How to do parsing. The order of parsing a simple sentence

Parsing order simple sentence

1. Parse the sentence into members and indicate how they are expressed (first, the subject and predicate are analyzed, then the minor members related to them).

2. Determine the type of sentence according to the purpose of the statement (narrative, incentive, interrogative).

3. Determine the type of sentence by emotional coloring (exclamatory, non-exclamatory).

4. Find the grammatical basis of the sentence and prove that it is simple.

5. Determine the type of sentence by structure:

a) two-part or one-part (definitely personal, indefinitely personal, generalized personal, impersonal, nominal);

b) widespread or not widespread;

c) complete or incomplete (indicate which part of the sentence is missing);

d) complicated (indicate how it is complicated: homogeneous members, isolated members, appeal, introductory words).

6. Draw up a sentence diagram and explain punctuation marks.

Parsing samples

1) My bonfire shining in the fog(A.K. Tolstoy).

The sentence is narrative, non-exclamatory, simple, two-part, widespread, complete, uncomplicated.

Grammar basis - the fire is shining my, expressed possessive pronoun. The predicate refers to the adverb of place in the fog, expressed by a noun V prepositional case with a pretext V.

Sentence outline At the end of a given declarative sentence there is a period.

2) At the end of January, surrounded by the first thaw, cherry trees smell good gardens (Sholokhov).

The sentence is narrative, non-exclamatory, simple, two-part, widespread, complete, complicated by a separate agreed definition, expressed by a participial phrase.

Grammar basis - the gardens smell. The subject is expressed by a noun in the nominative case, the predicate is a simple verb, expressed by a verb in the indicative mood. The subject includes an agreed definition cherry expressed as an adjective. The predicate refers to the circumstance of time in the end of January, expressed by the phrase (noun + noun) in the prepositional case with a preposition V, and the circumstance of the course of action Fine expressed by an adverb.

Sentence outline At the end of a given declarative sentence there is a period; commas in the sentence highlight the participial phrase, which, although it stands before the word being defined, is isolated because it is separated from it in the sentence by other words.

Ways to emphasize sentence members

When parsing a sentence into members, standard underlines are used: one line for the subject, two lines for the predicate, a dotted line for the object, a wavy line for the definition, alternating dots and dashes for the circumstance.

In some schools main member A one-part sentence is emphasized with three features, but the more common type of underlining is in which the main member of the nominative sentence is marked as the subject, and the main members of other one-part sentences are marked as predicates.

When underlined minor members proposals, it is advisable to be guided by the following principles.

An isolated member of a sentence is emphasized as a single member.

Accordingly, non-isolated members should be emphasized as detailed as possible in accordance with the questions asked to them.

Designation of words and phrases that are not parts of the sentence

As is known from morphology, auxiliary parts of speech are not parts of a sentence, but during syntactic parsing certain problems can be associated with them.

Conjunctions are not members of a sentence and are not distinguished when homogeneous members are combined, but in some cases they can be part of non-uniform members of a sentence.

Firstly, these are comparative conjunctions as part of comparative phrases, for example: The surface of the bay was like a mirror.

Secondly, these are unions consisting of isolated members of a sentence, for example: Stopping often and for a long time, we got to the place only on the third day.

Prepositions also cannot act as independent members of a sentence, but they are used as part of a prepositional-case group, together with the case form, expressing a certain meaning.

Therefore, it is customary to emphasize the preposition together with the noun to which it refers. In this case, it is necessary to pay attention to cases when the preposition and noun are separated by adjectives or participles, for example: instead of older brother. In this case, it would be a mistake to emphasize the preposition together with the adjective as a modifier; the underscore should be as follows: instead of older brother.

Shape-forming particles are part of the components verb forms and are emphasized together with the verb both in contact and non-contact positions, for example: Let him call me!

Semantic (non-shape-forming) particles are not members of a sentence, however, in school practice, a negative particle is not usually emphasized as a single member of a sentence together with the word to which it refers, for example: No smoking here. I didn't really count on help.

