Everything you should know about the Victorian era (well, at least you should know something). Victorian morality

The Victorian era is called by name and determined by the years of the reign of Queen Victoria (Great Britain and Ireland, as well as the Empress of India) - 1837 - 1901 This is the time of the emergence and formation of the middle class in England. And also the famous gentleman's code - the gallant era.

The word initially meant belonging to a noble origin (as the basic definition of an aristocrat, which opened up the category of title - Esquire), but due to the emergence of the middle class, it became customary to address and call educated and well-mannered men with a respectable and balanced disposition and manners (prim and imperturbable ), regardless of origin.

Contemporaries also noted that before and at the beginning of the 19th century. It was customary to call a “gentleman” any man who lived on income from capital, having the opportunity not to work, regardless of the qualities of his personality. In the Middle Ages, the word “gentleman” was usually understood as belonging to the category of untitled nobility - Gentry, which included knights, descendants of younger and not heir sons feudal lords (the title was inherited only by the eldest son).

However, from the standpoint of the image that was steadily formed in society in the Victorian era, and which appears to us as such now, in reality, a gentleman is distinguished by impeccable manners and gallant behavior towards ladies. In particular, a gentleman, under no circumstances, will dare or allow himself to be treated rudely, and in ladies’ company he will strictly observe the rules of etiquette.

So, a gentleman is punctuality and elegance, an impeccable ability to keep one’s word (hence the category “gentleman’s agreement”).

In addition to gentlemanliness, as noble manners in society and everyday communication for the middle class, we inherited from that era democratic trading approaches and trendy lines of behavior.

The seemingly modern “boom” of supermarkets (self-service systems of inexpensive price categories) takes its toll in the Victorian era, as a project specifically for the middle class.

The middle class mentality concept of first making a career and acquiring social status, earn money, but love must wait - precisely from that era.

The Victorian era is a noble era of the middle class, which took its rightful place in British society, displacing the aristocracy from its pedestal. The enormous influence of his masses changed society itself in its attitude to work and profession. If the English aristocrat considered it extremely important to avoid systematic work, and this confirmed his elite status as a leisure class of the upper social stratum, then with the advent of the influence of the spirit of the middle class, respectability of perception and professionalism was introduced. It's even becoming fashionable to be a professional.

The Victorian man was characterized by loneliness, against the backdrop of strict morals and customs that prevented the ease of making acquaintances. Realization took place mainly in the profession. Apparently for this reason, the category “houses” played the most important role. Creating a home, under the conditions of many years of engagement (until the young man “gets on his feet”), the opportunity to start a family, get a home, acted as a kind of ideal, a goal that they strived for, but did not always achieve.

Probably, under the influence of such conditions, the need for economic activity, as an opportunity to create and support a family, at the end of the 19th century. The first suffragettes appear, demanding equal rights with men. Others continued to be content with housekeeping and growing flowers in country houses built by their prosperous husbands. As part of this trend, the first cottage villages appeared, already at the end of the Victorian era. This is how the middle class tried to separate itself from the working class.

At the same time, detective stories became a characteristic hobby of the era (stories about Sherlock Holmes by Conan Doyle, numerous exciting works by Agatha Christie about Miss Marple, etc.).

Detective Sherlock Holmes embodied the good conservatism of the Victorian era.

Conan Doyle extremely accurately conveyed the sense of respectability, stability, nobility and excellent noble manners of the era inherent in any Victorian person that was demanded by society. Thanks to this, the character Holmes, fictional from beginning to end, is perceived as an absolutely real person of that time, and his apartment on Baker Street is a place of pilgrimage.

The expansion of trade relations led to the assimilation of Indian with Chinese and Japanese, as well as Persian with Arabic decorative styles for European living rooms - everything came down to the category of “oriental” - oriental style.

“And it resulted in a true Victorian eclecticism of an enriched cultural heritage, which was manifested in the interior diversity for each room: the bedroom could well be in the spirit of the revived Rococo, the library of the same house - in the style of the revived Gothic, and the hallway of the neoclassical style could lead straight to” Persian smoking room.

The gold of geometric and floral patterns reigns in the interiors and outfits of the era. It is applied with stencils to embossed wallpaper, and gilded frames are made for paintings. The ideal shading colors for interiors are red and burgundy. Plush drapes and velvet curtains in red and burgundy tones, with gold trim, separate the library and dining areas. Above the mahogany beds you can find pale yellow canopies with fringe, made of curtain fabric - they served as protection from drafts. There was a fashion for painting cheap wood furniture to look like hardwood (oak, mahogany).

Europe spread its values ​​around the world, with sharply dressed gentlemen pulling pith helmets over their eyes, traveling to exotic distant lands and previously unexplored corners of the world. All the wonderful works we read in childhood, the wonderful works of this era of great geographical discoveries, written by educated English authors with good manners, nobility of spirit and an excellent style of witty writing, shaped many of us, and will probably influence the minds of even one future generation.

Victorian era (and its features fashion trends) are conventionally divided into 3 periods:

Early Victorian era (period 1837-1860)

The early period of the Victorian era is also called the “Romantic Period”. Good reasons for this name were the youth and tenderness of the age of the new queen of the British throne.

During these times, she is passionately in love with her husband Albert, full of life, and adores jewelry (which she wears in huge quantities). The style is reflected in palace fashion, and then throughout the country: imitating its queen, England wears gold in all forms (with precious stones, enamel, etc.) and in sets of 4 or even more pieces of jewelry.

Gold and jewelry become an integral attribute evening dresses. IN daytime they wear less expensive and luxurious ones (made from selected pearls, corals, ivory, tortoiseshell). Earrings were worn dangling and swaying - long and large, bracelets - flexible and hard, sometimes with a stone, worn in pairs, and in a special fashion there were bracelets representing a strap with a buckle. In necklaces (fashionably short and with a stone in the center), it was customary to use a design that allows the stone to be separated and also worn as a brooch or pendant.

Feeding romantic ideas about nature, shaped by Ruskin's philosophical ideas about God and beauty, the era actively supported depictions of flora and fauna in jewelry. Also, often the sentimental content of medallions and bracelets was a lock of hair of a loved one or his image; engraved messages and inscriptions on the products were often used.

Middle Victorian era (period 1860-1885)

The Great Period - luxurious, lush and abundant - was the true origin of the (typical) image of the Victorian era that we have today. There was also a third, so there are 3 Victorian periods in total:

- early, characterized by neostyles (1835-1855);
- mid-Victorian luxurious (“Mid-Victorian period”, 1855-1870) period;
- “free revival of the Renaissance” late (“Free Renaissance revivals”, 1870-1901) period.

