home » Style » Dozens of people in Russia are imprisoned for "likes" and links on social networks. Do they jail for the correspondence Li to jail for the correspondence

Dozens of people in Russia are imprisoned for "likes" and links on social networks. Do they jail for the correspondence Li to jail for the correspondence

https: //www.site/2017-08-12/fsb_mvd_i_drugie_budut_chitat_vashu_perepisku_i_eto_narushaet_konstituciyu

Digital emergency

FSB, Ministry of Internal Affairs and others will read your correspondence

Pravda Komsomolskaya / Russian Look

The Ministry of Communications has published a draft order on the requirements for "organizers of information dissemination" on the Internet. This seems to be a purely departmental document, rather low in its status (not a law, not a presidential decree, not a government order) made a lot of noise. It has been compared to the imposition of a state of emergency, in which civil liberties are sharply curtailed for the sake of security. The order lists in detail the data that the "organizers of the dissemination of information" must store for 6-12 months and, most importantly, provide special services conducting operational-search activities (ORD).

There are no fundamental innovations in the document. Let me remind you that the obligation to store and provide the special services with data about our correspondence was enshrined in the law "On Information" back in May 2014. It was then that the very "register of organizers of information distributors" appeared, in which everyone who maintains "Activities to ensure the functioning of information systems and (or) programs for electronic computers, which are designed and (or) used to receive, transmit, deliver and (or) process electronic messages from users of the Internet".

Agree, this is a rather vague definition. It is not surprising that in this register, in addition to Yandex, Rambler, VKontakte, Mail.Ru and other services, there are items such as the site about the outstanding Tatar singer Sara Sadykova or the site “The World of Digital Photography”. According to this definition, any Internet forum, any site with comments, any simple program or service for exchanging messages over the Internet must be included in the register. Even online games about tanks, orcs or zombies - you can exchange messages there too! But, of course, first of all, these are instant messengers, social networks and postal services.

For brevity, we will call these "information dissemination operators" OPCs.

In that law, it was immediately said that it was the OCR that was obliged to store on the territory of the Russian Federation and transfer for operational search activities:

information on the facts of reception, transmission, delivery and (or) processing of voice information, written text, images, sounds, video or other electronic messages of Internet users and information about these users within one year from the date of completion of such actions;

But the fact of receiving and transmitting information is not the information itself. And in 2016, another norm was added. OPC is obliged to keep

text messages of Internet users, voice information, images, sounds, video and other electronic messages of Internet users up to six months from the end of their reception, transmission, delivery and (or) processing.

It was also said there that the procedure, terms and volume of storage of the information specified in this subparagraph are established by the government of the Russian Federation.

As far as one can judge, the new document of the Ministry of Communications establishes this procedure. From the order of the minister it follows that operators of special services will be able to receive all the above information promptly through their own interface. That is, they will not have to go to Yandex with a request to read your letter sent last week: they can simply log into your mailbox remotely, see whatever they want, and leave. Or they will be able to set up filters so that when the word “explosion”, “bomb”, “jihad” or, for example, “Navalny” is mentioned, your letter or message is immediately monitored.

Most of all, citizens were frightened by the list of information that operational services can receive. If the OPC concludes an agreement with the user, then the special services will be able to obtain all personal data in general: full name, birth data, passport data, and so on. Now, when registering on social networks, they do not ask for passport data, but proposals that Whatsapp and VKontakte should be allowed only with a passport are often heard, and it can be assumed that the state will take such steps.

However, according to the current rules, until such agreements are concluded, operatives will receive your phone number, IP address, date and time of sessions, location, information on payments, and, most importantly, the content of messages.

It turns out that we are finally entering the era of forced digital transparency, when all our correspondence, all our personal lives are potentially available to special services, including political investigations.

Of course, there are reservations in the laws that such information can only be obtained in the course of operational-search activities, and such activities cannot be carried out illegally, infringe on civil rights and freedoms, blah-blah-blah. But let's face it.

Firstly, we know that any citizen whom the state considers unreliable can easily become an object of operational-search activity, becoming a figurant in a criminal case or even just a subject of development. Moreover, the law on operational intelligence directly states: wiretapping can be applied both to persons suspected of committing crimes (ranging from medium gravity), and to those who may "have information" about such crimes. This formulation can be interpreted very broadly. May I have information about the crime? In theory, I can, at least that's what the investigator thinks. Who will check it?