It is permissible not to highlight both prepositions and all semantic particles.

Some teachers teach to highlight conjunctions by circling them, and prepositions by circling them with a triangle. This allocation is not generally accepted.

Introductory words and addresses are not parts of the sentence. Sometimes students enclose these components in square brackets or underline them with crosses. This is undesirable, since underlining is used only to indicate members of a sentence; It is permissible to mark these elements of the sentence by writing the words “introductory” or “address” over them.

Description of the complicating members of the sentence

When a sentence is complicated by direct speech or an inserted sentence, they are considered and described as an independent sentence, since both direct speech and an inserted sentence have their own purpose of utterance and intonation, which may not coincide with the purpose of the utterance and the intonation of the sentence itself.

So, for example, the proposal He asked indignantly: “How long will you continue to dig?!” should be analyzed as follows: the sentence is narrative, non-exclamatory, simple, two-part, common, complete, complicated by direct speech. Direct speech is an interrogative, exclamatory, two-part, extended, complete, uncomplicated sentence.

The participial phrase complicates the sentence only if it is isolated. In this case, the description should indicate the complication not by a participial phrase, but separate definition; in brackets it is possible, but not necessarily, to indicate that it is expressed by a participial phrase.

The comparative phrase can be any member of the sentence - the predicate ( This park is like a forest), circumstance ( The rain was pouring down like buckets), addition ( Petya draws better than Anton), definition (He's almost the same as his brother). In this case, comparative turnover can be either separate or non-separated. A complication is caused only by a separate comparative phrase, and, as in the case of a participial phrase, it is necessary to indicate the complication isolated circumstance, addition or definition.

Homogeneous members, introductory words and sentences, and addresses are also described as complicating the structure of a sentence.

Sentences with homogeneous predicates present some complexity. In school and pre-university practice, it is believed that a two-part sentence in which the subject is used with several predicates is a simple sentence complicated by homogeneous predicates. In a one-component sentence, there are as many parts as there are predicates in it, with the exception of cases when the structure of the predicate contains homogeneous parts.

For example: I was offended and did not want to answer him- a simple two-part sentence with homogeneous predicates.

I felt offended and didn’t want to answer him.- difficult sentence.

I felt sad and lonely- a simple one-part (impersonal) sentence with homogeneous parts of the predicate.

One-part sentences

When analyzing one-part sentences, students often make various mistakes.

The first type of errors is associated with the need to distinguish between one-part and two-part incomplete sentences.

As already mentioned, we diagnose a definite-personal sentence by the form of the main member: the predicate in it is expressed by a verb in the form of the 1st and 2nd person singular and plural indicative mood (in the present and future tense), and in the imperative mood; the producer of the action is defined and can be called personal pronouns of the 1st and 2nd persons me, you, we, you:

I walk and walk, but I can’t reach the forest.

The peculiarity of verb forms with the morphological feature of the 1st and 2nd person is that each of these forms can “serve” one single subject: a form ending in -у ( go-y) - pronoun I, form with ending -eat/-ish ( go-eat) - pronoun you, form with -em/-im ( let's go) - pronoun we, form with -ete/-ite ( let's go) - pronoun you. Forms 1 and 2 of the imperative mood also clearly indicate the person who is the producer of the action.

Since the morphological feature of the person is represented in the verb only in the indicated forms, sentences of a similar meaning with a predicate-verb in the form of the past tense of the indicative mood and the conditional mood are considered two-part incomplete, for example:

He walked and walked, but never reached the forest.

In this sentence, the form of the predicate does not indicate in any way the producer of the action.

Even if it is clear from the previous context that the producer of the action is the speaker(s) or the hearer(s), sentences or parts of a complex sentence without a subject with a predicate in the past tense or in the conditional mood should be characterized as two-part incomplete, since information about the producer of the action is extracted not from the sentence itself, but from the previous context, which, in fact, is an indicator of the incompleteness of the sentence or part of it; see, for example, the second part of a complex sentence:

I would help you if I knew how.