They were animated by a firm determination to oppose any further triumph of the democratic principle. New elections, called as a result of the change in monarch, strengthened the Conservative Party. The large cities of England, Scotland and Ireland voted predominantly in favor of the liberal and radical factions, but the English counties for the most part elected opponents of the ministry.

Meanwhile, the policies of previous years created significant difficulties for the government. In Canada, the discord between the mother country and the local parliament has reached dangerous proportions. The Ministry received permission to suspend the Canadian Constitution and sent Earl Dergham to Canada with extensive powers. Dergam acted energetically and skillfully, but the opposition accused him of abuse of power, as a result of which he had to resign from his position.

The government's weakness showed itself even more clearly in Irish affairs. The Ministry could achieve approval of the Irish tithe bill only after the complete elimination of the appropriation paragraph.

Chartism

At that time, the radicals formed an extreme faction that developed the “People's Charter” - a petition to parliament, which demanded universal suffrage, secret voting, annually renewed parliaments, etc. Beginning in the fall of 1838, the Chartists launched a strong campaign at meetings, collecting signatures for petitions and convened the so-called national convention in London at the beginning of 1839, looking for supporters among the working population of factory towns. The uprising that took place in the summer of 1839 was suppressed; the main Chartist leaders were put on trial and sent into exile. Chartism achieved a reduction in the working day.

Foreign and domestic policy

The year 1850 began under more favorable conditions. Habeas Corpus was restored in Ireland; thanks to free trade, revenues generated a surplus of 2 million pounds sterling, while the tax for the benefit of the poor was reduced by 400,000 pounds compared to the previous year.

In the discord between Russia and Austria, on the one hand, and Turkey, on the other, caused by the case of the Hungarian fugitives, England took the side of the Porte. In January 1850, an English squadron unexpectedly appeared in sight of Athens demanding payment of old bills, among which in the foreground was the reward of the Portuguese Jew Pacifico, who was an English citizen, for damage to his house during popular unrest. The response to the refusal of the Greek government was the blockade of all Greek harbors. Greece could only protest against this abuse of force; Envoys of other states expressed their censure of England's mode of action in more or less energetic terms. A month later the blockade was lifted; its consequence was a cooling of relations towards France and Russia. Lord Stanley invited the Upper House to censure the government for its conduct in Greece.

This proposal was accepted, but the lower house, at the suggestion of Roebuck, expressed formal approval of Palmerston's policy. However, the upper house vote was not without consequences. Palmerston realized the need to extricate himself from the isolated position in which he had placed England, and all the more diligently tried to get closer to the Great Powers on the Schleswig-Holstein question, resolved by the London protocols of July 4 and August 12, 1850.

It was a sensitive blow for the ministry sudden death Robert Peel. At the same time, the Austrian General Haynau, who arrived in London, suffered a personal insult from the workers at the Barclay brewery, and since Palmerston was in no hurry to give satisfaction, this further aggravated mutual relations with Austria, whose policy in Germany, especially the desire to include all Austrian lands into the German Confederation, provoked decisive resistance from England.

The Roman Curia prepared great difficulties for the Whig ministry. The papal breve of September 30 immediately appointed nine Catholic bishops for Great Britain; Cardinal Wiseman received the title of Archbishop of Westminister. This revived in the English clergy and people the deep-rooted hatred and aversion to Rome; the old “No Popery” click sounded again. At the beginning of 1851, Rossel introduced a bill on ecclesiastical titles, which prohibited the assumption of the episcopal title by all clergy who did not belong to the state church, and declared invalid all donations made in favor of such persons. To liberals and even to some Peelites, this bill seemed too harsh, and in the eyes of zealous Protestants it was still too timid.

Meanwhile, the lower house, despite the protest of the ministry, accepted Lock King's proposal to grant English and Welsh counties the same voting rights as cities. A ministerial crisis ensued, ending with the restoration of the previous cabinet, since Lord Stanley, the leader of the protectionists, failed to form a strong cabinet and attract people like Gladstone to it.

Politics took a back seat for a time thanks to the first World's Fair, which opened in London on May 1, 1851. A new source of weakness for the Ministry was the conduct of Lord Palmerston. True, he ensured that the Hungarian fugitives settled in Turkey, including Kossuth, were released; but the outcome of the struggle over Pacifico was a heavy defeat for him. The mediation commission elected on this issue recognized Pacifico's right to a reward of no more than 150 pounds sterling - and because of such a sum, the minister almost caused a European war.

Then a diplomatic break with Naples occurred as a result of Gladstone's letters about the cruelties of the Neapolitan government being sent to English envoys on the continent.

The coup d'etat, which took place in France on December 2, was joyfully welcomed by Palmerston, without the knowledge of the ministry and the crown. Rossel took advantage of this to get rid of his inconvenient comrade. Palmerston repaid him by introducing an amendment to one of the government proposals, the adoption of which caused the resignation of the ministry. This time, Lord Stanley (who received the title of Earl of Derby after the death of his father) managed to form a ministry (in February 1852). In the new cabinet, strictly Tory, he himself took the place of First Lord of the Treasury, Disraeli received the portfolio of finance, and foreign affairs passed to the Earl of Malmesbury.

The protectionist sympathies of the ministry led to the resumption of free trade agitation. The Cobden League has reopened; Rallies were held throughout the country and preparations were made for new elections. The government was in the lower house in an undoubted minority and owed its existence solely to disagreements among the liberal parties. In view of all this, Disraeli spoke in favor of continuing the customs policy of his predecessors.

The long-awaited dissolution of parliament followed in July, and new elections were immediately called. The ministry acquired a few extra votes, but not enough to have a majority in parliament. A considerable loss for him was the death of Wellington (September 14), who enjoyed a pacifying influence on the parties. Disraeli's financial proposals were rejected by a majority of 19 votes, and the Tory ministry was forced to resign (December 1852).

The cabinet that replaced him was made up of various parties who entered into an alliance with each other to overthrow Derby. The Peelites had their representatives in it in the person of Lord Aberdeen (First Minister) and Gladstone, who received the portfolio of finance, the Whigs in the person of Lord John Rossel, and the radicals in the person of Molesworth and Baines. Palmerston received the Ministry of the Interior.

Crimean War

Events in India were no less favorable. Since the capture of Delhi by the British, the center of gravity of the uprising shifted to Oudh and its capital Lucknow. In March 1858, the main quarters of Lucnow were taken by storm. In vain did the leaders of the insurgents seek help in Nepal, the only Indian state that still retained signs of independence: the ruler of Nepal entered into an alliance with the British.

