Boris Borshchevsky's adopted children. I still fit into my wedding dress! Barshchevsky Mikhail Yurievich - lawyer

Mikhail Barshchevsky and his wife have been together for forty years, and during this time they have managed to become not only wonderful parents, but also grandparents - their daughter Natalia, who will turn thirty-eight this year, has long become a mother, giving her parents grandchildren. Natalia followed in her father's footsteps - she graduated from the Faculty of Law of Moscow State University and works as a lawyer. But that is not all children of Mikhail Barshchevsky- together with his wife Olga Imanuilovna, they adopted twins Dasha and Maxim, who will soon be ten years old.

In the photo is the eldest daughter of Mikhail Barshchevsky

When they took the kids into the family, they were two years old, and during this time they became truly family to the Barshchevskys. And, if Olga and Mikhail became parents of younger children at a respectable age, then they gave birth to their own daughter when they were third-year students, but this did not prevent Mikhail from graduating from the university with honors. When the time came for Natalia, the eldest of Mikhail Barshchevsky’s children, to go to college, he, like his father once told him, advised her to go to law school.

As a second higher education, the wife of a lawyer received a law degree, and now she herself teaches inheritance and family law.

In the photo - Mikhail Barshchevsky with his younger children

Natalia has been living separately for a long time, but the youngest children of Mikhail Barshchevsky live with their parents in a large house in the Moscow region. Mikhail Yuryevich said that he himself grew up in a poor family and all his life he dreamed of his own country house. As soon as the opportunity arose, they moved to live outside the city. The Barshchevskys built their new house for several years, and now it has become their real family estate.

Mikhail Barshchevsky and his wife made the decision to take in adopted children when their grandchildren became adults and came to visit them less and less. After the kids appeared in the house, they looked at life differently, and today they do not regret at all that they decided to take this step several years ago.

Their daughter Natalia supported her parents in this decision, and this was a pleasant surprise for them. Searching for children in orphanages took no more than two months, much longer - about six months the kids got used to their new home. And then they thawed out and now Dasha and Maxim became absolutely domestic children. Mikhail Yuryevich admitted that after they had small children, he and his wife themselves became younger and reconsidered their lifestyle - they almost stopped attending social events in order to spend more time at home with the children.
You might also be interested to know:

Family

Mikhail Barshchevsky's maternal grandmother, German, was of noble origin. Her father, a descendant of the Teutonic knights, was a privy councilor and trustee of educational institutions in the Baltic.

Mikhail Barshchevsky is a fourth generation lawyer. His paternal great-grandfather, Yakov Davydovich Barshchevsky, was engaged in lawyering in Kharkov. Grandmother Tatyana Yakovlevna Barshchevskaya was a major revolutionary figure, was a member of the Cheka of Ukraine, then worked as a deputy prosecutor of Moscow. She had several generations of government officials in her family. rabbis of Ukraine.

Her husband Alexey Selivanovsky was the creator of the Literary Newspaper and its first editor-in-chief. In 1936 he was shot. Tatyana Yakovlevna was also repressed and exiled to the 101st kilometer. After rehabilitation in 1956, she began practicing law.

To Mikhail Barshchevsky's father as to his son "enemy of the people" a legal career was ordered. Having received a legal education, he was an investigator at the Ruza District Prosecutor's Office, and since 1950 he worked as a legal consultant and was one of the best legal consultants in the country.

Wife of Mikhail Barshchevsky - Barkalova Olga Imanuilovna, graduated from the Institute of Foreign Languages, then from the Faculty of Law of Moscow State University, Candidate of Philological Sciences, Doctor of Historical Sciences, teacher at the Moscow State Law Academy.

Daughter - Natalia Barshchevskaya (born 1977), graduate of the Faculty of Law of Moscow State University, candidate of legal sciences, works in a law office "Barshchevsky and Partners". Grandchildren: Alexander (born in 2000) and Leonid (born in 2003).

Biography

In 1963-1973 he studied at the English special school No. 29 on Kropotkinskaya.

In 1973-1979 he worked as a legal adviser at Moscow margarine plant.

In 1978 he graduated from the All-Union Correspondence Law Institute.

Became a lawyer in 1980 Moscow City Bar Association.

In 1982 he defended his Ph.D. thesis in Institute of State and Law of the USSR Academy of Sciences.

When starting his career in the legal profession, Mikhail Barshchevsky did not take on only obviously winning cases. " I decided: I would try to take on those cases that other lawyers had refused. When I lost them, and this happened quite often, my conscience was clear: even if I couldn’t, but others didn’t even try... But if I won, for me it was a real professional success".

By the end of the 1980s, the scope of his professional activity as a business lawyer was finally determined (Barshchevsky led the last criminal case in 1985). His career in this capacity developed in parallel with the formation of business in Russia, both small and medium-sized, and large. For example, he was the author of the charters of some of the first commercial banks, including Inkombank, Bank "Business Russia".

In 1989, Mikhail Barshchevsky, among the first 17 young lawyers, was sent through the Cultural Initiative Fund for an internship in the United States - at one of the largest American law firms - Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McLoy, whose clients were the New York Stock Exchange , Chase Manhattan Bank, Boeing, Lockheed, Rockefeller family.

Returning from the USA, in the summer of 1990, Mikhail Barshchevsky created and headed the first private law firm in Russia - "Moscow lawyers".

In 1993 the company was transformed into a law office "Barshchevsky and Partners" MGKA of Russia.

In 1997 he became a Doctor of Law.

In 2000 he was awarded the academic title of professor Moscow State Law Academy.

In 2001, Mikhail Yuryevich was invited to work at Government of the Russian Federation. He received the status of Plenipotentiary Representative of the Government of the Russian Federation in the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, and then in the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation and the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation. In fact, he performs the duty of a lawyer for the government of the country. Has the rank of Actual State Councilor 1st Class.

Barshchevsky was the author of the idea and the host of a number of television programs. Among them are “SSR. Rumors. Scandals. Investigations”, “Wait for an answer” (together with Tatyana Komarova). He also participated in other television projects: “Parents’ Day – Saturday”, “12th Floor”, “Vzglyad”, “Good evening, Moscow!”, “Do you know the law?”, “The trial is underway”, “The case is being heard” .

For many years, Mikhail Barshchevsky has been associated with the Club of Connoisseurs "What where When?" and the popular television program of the same name, fulfilling the role of an independent arbiter in it, and subsequently the “keeper of traditions.”

In 2002, he sat down at the gaming table for the first time as a team captain. Currently he is the host of the Dura Lex program on the Echo of Moscow radio station, where he also appears in the program "Special opinion".