In indefinite-personal sentences, as already mentioned, the main member is expressed by a verb in the 3rd person plural form (present and future tense in the indicative mood and in the imperative mood), the plural form of the past tense of the indicative mood or a similar form of the conditional mood of the verb. The producer of the action in these sentences is unknown or unimportant:

They are calling you / they called / let them call / they would call you.

Such sentences without a subject with a predicate in the indicated forms, in which the producer of the action is known from the previous context, are not indefinitely personal; see for example the second sentence in the following context:

We left the forest and tried to get our bearings. Then we walked along the path to the right.

Such sentences are also two-part incomplete.

Thus, when characterizing a sentence as a single-component definite-personal, it is necessary to remember the restrictions on the form of the predicate; when diagnosing a sentence as indefinite-personal, it is also necessary to take into account the meaning - an indication that the performer of the action is unknown.

Not all sentences are classified as generalized personal one-part sentences. one-part sentences, reporting an action that can be attributed to everyone, but only those in which the predicate is expressed in the 2nd person singular form of the indicative and imperative moods or the 3rd person plural form of the indicative mood:

The forest is being cut down and the chips are flying.

However, in a generalized personal meaning, definitely personal sentences with the main member in the form of 1st person and impersonal sentences can be used: What we have, we don’t keep; when we lose it, we cry; If you're afraid of wolves, don't go into the forest. Nevertheless, such proposals are not usually characterized as generalized and personal.

The greatest difficulties are associated with parsing an impersonal sentence.

It is very difficult to determine the composition of the main members in sentences like We had a lot of fun going down this slide., i.e. in sentences containing a copula, a nominal part and an infinitive. There are two traditions in the analysis of such proposals.

There is an opinion that when characterizing such sentences as impersonal or two-part, it is not the sequence of components that is important (the infinitive at the beginning of the sentence or after the copula and the nominal part), but the meaning of the nominal part of the predicate.

So, if in the nominal part an adverb is used with the meaning of the state experienced by the performer of the action (fun, sad, hot, cold, etc.), then this is a one-part impersonal sentence:

It was fun going down this slide.
It was fun to ride down this slide.

If in the nominal part a word is used with the meaning of a positive or negative evaluation (good, bad, harmful, useful, etc.), then we have a two-part sentence with a subject, an expressed infinitive:

It was harmful for him to smoke.
Smoking was bad for him.

According to another linguistic tradition, the characteristics of a sentence of this type depend on the order of the words in it, and not on the meaning of the word in the nominal part. If the infinitive comes before the connective and the nominal part, then, given the relatively free order of words in the Russian language, it denotes the subject of the message and is the subject:

Smoking was bad for him.

If the infinitive follows the copula and the nominal part, then we have an impersonal sentence:

It was harmful for him to smoke.

In a relationship impersonal offers It is also necessary to note the following: not impersonal, but two-part incomplete, it is customary to consider parts of a complex sentence, the position of the subject in which is replaced by an explanatory clause or direct speech, for example:

You could hear the gate creaking a (compare: It was audible).

“I’m lost,” flashed through my head.(compare: It flashed through my head).

Such sentences without a subordinate part or direct speech lose all meaning and are not used, which is a criterion for the incompleteness of the sentence. Thus, the sentences *It was heard or *It flashed through my head cannot be understood and are not used.

1. Characterize the sentence according to the purpose of the statement: narrative, interrogative or motivating.
2. By emotional coloring: exclamatory or non-exclamatory.
3. Based on the presence of grammatical basics: simple or complex.
4. Then, depending on whether the sentence is simple or complex:

If simple: 5. Characterize the sentence by the presence of the main members of the sentence: two-part or one-part, indicate which is the main member of the sentence if it is one-part (subject or predicate). 6. Characterize by the presence of minor members of the sentence: common or non-widespread. 7. Indicate whether the sentence is complicated in any way (homogeneous members, address, introductory words) or not complicated. 8. Underline all parts of the sentence, indicate parts of speech. 9. Draw up a sentence outline, indicating the grammatical basis and complication, if any.