Let me remind you right away that a “crime” today is not necessarily a murder or a terrorist attack. A "crime" may well be inciting hatred or insulting the feelings of believers, that is, your careless statement, or your friend, is enough to quite officially become an object of the ORD.

Second, and even more terrible, there are cases when seemingly classified information obtained in the course of an independent reconnaissance patrol "leaks" from the operational agencies and falls into the wrong hands.

Let me remind you of the Yekaterinburg policeman Artyom Pismenny. The court found him guilty of selling information about the wiretapping of the Ural politician Yevgeny Roizman through an intermediary. And he sold it not to anyone, but to a former employee of the prosecutor's office, Alexei Karpov, who was later convicted of organizing contract killings. This man was an enemy of Roizman and had motives for killing the Ural politician. In his hands were data on the conversations and movements of Roizman: a good tip for the killer! Through his spouse, he paid 300 thousand rubles for this. This is official information, the verdict was confirmed by the Supreme Court. The case was relatively high-profile, as it came to the surface. And what remains in the shadows? How much ORD data is sold and outsourced each day? Now it will be not only wiretapping, but also your mail, correspondence, communication with an accountant, even messages to friends or sexual partners.

You should not console yourself with the thought that your modest persona is not interesting to Lubyanka. Lubyanka - yes, it is not interesting. A major from your Ministry of Internal Affairs may be very interested. Maybe your competitors paid him, or maybe you had a fight with him in traffic. Or two years ago you were photographed at some meeting and you ended up in the base of the “E” center. And in addition to the Ministry of Internal Affairs and the FSB, the FSO, SVR, customs and FSIN also have the right to conduct operational-search activities (and access to your correspondence).

The argument “respectable citizens have nothing to hide” here, unfortunately, does not work - when the state receives broad powers, it ceases to be interested in what category of citizens you belong to. Random people are imprisoned for reposts on VKontakte - why not start imprisoning for words, pictures or videos sent in personal correspondence?

The strategy of the state is aimed at ensuring that citizens should not have secrets. Formally, the state does not interfere in the private life of citizens, but conditions are created when the possibility of such interference always exists. Now, according to the law, Internet services that are not included in the register cannot operate in Russia. And all services included in the register are required to open data for the FSB or the Ministry of Internal Affairs. Therefore, in theory, you should not be left with any possibility of secret correspondence using the Internet. In fact, many services that are not included in the register are still operating in Russia (Facebook, Gmail, Twitter and others), but we see a trend: the state will strive to keep on the territory of the Russian Federation only those services that “comply with Russian laws”.

I put these words in quotation marks because, in fact, all this violates the main law, the Constitution. It clearly states:

“Article 23. Clause 2. Everyone has the right to privacy of correspondence, telephone conversations, postal, telegraph and other messages. Limitation of this right is allowed only on the basis of a court decision. "

Indeed, according to the law, an independent reconnaissance patronage in violation of the secrecy of correspondence and negotiations is possible only by a court decision. But, judging by the letter from the Ministry of Telecom and Mass Communications, we are talking about a system of operational and constant interference in the correspondence of citizens. Obtaining judicial permission essentially remains on the conscience of the intelligence officers (and, as far as is known, judges almost always agree with the requests of the authorities to conduct an investigation, in fact, this is a formality).

All this is being done, of course, in the name of a glorious goal - the fight against terrorism. The draft order of the Ministry of Telecom and Mass Communications and those pro-government commentators who rushed to defend the idea of interference in private life on social networks also refer to the laws on the fight against terrorism. They remind that now the FSB will be able to quickly identify terrorist cells, neutralize recruiters, and prevent tragedies and deaths of people.

Most likely, this is just an excuse. And the very effectiveness of such a measure looks questionable. Yes, it can be successful in combating recruiters inviting young people to IS, but I have little faith that real terrorists preparing explosions in Russia use VKontakte or Agent Mail.Ru for communication. Rather, they will use obscure, very small services or sites and send encrypted messages to each other through them. Or they will refuse Internet correspondence altogether, using the proven old-fashioned methods of conspiracy and encryption.

Although global terrorism is an unconditional evil, and each of its victims is tragic, I would like to remind you that both in Russia and around the world, the powers that governments receive to protect themselves from terrorism are inadequate to the statistical size of the threat. In Russia, 62 people were killed by terrorists in 2016. Yes, this is a tragedy, this is a mournful figure. But 19 thousand people died from the use of low-quality water (official data from Rospotrebnadzor). Building a good water supply infrastructure is not so attractive from the point of view of gaining control over society, and this is also why the fight against terror is given incomparably more attention. And quite often the real struggle is replaced by police measures aimed, rather, at political control.