On October 27, 2012, at the congress of the political party he was elected to its federal civic committee.

Income

Mikhail Barshchevsky owns the largest real estate and vehicle fleet among government officials. Together with his wife, they own more than a dozen land plots ranging from several tens to several thousand square meters, five residential buildings and four apartments. The Barshchevsky spouses own a Hummer, two Mercedes, a Lexus, a Ford, a Daewoo Nexia and a VAZ.

Scandals, rumors

In 2010, Mikhail Barshchevsky on the Ekho Moskvy radio reacted rather negatively to a personal question about the flashing light. Mikhail Barshchevsky repeatedly spoke out in defense of smoking, for which he was accused of tobacco lobbying. The fact of lobbying was indirectly confirmed by Barshchevsky himself in his interview.

Secular journalist Bozena Rynska claims that in 2004 Barshchevsky invited her to become his mistress, and also repeatedly harassed her. According to the social commentator, he also showed signs of attention to her colleagues at the Kommersant newspaper, Anna Subbotina and Yulia Zozulina.

Rynska herself found such harassment from Barshchevsky extremely unpleasant, which she clearly reported on her blog, writing, among other things, that her " almost threw up". Bozhena is ready to prove the veracity of her words in court: “I have witnesses and a lie detector,” she said on her Facebook page. In addition, Rynska suspects the lawyer of actively using a dating site where he anonymously communicates with girls: " One young lady whom Barshchevsky danced told me that he sits for hours on Mamba and there, under an assumed name, but hinting that he is not an ordinary person, he recruits student chicks, and that they met him on Mamba".

Well-known lawyer, plenipotentiary representative of the executive branch of the Russian Federation in the Constitutional, Arbitration and Supreme Courts.

Descendant of the Teutonic Knights

Mikhail Barshchevsky was born on December 27, 1955. The family was intelligent. The Barshchevsky family included rabbis, lawyers and even distant descendants of the Teutonic knights.

Yuri Dmitrievich is a third generation lawyer. His grandfather, Yakov Davydovich, had a law practice in Kharkov. Mother, Tatyana Yakovlevna Barshchevskaya, became a member of the Cheka of Ukraine during the revolutionary years, then worked as a deputy prosecutor of Moscow. And then she fell into the millstone of Stalin’s repressions. Her husband, Alexei Selivanovsky, the creator and first editor-in-chief of Literaturnaya Gazeta, was charged with participation in a counter-revolutionary terrorist organization and sentenced to death; he died in 1938.

Tatyana Barshchevskaya turned into the wife of an enemy of the people and was expelled from Moscow. She returned in 1956, after the famous 20th Congress, and began practicing law.

Yuri Dmitrievich, the son of enemies of the people (Selivanovsky adopted the boy), was ordered to become a lawyer. The certified lawyer became an investigator at the Ruza District Prosecutor's Office, and in 1950 she began working as a legal consultant, achieving fame as one of the best in the country in her profession.

Mikhail Barshchevsky's mother, Erika Zalmanovna, was an actress. Her mother is a noblewoman of German origin, whose father, a descendant of the Teutonic Knights, was a trustee of educational institutions in the Baltic and rose to the rank of Privy Councilor.

Find out life

When Mikhail was growing up, all the difficulties associated with Stalin’s repressions were already behind, and the Barshchevsky family turned into quite prosperous. The boy studied at school with in-depth study of English No. 29 on Kropotkinskaya. He did not shine in his studies, fluctuating from C to C, but this did not bother him at all. Mikhail began writing in high school, and his father showed the results of his efforts to literary professionals. Their verdict was that he has the ability, but the young man doesn’t know life.

In order to “get to know life,” Mikhail first set his sights on the profession of a geographer, which gives him the opportunity to go on expeditions and communicate a lot with people. He even graduated from the school of young geographers at Moscow State University named after M.V. Lomonosov, however, it turned out that the road to higher education at this university was closed for him. The personal data was summed up, as Barshchevsky explained later (most likely, this refers to the famous fifth point, nationality - Mikhail’s father was a Jew).

Then the young man decided to focus on his acting career and after school he intended to enter “Pike,” the famous higher theater school named after Shchukin (in 2003, the educational institution was renamed the B.V. Shchukin Theater Institute).

The competition for admission to theater universities was enormous, and Yuri Dmitrievich, without trying to hinder his son’s aspirations, persuaded him to show himself to a famous teacher. There is no point in becoming an actor without real talent!

The teacher noted some abilities, but did not give guarantees. Mikhail decided to follow in his father's footsteps.

Fourth generation lawyer

Barshchevsky went to work at the Moscow Margarine Factory and at the same time became a student at the All-Union Correspondence Law Institute.

At that time, the legal profession was not as popular as it is in our time, and most people considered working as a legal adviser at an enterprise not a very interesting field. However, Mikhail never regretted his choice. In addition, he believes that the lawyer has every opportunity to realize both acting and directorial ambitions. As a way to experience life, a legal career was also an excellent choice, Barshchevsky himself later noted.

Doctor of Science and Professor

Mikhail Barshchevsky graduated from the All-Union Correspondence Law Institute in 1978. By that time, he realized that the choice of a legal career in his case was more than correct.

In 1984, the former C-grade student defended his PhD thesis at the Institute of State and Law of the Academy on the legal regulation of inheritance by will in the USSR.

In 1997, Barshchevsky was awarded the title of Doctor of Science. His dissertation covered problematic issues of the organization and activities of the legal profession in Russia.

In 2000, Barshchevsky became a professor at the Moscow State Law Academy. He acted as the compiler of a number of reference books, including the Great Legal Encyclopedia and the Household Legal Encyclopedia, and also wrote a large number of manuals, including on inheritance law, pensions and benefits, and real estate.

Famous lawyer

Barshchevsky began his career in law by working at an enterprise. He worked as a legal adviser at the Moscow Margarine Factory for six years, combining professional activities with studies. Then he moved to the Reutov city trade.

However, in 1980, Mikhail Yuryevich did what, for reasons beyond his control, his father could not do - he began practicing law, becoming a member of the Moscow City Bar Association.

By the time he defended his Ph.D. dissertation, Barshchevsky was already well known in professional circles. He took on both criminal and civil lawsuits, and not the winning ones, but just the opposite. He later told reporters that one day he simply decided to accept cases that his colleagues refused. I often lost, but my conscience was clear - so what if I couldn’t, others didn’t even try! And winning became real professional success. This approach created an excellent reputation for lawyer Barshchevsky.