If it's complicated: 5. Indicate what kind of connection is in the sentence: union or non-union. 6. Indicate what is the means of communication in a sentence: intonation, coordinating conjunctions or subordinating conjunctions. 7. Conclude what kind of sentence it is: non-union (BSP), complex (SSP), complex (SPP). 8. Parse each part of a complex sentence as a simple one, starting with point No. 5 of the adjacent column. 9. Underline all parts of the sentence, indicate parts of speech. 10. Draw up a sentence outline, indicating the grammatical basis and complication, if any.

Example of parsing a simple sentence

Oral analysis:

Declarative sentence, non-exclamatory, simple, two-part, grammatical basis: pupils and female students studying, common, complicated homogeneous subjects.

Writing:

Declarative, non-exclamatory, simple, two-part, grammatical basis pupils and female students studying, common, complicated by homogeneous subjects.

An example of parsing a complex sentence

Oral analysis:

Declarative sentence, non-exclamatory, complex, conjunction, means of communication subordinating conjunction because, complex sentence. The first simple sentence: one-part, with the main member - the predicate didn't ask common, not complicated. Second simple sentence: two-part, grammatical basis my class and I went common, not complicated.

Writing:

Declarative, non-exclamatory, complex, conjunction, means of communication subordinating conjunction because, SPP.

1st PP: one-part, with the main member – predicate didn't ask common, not complicated.

2nd PP: two-part, grammatical basis - my class and I went widespread, not complicated.

Example of a diagram (sentence followed by a diagram)

Another parsing option

Parsing. Order in parsing.

In phrases:

1. Select the required phrase from the sentence.
2. We look at the structure - highlight the main word and the dependent word. We indicate which part of speech is the main and dependent word. Next, we indicate in what syntactic way this phrase is connected.
3. And finally, we indicate what its grammatical meaning is.

In a simple sentence:

1. We determine what the sentence is based on the purpose of the statement - narrative, incentive or interrogative.
2. We find the basis of the sentence, establish that the sentence is simple.
3. Next, you need to talk about how this proposal is constructed.
   • Is it two-part or one-part. If it is one-part, then determine the type: personal, impersonal, nominal or indefinitely personal.
   • Common or not common
   • Incomplete or complete. If the sentence is incomplete, then it is necessary to indicate which member of the sentence is missing.
4. If this sentence is complicated in any way, be it homogeneous members or separate members of the proposal, this must be noted.
5. Next you need to analyze the sentence by members, indicating what parts of speech they are. It is important to follow the parsing order. First, the predicate and subject are determined, then the secondary ones, which are included first in the subject, then in the predicate.
6. We explain why punctuation marks are placed in the sentence one way or another.

Predicate

1. We note whether the predicate is a simple verb or a compound (nominal or verbal).
2. Indicate how the predicate is expressed:
   • simple - what form of the verb;
   • compound verb - what it consists of;
   • compound nominal - what copula is used, how the nominal part is expressed.

In a sentence that has homogeneous members.

If we have a simple sentence before us, then when analyzing it we need to note what kind of homogeneous members of the sentence they are and how they are related to each other. Either through intonation, or through intonation with conjunctions.

In sentences with isolated members:

If we have a simple sentence before us, then when analyzing it, we need to note what the turnover will be. Next, we analyze the words that are included in this circulation according to the members of the sentence.

In sentences with isolated parts of speech:

First, we note that in this proposal, there is direct speech. We indicate the direct speech and text of the author. We analyze and explain why punctuation marks are placed in the sentence this way and not otherwise. We draw a proposal diagram.

In a compound sentence:

First, we indicate which sentence according to the purpose of the statement is interrogative, declarative or motivating. We find simple sentences in the sentence and highlight the grammatical basis in them.