Lord Stanley, the talented son of the Earl of Derby, successfully carried out the plan for the reorganization of India. The dominance of the East India Company ended, the board of directors was abolished, and in its place the position of a special minister responsible to parliament was created with a board of 15 members.

Shortly before this, the ministry suffered a severe defeat on the question of the Jews. When the bill for the admission of Jews to Parliament was rejected for the third time by the peers at the insistence of Lord Derby, the opposition, outraged by such disrespect for the resolutions of the lower house, proposed to the House simple solution recognize Baron Rothschild as a representative of the City of London. Lord Derby had to yield. He introduced a new bill of oath into the upper house, which made it possible for the admission of Jews. This bill was passed by the Lords, after which Rothschild took his place in the House of Commons.

In the same 1858, Lord Elgin concluded an agreement with Japan, which brought enormous trade advantages to England.

In England itself, reformist agitation assumed impressive proportions in 1859; Shortly before the opening of parliament, Bright came up with a reform project of a purely democratic nature. The Ministry decided to introduce its own bill in order to calm down with some concessions public opinion. The Whigs entered into an agreement with the Radicals to reject this bill, which did not meet with approval among the Tories. On the 21st March Lord John Rossel moved the House to declare that the Reform Bill was not suited to the needs of the country; this proposal was adopted by a majority of 39 votes. Following this, the dissolution of parliament was announced.

This step caused great excitement in the country, especially since the foreign policy of the ministry threatened new dangerous complications. At the first signs of a clash between Austria and France in the Italian affair, although the government assumed the guise of complete impartiality, from its statements one could understand that it was leaning more towards the side of Austria, while sincere sympathy for the cause of Italian freedom prevailed among the people. Mediation offered by Lord Malmesbury was rejected by Napoleon III.

The extensive naval armaments announced by the government, the strengthening of the Mediterranean fleet, Lord Derby's statement that England might find herself forced to occupy Trieste, the call for the formation of volunteer detachments, even the declaration of neutrality, interpreted in a sense favorable to Austria, all this maintained public distrust of the intentions. ministers and influenced new elections. The fear of being drawn into a war to maintain European absolutism prompted the radicals to forget their dislike of Lord Palmerston.

Lord Rossel was reconciled with his long-time enemy; a coalition was formed of all liberal factions with the aim of overthrowing the Conservative ministry, to which the new House of Commons expressed its distrust (June 1859). The Tories have fallen. Palmerston took over as First Minister, Rossel became Foreign Minister, and the remaining portfolios were distributed to Whigs, Peelites and Radicals. The ministers included Gladstone and Milner-Jibson. There was no more talk of sabotage into the Adriatic Sea to defend Trieste; in alliance with Russia, an attempt was made to divert the Prussian court from intervention in favor of Austria.

All other interests were relegated to the background due to the North American crisis that broke out in early 1861. If the seemingly inevitable collapse of the proud republic aroused a certain sense of schadenfreude in the British aristocracy, then the influence of the internecine war on cotton production, which fed a significant part of the working population of England, inspired serious fears. Gladstone's budget indicated continued improvement in finances. Revenues promised a surplus of almost 2 million, which is why the Chancellor of the Exchequer proposed not only the abolition of the paper tax, but also a reduction in income tax. In order to deprive the lords of the opportunity to reject the first of these measures a second time, the financial proposals of the ministry were submitted to the upper house not separately, but together with the budget, and although the lords protested against this, they, on the advice of Lord Derby, did not bring matters to a collision with the House of Commons.

The treaty between England, France and Spain, by virtue of which the demands made by these three powers on the Mexican government were to be supported by military force if necessary, indicated the intention of the Allies to take advantage of the critical situation of the alliance to intervene in American affairs.

Thanks to an unexpected incident, matters suddenly became so acute that one could fear a decisive break. The English mail steamer Trent, on which the commissioners of the southern states of Mason and Slidel were traveling, was detained by an American military corvette under the command of Captain Wilkes, who arrested the commissioners and took them to New York. The news of this caused great indignation in England. The British envoy in Washington, Lord Lyons, immediately received orders to demand the extradition of the prisoners and satisfaction for the insult inflicted on the British flag. The government of President Lincoln understood that, under these conditions, a break with England could have the most fatal consequences for the union. It condemned the action of its officer and released the prisoners. The peaceful outcome of the clash was partly Prince Albert's business. This was the last service he rendered to his second fatherland. He died on December 14, 1861, sincerely mourned by the British nation.

The joint intervention undertaken by England, France and Spain in Mexican affairs had a completely unexpected outcome. Spain and England were not slow to realize that the plans of the French emperor went much further than the original goal of the expedition. First English and then Spanish troops left Mexico. This step could not help but touch the heart of the French emperor, but he hid his displeasure because he needed further assistance from England for his transatlantic plans.

On October 30, 1862, Minister Drouin de Luis sent an invitation to the courts of London and St. Petersburg to take measures to end the internecine war in America, transparently hinting at the possibility of armed intervention. But the St. Petersburg court decisively rejected the French invitation, and Lord Rossel followed his example.

The revolution in Greece, which cost King Otto the throne (October 1862), produced a new turn in England's eastern policy. In order to prevent the election of the Prince of Leuchtenberg, the nephew of the Russian emperor, as king, it was decided to make a territorial sacrifice to Greece. The Greeks were given to understand that if they made a choice pleasing to the British cabinet, the latter intended to agree to the annexation of the Ionian Islands to the Greek kingdom.

The bombing of a London prison to free Fenian prisoners again brought the Irish question to the fore. Realizing the impossibility of resolving it through persecution alone, Gladstone, at the very beginning of the 1868 session, introduced three famous resolutions into Parliament, which stated the need to destroy the Irish state church. They were adopted by a majority of 65 votes. The ministry, headed by Disraeli due to Derby's illness, decided to remain in office and appeal to the people. On July 31, the last parliament elected under the 1832 law dissolved.

By this time, the war with Abyssinia, caused by the refusal to release British prisoners, had ended successfully.

New elections gave a Liberal majority of 118 votes. Disraeli resigned; the drafting of the ministry was entrusted to Gladstone (December 1868). In addition to members of the former Liberal cabinet, the ministry included John Bright and Adulamite Low, who managed to make peace with the Liberals.