As a result, Mikhail Yuryevich focused on business advocacy. Such a concept did not exist in the USSR, but perestroika was approaching, and Barshchevsky’s professional aspirations coincided with the general direction of the country’s development.

"Barshchevsky and partners"

At the end of the 1980s, the first commercial banks began to appear in the USSR. Barshchevsky wrote charters for several of them, including Inkombank and Delovaya Rossiya Bank.

By that time, he was considered one of the most promising lawyers in the country, and it is not surprising that in 1989, the Cultural Initiative Foundation, together with 16 Soviet colleagues, sent Barshchevsky for an internship at one of the largest American law firms. Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McLoy's clients included the New York Stock Exchange, Boeing and the Rockefeller family.

Having returned, Mikhail Barshchevsky organized and headed the first private law firm, Moscow Lawyers. She turned out to be by no means a one-day event. In 1993, the company was transformed into the Barshchevsky and Partners law office, which still exists.

The main capital of the company was not sponsorship funds, but the impeccable reputation and successful service of the creator, and his fame was facilitated by good contact with journalists.

Barshchevsky found some employees at his place of work - by that time he was already actively teaching and at the same time looked after promising students in the last courses of the Moscow State Law Academy. Most of the lawyers working in the law office are former students of Mikhail Yuryevich.

Among the clients of the Barshchevsky and Partners firm are foreign banks and companies and government agencies.

In defense of honor and dignity

While dealing with the affairs of the firm, Barshchevsky did not forget about his own legal practice. He has won cases to protect honor and dignity, when clients were high-ranking officials, for example, ex-chairman of the antimonopoly committee Leonid Bochin, deputy chairman of the Central Bank of Russia Alexander Potemkin, press secretary of the head of the Moscow administration Sergei Tsoi.

"The Case of Writers"

Another “high-profile client” of Barshchevsky was Anatoly Chubais, who filed a lawsuit against journalists after the publication of his book on privatization. In 1997, the so-called writers' case became resonant. The scandal broke out after five leading informants of the then government - Chubais, Maxim Boyko, Alexander Kazakov, Alfred Kokh and Pyotr Mostovoy - received an advance for the not yet written book “The History of Russian Privatization.” Each received 90 thousand dollars, and journalists suspected that this was a kind of bribe.

Chubais, who was then Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance, sued journalists Alexander Minkin and Sergei Dorenko, his lawyer was Mikhail Barshchevsky. And he lost the case. The Judicial Chamber for Information Disputes under the President of the Russian Federation did not satisfy Chubais’ demands, explaining that journalists’ speeches regarding the dissemination of information about the circumstances of writing a book about privatization in Russia are a legitimate exercise of the rights to freedom of search and dissemination of information, as well as the right to express their personal opinions.

Minkin and Dorenko received reprimands for violating the requirements of the media law and the norms of journalistic ethics, which, as stated in the definition, were expressed in the use of “incorrect and derogatory definitions and epithets.”

Mikhail Yuryevich was dissatisfied with the court verdict, but losing the case did not damage his professional reputation.

What where When

Mikhail Barshchevsky not only willingly communicates with journalists, but also, with varying degrees of success, tried himself as a presenter and author of television programs, including “The Twelfth Floor”, “Vzglyad”, “The Case is Hearing”, “The Trial is Coming” and other programs . His greatest fame was brought to him by the program “What? Where? When".

Barshchevsky became a co-founder of Igra LLC, which was preparing the cult program, in 1995. For a long time he was an arbitrator in controversial issues between spectators and experts, then he was appointed guardian of traditions.

For several years, Barshchevsky was satisfied with the role of an arbitrator, but in the end he could not stand it and in 2002 sat down at the gaming table, gathering his own team.

Another hobby of Barshchevsky, also related to his main profession, was writing books. In addition to stories, he wrote a novel about a young lawyer Vadim Osipov, “The Ice Has Broken,” which was based on the series “Defense Against,” the play “At the Crossroads,” which was presented at the Stas Theater Namin, and a documentary novel that highlights the course of the legal battle between two oligarchs, one of whom was Roman Abramovich, and the second was Boris Berezovsky. The book is called "Happy Are the Have Nots."

In the civil service

Mikhail Barshchevsky's career developed more than successfully, but in 2001 his status as a lawyer was suspended. The reason was Barshchevsky’s transition to public service. Since March 12, 2001, he has been the plenipotentiary representative of the Russian government in the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, and since July 26 of the same year, also the plenipotentiary representative of the government in the Supreme Court. He also represented the government in the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation until its abolition in 2014.

As Mikhail Yuryevich recalled, the civil service had not yet become fashionable, and friends unanimously twirled their fingers at their temples. However, by that time Barshchevsky had already achieved almost everything that was possible, and he was simply interested in a new direction.

At the same time, Barshchevsky values ​​​​his independence and does not strive to be in the mainstream. In December 2006, he joined the liberal party "Civic Force", and in 2012 he was elected to the federal civic committee of another party, "Civic Platform".

As an official representative of the government in the highest courts, Barshchevsky does not consider it necessary to hide his opinion on certain issues if it does not coincide with the dominant point of view. For example, he opposed the “Dima Yakovlev Law” and the bill banning smoking in public places and criticized the Pussy Riot trial.

“It happens in different ways, and on some issues, on the contrary, I am even more conservative than the authorities. I’m not fighting against the authorities - I just have my own vision on some issues,” Barshchevsky explained in another interview.

Olga and Natalya

Mikhail Barshchevsky tied the knot while still a student. His chosen one was a student at the Moscow Institute of Foreign Languages ​​named Olga. They met in line for tickets to one of the holiday homes in the Moscow region - the girl kept dropping money, the young man politely picked it up. An acquaintance began, then a romance.

The lovers did not wait for graduation, as was usually practiced in the Soviet Union. They got married and moved into the apartment of Mikhail's parents. There, in 1977, their daughter Natasha was born. She also became a lawyer - already the fifth generation of the family!

Olga Immanuilovna, a graduate of the Moscow Institute of Foreign Languages, also succumbed to her husband’s influence and received a second degree at the Faculty of Law of Moscow State University, became a Doctor of Historical Sciences, and a teacher at the Moscow Law Academy.

Grandchildren and children again

Natalia Barshchevskaya's first husband was businessman Lev Khasis, to whom she gave birth to two sons, Alexander and Leonid.

In 2009, Natalya Mikhailovna entered into a second marriage with businessman Kirill Meshcheryakov, they have two daughters, Yulia and Elizaveta.