We find conjunctions that connect simple sentences into complex ones. We note what kind of conjunctions they are - adversative, connecting or disjunctive. We determine the meaning of this entire complex sentence - opposition, alternation or enumeration. We explain why the punctuation marks are placed in this way in the sentence. Then each simple sentence that makes up a complex sentence must be parsed in the same way as a simple sentence is parsed.

In a complex sentence with a subordinate clause (one)

First, we indicate what the sentence is according to the purpose of the statement. We highlight the grammatical basis of all simple sentences that make up a complex sentence. Let's read them out.

We name which sentence is the main one and which is the subordinate one. We explain exactly how complex sentence it is, we pay attention to how it is constructed, how the subordinate clause is connected to the main clause and what it refers to.

We explain why punctuation marks are placed in this way in this sentence. Then, the subordinate and main clauses must be parsed in the same way as simple sentences are parsed.

In a complex sentence with subordinate clauses (several)

We call what a sentence is according to the purpose of the statement. We highlight the grammatical basis of all simple sentences that make up a complex sentence and read them out. We indicate which sentence is the main one and which is the subordinate clause. It is necessary to indicate what the subordination in the sentence is - either it is parallel subordination, or sequential, or homogeneous. If there is a combination of several types of subordination, this must be noted. We explain why punctuation marks are placed in this way in the sentence. And, at the end, we analyze the subordinate and main clauses as simple sentences.

In a complex non-union sentence:

We call what a sentence is according to the purpose of the statement. We find the grammatical basis of all the simple sentences that make up this complex sentence. We read them out and name the number of simple sentences that make up a complex sentence. We determine the meaning of the relationships between simple sentences. It can be sequence, cause and effect, opposition, simultaneity, explanation or addition.

We note what the structural features of this sentence are, what kind of complex sentence it is. How are the primes connected in this sentence and what do they refer to.

We explain why the punctuation marks are placed in this way in the sentence.

In a complex sentence in which there are different types of connections.

We call what purpose the sentence is in terms of the purpose of the statement. We find and highlight the grammatical basis of all simple sentences that make up a complex sentence, and read them out. We establish that this proposal will be a proposal in which there are different types communications. Why? We determine what connections are present in this sentence - conjunctional coordinating, subordinating or any others.

By meaning, we establish how simple ones are formed in a complex sentence. We explain why punctuation marks are placed in the sentence in this way. We parse all the simple sentences from which a complex sentence is composed in the same way as a simple sentence.

Everything for studying » Russian language » Parsing sentences

To bookmark a page, press Ctrl+D.

Link: https://site/russkij-yazyk/sintaksicheskij-razbor

Words and phrases are the components of every sentence in writing and in oral speech. To construct it, you must clearly understand what the connection should be between them in order to construct a grammatically correct statement. That is why one of the important and complex topics in school curriculum Russian language is the syntactic analysis of sentences. In this analysis it is carried out full analysis all components of the utterance and the connection between them is established. In addition, determining the structure of a sentence allows you to correctly place punctuation marks in it, which is quite important for every literate person. Usually, this topic begins with the analysis of simple phrases, and after that children are taught to conduct syntactic analysis of sentences.

Rules for parsing phrases

Analyzing a specific phrase taken from context is relatively simple in the Russian syntax section. In order to produce it, they determine which of the words is the main word and which is the dependent one, and determine which part of speech each of them belongs to. Next, it is necessary to determine the syntactic relationship between these words. There are three of them in total:

• Agreement is a kind of subordinating relationship in which the gender, number and case for all elements of the phrase are determined by the main word. For example: a moving train, a flying comet, a shining sun.
• Control is also one of the types of subordinating connections; it can be strong (when the case connection of words is necessary) and weak (when the case of the dependent word is not predetermined). For example: watering flowers - watering from a watering can; liberation of the city - liberation by the army.
• Adjunction is also a subordinating type of connection, but it applies only to words that are unchangeable and not inflected by case. Such words express dependence only by meaning. For example: riding a horse, unusually sad, very scary.

