Public organization Swedish Doctors for Human Rights. “There is no evidence that can be discussed”: a Swedish doctor about the chemical attack in Syria

The independent American publication Veteranstoday.com published an investigation into the organization “ Swedish doctors for Human Rights" (SWEDHR). Medical scientists analyzed in detail the actions of White Helmets employees to save children and came to shocking conclusions: children were killed for the sake of realistic footage!

The independent American publication Veteranstoday.com published an investigation by the Swedish Doctors for Human Rights (SWEDHR) organization, exposing the scandalous video. Swedish medical scientists analyzed in detail the actions of the White Helmets to save children and came to shocking conclusions. The article also claims that behind the monstrous falsification is the so-called “deep state,” a certain association consisting of CIA employees, British intelligence services and al-Qaeda militants.

Children were killed for realistic shots

As SWEDHR experts noted, the rescue of children captured on video is in fact a real murder. At first, it seemed to doctors that the child whom the White Helmets allegedly tried to save was already dead, but subsequent study of the material led to the discovery of even more terrifying facts.

In one of the episodes of the video, it is clear that the child is still alive, but is unconscious and is probably suffering from an overdose of opiates. Then one of the “rescuers” injects him with adrenaline into his chest, in the area of ​​his heart, which ultimately inevitably led to his death.

SWEDHR experts provided a detailed report proving the facts of falsification:

“The White Helmets treated the child very carelessly and carelessly throughout the entire video, and this alone could have caused severe harm to his health.

- The White Helmets injected adrenaline directly into the child’s heart using a syringe with a long needle. This method of treatment is not used when providing first aid for a gas attack.

- The “rescuer” in the video inserted a needle into the heart, but did not press the syringe plunger, that is, the child did not receive the medicine.

- By external signs experts determined that the child was under the influence of opiates and was likely slowly dying from an overdose. In the video, he does not show any symptoms of gas poisoning.

“The other children in the picture also do not have these symptoms.

- SWEDHR experts concluded that staged injection using a syringe with a long needle was the main cause of death of the child. In their opinion, it was a targeted infanticide, presented as an attempt to save the boy's life.

- The translation of the video also turned out to be fake: phrases in the background can be heard Arabic, which only contained instructions on how best to position the child in the frame, and not how to help him and save his life.

- The videos were published on the official channel “Syrian Civil Defense in Idlib Province,” owned by the White Helmets. It was produced by the White Helmets, but the Al-Qaeda flag was seen in the video.

As SWEDHR doctors analyzed the video, several more terrifying discoveries were made. As a result, it was generally accepted to consider the published video sequence to be fabricated, and the process depicted in it to be deliberate infanticide.

It is noteworthy that the White Helmets continue to promote themselves in Hollywood. In December 2016, it became known that a full-length feature film would be made about the activities of the NGO, produced by none other than George Clooney. The film will be based on documentary"The White Helmets" produced by Netflix.

It is known that George Clooney is aware of the revealing SWEDHR investigation, since its first results were published in early March of this year. However, the actor did not abandon the film about the criminal community, and work on the film continues.

As an addition: Currently, the website of the American publication Veteranstoday.com has crashed, which indicates that the investigation is on the right track

The “Time” program with a sensational story entitled “The Chemistry of Deception.” The story said that the head of the organization “Swedish Doctors for Human Rights” “had some uncomfortable questions about the video that became the reason for the American strike on an air base in Syria.”

The hero of the plot is Professor Marcello Ferrada de Noli, whom Channel One presents as “one of the most authoritative scientists in Sweden.” True, the channel does not specify that he is a psychiatrist by specialty, and his research papers associated with the study of the causes of suicide.

What claims does the Swedish psychiatrist make regarding the video filmed by the Syrian White Helmets? He drew attention to the fact that the people providing assistance to the victims were not wearing protective equipment, including gloves. "Sarin affects the skin, you just can't touch the skin, so it's contaminated, just like the air," Ferrada de Noli says. He is surprised why the White Helmets volunteers do not wear the chemical protective suits that they have (the latter is proven by photographs).

However, sarin is an unstable substance and disintegrates quickly. In open areas it lethal effect persists for several minutes, and only in funnels - up to several hours (and with low temperatures, hardly possible in April in Syria - and up to two days). The presence of impurities can make sarin even less persistent.

After this, Ferrada de Noli and the author of the story, Timur Siraziev, move on to an episode from the White Helmets video, where a volunteer sniffs the victim’s hand and says: “This doesn’t smell like chlorine” (as translated by Channel One; in fact, chlorine is chlorine ). This episode is commented on as follows: “The very fact that there is a smell contradicts the statement of the author of the video that children are victims of sarin poisoning, says Marcello de Noli.” The Swedish doctor is filmed saying: “You can’t smell the sarin. There are no signs of sarin. I wonder why Western journalists ignore obvious facts, why governments make decisions based on fake videos.”