Meanwhile, the Barshchevsky elders adopted twins Maxim and Daria, born in 2005. The status made it possible to ease bureaucratic obstacles as much as possible, so all that remained was to choose.

In the end, Maxim chose - he came up, slapped Mikhail Yuryevich on the hand and said: “This is mine.” The sister behaved more cautiously, but still decided to go into Olga Imanuilna’s arms.

In interviews, the Barshchevskys do not speak high words, preferring pure pragmatism. In their opinion, there is no better way to prolong youth and maintain tone - grandchildren are grandchildren, and they have their own parents. Barshchevsky advises two people to adopt at once and promises that they will become “theirs” in two years. “You will begin to recognize in him your own gestures, rhetoric, habits, affections. With relatives, this process occurs from the day of birth, gradually and imperceptibly. With receptionists, there was nothing for a long time, and then suddenly there was a lot,” he promises.

Had a heart attack

On May 21, information spread in the media that Mikhail Barshchevsky was hospitalized due to heart problems. As Barshchevsky himself reported, he suffered a heart attack the day before on Sunday morning.

“Now I feel better than a corpse. Let’s see, after a heart attack, the first three days are indicative, now I’m in the hospital,” said the government’s plenipotentiary envoy to the highest courts.

Barshchevsky underwent stenting of the vessels that supply the heart with blood. During the operation, the patient is given a special frame, which straightens the narrowing of the artery and ensures normal blood flow.

Now Barshchevsky is in the Lyubertsy city hospital, and will soon be transported to one of the capital’s medical institutions.

Basic data:

Registry number: 77/3889
Certificate number:
Region: Moscow

Experience:

Experience from: No information
Specialization: No information
Experience in courts: No information
Awards: Gold medal named after. F. N. Plevako
Title: Doctor of Legal Sciences

Contacts:

Chamber membership: Moscow Bar Association
Organizational form:
Name of the organization: No information
Address: No information
Phone: No information
Mail: No information
Note: Honored Lawyer of Russia

Biography:

Place and date of birth

Mikhail Yuryevich Barshchevsky was born on 12/27/1955 in Moscow. Father, Yuri Dmitrievich, and mother, Erika Zalmanovna, were lawyers. Barshchevsky's great-grandfather, Yakov Davydovich, was a lawyer in Kharkov, and Mikhail Yuryevich's grandmother, Tatyana Yakovlevna, worked as an assistant prosecutor.

Education

From 1963 to 1973 he studied at English school No. 29.

In 1978 he graduated from the All-Union Law Institute with honors, and in the same year he entered graduate school via correspondence at the Institute of State and Law of the USSR.

In 1984, Barshchevsky became a candidate of legal sciences.

From 1989 to 1990, Mikhail Yuryevich underwent an internship at the famous American company Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McLoy.

In 1997 he received the title of Doctor of Law.

In 2000 he became a professor at Moscow State Law Academy.

Career and specialization

From 1973 to 1979 he worked as a lawyer at a margarine factory in Moscow.

From 1979 to 1980 – legal adviser of the Reutov city trade.

In 1980 -1990, Mikhail Barshchevsky received the status of a lawyer and began working at the city bar in Moscow.

In 1990 he organized the first private legal organization in Russia - “Moscow Lawyers”. Three years later, he transformed his organization into the legal bureau “Barshchevsky and Partners”.

Since 2001, he has become a representative of the Government of the Russian Federation in the Supreme, Constitutional, and Supreme Arbitration Courts of the Russian Federation.

From 2006 to 2008, he was a member and chairman of the council of the Civil Power party.

Since 2012, he has been a member of the Civic Platform party.

Until 1985, he specialized mainly in criminal law and procedure; Barshchevsky was especially interested in complex and virtually “hopeless” cases. Until 2001, the lawyer was involved in protecting the interests of commercial organizations, cases related to the protection of honor, dignity, and registration of inheritance. Upon entering the civil service, Mikhail Yuryevich left his legal practice.

Merits and famous deeds

Mikhail Barshchevsky represented the interests in civil proceedings of such famous persons as B. Yeltsin, V. Voroshilov, A. Chubais, E. Sagalev, S. Yastrzhembsky, Yu. Shafranik and many others. The lawyer represented the interests of the largest banks in Russia and Europe, as well as various ministries.

Mikhail Yuryevich is an Honored Lawyer of Russia, awarded the Order of Honor, the Gold Medal named after. F. Plevako.

Mikhail Yuryevich is a permanent member of the “What, where, when?” club; he also participated in the establishment of “Igra” LLC, which is engaged in filming the TV show of the same name. Barshchevsky is the author of several books on jurisprudence and advocacy, as well as hundreds of articles on the same topics. His hobbies include traveling, chess, and theatre.

He is married to Olga Barkalova, a law teacher at Moscow State Law Academy, and has two daughters and a son from his marriage. Daughter Natalya continues her father’s work and works as a lawyer.

Reviews:

When adding Mikhail Yurievich Barshchevsky to the page, try to be objective. Any comment is reviewed by moderators, this takes time. Your words must be SUPPORTED BY DOCUMENTATION (checks, court decisions, etc.)! Leave your contacts, otherwise your review risks being deleted!

All available information about the lawyer Barshchevsky Mikhail Yurievich. The information is taken from an open source: the website of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation and is provided to visitors free of charge. If you are Mikhail Yuryevich Barshchevsky and would like to supplement, change or delete information about yourself, write us a letter.
This page is not an official lawyer page. This lawyer is not an employee of the TopYurist.RU website and does not provide consultations here. If you want to solve your problem, then take advantage of free legal advice from our partners.

More lawyers:

Comments

Shulim Weinstein

Mr. M. Barshchevsky. Do you agree with my point of view:
"As long as the Rule of Law remains unshakable in Russia, it will remain unshakable
Russia!" Today I came across the facts when officials establish their rights over the Rule of Law. Tomorrow 01/26/15 in the Presnensky court
will hear the case on my Claim of the DzhP and ZhF (now DGI) of Moscow. I am far from sure that the Court will not follow the lead of the officials. Allow me
after the trial, send you materials on the case by e-mail if this happens -
Sincerely, Shulim Weinstein, 77 years old. As a well-known "expert" ho-
I want to ask you one question: “Which major political figure of the 20th century wrote an autobiographical book about his homeland and ended it with a quote
“The most precious thing a person has is life, and one must live it in such a way that shame does not sting... so that when dying one can say...” and what is this book called.”
Sincerely, Shulim Weinstein.