The 1869 session opened with the release of a significant number of Fenians and the announcement of the impending restoration of Habeas corpus in Ireland. On March 1, Gladstone introduced his Irish Church Bill into the Lower House. He proposed to immediately stop the payment of allowances to Irish priests and to transfer all church property into the hands of a royal commission, which would undertake the payment of lifetime income to the owners of ecclesiastical places. Irish bishops were to lose their seats in the upper house, Irish ecclesiastical courts were to cease their activities. Of the 16.5 million value of the property of the Irish Church, it retained the right to only 6.5 million, while the remaining 10 million were to be used partly for general useful purposes, partly for benefits to Catholics and Presbyterians. The Lower House adopted this bill with a majority of 361 votes to 247. Although the House of Lords approved it in the third reading, it did so with many amendments. Since these amendments were rejected by the lower house, and the Lords did not yield, fears arose at one time that the reform would not take place; but the conflict was removed by a compromise between the Earl of Granville and Lord Cairns, the leader of the opposition.

After the resolution of the Irish church question, another reform, which was in connection with the Irish unrest, should have come next - namely, a change in land relations in Ireland. This constituted the main task of the 1870 session. Already on February 15, Gladstone introduced his Irish Bill into the lower house. It was supposed to recognize farmers at the end of the lease period as having the right to compensation for all improvements and buildings they had made; facilitate farmers through benefits from state treasury the purchase of land property, and for farmers - the cultivation of infertile lands; finally, establish arbitration courts to resolve all disputes and misunderstandings between farmers and landowners. The bill passed both houses and became law on August 1. In addition, both houses approved the new law on public education proposed by Forster (initially for England and Wallis). The whole country was supposed to be divided into school districts and then found out how the existing schools in each district corresponded to the true needs of the population. Those districts in which the condition of the schools turned out to be satisfactory were to remain in the same position, while in the rest it was planned to open a corresponding number of new schools. The following three basic rules were established for these new schools:

  • 1) compliance of teaching with the program approved by parliament,
  • 2) supervision of government inspectors regardless of religious differences,
  • 3) absolute freedom conscience, by virtue of which none of the students can be forced, against the will of the parents, to participate in religious teaching.

The acceptance or non-acceptance of these rules is left to the good will of the school authorities, but only if they are accepted does the school become entitled to benefits from Parliament.

The English commissioners were greeted in London with noisy rejoicings, as messengers of an “honorable peace.” peace with honor). Lord Hartington's motion to vote a censure on the ministry's Eastern policy was rejected by 388 votes to 195. Important legislative measures were out of the question during the session of 1878 in view of the predominant importance foreign policy. The Home Ruler Party resumed its obstructive tactics on various occasions, but refrained from repeating scenes like last year. An important event in history there was a gap between its moderate and revolutionary elements over the debate about the murder of a large landowner, the Earl of Leitrim.

Late Victorian period

Soon after the closure of parliament, news arrived of the Russian movement towards the Amu Darya and the arrival of the Russian embassy in Kabul. This was Russia's response to sending Indian troops to Malta. For his part, Lord Beaconsfield decided to abandon the policy of non-intervention in Afghanistan that his predecessors adhered to. When the Afghan emir Shir Ali did not agree to the presence of British residents in Kandahar and Herat, the Anglo-Indian army entered Afghanistan and quickly occupied the Peiwar Pass, thus removing one of the main obstacles to Kabul.

At the beginning of 1879, Shir Ali fled Kabul and soon died. His successor, Yakub Khan, made peace with England.

In Ireland the general excitement was maintained by huge rallies. Parnell proposed a system of public ostracism against anyone who dared to lease lands from which the previous tenants had been expelled, or who in any way acted contrary to the land league. A whole series of violence was committed against court officials, land agents, farmers who remained faithful to the contracts, and in general against all persons who for some reason were unpleasant to the league. All this aroused all the greater fears because the perpetrators were not found and the police were powerless.

The government increased the number of troops and brought 14 leading members of the Land League, including Parnell, to trial on charges of sedition. The extent to which the Irish people took to heart the means of social ostracism recommended by Parnell was shown by the story of Captain Boycott, a farmer and land agent in Mayo, after whom this whole system, which took on the character of real terror, received the name of boycott. Soon in Ireland, except Ulster, there was not a single corner left where the league did not have its own branches and secret courts, the members of which had terrible weapon boycotting. In the case of the Land League members, the jury could not reach an agreement, and the trial remained without result. At the beginning of 1881, a bill was proposed to parliament to suppress anarchy in Ireland and a land bill tending to transform agrarian relations. Home Rulers declared their firm intention to slow down the first of these bills at all costs. The debate dragged on for 42 hours straight. Finally the bill passed its first reading; but already on the same day, regarding the proposal for a second reading, the home rules resumed their obstructive tactics.

The need for changes in the charter of the chamber itself became absolutely clear. Gladstone's proposal in this regard caused new stormy scenes. It was adopted, but the Irish deputies still managed to delay the approval of the bill for as many as 12 meetings. Then came the turn of the Land Bill. It contained the following main regulations: restriction of the landowner’s right to refuse the farmer further maintenance of the lease; providing farmers with the cost of all improvements they have made on the leased plot; review of excessively high rents by special assessment offices, the determinations of which should be equally binding on both landowners and farmers; increase in lease terms; finally, the issuance of loans for the improvement or purchase of rented estates, for the raising of empty lands, as well as for the resettlement of the hopelessly impoverished. Despite many amendments, the bill remained unchanged in its essential points; but after being examined by the Lords he returned to the lower house unrecognized. The Ministry expressed its readiness to make concessions, but rejected all amendments that violated the main purpose of the bill. The lords stood their ground. Gladstone made several more concessions, and finally the bill received royal assent (August 1881).

In April of the same year, Lord Beaconsfield died, who was succeeded as leader of the Conservative Party in the upper house by Lord Salisbury. A Boer uprising broke out in the Transvaal. Through the Orange Republic, negotiations were opened, which ended in peace, which was based on the recognition of the sovereign rights of the Queen and self-government of the Boers.

The government calmly looked at the occupation of Tunisia by France, but in advance declared its protest against the expansion of French influence in Tripoli.

Efforts to renew the Anglo-French trade agreement concluded by Cobden in 1860, in which Charles Dilck took an outstanding part from the English side, were defeated by the resistance of French protectionists.

The Irish Land League was closed by the government; assessment presences for rent review opened their activities, reviving hopes for a better future. But already in the first days of 1882, a new ferment of hostile elements was discovered. Fenian secret societies tried to occupy the gap left by the destruction of the land league; they were supported by cash benefits and emissaries from America.

