “dance”. Then we distribute the remaining words among the members of the sentence, taking into account the fact that they are all divided into a subject and a predicate group. In the first group, in the second - addition and circumstance. Please also take into account that some words are not members of the sentence (for example, conjunctions, interjections, introductory and inserted constructions), and that several words together make up one member of the sentence (adverbial and participial phrases).

Make a diagram offers, explain the placement of punctuation marks.

Video on the topic

Morphemic parsing words - parsing by composition, definition and selection of significant derivational parts of a word. Morphemic parsing precedes word formation - determining how the word appeared.

Instructions

With syntactic parsing e simple sentence stands out (subject and predicate). Then the type of sentence is determined by the purpose of the statement (narrative, interrogative or incentive), its emotional coloring (exclamation or ). After this, it is necessary to establish the type of sentence by its grammatical basis (one-part or two-part), by members (common or non-common), by the presence or absence of any member (complete or incomplete). Also, a simple can be complicated (homogeneous or isolated members are present) or uncomplicated.

With syntactic parsing e complex sentence in addition to determining the grammatical basis and type of sentence according to the purpose of the statement, it is necessary to prove that it is complex and establish the type of connection between simple sentences (conjunctive or non-conjunctive). If the connection is conjunction, then the type of sentence is determined by the nature of the conjunction: compound. If the sentence is complex, then it is necessary to find out what kind of coordinating conjunction the parts of the sentence are connected with: connective, disjunctive or adversative. In a complex complex, the main thing is determined and subordinate clause, a means of connecting the subordinate clause with the main one, the question answered by the subordinate clause, type. If a complex sentence is non-union, then the semantic relationships between simple sentences are determined and the punctuation mark is explained. It is also necessary to draw an outline of the proposal.

Video on the topic

Tip 6: How to Define an Indefinite-Personal Sentence

A sentence expresses a message, a motive, or a question. Two-part sentences have a grammatical basis consisting of a subject and a predicate. Grammar basis one-part sentence represented by either a subject or a predicate.

Instructions

All verbal one-part sentences have a predicate, but no subject. Moreover, in a definite personal sentence, the form of the verb and the meaning of the message suggest that the action refers to to a certain person: “I love books”, “Find correct solution", "Take care, and honor from a young age."

The verb can be in the first or second person singular form or in the indicative or imperative mood. The first person means that the verbal question is asked from the pronouns “I”, “we”; second person – from the pronouns “you”, “you”. The imperative mood encourages action, the indicative simply conveys information.

How to parse correctly

Analysis of the proposal and drawing up a diagram are included in basic complex knowledge school curriculum. Therefore, such tasks are given to students already in primary school, where they learn to parse simple text structures.

In grades 5–8 and 9–11, the task becomes more complicated: new terms and additional characteristics. A full set of signs is given already in the 7th–8th grades. To correctly draw up a diagram, you need to understand the essence of the analysis and remember a few rules.

What is sentence parsing

The answer lies in the term itself. Syntax is a system of rules for connecting different units together. Accordingly, the purpose of syntactic analysis of a text structure is to show the connections between its components.

note

For parsing, the text or the required part of it is written out in a notebook, one line at a time, so that there is room for underlining and markings above the words.

How to parse a sentence correctly? A plan illustrated with examples will help answer this question.

Analysis algorithm and characteristics

There is a clear order of parsing. If you stick to it, there will be no problems.

A simple sentence is a unit of a syntax system that has only one predicative part. This means that only one grammatical basis (two-part) or only one main member(one-part). The order of its parsing is as follows:

1. In a two-part sentence, find and emphasize the subject (what is being said) and the predicate (what is being said); in a one-component – ​​the main member:

2. Determine the type by the content of the speaker’s task, or by the purpose of the utterance:

• Narrative: The dug-up road sleeps. (S. Yesenin)
• Interrogative: What should we do in the village? (A. Pushkin)
• Incentive: Let's go to Tsarskoe Selo! (O. Mandelstam)

3. Parsing the proposal is not complete without several characteristics:

3.1. By composition:

Two-part – both subject and predicate are present:

Monocomponent differs in that the subject (what is said) and the predicate (what is said) are expressed by one member. It is not called “subject” or “predicate”, as in two-part, because its meaning is not reducible to either of these components. To designate this unit, the term “main member of a one-component sentence” (PCHOP) is used.