• answer

Alla Evgenievna

Complaint against the illegal verdict of the Shchelkovo City Court M.O. in particular to judge L.A. Stuneeva.
Dear Mikhail Yurievich! I ask you to help! My son, Shirinov Roman Azhdarovich, born in 1985. was illegally convicted under Article Part 3 of Article 161 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation with a sentence of 7 years in prison to be served in a maximum security colony. My son is an honest, decent person, they accuse him of something he did not do. He is accused by the family of his ex-wife. I would not have applied if the situation had not been so absurd, all the actions were developing before our eyes. In 2011, my son married a girl, against the will of her parents. They lived at her home with her parents in the Shchelkovsky district, Zagoryansky village , because the parents of the ex-wife did not let them go, in 2012 they had a daughter. There were no open quarrels with his wife’s parents, grandmother (Vasilieva’s victim) and grandfather. It all happened because of taking the child abroad for permanent residence. Roman refused to go, refused to give a power of attorney to take the child for permanent residence, then his father-in-law said that he would imprison Roman, and his mother-in-law would divorce him and deprive him of paternity. This became the impetus for the accusation. After the conflict in early July 2013. my son didn’t go to them anymore, then they took the last day of his stay at their house as a basis. Roman brought money to them, which his former father-in-law asked to bring from Yaroslavl. This is where the whole tragedy of our family begins. Roman’s wife stayed at home with her parents, because she was afraid and asked us to forgive her for everything. Although she continued to come to us on weekends. Her parents forced her to give her power of attorney to a lawyer for a divorce and, without the presence of my son and without notifications to our address (Roman is registered with us), they divorced me the first time. The whole thing was "concocted" just like they did it. About the matter. The victim Vasilyeva (grandmother of the ex-wife) lived with her daughter (with her mother-in-law and father-in-law) wrote a statement that Roman allegedly took possession of her funds in the amount of 1 million 467 thousand 407 rubles 50 kopecks (a particularly large amount) by stealing a paper gift from a dresser drawer package on July 5, 2013. But half a year has passed since the theft and the filing of a statement with the police; the statement was filed on November 18, 2013. How was the application accepted after such a period had expired? During the investigation, which lasted a year and a half, my son was free. Many times the case was closed, but all the time the prosecution brought in some people and the case was reopened based on absurd stipulations. So the case came to trial. No one responded to our complaints. In private conversations, prosecutors were surprised by the case and said that the case would be closed, but as soon as the case reached them, the case was resumed and there were cases where people simply ran away from our lawyers through the yards. We hoped for a trial, but alas. There is not a single piece of evidence in the case, only Vasilyeva’s words. 1. The statement was written 6 months after the date of the theft 2. It was not Vasilyeva herself who wrote the statement, but her daughter, she just signed it 3. There are no fingerprints, there is no evidence at all! 4. Whether there was money at all, Vasilyeva cannot prove 5. A lie detector examination was carried out, which showed that Roman did not commit theft, but it was not taken into account, the judge said that it was possible that Roman had colluded with the expert, although the examination was carried out in the office investigator according to all the rules. 6. Vasilyeva’s testimony at all stages of the consideration is different, the court did not take this into account. Today the regional court was held, we hoped that if the father-in-law has all the connections there and influenced the course of the case, there is reason to say this, then the regional court will sort it out. It turned out to be 10 minutes. It was enough to just listen to the lawyers and that’s it. This is how people's destinies are decided. It turned out that it is very easy to slander a person and imprison him for such a long period of time, but it is almost impossible to prove innocence. Especially if the prosecution has money and in the Shchelkovo court their lawyer’s wife works as a judge. How can you fight the system I don’t I present. Our family encountered the judicial system for the first time and what a nightmare, everyone is corrupt. I never thought that those who have money really have money. Mikhail Yuryevich, I really ask you to help, please take control of this matter, because you are an authorized representative in the highest judicial authorities. We will now file a cassation appeal, then to the Supreme Court. But we no longer believe in a positive outcome. I ask you to help and answer me, this is a cry from the soul, I am ready to provide a copy of the case so that you can see how absurd everything is. Help, I beg you! I didn’t have time to send the letter right away and it fell on our heads, today I brought a package to my son, but they didn’t accept it from me, they said that he had already been sent to the stage. How is it possible to send a person a day after the trial, without documents, without an appeal ruling. If we were not sure that our son did not do this, we would never have defended him. It’s just that all this developed before our eyes and we all heard all the threats from our father-in-law and mother-in-law for half a year. We never thought that people whom he had never offended, because he did not obey them, could ruin their whole life.
My mother-in-law told me that I was divorcing the children and then depriving them of their surname and paternity. I then laughed and told her not to take on too much. but it turned out that now she was laughing at us. And we divorced, we didn’t know anything. But my son was a good father and husband; he and his wife didn’t even quarrel once in four years.
I am ending my chaotic letter. I don't even want to reread it. I am sending it to you as is. Sorry for the collapse, I want to write so much, but I don’t know how to convey all the pain of my soul and heart. I already lack health and strength. I hope that at least you can help with advice.

• answer

Alexander

I, Sakharov A.N. inv. 2 gr. Chernobyl nuclear power plant since 1996 Former head of a public organization. I haven't managed since 2004. for health. Conducted countless ships from 1997 to 2004. I am familiar with all the twists and turns in the destruction of our law.
I personally heard from you on TV about your participation in these changes with the late Pochinok. I don’t want to talk about all the iniquities of your actions except one. Who gave you the right to equalize the amounts of VHI for disabled people? Personally, I worked my entire working life in harmful working conditions (they paid more), and so did the miners. And you equated me with drunks, mechanics and plumbers whose earnings in housing and communal services were minimal and they knocked down three rubles from grandmothers for a gasket. If you made an equalization according to For other reasons, they would have said that I was indulging the Ministry of Finance or someone else.... You will not be happy.
Without respect Sakharov A.N. No answer required, don't bother.

• answer

NIKKU Nadezda,

I am looking for a lawyer who agrees to represent the interests of my daughter in the ECHR
Facts of the case Ref. 57022 /15

The applicant is a Russian citizen, born in 1980.
On July 21, 2015, she asked for asylum in the Netherlands and lived with her mother in the Ter Apel refugee camp.
The applicant is disabled. Cause of disability - “general disease” /app. page 1/

Due to health conditions and due to legal ignorance, the applicant could not fully protect her rights and therefore issued her mother a notarized power of attorney to protect her rights. (hereinafter referred to as representative) /app. page 2/

On August 13, 2015, the applicant went to the Refala Clinical Hospital to diagnose her health condition.
However, the endocrinologist limited himself to taking a general blood and urine test, and unreasonably prescribed the applicant the antipsychotic drug Нaldol.
On the territory of Russia, the applicant underwent evidence-based medical diagnostics and a violation of all body functions was revealed. Professor, academician, doctor - neurorehabilitation specialist A.P. Efimov in conclusion indicated a CONTRAINDICATION for taking antipsychotics. /app.page............................./Antipsychotics cause the applicant excruciating physical suffering, so she refused to take Haldol.