At the beginning of the 1882 session there was a clash between Gladstone and the Upper House. The latter decided to elect a special commission to examine the results of the Irish Land Bill. In Gladstone's opinion, such a commission, appointed by and for the interests of landowners, could only provide bad influence to the work of pacification begun in Ireland. He therefore proposed that the censure be voted on by the upper house, which was adopted by a majority of 303 votes to 235.

The Lords nevertheless elected a commission, but without the assistance of the government, it remained stillborn. The Tories themselves found it necessary to meet the demands of the Land League and made a proposal to assist farmers in purchasing their leased plots with benefits from the treasury, while at the same time demanding stricter measures against secret societies. The conciliatory mood was disturbed by the news of the murder of the new Secretary of State for Ireland, Lord Frederick Cavendish, and his comrade Bork in Phoenix Park, Dublin (May 6). This murder was the work of secret societies who did not want to hear about the agreement. Already on May 11, Garcourt introduced into the lower house a crime prevention bill, which, in addition to other measures to protect public safety, included permission to conduct house searches day and night, the appointment of emergency courts, the right to ban newspapers and public gatherings. The bill was passed by both houses. Following this, Gladstone passed another law aimed at helping the poorest Irish tenants.

In the sphere of foreign policy, Egyptian affairs were of main interest. Back in the fall of 1881, a military party was formed in Egypt under the leadership of Arabi Pasha, which openly became hostile to foreigners. In this regard, on June 11, 1882, there was an indignation of the mob in Alexandria, and the British consul was wounded. On June 15, Gladstone formulated in parliament his Egyptian policy in 3 main points: joint action with France, respect for the sovereign rights of the Porte and the establishment of a lasting order in Egypt in the interests of Europe and with the approval of the great powers. The European Conference that met in Constantinople (June 23) acted in the same spirit. But the slowness of the Porte, the reluctance of France to intervene armed, and the increasingly provocative manner of Arabi's actions soon forced England to a more energetic course of action. On July 6, the English government sent Arabi Pasha a demand to suspend the fortress work he had begun in Alexandria, and since Arabi ignored this demand, on July 11 the British fleet under the command of Admiral Seymour opened fire on the Alexandrian forts.

On July 13, Arabi left the city, which was set on fire by the mob. Having occupied Alexandria, the British turned their forces against Arabi. The most outstanding English commander, Wolseley, was sent to Egypt, and on August 13 he won a brilliant victory over Arabi Pasha at Tel el-Kebir. The latter surrendered and was taken to the island of Ceylon.

By the end of the session, Gladstone's proposed changes to the parliamentary statutes were adopted. The most important of them was the so-called. closure rule closure), by which the speaker was given the right, with the consent of the majority, to declare the debate over and the establishment of the so-called large committees (eng. grand committees) for preliminary development special issues, which have hitherto been discussed in full session of the House. These two regulations largely limit the possibility of abuse of freedom of speech. There have been important changes in the composition of the ministry. Bright retired immediately after the bombing of Alexandria. Gladstone ceded the portfolio of finance to Childers, reserving only the post of First Minister, and new members joined the cabinet: Lord Derby, who openly went over to the liberal camp, and Charles Dilke, who belonged to the radical wing of the party.

In the 1883 session the ministry still had a majority in the House of Commons. A bill against the manufacture and sale of explosives passed both houses on the same day. Thanks to large committees elected on the basis of the new parliamentary statute, the chamber with unusual speed adopted laws introduced by the ministry on insolvency, on abuses in parliamentary elections and on protecting the rights of inventors. In the same way, a law was passed, although not without strong resistance, to improve the living conditions of English and Scottish farmers.

In Ireland things continued as before. How far the network of Fenian conspiracies spread was demonstrated by the murder of Carey, one of the crown witnesses in the trial against the murderers in Phoenix Park; he was killed on a British steamer just as he was about to land on the African shore.

In Egypt, matters became more complicated due to unrest that broke out in Sudan. Back in 1882, a national-religious movement arose there, headed by the Mahdi (prophet) Mohammed-Ahmed. On November 1, 1883, he utterly defeated the Egyptian army, commanded by British officers, and a few days later another detachment suffered a brutal defeat at Suakim. The outburst of indignation that gripped the entire nation forced Gladstone to agree to send General Gordon to the Sudan as Governor-General. Gordon immediately hurried to his destination, but was poorly supplied with troops and money. The Egyptian army under the command of the Englishman Baker was completely defeated (February 11, 1884) by Osman Digma at El-Teb, and Gordon himself was forced to lock himself in Khartoum, without provisions and with a garrison overcrowded with traitors. The whole nation demanded that the brave general not be abandoned to the mercy of fate, and the ministry decided to send General Wolsley to his rescue. But before the vanguard of the new army reached Khartoum, the city surrendered to starvation and Gordon was killed (January 26, 1885). Wolseley was ordered to retreat. By the end of May, all British military forces had returned to Upper Egypt.

If, despite the dismal outcome of Egyptian affairs, the House rejected the Tories' proposed censure of the ministry, this is explained by the fact that, through a number of reforms in the field of domestic policy, Gladstone was able to acquire reliable supporters among the radicals. Among these reforms, the first place was occupied by a new electoral law, which eliminated the difference between rural and urban voters and granted suffrage in the counties to every tenant of an apartment; In addition, the right to vote was granted to servants with a qualification of 10 pounds. In this way, 2 million new voters were created. The lower house passed this bill on June 26, 1884, but the upper house decided not to proceed to the second reading until the ministry introduced its bill on the distribution of electoral districts. Gladstone did not agree to this demand.

Under pressure from the press, the lords yielded; the electoral bill was adopted by them. Soon after, the other half of the reform was realized: many small towns were deprived of the right to have their own special deputy, the number of representatives from big cities was enlarged, the counties being divided into electoral districts of approximately equal population. Gladstone's weak successes in the field of foreign policy, and on the other hand, his courtesy to the radicals and Irish autonomists, had long caused an estrangement between him and the moderate Whigs. This led to the fact that when on June 3, 1885, regarding the budget, Gix Beach introduced a resolution expressing no confidence in the government, the latter was defeated and resigned.

The creation of a new cabinet was entrusted to the head of the Tories, the Marquis of Salisbury. He himself took over the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Northcote, who at this time passed with the title of Lord Iddesley into the upper house, became president of the privy council, Gix Beach received control of finance, and Lord Churchill received the Ministry of Indian Affairs.