Polina Nemirovskaya made a good comparison in the Telegram channel: even to inspect your backpack, a police officer must introduce himself, give reasons and invite attesting witnesses. And it will be possible to get into your correspondence, into your videos, into your conversations anonymously, quietly, without any reason. At the same time, we live in a time when the contents of the messenger are much more important, more intimate than the contents of a backpack.

If we accept that the fight against terror is just a pretext for tight control over the Internet, then what is the real reason? Probably, the fact that the state sees for itself a serious threat in free communication, which has grown many times over thanks to the Internet. In some ways it is right. While communicating, people discuss the problems of the state, have the opportunity to exchange negative information, including criticizing the government. What kind of authority would like it?

But at the same time, it risks overlooking the opportunities that a free Internet, free exchange of information, knowledge and ideas gives to Russian society. The Internet has given a huge country the opportunity to unite and interact on a new, digital level. The infrastructure of the Internet directly affects the economy through human capital. The world is striving for an economy of knowledge, an economy of ideas, and the Internet is the circulatory system of this economy. By roughly intervening in it, destroying Internet freedom, we slow down our development, throw the country back.

A bill has been submitted to the State Duma for consideration, according to which correspondence on the Internet between an adult and a child, which is intimate in nature, will be punished from 5 years in prison to 12. The author of the bill, the chairman of the State Duma Committee on Family, Women and Children, Elena Mizulina, believes that it is high time put an end to impunity for pedophiles who actively use modern means of communication in order to corrupt children. "Anything that is prohibited in real life should be prohibited on the Internet," she said.

The Criminal Code already contains an article that criminalizes sexual abuse of minors without the use of violence - this is Art. 135 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. The commentary to the article describes what exactly can be qualified as lecherous actions with children under 16 years of age. The detailed list even includes cynical conversations aimed at arousing the child's sexual instinct.

It would seem that today the law comprehensively protects children both from direct encroachments on their sexual integrity, and from not so direct molestation, showing that the spiritual integrity of a child is also a value that needs protection no less than the body. For example, Art. 134 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation on violence against a person who has reached the age of 12, but has not reached the age of 14, provides for a punishment of 3 to 10 years. And Art. 135 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation on committing lecherous acts without the use of violence against children of the same age speaks of a punishment in the form of imprisonment from 3 to 8 years. It turns out that the law is strict and specific, putting a barrier to perverts of all stripes, parents can sleep peacefully.

It was not so. Pedophiles quickly began to master the unique properties of modern communications and Internet technologies: the ability to remain anonymous in communication and use any mask convenient for you, the ability to instantly contact a large number of users of all ages, and finally, the possibility of high-speed exchange of video and photo information. The law, which could not keep up with technical progress, left not just loopholes - huge holes, and they immediately began to use it.

Today, for a pedophile, meeting children on the Internet is the easiest way to establish contact with a youngster, ”says Denis Davydov, chairman of the board of the Safe Internet League.

Parents of a child who has gone headlong into a computer game or hangs out at night in chats, most often do not even know what kind of stranger their child can meet on the Internet. The smaller the child, the more open and naive he is. The higher his chances of becoming an object of manipulation. And not everyone will share their newly acquired experience with their parents.

Employees of the Safe Internet League conducted an experiment: in the most popular Russian social networks, they registered pages on behalf of underage users aged 10 to 14 years. We provided these accounts with the details of the life of an invented child, a large number of photos, comments, in a word, created the appearance of real children and began to observe what would happen next. The discovery did not please: pedophiles came into contact with a dummy child within the first 48 hours! It was not difficult for the adult employees of the Safe Internet League to understand the intentions of the new interlocutor: the person started a conversation, usually starting with compliments, skillfully took an interest in the child's problems, trying to gain confidence in him, to impress him as a kind and caring senior mentor, or, conversely, his own on the board a peer with the same interests. It was obvious that the new-found "friend" was trying to grope for the child's weaknesses, determine his desires, and find out what he was dreaming of. After such reconnaissance in force, the "friend" smoothly translated the conversation in the direction he needed, and it was always the topic of sex. After one or two conversations, the pedophile agreed with the child about the time and place of the meeting. Amazingly, the adult uncle was not embarrassed by either the young age of the interlocutor or the presence of his parents.