On August 14, 2015, camp staff suggested that the applicant go to the clinic, as they said, for diagnostics. They refused to name the clinic's profile.

The applicant and her representative agreed and headed towards the ambulance. Suddenly, three police officers grabbed the applicant, used brutal physical force and a choke hold (the applicant coughed) and dragged her onto a gurney. His hands were tightly handcuffed to the gurney and in a half-bent position, and within 3 hours he was transported to a psychiatric clinic.
The applicant developed bruises and scars on her hands from the handcuffs.

On August 16, 2015, the representative submitted an application to the Immigration and Naturalization Service to leave the Netherlands.

The psychiatric clinic was located in the building of a former, especially guarded prison and retained all the attributes and procedures of a prison.
The applicant was locked up 24 hours a day in a cell with faulty plumbing. The smell of feces made her want to vomit. The applicant was deprived of outdoor exercise. The food was served through a slot in the iron door and the table stood opposite the faulty toilet.

The representative asked to transfer the applicant to another premises, but to no avail. The representative provided the department staff with a list of foods that caused allergies to the applicant, but this information was ignored and on August 17 the applicant developed swelling, an anaphylactic state, confusion and completely refused food and drinks.

The applicant was not examined by a commission of psychiatrists, she was not diagnosed and was not offered voluntary treatment at the clinic. Russian-speaking psychiatrist G. refused to collect anamnesis and get acquainted with the diagnosis of his health status made in Russia. Refused to carry out diagnostics in the Netherlands and take measures to provide safe food. He said: “I am not obligated to do ANYTHING until the court makes a decision on hospitalization.”

The applicant and her representative were not provided with a copy of the medical report and the clinic’s statement on the need for deprivation of liberty and compulsory psychiatric treatment.
On August 20, 2015, a court hearing was held at the clinic, at which the prosecutor was absent and there was no audio recording of the process.
The applicant gave the court adequate answers to the questions.
Psychiatrist G. told the court that the applicant “only at the first meeting with him, on August 18, was angry and shouted at him, but after 20 minutes she calmed down. This anger was one-time and was expressed in words. The rest of the time the anger did not recur, there was no aggression.” .
Psychiatrist G. concluded: “Emotionally Natalya Line is not okay, but the reason for this is unknown to him,” he further informed the court that the patient has a neurological disease, encephalopathy, but asked to interview the patient’s mother for more details about her health.
The lawyer said that she “knows nothing about the client, because her mother did not allow me to meet with her.”
The representative gave the judge a power of attorney, which the court read with the help of an interpreter, two petitions and challenged the lawyer.
In response, the judge called the guards, who rudely removed the representative. The applicant ran out after her mother and was not allowed into the meeting again.
On August 26, 2015, the representative filed an appeal with the court /adj. page ..../, four petitions (including for familiarization with the protocol and case materials) /app. page....../ and a statement of claim for causing harm to the applicant’s health /app. page..... ./

On September 4, 2015, the applicant was given a photocopy of the Overijssel court decision in a Dutch language she did not understand, which contained a first and last name that did not correspond to the applicant’s first and last name. The court seal was missing. /adj.page....../
On September 8, 2015, the applicant supported the appeal filed by the representative and filed her short appeal with the court about disagreement with the decision /app.page...../, requested to receive the court decision in Russian and the opportunity to familiarize herself with the case materials. She challenged the lawyer and the judge. She asked to be given her freedom and inviolability /adj. page....../.

The Overijssel court did not indicate the end date of hospitalization in the decision, but limited itself to the wording “for three weeks.” If we count from the date of the court hearing, then on September 9, 2015, the applicant should have been given freedom, but she continued to be detained, the applicant’s bank card was taken away, and from September 10, the representative was prohibited from visiting the applicant for 4 weeks.
On September 15, 2015, the representative filed a statement of claim for violation of the applicant’s right to freedom and asked for compensation for the damage caused in full /attached page...../
On September 17, 2015, a court hearing was held, to which the court allowed the representative as an observer, but prohibited him from participating in it.
The court did not announce the topic of the hearing, did not inform about rights and obligations, and did not provide the opportunity to exercise rights. The court showed disdain for the applicant - the hearing was rapid, consisted of only 4 phrases and looked like a mockery:
The court gave the floor to the applicant and she said: “I want to leave the hospital.”
The lawyer added: “I draw the court’s attention to the fact that the client wants to be discharged from the clinic.”
Psychiatrist T. stated: “The patient needs medical help.”
The judge joyfully announced that he had “decided to extend the applicant’s hospitalization by 6 months” and closed the hearing.

On September 22, 2015, the representative filed an appeal with the Zwolle court against the decision to extend the period of hospitalization /app.page....../, a statement of claim for an illegal ban on meetings and communication /app.page...... ...../, petitions for familiarization with the protocol, case materials and appointment of the assistance of a lawyer capable of carrying out effective legal defense /app. page........./.
However, the next day, September 23, 2015, the Zwolle court arbitrarily, without making a ruling, returned the appeal, the claim and both petitions /app.page............./
On September 24, 2016, the representative saw the applicant, her condition had deteriorated significantly, her eyes were rolling back, there were signs of impaired consciousness, there was a danger of blood stasis and death, so on September 25, 2015, the representative filed a complaint with the Supreme Court of the Netherlands and the Attorney General at the Supreme Court about violation of the applicant’s right to protection of life and health, the right to a fair trial and asked to cancel the court decision of September 17, 2015 /attached page............./