The new cabinet pursued its foreign policy quite happily: relations with Germany, shaken by the latter’s successes in Africa, improved, disagreement with Russia over the Afghan borders was settled, General Prendergast occupied Burma, and already on January 1, 1886, the Viceroy of India proclaimed the annexation of Burma to British Empire.

Meanwhile, at the beginning of December 1885, parliamentary elections took place on the basis of the new electoral law, giving the liberals a significant number of votes thanks to the assistance of rural voters who wished to express their gratitude to Gladstone and his friends for the political rights granted to them. In total, 333 Liberals, 251 Tories and 86 Irish autonomists were elected. In Parliament, the Irish united with Gladstone's friends, and already on January 26, 1886, the Salisbury cabinet was defeated over the address. The Tories resigned.

Since moderate Whigs, like Lord Hartington and Goshen, stood aside, the cabinet was composed mainly of Gladstone's friends and radicals - Lord Rosbury, Childers, Morley, Chamberlain. Gladstone immediately introduced two bills to pacify Ireland in the lower house. One of them intended, with the help of a redemption operation, to convert large land property, which was exclusively in the hands of the British, into free peasant ownership, and the other - to grant Ireland a native government and a special people's parliament. The new Irish Parliament was to consist of ²/3 elected members and 1/3 members appointed by the English government. All matters relating to Ireland were to be subject to his jurisdiction, with the exception of foreign policy, customs and military matters; in return, Irish members would lose their seats in the Parliament of the United Kingdom.

There was a violent opposition in the country against this last bill; Not only all the conservatives, but also the moderate Whigs, led by Lord Hartington, took up arms against him; even many radicals spoke out against the law, the consequence of which would be such a far-reaching separation between Ireland and England. Chamberlain left the office with his friend Trevelyan. The Irish Autonomy Act was rejected in the Lower House (June 7) by a majority of 341 to 311. Gladstone appealed to the country, but after an unusually excited electoral struggle, the people spoke out, in July 1886, against the ministry. In addition to 86 Irish autonomists, only 191 Gladstone supporters got into the new parliament, while the Tories received 317 seats and the liberal unionists 76.

Since Hartington refused to join the cabinet, Salisbury formed a purely Tory ministry, which included, among other things, Lord Iddesley, Gicks Beach, Lord Churchill and Cranbrook. Ireland responded to the overthrow of Gladstone's ministry with new agrarian crimes and street riots. Dillon and O'Brien, leaders of the national league that was formed in place of the former land league, recruited supporters everywhere for their “plan for a new campaign.” By this plan it was proposed to appoint trustees from the league to fix the rents of every private estate in Ireland; If the landlords do not accept the assessments made by these trustees, then the tenants must stop paying rent altogether. Irish MPs tried to challenge the government in the lower house, but Parnell's amendment to the address was rejected along with his Land Bill, which would have reduced rents by 50%.

At the end of 1886 and at the beginning of 1887, some changes took place in the ministry. First of all, Lord Churchill unexpectedly resigned. His place was offered to the leader of the Liberal Unionists, Lord Hartington, who himself refused to accept the position, but persuaded his friend Goschen to join the ministry as Chancellor of the Exchequer. This marked the beginning of a rapprochement with the moderate Whigs. Lord Iddesley and Geeks Beach then left the ministry; the latter's place was taken by Balfour, Salisbury's nephew.

The unrest in Ireland forced the government, at the end of March 1887, to introduce a draft of a new pacification law. Despite strong opposition from Gladstone's supporters and Irish MPs, the ministry's proposal received a majority and came into force in June 1887.

In August 1887, the Irish National League was closed as a dangerous society, and its branches were dissolved; the consequence of this was new disturbances.

In April, the Imperial Conference opened in London. Imperial conference) of all British colonies with the aim of more closely linking the ties between the colonies and the mother country.

In the field of foreign policy, disagreement arose with France over the New Hebrides Islands, which was soon settled; There were misunderstandings with Russia on issues of the Afghan borders and Bulgarian affairs. When, after a long interregnum, the Bulgarians elected Ferdinand of Coburg as prince, the St. Petersburg cabinet turned to the Porte with a demand to recognize the illegality of this election. But England, supported by Austria and Italy, refused to accede to this demand, and the meeting of Queen Victoria with Emperor Franz Joseph in April 1888, apparently, did not remain without influence on the fact that Austria and England took a hostile position in the Bulgarian question Russia.

In Ireland, despite special laws and emergency courts, agrarian unrest did not stop. The statement of the Roman Curia (1888), which in harsh terms condemned the boycott system, caused great irritation in the country. The Irish replied that they did not intend to borrow their policy from either Italy or England, and flatly refused to stop the measures of violence condemned by the Pope. In August, Parliament discussed a proposal to set a trial for Parnell, accused by the Times newspaper of being an accomplice to the murderers of Cavendish and Borke. Parnell, without waiting for the decision of the commission appointed by Parliament, began legal action against the Times for libel; Pigot, who delivered letters compromising Parnell to The Times, confessed to the forgery and committed suicide (February 1889).

Parnell's trial with the Times made a deep impression in the country. The series of private elections that followed showed that the Tory cabinet was increasingly losing ground. The new trial of Parnell, who was convicted of illegal cohabitation with a married woman (whom, however, he later married), alienated Gladstone’s supporters from him and created a split within the Irish autonomists themselves, who demanded that Parnell temporarily renounce the leadership of the party and the parliamentary parliament in general. activities. The most important internal measure that marked the reign of the Conservative ministry in recent years was the transformation of local government on more democratic principles.

This new law came into force on April 1, 1889. In the same year, a special Ministry of Agriculture was established. In 1890, £33 million was allocated to assist Irish tenants in purchasing their leased estates; in 1891 a new bill was passed to the same end, allowing tenants who were forcibly removed for non-payment of rent to sell their tenancy to others within a period of five years. The Conservative majority in the House of Commons, although reduced (through separate elections favorable to the Liberals), is still strong enough to prevent the adoption of radical reforms, such as free primary education, rejected (February 1890) by a majority of 223 votes to 163. Budgetary the surplus, however, is used to develop public education and improve the position of public teachers. The queen's request to allocate special sums for the maintenance of her grandchildren (the son and daughter of the Prince of Wales) met with opposition from the leaders of the radical party, Labouchere and Morley. The House of Commons agreed only to a slight increase in the funds allocated to the Queen personally (August 1889).

In both 1889 and 1890 there were major workers' strikes in London and other large cities in England.

English troops took part in the defeat of the Dervishes who invaded Egypt from the south.