An example of syntactic parsing of phrases

The syntactic analysis of the phrase should look something like this: “speaks beautifully”; the main word is “speaks”, the dependent word is “beautiful”. This connection is determined through the question: speaks (how?) beautifully. The word “says” is used in the present tense in the singular and third person. The word “beautifully” is an adverb, and therefore this phrase expresses a syntactic connection - adjacency.

Parsing diagram for a simple sentence

Parsing a sentence is a bit like parsing a phrase. It consists of several stages that will allow you to study the structure and relationship of all its components:

1. First of all, the purpose of uttering a single sentence is determined; they are all divided into three types: narrative, interrogative and exclamatory, or incentive. Each of them has its own sign. So, at the end of a narrative sentence telling about an event, there is a period; after the question, naturally, there is a question mark, and at the end of the incentive - an exclamation mark.
2. Next, you should highlight the grammatical basis of the sentence - subject and predicate.
3. The next stage is a description of the structure of the sentence. It can be one-part with one of the main members or two-part with a complete grammatical basis. In the first case, you additionally need to indicate what kind of sentence the nature of the grammatical basis is: verbal or denominative. And then determine whether there are secondary members in the structure of the statement, and indicate whether it is common or not. At this stage you should also indicate whether the sentence is complicated. Complications include homogeneous members, addresses, phrases and introductory words.
4. Further, the syntactic analysis of the sentence involves the analysis of all words according to their belonging to parts of speech, gender, number and case.
5. The final stage is an explanation of the punctuation marks in the sentence.

Example of parsing a simple sentence

Theory is theory, but without practice you cannot consolidate a single topic. That is why the school curriculum spends a lot of time on syntactic analysis of phrases and sentences. And for training you can take the simplest sentences. For example: “The girl was lying on the beach and listening to the surf.”

1. The sentence is declarative and non-exclamatory.
2. The main parts of the sentence: girl - subject, lay, listened - predicates.
3. This proposal is two-part, complete and widespread. Homogeneous predicates act as complications.
4. Parsing all the words of the sentence:

• “girl” - acts as the subject and is a noun female in the singular and nominative case;
• “lay” - in a sentence it is a predicate, refers to verbs, has a feminine gender, singular number and past tense;
• “na” is a preposition, used to connect words;
• “beach” - answers the question “where?” and is a circumstance expressed in a sentence by a masculine noun in the prepositional case and singular;
• “and” is a conjunction used to connect words;
• “listened” is the second predicate, a feminine verb in the past tense and singular;
• “surf” - in a sentence it is an addition, refers to a noun, has masculine, singular and used in the accusative case.

Identification of sentence parts in writing

When parsing phrases and sentences, conditional underscores are used to indicate that words belong to one or another member of the sentence. So, for example, the subject is underlined with one line, the predicate with two, the definition is indicated with a wavy line, the complement with a dotted line, the circumstance with a dotted line. In order to correctly determine which member of the sentence is in front of us, we should pose a question to it from one of the parts of the grammatical basis. For example, the definition answers the questions of the adjective, the complement is determined by the questions of indirect cases, the circumstance indicates the place, time and reason and answers the questions: “where?” "where?" and why?"

Parsing a complex sentence

The procedure for parsing a complex sentence is slightly different from the above examples, and therefore should not cause any particular difficulties. However, everything must be in order, and therefore the teacher complicates the task only after the children have learned to parse simple sentences. To carry out the analysis, a complex statement is proposed that has several grammatical bases. And here you should adhere to the following scheme:

1. First, the purpose of the statement and the emotional coloring are determined.
2. Next, the grammatical bases in the sentence are highlighted.
3. The next step is to define the connection, which can be done with or without a conjunction.
4. Next, you should indicate by what connection the two grammatical bases in the sentence are connected. These can be intonation, as well as coordinating or subordinating conjunctions. And immediately conclude what the sentence is: complex, complex or non-union.
5. The next stage of parsing is the syntactic analysis of the sentence into its parts. It is produced according to the scheme for a simple sentence.
6. At the end of the analysis, you should construct a diagram of the sentence, on which the connection of all its parts will be visible.