In fact, the words of the volunteer speaking English were reported incorrectly by Channel One; in the plot you can clearly hear the original phrase: This is not chlorine gas - “This is not chlorine.” That is we're talking about not about the mythical smell of sarin, but about the absence of the smell of chlorine.

The Channel One story also contains the opinions of Russian experts. Former head of the radiation chemical service biological protection Airborne Forces Vladimir Zaitsev says: “Here you can’t see any oily liquid getting on the skin on the children’s bodies.” However, the encyclopedia “Civil Protection”, published by the Russian Ministry of Emergency Situations, says about sarin: “combat state - vapor and finely dispersed aerosol.” In other words, people die by inhaling the vapors of this toxic substance, and in this case, traces of liquid on the skin do not necessarily appear.

Another participant in the story, military expert Igor Nikulin, says: “Some victims are foaming, others are not. If there was sarin, then everyone would have foam.” But foaming at the mouth with sarin poisoning does not always occur. The same encyclopedia “Civil Defense” writes: “ Toxic effect Z., in all types of its penetration into the body, manifests itself in a disturbance of neuromuscular activity (local convulsions, paralysis of vital organs)”; the symptom foaming at the mouth is not mentioned at all. And here’s what a certain military expert in Damascus told a correspondent in 2013: Komsomolskaya Pravda“Nigina Beroeva about the effects of sarin (the newspaper then tried to blame the opposition for a chemical attack in the suburbs of Damascus, after which Bashar al-Assad had to agree to the elimination of his chemical weapons): “At first everyone would begin to choke, their eyes would water, perhaps they would foam at the mouth . Then loss of consciousness. Without assistance - quick death."

Moreover, the conclusions about the use of sarin in Khan Sheikhoun are not based solely on photographs and videos. On April 6, this information was confirmed by the Turkish Ministry of Health, based on the results of the autopsy of the bodies of the dead. Sarin itself is unstable, but when it breaks down in the body, isopropylmethylphosphonic acid is formed, which can remain in the blood albumin for a long time; its presence indicates the action of sarin.

The founder of the NGO Swedish Doctors for Human Rights (SWEDHR), Professor Marcello Ferrada de Noli, said on RT that the evidence presented by the White Helmets of a chemical attack by Syrian government forces is extremely dubious and that volunteers of this organization have already been convicted of such attacks in the past fabrications.

“I cannot judge the nature of this incident as there is no evidence to discuss. There are messages that have been voiced officials in the USA, in particular in the Pentagon. What follows are testimonies given by representatives of the White Helmets, whose veracity in such matters is highly questionable. If there is evidence of this chemical attack, it should have been shown to the general public, and before the strike, ordered by President Trump in defiance of international law", said Professor Ferrada de Noli.

Earlier, Professor Ferrada de Noli in his journal The Indicter stated that the events captured in the videos of the White Helmets organization were staged. Thus, SWEDHR experts noticed that in one of the previous videos one can see how the “rescuer” inserts a syringe needle into the child’s heart, but does not press the plunger, that is, nothing was injected into the boy. Moreover, experts believe that the young patient, even if he was not already dead at the time of filming, “could have died from the injection procedure itself.”

In another video, members noted that three children who underwent "life-saving procedures" ultimately died, but the White Helmets' findings that the children died as a result of chlorine gas poisoning were disputed by independent medical reports. The “victims of the chemical attack,” according to the experts’ conclusions, could have been under the influence of opiates and, in all likelihood, died slowly from an overdose of narcotic substances.

According to the founder of SWEDHR, this situation has arisen before and its main motive is to create a pretext for introducing a no-fly zone in Syria.

“Previously, there were also reports of chemical attacks allegedly carried out by the Syrian government. But after studying the materials provided by the United States and Great Britain, UN experts said that it was impossible to establish the identity of these weapons. So this situation is not new. And here again the leitmotif was the introduction of no-fly zones in Syria,” said Ferrada de Noli.

The professor noted that the new accusation of using chemical weapons was made public after government forces began a confident offensive against the positions of militants of various radical groups.

“The Syrian government is accused of using chemical weapons to create the need for political or even military action against Syria. A reason is needed, and here is the previously presented argument about the use of chemical weapons. But there is absolutely no logic in it. The main factor in this situation is that the Syrian government has successfully attacked militant positions over the past year and a half, and Western governments have realized that these groups will not be able to resist the Syrian government. The situation needed to be reversed, and for this a casus belli was needed,” the expert emphasized.

Marcello Ferrada de Noli also recalled that militants have already carried out such attacks using chemical weapons in the past, and the US and British governments know about this.

“No one asked British Foreign Minister Johnson where this evidence he was talking about was. There are only witness statements, as in previous similar cases. In March 2015, HRW issued a report on the Syrian government's chemical attack, which was based on the anonymous testimony of two witnesses, one of whom was a White Helmets functionary. He stated that he heard the helicopter, but did not see it. There were no videos. The only thing they showed was their video from the hospitals. We analyzed these frames and saw that health care the assistance they provided was simply a performance,” the professor concluded.