Disagreements arose between the USA and Great Britain over freedom of navigation in the Bering Sea, and between France and England over fishing off the coast of Newfoundland (1890). England recognized the rights of France to Madagascar, France - the rights of England to Zanzibar (established under the Zanzibar Treaty of 1890 with Germany).

1899 - the beginning of the Anglo-Boer War.

Fight for Africa

Long-standing misunderstandings between England and Germany on the issue of the South African possessions of both powers were put to an end by the treaty of July 1, 1890, according to which Germany made great concessions to England in Africa, but received the island of Heligoland from England.

In Africa, there were reasons for strife between Portugal and England, which at one time threatened war.

In 1891, Parnell, who failed to return to his former role as leader of the Irish autonomists.

Victorian morality

The values ​​professed by the middle class and supported by both the Anglican Church and the opinion of the bourgeois elite of society began to prevail in society. Middle-class values ​​and energy underpinned all the achievements of the Victorian era.

Sobriety, punctuality, hard work, frugality and thrift were valued even before Victoria's reign, but it was during her era that these qualities became the dominant norm. The queen herself set an example: her life, completely subordinate to duty and family, was strikingly different from the life of her two predecessors. Most of the aristocracy followed suit, abandoning the flashy lifestyle of the previous generation. The skilled part of the working class did the same Lewis Carroll You can Middle Ages Wikipedia


  • Victorian era, 1837–1901

    These years, like the Elizabethan era, are often depicted as a golden age in English history. Trade flourished, industrial production gained unprecedented strength, vibrant cities grew everywhere, and the possessions of the British Empire extended throughout the world.

    Among the many changes that took place in those years, I would like to note one, the most significant, - the outflow of the population from rural areas to cities. If in 1801, according to the census, the urban population accounted for only 30% of the total number of Englishmen, then by the middle of the century this figure had increased to 50%, and in 1901 80% of the population lived in cities and their suburbs. This trend was undoubtedly very convenient for the developing industry, since it created an inexhaustible reserve work force, but it also gave rise to serious problems. Due to the great overcrowding, terrible dirt and poverty reigned in the cities. At first, the government tried to turn a blind eye to the plight of poor citizens, but then individual employers appeared who tried to take care of their employees. Gradually they realized that this could only be done properly if there were appropriate government laws. Such laws began to appear under pressure from industrialists, and each new law controlling the living and working conditions of workers meant more and more interference in the lives of British citizens. The army of civil servants grew steadily: in 1832 there were about 21 thousand of them, by 1880 there were already over 50 thousand, and in 1914 over 280 thousand hired workers worked at state enterprises.

    Victoria: Queen and Wife

    For for long years Queen Victoria was a symbol of reliability and stability for the entire nation. This woman, even in her youth, showed extraordinary strength of character, as evidenced by her refusal to sign documents while ill with typhoid fever in 1835. However, she achieved true greatness when she ascended the English throne. Already in the first year of her reign, one of the journalists noted: “She never leaves her post for a minute - the most hardworking and obliging queen in the world.” Although there were those who considered Victoria a limited and stubborn person.

    A year after her coronation, in 1838, the queen fell in love with her brilliant cousin, Prince Albert of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha, and the wedding soon took place. Since then, Victoria relied on her husband in everything, recognizing his intellectual superiority. Those around him immediately felt Prince Albert's influence. If before that Victoria had the habit of sleeping late, then the very next day after her marriage, her subjects saw their queen walking hand in hand with her husband in the predawn fog. As one of the courtiers sarcastically remarked: “Not the most The best way give the country the Prince of Wales."

    It was an extremely successful marriage, although, naturally, there were some disagreements: the parents did not always see eye to eye on raising children. And they had a lot of children - nine. The first, in 1840, was born Victoria, who later became the wife of the German emperor. She was followed in 1841 by Edward, Prince of Wales, the future King Edward VII. Besides them there were three more boys and four girls. Prince Albert attached great importance family life, taking special care of children's education. Their married couple served as role models throughout England for many years.

    Queen Victoria

    If in previous centuries members of the royal family were often distinguished by their penchant for gambling, drinking and love affairs, then the current monarchs expressed ardent disapproval of all these vices. Part of this condemnation fell on their eldest son, who indulged too zealously in the joys of life. Victoria inherited three estates - Buckingham Palace, Windsor Castle and the Royal Pavilion in Brighton. Either these buildings were not spacious enough for royal family, or seemed insufficiently private, but the family purchased two more houses - Osborne House on the Isle of Wight and Balmoral Castle in Scotland. In these places they finally found the peace and solitude they had so dreamed of. Queen Victoria later wrote: “Here we can stroll peacefully without fear of running into a crowd of curious people.”

    From the book History of the USA author Ivanyan Eduard Alexandrovich

    Chapter X The era of “new imperialism” (1901–1921) Figures of American history: Theodore Roosevelt (1858–1919), 26th President of the United States (1901–1909) William Howard Taft (1857–1930), 27th President of the United States (1909) –1913) Woodrow Wilson (1856–1924), 28th President of the United States (1913–1921) Events and dates: 1902 - Introduction of national quotas for

    From the book History of the British Isles by Black Jeremy

    Victorian Era The contrast with the turbulent political events on the continent, often accompanied by violence, led to a certain complacency. Surviving defeats and colonial uprisings from 1791-1835, Britain's colonial and maritime rivals for the next four

    From book Sinister Secrets Antarctica. Swastika in the ice author Osovin Igor Alekseevich

    Hans Kammler: youth and youth, 1901–1933 Hans (Heinz) Friedrich Karl Franz Kammler was born on August 26, 1901 in the German city of Stettin (now Szczecin, Poland). In 1919, after voluntary service in the army, he joined the so-called “Freikorps”, “free

    From the book History of Russian Literature of the 19th Century. Part 1. 1795-1830 author Skibin Sergey Mikhailovich

    1830s (1830–1837). Boldin autumns of 1830 and 1833 Several events in Pushkin's life influenced his life and work in the 1830s. Among them: matchmaking with N.N. Goncharova and her marriage, the Polish uprising, to which the poet responded with several works,

    From the book Grand Admiral. Memoirs of the commander of the Navy of the Third Reich. 1935-1943 by Raeder Erich

    From the book A Brief History of England author Jenkins Simon

    Edwardian Era 1901-1914 The Viceroy of India, the most brilliant of all colonial governors in the world, celebrated the coronation of Edward VII (1901-1910) belatedly, but with incredible scope. In 1903, Baron Curzon summoned all the maharajas and nabobs of the country stretching from