You also need to specify the type of one-part:

• Definitely personal - GCOP is expressed by a verb of the 1st and 2nd person singular. h. Closest to two-part: the unnamed subject of the action is restored by the listener according to the form of the verb.
  Examples:
  I love the sandy slope (A. Pushkin)
  What are you doing sweetie? (A. Ostrovsky)
  Please leave them, leave quickly. (Yu. Dombrovsky)
• Indefinite-personal – GCOP is expressed by a 3rd person plural verb. h. When parsing a sentence syntactically, it is important to understand the connection between form and meaning: here such a verb is used because the subject of the action is not so important or expressed collectively.
  Examples:
  “We don’t carry machine guns! We have no weapons!” - they shout from the trucks. (V. Makanin).
  Brick and concrete wall surfaces are finished with plaster (Landscape Design. 2003. No2)
• Generalized-personal – GCHOP is expressed by a verb of the 2nd person singular. h. (less often - in the form of the 1st person singular and plural). Meaning – generalization of personal or collective experience.
  Examples:
  You do something for him, you fight like a fly in a web... (A. Volkov)
  You won’t recognize a friend without trouble (last)
  They don’t go to someone else’s monastery with their own rules (last)
• Impersonal - expresses the manifestation of processes or states that occur or exist independently of the active figure. The independence of action from the subject, the inability to change the course of events, is a key feature of this type. During the syntactic parsing of sentences, impersonal units are those units whose PHOP is expressed by a state category, an adverb or an infinitive.
  Examples:
  I felt scared - so be it...
  We can't do magic with Tatyana. (A. Pushkin)
  Since the evening he had been uneasy, either shivering or aching. (A. Solzhenitsyn)
• Nominative (nominative) – denotes an object in space, indicates, gives an assessment. Most often, GCHOP is expressed by a noun, which is in the nominative case.
  Examples:
  Warm gusts of wind,
  Distant thunder and rain sometimes... (F. Tyutchev)

3.2. By prevalence

• unextended - there are only main members: We were leaving. (R. Rozhdestvensky)
• common - there are both major and minor: The golden grove dissuaded me // With birch, cheerful language. (S. Yesenin)

3.3. By completeness

• complete – self-sufficient in meaning: I love thunderstorms in early May (F. Tyutchev)
• incomplete – the meaning is not clear without context: Do you love chess? - Not good. (S. Dovlatov). It is impossible to understand the meaning of the answer outside the context of the question.

4. The next stage of syntactic parsing of a sentence is identifying cases of complication:

Homogeneous members:

I wandered in a toy thicket // And discovered an azure grotto... (O. Mandelstam)– complication with homogeneous predicates.

Separate members:

• Participial phrase: The Krasovs' great-grandfather, nicknamed the Gypsy by the courtyard, was hunted down by the master Durnovo with greyhounds. (I. Bunin)
• Participial phrase: ...looking at him, how can one not remember the horse? (A. Golyandin)
• Standalone application: I called another friend of mine, a very large farmer from Argentina... (A. Tarasov)
• Contact: Aunt Vasya, they left me with a task to redo, and Tanya was waiting for me... (L. Ulitskaya)
• Introductory structures:
  You yourself said that you are my friend. (A. Vampilov)
  But it happens that in the morning you shave, wash, get dressed - look in the mirror - you will be satisfied... (E. Grishkovets)
• Plug-in designs:
  Really - even if you don't want to - couldn't you do this for me?

5. Select the members of the sentence - that is, establish syntactic function components and underline accordingly. This is the largest section in terms of volume. At this stage you need to be especially careful, because one awkward mistake at the beginning can lead to incorrect syntactic construction and evaluation of a simple construction.

Beginners should do their analysis based on this article or textbook. You can select the material for analysis yourself or take home exercises. Experienced students can peek into theory only where necessary. To consolidate the skill, you need to do several analyzes yourself and then check them. For verification, it is better to contact the teacher, and if this is not possible, do a syntactic analysis of the sentence composition online.