Parents do not even know what kind of experience their child gets when walking on the World Wide Web.

Corruption of children through correspondence on social networks is no longer isolated cases, but an entire industry working to produce child pornography commissioned by rich perverts, says Assistant Children's Ombudsman Pavel Astakhova, head of the Turn the Pedophile movement Anna Levchenko. - Pedophile blackmailers force children to send them photographs of a depraved nature and even rape themselves with objects, threatening that they will tell their parents and classmates how far the correspondence has reached. Over the past year, the number of calls to the "Turn over the pedophile" hotline has increased significantly, and most often people report harassment of youngsters on the Internet.

While such a qualifying feature as the commission of lecherous acts using information and telecommunication networks, in Art. 135 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation is not provided for, - Elena Mizulina explained to RG. - As a result, the most common forms of committing lecherous actions, including through the exchange of indecent photos using mobile devices, communication of pedophiles with children in online games remain inaccessible to law enforcement agencies.

Now, if parents even discover claims to their child and come with a statement to the law enforcement agencies, they will be refused to initiate a criminal case. Under the pretext that communication was virtual, and virtual lecherous actions are not punishable.

Parents are told: you have no real contact of a pedophile with a child. When there is a real contact, then come, - says Anna Levchenko. - The adoption of the bill will help reduce the number of unsolved crimes against children and achieve the inevitability of punishment for harassment of children on the Internet.

The bill proposes to consider lecherous acts committed with the use of information and telecommunication networks as the most socially dangerous form of child perversion. Such a crime is comparable to lecherous acts committed against two or more children, for which the punishment is from 5 to 12 years in prison. If the bill is passed, law enforcement agencies will receive an additional tool in the fight against pedophiles who abuse children on the Internet.

Technically, it is not difficult to determine the owner of a computer, phone, iPad and other toys from which corrupting messages were sent. To prove the presence of corpus delicti in his actions too. So far, only the legislative framework is lagging behind. We think there is no need to delay. After all, no one has researched how destructive such meetings with pedophiles on the Internet can be for a child, says Denis Davydov.

The legislative initiative also provides for changes in Art. 242.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation ("Production and circulation of materials or items with pornographic images of minors"). The amendment to this article is technical in nature and makes it easier to apply in practice.

Statistics

Today 72% of Russian teenagers are active Internet users. A joint study by MTS, Kaspersky Lab and the Safe Internet League showed that every second minor in Russia has a personal computer, and 40% of adolescents have access to the Internet via smartphones. And every second child over 7 years old has at least once encountered a pedophile on social networks, every third child was sent pornographic photos and videos. Moreover, in 90% of cases, such a fan of online communication pretended to be a peer of his minor interlocutor.

Russia harshly suppresses ordinary users of social networks if they post things on the Internet that could be interpreted as "a danger to the state." Andrei Bubeev was sentenced to more than two years in prison for a picture he shared with 12 of his friends on the VKontakte social network.

The hand squeezes the tube of toothpaste, the toothpaste flows out. Nearby - the words about "squeezing" the country out of itself.

This is a description of the picture, thanks to which Andrei Bubeev ended up in prison. For sharing it with 12 friends on social networks, he was sentenced to imprisonment for more than two years, writes the AR news agency in an article published on Monday.

Context

Russia uses extremism laws against dissidents

Reuters 17.12.2010

Yuri Schmidt - on pardon, Medvedev, on extremism, parties and civil society

Russian service RFI 05.04.2012

Exhibition in the Hermitage is being checked for extremism

The Independent 08.12.2012 His wife Anastasia (23 years old) shows the picture to the journalist AR. According to the news agency, the authorities in Russia harshly suppress ordinary users of social networks if they post things on the Internet that could be interpreted as "a danger to the state."

“He was interested in politics, read the news, shared information, but he did it for himself. It's like collecting newspaper clippings, ”says Andrei's wife Anastasia.

She now lives alone with their four-year-old son and had to drop out of medical school because she didn't have the money to hire someone to look after her son while she was at school.