    From the book Jews of Russia. Times and events. History of the Jews of the Russian Empire author Kandel Felix Solomonovich

    Part Four (1901–1917)

    From the book Scramble for Antarctica. Book 2 author Osovin Igor

    Part 10 HANS KAMMLER: YOUTH AND YOUTH, 1901-1933 SS Obergruppenführer Hans Kammler and super-secret technologies evacuated from the Third Reich in the spring of 1945 “The name of SS Obergruppenführer Hans Kammler was not even mentioned at the trial against war criminals in

    author Daniel Christopher

    Chapter 7. Order and disorder, 1714–1837 Five bright stars stand out on the political horizon of England in the 18th century. This is, first of all, King George II (1727–1760), then his grandson George III (1760–1811). Special mention should be made politicians- prime ministers

    From the book England. History of the country author Daniel Christopher

    William IV, 1830–1837 Compared to the extravagant George IV, William looked much simpler and more unassuming. At one time he served in navy- since then the nickname “Sailor Billy” has stuck to him, - some eccentricities even allowed him to be called

    From the book England. History of the country author Daniel Christopher

    Chapter 8. Victoria and the Empire 1837–1910 Succession to the Throne Queen Victoria, born on May 24, 1819, received the name Alexandrina Victoria at baptism. Her father, the Duke of Kent, brother of King William IV, died in 1820, when the girl was only eight months old.

    From the book England. History of the country author Daniel Christopher

    Domestic Unrest and the Restoration of Peace, 1837–1851 The Hungry Forties: Chartists, Bread and Potatoes Despite the pomp and splendor of Queen Victoria's coronation, things were not going so well for the country. An industrial and agricultural decline was brewing in England.

    From the book Theory of Wars author Kvasha Grigory Semenovich

    Chapter 7 THE VICTORIAN AGE On the one hand, this is just the sum of the third and fourth phases of the Fourth England (1833–1905). Likewise, Soviet era– this is just the sum of the second and third phases of the Fourth Russia (1917–1989). On the other hand, the concept "Victorian era" is given

    author Commission of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks

    From the book Grand Admiral. Memoirs of the commander of the Navy of the Third Reich. 1935-1943 by Raeder Erich

    On Land and at Sea, 1901-1905 After two years at sea and forty-five days' leave with my parents in Grünberg, I was assigned to the 1st Fleet Crew at Kiel, first as platoon commander and later as second adjutant. commander. The naval crew of that

    From the book A Short Course in the History of the All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks) author Commission of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks

    CHAPTER I THE STRUGGLE FOR THE CREATION OF A SOCIAL DEMOCRATIC WORKERS' PARTY IN RUSSIA (1883-1901

    The Victorian era, or the era of the reign of Queen Victoria (1837-1901) was a strange time when some traditions were broken and others were born - strange and repulsive. Perhaps the reason was that the British were crazy about their kings, and with the death of Victoria's husband, Prince Albert in 1861, widespread, continuous mourning began in the country. In conditions of eternal grief, you begin to look at the death of a loved one from a different angle. What now terrifies and causes unpleasant movement of the hair on the head was then not obvious, but the norm...

    Attention: the article contains shocking images and is not recommended for viewing by site visitors under 18 years of age, as well as by people with a traumatized psyche!

    Posthumous portraits

    Until 1839, portraits were painted with a brush on canvas (or wood) - this was a long and expensive task, not accessible to everyone, but with the invention of the daguerreotype, acquiring your own portrait, or a portrait of loved ones, became accessible to almost everyone. True, the middle class often did not think about this, and grabbed their heads only after family members “played the box.”

    Post-mortem portraits began to become very popular. And with the invention of the carte de visite in the middle of the century, photographs could be printed in any quantity and distributed to all close and distant relatives and friends.

    Given the high infant mortality rate, postmortem photographs of infants of all ages have become especially popular. At that time, such images were not perceived as taboo, but were a kind of norm.

    The idea of ​​post-mortem photographs caught on so well that it eventually reached a new level. Photographers tried to add “life” to the portraits, and corpses were photographed surrounded by family.

    The deceased children had their favorite toys shoved into their hands, and their eyes were forcibly opened and propped up with something so that they would not accidentally slam shut during the slow filming process. Sometimes the photographer's students added rosy cheeks to the corpse.

    Sad decorations

    The only acceptable thing for women was to wear items made of brown coal as mourning jewelry - dark and gloomy, it was supposed to represent longing for the departed. Jewelers, it must be said, took no less money for products made from coal than for jewelry with rubies or emeralds.

    This was worn during the first stage of mourning. A year and a half. On the second, the woman could afford to wear some jewelry. But with one caveat - they had to contain hair. Human. Hair from the head of the deceased.

    Brooches, bracelets, rings, chains, everything was made from hair - sometimes they were included in gold or silver jewelry, sometimes the jewelry itself was made exclusively from hair cut from a corpse.

    The widow was required to wear a heavy black veil that hid her face for the first three months after her husband's death. After three months, the veil was allowed to be lifted onto the hat, which, of course, significantly facilitated the movement of women in space.

    Almost nothing was visible through the mourning veil. The woman wore a veil on her hat for another nine months. In total, the woman did not have the right to remove her mourning for two years. But the majority, along with the queen, preferred not to take it off for the rest of their lives.

    Haunted houses

    When a family member died, the mirrors in the house were covered with dark cloth. For some reason this norm has taken root in Russia, but not in such a global time frame - in Victorian England mirrors were kept closed for at least a year.

    If a mirror fell and broke in the house, this was considered a sure sign that someone in the family would definitely die one of these days. And if someone did die, the clocks in the whole house were stopped exactly at the moment of his death. People sincerely believed that if this was not done, it would bring more deaths and troubles.

    But they carried the dead out of the house head first, so that the rest of the family would not “follow” him.

    With all this, coffins with bells were especially popular in the Victorian era. So, it seemed, he died and died, but just in case, the corpses were not buried for almost a week, and then they hung a bell over the grave, in case the deceased, by coincidence of circumstances, turned out to be alive and well and, waking up in the grave, would be able to tell the whole world, that it needs to be dug up.

    The fear of being buried alive was so great that bells were attached just in case to everyone who was buried in the ground, even to a corpse with obvious signs of decomposition. To make the task completely easier for a potential living person, the bell was connected by a chain to a ring, which was put on forefinger deceased.

    Well, and for a snack – completely unrealistic photographs of people without heads from the Victorian era. If you believe all sorts of archives, this method of photo manipulation was exactly in second place after post-mortem photography. Damn these Englishmen...

    Views