After the grammatical basis, you need to find the members of the sentence of the subject group (that is, those to which the question is asked from the subject) and the predicate group. Each member is emphasized in its own way:

The type of member and the part of speech by which it is expressed are written above the words. Example: with bitterness - a circumstance of a course of action, expressed by a noun. with a preposition in creativity. case.

Parsing a complex sentence will not be difficult to master after studying the previous material. The plan is:

1. Select all the grammatical bases, count them and determine how many simple parts make up a complex one. There are as many parts as there are basics.
   Dad got on the horse and we rode off. (L. Tolstoy). There are two simple ones in this complex unit.
2. Find conjunctions and allied words.
   I’m sorry that it’s winter now (O. Mandelstam)– subordinating conjunction “what”.
   When Cherubina exposed herself, Makovsky came to visit her (M. Voloshin)– subordinating conjunction “when”.
   Sleepless nights and half-asleep days flew by, but there was no help from anywhere. (N. Pomyalovsky)– adversative conjunction “but”.
   Unlike conjunctions, allied words will always be full members of the sentence; logical stress may fall on them.
   Russia is converging with the West, which until then was completely alien to it. (A. Khomyakov)
   If you have difficulties in the analysis, you can contact a search engine and analyze the proposal on the Internet for free. But if you have the opportunity to talk to the teacher, it is better to solve the problem this way. There are many difficult places in Russian syntax, which can only be understood in conversation with a teacher.
3. Indicate the meaning of conjunctions and, accordingly, indicate the nature of the connection between the parts. They come in three types:
   Essays consist of two or more equal components: She gave him her hand, and both went along the road to her estate. (I. Turgenev)
   In subordinate clauses, the main and dependent parts are distinguished, and a question is asked from the first to the second and the type of dependent (subordinate) component is determined from it: An hour and a half later I wake up because the sun begins to burn my cheek (M. Voloshin). We ask the question: why do I wake up, for what reason? The type of dependent part is a clause of cause.
   The essence of the non-union is clear from the term itself. Such units lack any lexical means of communication: Koltsov is not only a national poet: no, he stands higher. (V. Belinsky)
4. This stage of syntactic parsing of a complex sentence is relevant only for complex constructions. Its content is to determine the meaning of subordinate clauses.
   I barely had time to put on my cloak when it began to snow (M. Lermontov) - subordinate tense.
   Now a neighbor came running to her wife and said that the old people had gathered at the mosque and wanted to stop you (L. Tolstoy) - explanatory clause.
   The name Morgach also suited him, although he did not blink his eyes more than other people (I. Turgenev) - a subordinate clause.
   The prince did not hear anything further, because the valet began to whisper. (F. Dostoevsky) – subordinate reason.
5. Analysis of each simple component within a complex one.

What is a proposal scheme

The final chord of the analysis is a diagram drawing. It is a graphical representation of basic information: the number of parts, their relationships, means of communication and types of dependent parts.

A drawing is an abstraction of syntactic relations, delimited from specific lexical content. A correctly compiled drawing shows a high understanding of the “Syntax and Punctuation” section and competent mastery of syntactic parsing of a sentence.

Unit boundaries are indicated by square brackets; A period is placed after the closing parenthesis. Homogeneous members in the diagram are circled, and the participial phrase is placed in parentheses.

In a complex scheme, accordingly, two or more parts are distinguished. In the text itself, they are separated by brackets to transfer this mapping into the diagram, and are numbered in order. Only the base is transferred to the diagram. Since you will have to draw a lot, to make the drawing even, use a stencil and a sharpened pencil.

In non-union and complex compounds, only square brackets are used to show the equality of the parts:

For the syntactic analysis of sentences with a main and dependent (dependent) parts, that is, complex constructions, there are two types of schemes - horizontal and vertical:

Syntactic analysis of simple and complex sentences on the Internet

Obviously, such an analysis takes a lot of time and effort and requires certain knowledge and skills. Therefore, many students prefer to do analysis syntactic construction by composition online. This good remedy for self-examination, but only if the quality of service deserves respect.

You can do an analysis on the Glavred website (glvrd.ru). The syntax analysis here does not correspond to the school one, but it will tell you the names of the parts of speech and identify some members of the sentence. For use:

1. Paste text into the window on the main page.
2. Select the “Syntax” tab at the top left of the window.
3. Point at the highlighted word and get information in the white field to the right of the window.