On September 29, 2015, the representative filed a complaint with the Supreme Court of the Netherlands, the Attorney General of the Supreme Court and the President of the Zwolle Court about the illegal return of documents and the refusal to consider the appeal. He asked to recognize the actions of the court as illegal, to oblige them to accept the documents back and to consider the appeal /app. page........./.
On October 19, 2015, the applicant and her representative again contacted the Immigration and Naturalization Service with an application to leave the country /app. page........./.
On October 29, 2015, the representative filed a claim with the Zwolle court for violation of the applicant’s right to freedom and security, the right to prompt court review of the lawfulness of detention and to release if his detention was declared illegal by the court, the right not to be subjected to torture or inhumane treatment. and degrading treatment or punishment, the right not to be discriminated against, the right to a fair trial, the right to respect for private and family life, the right to an effective remedy, the right to leave the Netherlands / appendix page......... /
On November 16, 2015, the representative sought protection from the President of the Russian Federation and the Russian Embassy in the Netherlands.
Based on paragraph "C" of Article 1 of the Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, "the provisions of the Convention no longer apply to a person who 1) voluntarily again avails himself of the protection of the country of his nationality", interrupts the consideration of the request for asylum and obliges states to provide the citizen with the opportunity to return to his homeland, however psychiatrists continued to hold the applicant in the clinic.
On December 10, 2015, the representative and the applicant appealed to the Zwolle court with a request to issue a court decision dated September 17, 2015 and grant the applicant freedom to return to her homeland /app. page........./.
On January 14, 2016, the applicant and her representative filed a claim with the Zwolle court alleging harm to the applicant’s health, violation of her right to freedom and the right to return to her homeland /app.page........./.
The consular department of the Russian Embassy in the Netherlands petitioned the DT&V service of the Netherlands for our return to Russia, however, on February 3, 2016, the applicant was transported from the clinic to the airport and sent by plane to Germany, and the decision of September 17, 2015 was never issued to the applicant.
Two appeals against two court decisions have not been considered. Not a single claim has been considered. Not a single request was granted.
The Supreme Court of the Netherlands advised to contact a lawyer. But Line had a lawyer, but he was inactive. Thank you in advance. He didn’t do anything bad to the girls, there was no rape, they danced and laughed, and then they wrote a statement against the guy. I didn’t even think that this could happen.
Only one injured party was present at the trial; the court did not re-summon the second girl for a full consideration of the case. And he passed judgment.
I filed a complaint with the Moscow City Court. And the second girl and her mother came to the trial, they asked to be given a suspended sentence, since there was no violence against the girls, they did not think that this would happen, that such a harsh decision would be made by the court. That Artem had done nothing wrong and they knew him as a good young man.
July 5 Moscow City Court 2016 left the sentence unchanged: 5 years and 10 months of strict regime under Art. 135 part 3
My son served in the army in 2010-2011 in the Artillery Forces, in the Nizhny Novgorod village of Mulino. Participated in the 2011 Victory Parade.
After the army, in 2011, he entered the Eastern Humanitarian and Legal Academy, majoring in Management, and successfully completed the 4th year.
Worked in the company "DP-TRADE" LLC as a manager
In 2016 he got married and had a son. After he was imprisoned, the child died, fell asleep and did not wake up in his sleep (infant death). The wife filed for divorce after learning about this deadline. Everything went downhill.
He has already served 1 year and 4 months, I asked, wrote, that he be sent closer to Moscow since I live on Shcherbinka, my grandmother is 80 years old, after a stroke, I can’t leave her for a long time, I’m 53 years old, I have diabetes, we raised him alone without a father (he died when Artem was 4 years old). It is very difficult for me to go far from my grandmother; he was sent to the Mordovian region, the village of Sosnovka, IK No. 7.
I really ask and beg you, help. Yes, he is guilty, but he repents, he understands that he was wrong. But he didn’t do anything bad to the girls. Help, I don’t know where to knock and ask for justice. Lawyers only promise and take money, but to no avail. I thought about the investigators, about the judges, that our court was the most humane and fair, but it turns out that it is not. I beg you, I appreciate you and admire your truthful statements, which is why I turn to you with a call for help. Thank you in advance. Maybe at least someone in our country can help or at least tell me how to help him and what I should do next. Thank you.
With respect, Venkova E.N.

• answer

Flur

An ex-wife with her convicted partner, a former policeman, entered into an agreement in the bailiff service. The last 2 bailiffs counted me in 2015 and 2016 for alimony debt for re-collection from 2007 to 2011 of 5 million rubles, although back in 2013 another bailiff issued a resolution in which the debt was 0, that is, there was no debt! In the first instance (Podolsk city court), the SPI recognized that the calculation was illegal and should be recalculated, and the court declared the decision illegal. Then the SPI suddenly filed a complaint, like the claimant, against the decision with the Ministry of Defense and (for one million rubles, as I learned) they canceled the decision and denied me the Claim. The cassation and supervisory authorities in the RF Armed Forces did not bother and unsubscribed. Now there is only one hope left: the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation. I have always been an entrepreneur and passed the declarations on Uprschenki in the reporting period, the cathode in recent years is annual. The bailiff calculated my income on a monthly basis, and in those months where there was no money coming in, because... I was working off the advances previously made to my account and therefore in the following months there was only expenses for salary and lubricated materials, spare parts for trucks, as well as payments on previously received loans... but for Spy this was not enough and not enough During these months she also counted me as NON-WORKING according to the monthly average! I am sure that this is not legal because a person cannot and should not pay twice. Please, I need help in drawing up a complaint to the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation

Mikhail Barshchevsky is a widely known person. Plenipotentiary representative of the Government of the Russian Federation in the Constitutional, Supreme and Supreme Arbitration Courts. Keeper of the traditions of the game “What? Where? When?". And also a husband with thirty years of experience. Barshchevsky doesn’t let anyone into the world of home comfort. It is inhabited by four dogs, a parrot Zhirik and 60 aquarium fish. The fragile Olga reigns supreme there. His wife. They have been together since the time when Mikhail Yuryevich was still a law student.

“My wife is an adult and will make her own decision,” Barshchevsky responded to a request for an interview with his other half. This is a rare case - in the bureaucratic world, husbands, as a rule, decide everything for their wives. Little is known about Barshchevsky’s wife. More precisely, nothing is known.

And here we are - in the kitchen of an elite Moscow apartment. Porcelain zebras and dogs “look” at me from the windowsill and from the back of the sofa. There are hundreds of them - of different sizes and colors. And this is only a small part of the owner’s collection! The rest of the exhibits are at the dacha, where the Barshchevsky family mainly lives. The owner of the family also has his own collection of edged weapons. Previously, the couple collected stamps together. I find out all this while Olga gracefully and quickly sets the table. It is immediately obvious that guests come here often. And somehow the interview immediately goes from being official to being at home. Such a “conversation with gingerbread” in a good Moscow family. And the first question, of course, is about Olga’s parents.