According to his wife, Bubeev spent a lot of time on the Internet. He shared links on the Russian social network VKontakte and participated in political debates on local newspaper websites. VKontakte is the most popular social network in Russia with over 270 million accounts.
“His page was not popular, he had only 12 friends. He simply could not set himself the goal of forcing someone to do something. "

Use extremism law

At least 54 people in Russia have been jailed for “inciting hatred,” most of them for either uploading or sharing things themselves. This figure is almost five times higher than the figure five years ago, according to the Moscow-based human rights group SOVA. The group studies human rights, nationalism and xenophobia in Russia. The number of sentences for incitement to hatred rose from 92 in 2010 to 233 last year.

A 2002 Russian law defines extremism as activities that "undermine state security and constitutional order" or "glorify racism or terrorism and encourage others to do so."

The vague definition in the law makes it possible to prosecute a wide variety of people - from those who create a terrorist cell or walk around with Nazi symbols, to those who most often write on the Internet what can be interpreted as a danger to the state. In the end, the court decides for itself whether a post on social media poses a danger to the state.

Attack on those who criticized interference in Ukraine's affairs

In February 2014, President Vladimir Putin also signed an amendment to the law that provides for heightened penalties for non-violent extremist crimes such as incitement to hatred. That same year, but later - after Russia annexed the Crimean peninsula - Putin signed a law that made "steps aimed at destroying Russia's territorial integrity" a crime that could result in up to five years in prison.

Many of those who have ended up in jail for inciting hatred on social media in Russia in the past couple of years have been critical of Russian intervention in Ukraine.

So it happened with pictures and articles that Andrey Bubeev repost.

Andrei believes that the fact that he was imprisoned was done on purpose: so that other citizens were afraid to express their opinions, says his lawyer Svetlana Sidorkina in an interview with AP.

Captured by the Russian special police

Exactly a year ago, a 40-year-old electrician went to work on a construction site outside the city. Since the investigators could not get through to him, they began to search for him as a suspect in extremism. When Bubeev on the same day stopped by to visit his wife and son at the dacha in the village, a special police officer rushed into the house and grabbed him.

A few months after his arrest, he pleaded guilty to “inciting hatred towards Russians,” and was sentenced to a year in prison. He has reposted photos, videos and articles by nationalist Ukrainian groups, including those fighting against Russian-backed separatists in eastern Ukraine.

Less than two weeks after the sentencing of Bubeev, he was sentenced again. This time he was accused of "inciting terrorism and actions that undermine the territorial integrity of Russia." He shared a picture with a tube of pasta, as well as an article titled "The Crimean Peninsula is Ukraine", which called for military aggression against Russia.

On May 6, Bubeev was sentenced to imprisonment for a term of two years and three months.

Sentenced to years in prison

Earlier this month, another man was sentenced to two years in prison in Astrakhan for calling out Ukrainians to "fight against Putin's occupying forces."

In December, a man in Siberia was sentenced to five years in prison for “inciting hatred” against residents of eastern Ukraine in a video he posted online.

In October, a southern Russian court sentenced a political activist to two years in prison for illegal protests and social media posts in which he criticized Putin and urged southern Russia to join Ukraine.

The online community is owned by a pro-Putin billionaire

According to the SOVA group, half of the posts leading to sentences for incitement to hatred were posted on VKontakte. The company behind the social networking site is owned by pro-Kremlin billionaire Alisher Usmanov. SOVA director Alexander Verkhovsky believes that this makes it easier for the Russian authorities to access VKontakte accounts than in foreign online communities.

Bubeev's defender claims that thanks to the privacy settings on the social network, his page was available to him and 12 of his friends. The lawyer says in an interview with AP that he cannot explain how the security service found his post - and how she even got access to accounts on this network.

VKontakte did not want to comment on the case when the news agency approached it.

Decline in violent racist crime

In the early 2000s, a wave of violence against Asian foreign workers swept across Russia, but attacks dropped sharply after dozens of neo-Nazis received lengthy prison sentences for extremism.

Human rights activists and lawyers who have worked with extremism cases say the decline in violent hate crimes has prompted police and investigators to prosecute non-violent insults to show that the fight against extremism continues, AP said.

InoSMI materials contain assessments exclusively of foreign mass media and do not reflect the position of the InoSMI editorial board.

Now, in our age of information technology, there are plenty of ways for virtual communication - here you can find email, social networks, and instant messengers. Some people believe that the Internet can securely keep them incognito, and they can do absolutely anything without punishment.

In fact, this is not the case, and in the event of the start of operational-search activities, it will be possible to establish the true culprit.