Another resource is School Assistant (school-assistant.ru). Its advantage is brevity in the presentation of the material. The path to analysis information is as follows:

1. In the left menu, click “Russian”.
2. Select the desired class (5, 6, 7).
3. Select the section you are interested in.

A brief theoretical reference and tasks will appear on the page, which will be completed after completion. automatic check. To save results, you need to register in your personal account.

Create a diagram online

Comparing results from different sites with your own analysis will help you check the work of electronic intelligence and choose the best one among them. It is better to contact an online assistant after analyzing and completing the drawing yourself, so that third-party information does not interfere with your training.

You can also understand the structure through linguist forums, where experienced specialists will help resolve controversial issues. It is also better to contact them after some part of the task has already been completed, so that there is a subject for discussion.

Tables and diagrams will also provide great support, in large quantities posted on the Internet. All of these resources and materials will help you create a syntactic analysis (diagram) of a sentence and analyze it according to its composition online for free. The key to success is understanding the theory and regular practice.

Syntactic parsing of a sentence is the parsing of a sentence into members and parts of speech. You can parse a complex sentence according to the proposed plan. The sample will help you correctly format a written analysis of a sentence, and the example will reveal the secrets of oral syntactic analysis.

Sentence parsing plan

1. Simple, simple, complicated by homogeneous members, or complex

2. According to the purpose of the statement: narrative, interrogative or motivating.

3. By intonation: exclamatory or non-exclamatory.

4. Common or not common.

5. Determine the SUBJECT. Ask questions WHO? or WHAT? Underline the subject and determine which part of speech it is expressed in.

6. Define the PREDIC. Ask questions WHAT DOES? etc. Underline the predicate and determine which part of speech it is expressed in.

7. From the subject, ask questions to the secondary members of the sentence. Underline them and determine which parts of speech they are expressed in. Write down phrases with questions.

8. From the predicate, ask questions to the secondary members. Underline them and determine which parts of speech they are expressed in. Write down phrases with questions.

Sample sentence parsing

The sky was already breathing autumn, and the sun was shining less and less often.

This sentence is complicated First part:

(what?) sky - subject, expressed by a singular noun. h., Wed. r., nar., inanimate., 2 sk., i. P.
(what did?) breathed - predicate, expressed by the verb nes. view, 2 pages, unit. h., past vr., wed. R.
breathed (what?) in the fall - addition, expressed by a noun in singular. h., w. r., narit., inanimate., 3rd class., etc.
breathed (when?) already - a circumstance of time, expressed by an adverb

The second part:

(what?) sun - subject, expressed as a singular noun. h., Wed. r., nar., inanimate., 2 sk., i. P.
(what did it do?) shone - predicate, expressed by the verb nes. view, 1 book, unit. h., past vr., wed. R.
shone (how?) less often - a circumstance of the manner of action, expressed by an adverb
shone (when?) already - a circumstance of time, expressed by the adverb

Example of parsing a sentence

They either flew obliquely in the wind, or lay vertically on the damp grass.

This proposal is simple.

(what?) they are the subject, expressed by a plural pronoun. h., 3 l., i. P.
(what did they do?) flew - homogeneous predicate, expressed by the verb non.view, 1 sp., plural. h.. last vr..flying
(what did they do?) lay down - homogeneous predicate, expressed by the verb non.view, 1 sp., plural. h.. last vr..
flew (how?) obliquely - a circumstance of the course of action, expressed by an adverb.
flew (how?) in the wind - circumstance of the course of action, expressed by the adverb
lay down (how?) vertically - a circumstance of a course of action, expressed by an adverb
lay down (where?) on the grass - an adverbial circumstance of place, expressed by a common noun, inanimate, in singular. h., w. r., 1 fold, in v.p. with a pretext
grass (what kind?) raw - definition, expressed by an adjective in singular. h., w.r., v.p.

To use punctuation marks correctly, you need to have a clear understanding of the sentence structure. Syntactic parsing, that is, parsing the sentence into members, is intended to help you understand it. Our article is devoted to the syntactic parsing of sentences.