Connecting parts of a complex sentence

As a rule, to connect parts in complex sentences, conjunctions and allied words are used, which must be preceded by a comma. Such proposals are called allied. They are divided into two types:

• Compound sentences joined by conjunctions a, and, or, then, but. As a rule, both parts in such a statement are equal. For example: “The sun was shining and the clouds were floating.”
• Complex sentences that use the following conjunctions and allied words: so that, how, if, where, whither, since, although and others. In such sentences, one part always depends on the other. For example: " Sun rays will fill the room as soon as the cloud passes."

In the Russian language, the process of syntactic analysis is considered to be an alternating comparison of words with the selection of a certain subset from the set of all words. The result is syntactic sequencing, which is used in conjunction with lexical analysis. Syntactic analysis makes it possible to analyze the structure of a sentence, which increases the level of punctuation literacy.

It is acceptable to perform parsing in both simple and complex sentences, as well as phrases. Each example has its own analysis scenario, which emphasizes its inherent components. When parsing, you must have the ability to isolate phrases from sentences, as well as determine whether a sentence is simple or complex. In addition, you should understand how the phrase is constructed and assign it a connection type. There are the following types of communication: coordination, adjacency, control. When parsing, we need to select the desired phrase in a sentence, then set the main word. The next step is to determine the tense, mood, and person and number of the main word. As for the analysis of a simple sentence, it is necessary to initially determine it by the purpose of the statement, namely, whether it is narrative, imperative or interrogative. Then you need to find the subject and predicate. The next step is to determine the type of sentence - it is one-part or two-part. Afterwards, we find out whether the sentence contains words in addition to the subject and predicate, which will allow us to say whether it is common or not common. Next there will be an establishment - a complete or incomplete sentence. Let's look at this example: “I have never listened to music more beautiful than Beethoven.” We will consider the proposal simple. Endowed with one grammatical basis - “I didn’t listen.” “I” is the subject, personal pronoun. “Didn’t listen” is a simple verb, a predicate, which includes the particle “not.” The sentence contains the following minor members “music” - an object expressed by a noun. “More beautiful” is a definition expressed by an adjective in comparative degree. "Beethoven" is an object, a noun. Now we can characterize this sentence - it is declarative, not exclamatory; in structure - simple, since there is one grammatical basis; two-part - there are both main members; widespread - because it contains secondary members; complete - no missing members. There are also no homogeneous members in the sentence.

The parsing order may vary. Sometimes it is necessary to characterize a complex sentence as a whole, and sometimes it is necessary to analyze its parts, which are organized as simple sentences. Let's consider the option of a more detailed syntactic analysis. First, we define the sentence according to the purpose of the statement. Then look at the intonation. After this, you should find simple sentences as part of a complex one and determine their bases. Next, we highlight the means of communication between the parts of a complex sentence and indicate the type of sentence by means of communication. We determine the presence of minor members in each part of a complex sentence and indicate whether the parts are common or uncommon. In the next step, we note the presence of homogeneous members or appeals.

Using the sequence and rules of syntactic analysis, it will not be difficult to correctly parse a sentence, although in terms of parsing speed you will most likely be surpassed by a good sixth-grader.

Sentence parsing is a detailed analysis of a sentence, divided into several components. Thanks to this method Students will test their knowledge of the syntax of the Russian language. IN educational institutions Parsing is the last chapter in the syntax section because it provides an opportunity to use previously acquired knowledge in a comprehensive manner.

How to parse a proposal

Syntactic analysis is a logical and step-by-step process. They use it at school two types of parsing: oral and written. Their difference lies in the fact that in written language the parts of speech are marked schematically, while in oral language they are spoken out.