For example, some young people have an irresistible desire to communicate with their virtual girlfriends on various kinds of erotic topics. Is this communication safe from a legal point of view, or is there something to be afraid of?

Norms of the law

The talkative "Casanova" can be prosecuted under Article 135 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, which prohibits lecherous actions, but only under the cumulative observance of the following conditions:

Correspondence is carried out by a person who has reached the age of 18 (guilty person);

The addressee of the messages is a person who has not yet reached the age of 16 (victim);

It will not matter what gender the persons conducting the conversation “about this” will be, as well as who initiated the conversation on the “hot topic”.

It can be very difficult to prove that the interlocutor did not know that the other party is not 16 years old. The fact of personal acquaintance, photos and information from social networks can be taken into account.

So there was no debauchery!

The persons accused under this article often say that they did not commit any lecherous actions, they only refreshed in correspondence the topics covered in biology about sexual reproduction of mammals from a scientific point of view, and in general, "they have never seen a youngster in the eyes." Say, what kind of debauchery can there be in the fact that they just talked on the Internet?

In accordance with the explanations of the Plenum of the Supreme Court, contained in the Decree of December 4, 2014 No. 16, any actions aimed at awakening the interest of a person under 16 years of age in sexual relations or arousing the latter's desire to engage in carnal pleasures can be considered depraved.

At the same time, the Resolution noted that lecherous actions can be carried out both through the Internet and through any other telecommunication networks.

Thus, if it follows from the correspondence that the perpetrator somehow fueled the victim's interest in sex, he may well be prosecuted under Article 135 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation.

The punishment under the article is provided up to the actual imprisonment.

If you do not want to find yourself in a similar situation, you do not need to start communication on erotic topics on social networks with persons whose age you are not sure of. This can be fraught with serious criminal law troubles.

That's right, let them summon a summons. Perhaps they are trying to commit extortion against you.

In this case, you can contact the police yourself.

Not the fact that the person who called you is really an investigator. But who called said to drive up to the 62 police department

Section 228

Just look so that you don't get planted with drugs. Ask an additional question Correspondence is the basis for conducting an OSA in your relation upon the received information about sales.

They will dig Ask an additional question (Leningrad and region.) Piterov Vyacheslav Legal services in the Russian Federation: inheritance, family, housing and other disputes, real estate transactions ... Meshcheryakova Olga Vasilievna Sokolov Dmitry Gennadievich

Does the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia have the ability to track personal correspondence on VKontakte?

The Ministry of Internal Affairs did not like this and they wanted to "privatize" part of these server capacities, having previously combined them into a common dynamic space. But a motivated refusal awaited them from the owners - this is technically impossible.

Buy your servers, and we will provide you with one-way high-speed access and arrange for yourself "caches" of any size and do with them what you want!

But this is a huge amount of money, they are not in the state treasury, and forcing the oligarchs to “shake the money” is a hopeless undertaking.

Blackmail and extortion on VKontakte

That is, if a swindler just wrote that he wants to send information compromising you to his friends, but has not done so yet, this is already considered extortion. The popular social network is one of the favorite places for a variety of blackmailer swindlers.

Today we will look at three of the most popular ways to ruin the life of an ordinary person: Criminal liability for Internet extortion Blackmailing with pictures, videos and correspondence of an intimate nature is a criminal offense.

Blogger's Code

According to her, they not only opened a case against the famous blogger Anton Nosik, who called for “wiping Syria off the face of the Earth,” but also judging ordinary people, like single mother Ekaterina Vologzheninova, who posted poems and pictures on VKontakte in support of the revolution in Ukraine. After the adoption of the bill, Yarovaya will be imprisoned for extremism for eight years instead of four and for ten years deprived of the right to engage in professional activities (which professions will be subject to the restriction - it is not specified).

A new chapter “Promoting extremism” appeared in Article 148.

Correspondence in social networks with a child

(Kamchatka Territory, Vilyuchinsk) I had a similar story a couple of years ago, though then the girl said that she was 20 years old and posted someone else's photo.

As I found out that she was 15, he immediately shamed her and stopped communicating. Everything seems to be quiet, no one came and took them away with handcuffs! :-) October 15, 2015, Thursday, 18:51 Fadeev Maxim (Republic of Chuvashia, Cheboksary) Urgent issues March 19, 2019, Saturday, 00:23

lawyer by phone:

Take advantage of a free online legal consultation