Syntax units

Syntax studies the connections between words within phrases or sentences. Thus, the units of syntax are phrases and sentences - simple or complex. In this article we will talk about how to do a syntactic analysis of a sentence, not a phrase, although they are often asked to do this at school.

Why is sentence parsing needed?

Syntactic analysis of a sentence involves a detailed examination of its structure. This is absolutely necessary in order to put punctuation marks correctly. In addition, it helps to understand the connection of words within a phrase. During syntactic analysis, as a rule, the characteristics of the sentence are given, all members of the sentence are determined and it is replaced by what parts of speech they are expressed. This is the so-called full parsing. But sometimes this term is used to refer to a short, partial, syntactic analysis, during which the student only emphasizes the parts of the sentence.

Members of the sentence

Among the members of a sentence, the main ones are always identified first: subject and predicate. They usually form the grammatical basis. If a sentence has one grammatical stem, it simple, more than one - complex.

The grammatical basis can consist of two main members, or include only one of them: either only the subject, or only the predicate. In the second case we say that the sentence one-piece. If both main members are present - two-part.

If, apart from the grammatical basis, there are no words in a sentence, it is called undistributed. IN widespread there is also an offer minor members: addition, definition, circumstance; a special case of the definition is application.

if a sentence contains words that are not members of the sentence (for example, appeal), it is still considered uncommon.

When performing analysis, it is necessary to name the part of speech by which one or another member of the sentence is expressed. The children practice this skill while studying Russian in the 5th grade.

Offer characteristics

To characterize a proposal, you need to indicate it, you need to describe it

• according to the purpose of the statement;
• by intonation;
• by the number of grammatical bases and so on.

Below we offer an outline of the proposal's characteristics.

According to the purpose of the statement: narrative, interrogative, motivating.

By intonation: exclamatory or non-exclamatory.

Exclamatory sentences can be any type of sentence, not just incentive ones.

By the number of grammatical bases: simple or complex.

By the number of main members in the grammatical basis: one-piece or two-piece.

If the sentence is one-part, it is necessary determine its type: nominative, definitely personal, indefinitely personal, impersonal.

By the presence of minor members: widespread or not widespread.

If the proposal is complicated in some way, then this must also be indicated. This is a plan for parsing a sentence; It's better to stick to it.

Complicated sentence

A sentence can be complicated by address, introductory and inserted constructions, homogeneous members, isolated members, direct speech. If any of these types of complications is present, then you must indicate that the sentence is complicated and write with what.

For example, the sentence “Guys, let’s live together!” complicated by the address “guys”.

If the sentence is complex

If it is necessary to analyze a complex sentence, you must first indicate that it is complex and determine its type: conjunctive or non-conjunctive, and if conjunctive, then also complex or complex. Then characterize each of the parts in terms of the composition of the grammatical basis (two-part or one-part, type of one-part) and the presence/absence of minor members.

The table shows the minor members and their questions.

Minor members can be expressed in different parts speech, for example the definition:

wool skirt- adjective;

wool skirt- noun;

ironed skirt- participle;

habit of winning- infinitive...

Example of parsing a sentence

Let's look at the proposal “I didn’t know that you, Masha, moved from the village to the city”.

We emphasize grammar basics. There are two of them: knew and You moved. Let's define parts of speech: knew- predicate, expressed by a verb in personal form, etc.

Now we emphasize minor members:

Moved from where? from the village - a circumstance expressed by a noun; Where? to the city - also a circumstance, also expressed by a noun. Masha- this is an appeal, it is not a member of the sentence.

Now let's give characteristics. The sentence is narrative, non-exclamatory, complex, conjunction, complex.

The first part “didn’t know” is incomplete and undistributed.

The second part is two-part, widespread. Complicated handling.

At the end of the analysis, you need to draw up a diagram of a complex sentence.

What have we learned?

Parsing is designed to help you understand the structure of a sentence, so you need to indicate everything that can be associated with it. It is better to carry out the analysis according to plan, then there is a greater chance that you will not forget anything. It is necessary not only to emphasize the members of the sentence, but also to identify the parts of speech and characterize the sentence.

Test on the topic

Article rating

Average rating: 4.4. Total ratings received: 84.

§1. What is syntactic parsing, what are its specifics?