Step by step analysis:

1. Determine what purpose carries a proposal. If the author is trying to tell something - narrative, ask - interrogative, induce to some action - incentive.
2. Emotional color in writing is expressed by the presence of an exclamation mark. If at the end you see Exclamation point, then the sentence is exclamatory. If it is not there, it is non-exclamatory.
3. Count the number grammatical basics. One grammatical basis is simple, several are complex.
4. Describe The connection between the parts of the sentence is union or non-union.
5. Determine how the parts communicate with each other: conjunctions (subordinating or coordinating) or intonation (punctuation marks).
6. Depending on the alliances describe the type: compound, complex or non-union.
7. Analyze each part for the following parameters: the presence of major and minor members, the search for complicating factors (homogeneous members, introductory structures, interjections, addresses).
8. Make a diagram sentences, graphically highlighting the components.

Note! Syntactic analysis of a complex sentence differs from a simple one only in the number of grammatical bases. Because of this, some steps (step 7) are repeated.

The best services for online analysis

Lexis Res

Lexis Res website is one of best services for member-by-member parsing on English language. Main advantage – detailed description all meanings of a single word, which will help users learning English.

The interface consists of two buttons. Team " Analyze" starts the process. The results are available at the bottom of the page. Function " Random sentences» will allow you to get acquainted with the work of the site using the example of a random offer.

pros:

• Detailed parsing.
• No annoying advertising.
• Wide functionality of the service.
• Minimalist interface.
• Extensive base of words.

Minuses:

• The resource is adapted for English expressions only.
• Lack of graphic symbols.
• Without proper knowledge foreign language It will be difficult to read detailed explanations.

Delph-in

Delph-in service is another English-language resource dedicated to parsing. Uniqueness is that it uses the Linguistic Knowledge Builder programming language, which is used in foreign universities.

Using the Linguistic Knowledge Builder Method provides benefits in terms of detail and its components. The English Resource Grammar technology, which is also used in foreign education, is responsible for visualization.

Advantages:

• Great for exploring highly focused offerings.
• A huge number of tools for parsing parts of speech.
• There is no limit on the number of characters.

Flaws:

• People with a good command of English will be able to fully work with the service.
• A cumbersome interface that will take time to master.

MorphologyOnline

The MorphologyOnline website is a Russian-language resource dedicated to syntax. The site interface fits into one button. From user required enter necessary word, and the program will analyze it.

For the convenience of users, the service provides step-by-step check. In most cases, the verification process is carried out in three stages: identification of the part of speech, morphological features and probable syntactic role.

pros:

• Detailed analysis.
• Operational operation of the site.
• No advertising.

Minuses:

• Parsing is carried out within one word.
• The main emphasis of the resource is on morphology.
• Narrow specialization.

Gramota.ru

Gramota.ru is a Russian-language site that parses the requested word. Submitted by the service is carried out checking the selected word not only for syntactic and morphological characteristics, but runs the selected word through all popular dictionaries, including the dictionary of specialized terms.

Advantages:

• Detailed analysis of a word, including searching for meaning in dictionaries.
• Nice user interface.
• Possibility to choose criteria.

Flaws:

• The program parses one word at a time.
• The site is more focused on morphological analysis.

Goldlit

Goldlit website is one of the best parsing portals. Key Advantage Russian-speaking competitors have the opportunity to analyze entire proposals.

The algorithm of actions is extremely simple: the user enters a phrase or word. The portal processes the information and parses each word separately. Near every member the initial forms of the word, the part of speech to which it belongs, are written, and then grammatical analysis and declension by case are performed.

pros:

• Detailed syntactic and grammatical analysis.
• There are no restrictions on the topic and number of characters.
• Friendly interface.
• The site is easy to use.
• Additional information on the literature.

Minuses:

• Lack of grammar reference books.
• The service is more focused on literature.