BLOOD OF ARBAT

— Your husband is a native Muscovite. And you?
— I am from an Arbat family in the third generation. My grandfather was a translator and journalist, he knew 10 languages. Dad was a journalist and then a writer, although his first education was in law. For several years he worked as an investigator in Petrozavodsk - I lived there for the first four years, although I was born in Moscow.
— Did you manage to instill these “Arbat” qualities in your daughter?
- To some extent... But it’s not the same. We have, as Okudzhava sang, “Arbatism dissolved in the blood.” And the daughter is a different generation, a different psychology.
— Your husband is a public person. But no one knows what his wife does.
— I am a doctor of sciences, I teach law. But by first education I am a philologist. Graduated from the Institute of Foreign Languages, taught French. Then she defended her dissertation at the Faculty of Philology of Moscow State University on the topic: “The relationship between dialogue and monologue in oral and written speech in civil proceedings.”
— How did legal education appear?
— When I defended myself, Barshchevsky was offered a contract in America. And we lived six months there, six months here. This lasted for three years, I didn’t work and I went completely wild. And then came perestroika, and no one needed my French, everyone was learning English. My daughter is also getting ready to go to law school. I decided: why am I worse? My mother is a lawyer, Misha is also a fourth generation lawyer.

DREAMS DREAMS…

— What was the limit of dreams for young specialists in Soviet times?
- Advocacy. For three years Misha tried to join the bar, and for three years he was not accepted. The reasons are different. First of all, young. Secondly, no connections. Thirdly, not a member of the CPSU. In those years I worked as a translator for Valentina Tereshkova, in the Committee of Soviet Women. And it was difficult to even dream of a different life then.
— Where did the young Barshchevsky family live after the wedding?
— At the Barshchevsky Sr., in a three-room “Khrushchev” with Misha’s parents and grandmother. Our daughter Natasha was born there. For three years, the six of us lived in a three-room apartment. And they lived very friendly! I had an amazing mother-in-law. When my husband and I quarreled, both my father-in-law and mother-in-law took my side.

(Olga praises her husband so much that I can’t resist asking a provocative question.)

— Did Mikhail Yuryevich wash diapers?
- I washed it! And at night he got up to see Natasha. Once he had to defend his thesis, he was very worried. And then one day he wakes up at night in a panic: “I have to go to a competition! I need to go to the competition!” I say: “What competition?” And he responded: “Wash the diapers!” By the way, Misha is great at cooking and baking. Since he is a bore and a meticulous person, he approaches everything thoroughly and meticulously.

WE BUY OUTFITS TOGETHER

— Your husband is a government lawyer. This is the world of officials. Are you friends with the wives of officials?
- No. I communicate occasionally, but no friendship has arisen.
— Do you think they treat you as Barshchevsky’s wife or as a separate, accomplished person?
— In the bureaucratic world, of course, they treat me as Barshchevsky’s wife. It `s naturally.
— Do you go to government “parties”?
- Me not. He goes, but it's not a party. And, for example, on someone’s birthday in the White House. Although no... (Olga has difficulty remembering) once Barshchevsky took me to a reception in the Kremlin, and there I had to be in an evening dress.
— Do you have enough evening dresses in your wardrobe?
- Eat. But there are few reasons to wear them. It happens that on our friends’ birthdays we all agree and come in evening dresses. Then twice a year there is a ball of the Assembly of the Third Millennium. And you should definitely come there in long evening dresses.
-Who buys dresses?
— We buy together in the States. This business is well established there. The dresses are inexpensive - 200-300 dollars, and not like ours - 2 - 3 thousand dollars. Therefore, I can afford to buy several dresses.
— Can you afford to buy a suit, say, for 3 thousand dollars?
- Can.
- How will your husband look at this?
- Very good. I have such suits. But you understand, I buy them more than once a week. Barshchevsky knows that I am not a spender and will not buy an expensive item just because it is fashionable.

BY TROLLEYBUS FROM THE REGISTRY OFFICE

— Do you have family traditions?
— We celebrate all birthdays. Not necessarily broadly, but sincerely. And when we still lived with Misha’s parents, we celebrated all birthdays in three stages. First, relatives - 20 people, then - fellow lawyers, then - friends. We also celebrate the day we met and the wedding day.
— Was the wedding dress gorgeous?
- No, a simple pink dress. By the way, I have it hanging in my closet and I can still fit into it! I remember that someone got my mother a piece of material, and we sewed this dress from it. We got married without a wedding procession, we left the registry office on a trolleybus! And the next day we flew off on our honeymoon to Vilnius.
- Do you often call each other - not on business, just like that?
- Very. We call each other ten times a day. Mostly Misha calls. I don't call because he might have negotiations or an important meeting. Why tear it off?
— Do you take part in raising your grandchildren?
- Certainly. They spend a lot of time at our dacha. Since they are city boys, we accustom them to the forest. They love to collect lilies of the valley and mushrooms. And the eldest, he is six years old, already understands trees. Barshchevsky and I are completely crazy mushroom pickers. And our grandchildren love our dogs very much. We are happy about this: when children are raised close to animals, they become kinder.

EITHER A GIRL OR A VISION

Olga and Mikhail met in a holiday home near Moscow. Olga stood in front of Mikhail in line for vouchers and kept dropping money, and he picked it up. An acquaintance began. Once we got together for a dance. Olga and her friend were preening themselves in the room, while Mikhail and his friend stood and waited outside the door. And suddenly it was not Olga who appeared before Mikhail, but a girl... his dreams, a girl with gray curls.

Using silver hairspray, Olga gave herself one silver strand. It looked impressive. But the main thing is that Mikhail had already seen a dream come true with a lock of hair before, at the Sovremennik Theater and fell in love with it then. I saw her twice and was afraid to approach her twice. Olga did not believe this story at first. But when they arrived in Moscow and checked the surviving theater tickets, everything came together.

Famous adoptive parents

In 2008, lawyer Mikhail Barshchevsky and his wife Olga took two-year-old twins Maxim and Dasha from an orphanage.

Barshchevsky’s eldest daughter Natalya is married to Kirill Meshcheryakov, the owner of a large construction company.

There are such gossip...

The story about the Barshchevsky family would be incomplete without a spicy episode with Bozhena Rynskaya:

...With his wife alive, Mr. Barshchevsky climbs into everything that crosses his life path tangentially

I still remember that I asked Barshchevsky to help my fiancé with citizenship, but he replied that it was not profitable for him. Then we met again at the Monolith club, where Barshchevsky, breathing tobacco, slobbered into my ear: “Remember that I want you.” I almost threw up.”

“It’s difficult for me to comment on everything that concerns Bozhena Rynska, because I’m a lawyer, not a psychiatrist,” Mikhail Barshchevsky commented on the journalist’s notes.