Parsing- this is a complete grammatical characteristic of a syntactic unit:

• phrases
• simple sentence
• complex sentence

When performing syntactic analysis, it is important to be able to distinguish between units of syntax and to realize that these are units different levels, and understand what features characterize each of them. Parsing requires not to confuse a phrase and a simple sentence, as well as simple and complex sentences, and to know how to parse each of them.

§2. What you need to know and be able to do

Parsing requires knowledge and skills.

Need to know:

• what is the difference between a phrase and a sentence
• what is the difference between a simple and complex sentence
• how a phrase is constructed, and what they are like (type by main word)
• syntactic connections of words in a phrase: agreement, control, adjacency
• what features characterize a sentence: the purpose of the utterance, semantic and intonation completeness, the presence of a grammatical basis
• what are the sentences based on the number of grammatical bases: simple, complex
• What are the types of simple sentences in their structure: two-part, one-part (nominal, definite-personal, indefinite-personal, generalized-personal, impersonal)
• what are the types of complex sentences: according to the nature of the syntactic connection of their parts: allied, non-union; allied: complex and complex)
• what is the syntactic role of words in a sentence (analysis by sentence members)

You need to be able to:

• determine which syntactic units the unit given for analysis belongs to
• highlight phrases in a sentence
• find the main and dependent word in a phrase
• determine the type of syntactic connection
• determine the grammatical basis of a sentence
• determine the type of sentence by its grammatical basis (two-part - one-part) and by the nature of the main member (for one-part sentences)
• define sentence members
• identify complicating components: homogeneous members, isolations, introductory elements (introductory words and sentences, inserted structures), addresses, direct speech and citation
• determine the number of parts in a complex sentence
• determine the type of syntactic connection and the type of complex sentence

§3. The order of parsing syntactic units

Collocation

1. Determine the main and dependent words, highlight the main thing, and from it raise a question to the dependent one.
2. Determine the type of phrase based on the main word: noun, verb, adverb.
3. Determine the type of syntactic connection: coordination, control, adjacency.

Simple sentence

1. Perform an analysis of the members of the sentence: underline all the members of the sentence, determine by what (word, what part of speech) they are expressed.
2. Give a description of the purpose of the statement:

• narrative
• interrogative
• incentive

3. Describe the emotions and intonation expressed:

• non-exclamatory
• exclamation point

4. Determine the number of grammatical bases and determine the type of sentence by their number:

• simple
• complex

5. Describe the presence of main members:

• two-part
• one-piece

a) one-part with the main member subject: nominative
b) one-part with the main member predicate: definite-personal, indefinite-personal, generalized-personal, impersonal

6. Describe the presence of minor members:

• common
• not widespread

7. Characterize it in terms of completeness (the presence of sentence members necessary in meaning):

• complete
• incomplete

8. Determine the presence of complicating components:

• uncomplicated
• complicated:

a) homogeneous members of the sentence
b) separate members: definition (agreed - uncoordinated), addition, circumstance
c) introductory words, introductory sentences and plug-in constructions
d) appeal
e) constructions with direct speech or quotation

Note:

When expressing distinctions by participles and participial phrases, as well as comparative constructions, to characterize how exactly the isolation is expressed

Difficult sentence

1. As in a simple sentence, identify the members of the sentence.
2. As in a simple sentence, characterize the purpose of the statement:

• narrative
• interrogative
• incentive

3. As in a simple sentence, describe the emotions and intonation expressed:

• non-exclamatory
• exclamation point

4. Based on the number of grammatical stems (more than one), determine that the sentence is complex.
5. Determine the type of syntactic connection between the parts of a complex sentence:

• with union connection
• with non-union connection
• with a combination of union and non-union connections

6. Determine the type of complex sentence and means of communication:

• compound (: connective, disjunctive, adversative, connecting, explanatory or gradational)
• complex (: temporary, causal, conditional, target, consequence, concessive, comparative and explanatory, as well as allied words)
• non-union (connection in meaning, expressed intonation)

7. Determine the type of complex sentence (for example: a complex sentence with an explanatory clause).
8. Next, each part of a complex sentence is characterized (according to the scheme of a simple sentence - see the scheme for parsing a simple sentence, paragraphs 5-8)
9. Create a diagram of a complex sentence that reflects