Let us recall that on the night of April 7, 59 cruise missiles"Tomahawk" at the Syrian airbase of Shayrat in Homs province. According to some reports, nine people died as a result of the attack. US President Donald Trump linked the application missile strike with vital interests national security USA and since the April 4 incident chemical attack in Idlib, which was blamed on Syrian government forces. At the same time, Moscow and Damascus categorically deny the very fact that Assad’s army has chemical weapons.

STOCKHOLM, April 15. /Corr. TASS Irina Dergacheva/. Public organization The Swedish Doctors for Human Rights (SWEDHR) is under pressure for its revelations about the activities of the so-called White Helmets in Syria and is being tried in every possible way to silence it. The founder of the NGO, Professor Marcello Ferrada de Noli, told a TASS correspondent.

To confirm his words, he drew attention to the attempt to delete an article about SWEDHR on Wikipedia after it published material about the White Helmets.

“They want to silence us,” he commented.

On April 11, a banner appeared on the SWEDHR Wikipedia page that read in capital letters: “This article is proposed to be removed.” After a lively discussion on the Internet, the administration of the electronic encyclopedia decided to leave the material, but placed a warning at the very beginning about doubts about the impartiality and sources.

“It’s interesting that if you look at the history of changes to the article, all the demands for the removal of the article began after the publication in my magazine The Indicter of revelations regarding the White Helmets video,” notes de Nolli.

Independent organization

Despite the fact that there were already many human rights organizations in Sweden, the professor and his colleagues founded a new one in 2014. "We believe that Sweden's poorly formulated position regarding a number of international conflicts recent years coupled with the ongoing rapprochement with NATO, have influenced the content and focus of Swedish human rights organizations, both government and NGOs funded in whole or in part from public sources,” explained de Nolli.

“We are independent, we do not receive funding from the state. And they cannot silence us,” the interlocutor emphasized.

According to him, the very fact that the Syrian representative to the UN, in his speech to colleagues, referred to the report of the Swedish Doctors for Human Rights, “is a reward for him.”

The professor continues to monitor events surrounding the conflict in Syria. “I can’t believe that the governments of the countries don’t know what really happened and who is behind it - they have excellent intelligence, good cooperation. Why did the United States strike (at a military airfield in the Syrian province of Homs)? All projects ( US President Donald) Trump's presidency had previously been compromised, this was done to improve the internal situation," he says.

Analysis of the White Helmets video

SWEDHR previously published an analysis of a White Helmets video purportedly taken after a chemical weapons attack in the Syrian city of Khan Sheikhoun in Idlib province, indicating that the “rescue measures” in the video were staged.

Thus, doctors drew attention to the fact that the solution in the syringe, which was allegedly used to inject a child injured as a result of a chemical attack, was in fact never injected into his body. Moreover, the child could die during this type of “rescue” procedure. Judging by external signs, it looked like the children were under the influence of opiates and were dying from an overdose, without giving the impression of being victims of a chemical attack.

“After the video showed inconsistencies in the actions (of doctors) to save people’s lives, I conducted a frame-by-frame analysis of the White Helmets video, studied it in slow motion, and saved individual frames from the overall video sequence,” says the doctor.

He made a slow-motion copy and sent a link with the material to his NGO colleagues. This video featured an episode with a syringe. The doctors' conclusions were then published on the Internet.

The professor draws attention to the hype around the White Helmets: they were nominated for the Nobel Prize and received an “alternative Nobel Prize” in Sweden (For Meaningful Life Support, Right Livelihood). “This was accompanied by an international campaign organized by Western media in support of the nomination of the film about the White Helmets for the Oscars,” he recalls.

Who are the White Helmets?

The non-governmental organization "Syrian Civil Defense" ("White Helmets") was created in late 2012 - early 2013 and is positioned as a humanitarian volunteer organization of a neutral and impartial nature. Last year she was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize. However, the organization has repeatedly been criticized for the unreliability of the information disseminated. Official representative Russian Foreign Ministry Maria Zakharova proposed to nominate the White Helmets organization instead Nobel Prize for an Oscar film award for a staged video of two of its representatives allegedly helping a wounded man in a destroyed Syrian city.

Human Rights Watch report

One of the main participants in this campaign was the organization "Human Rights Watch" (HRW). "Central to this PR stunt is that, before the Academy Awards ceremony even began on February 13, 2017, HRW published a report summarizing bogus reports of chemical attacks in recently liberated Aleppo. This piece of familiar HRW propaganda reworks an earlier report." from April 2015, which refers to an alleged gas attack in the city of Sarmin, in Idlib,” says de Nolly.

According to him, the report "Attack in Sarmin", published by HRW in April 2015, is itself "an excellent example of fabrication of evidence." HRW refers to two witnesses, anonymous "residents of Sarmin", and claims that "shortly before the attack" they "heard" the noise of a helicopter. "They heard it, but did not see it. Both also said that they did not hear 'any explosions.'" There is not a single reference in the entire HRW report to direct witnesses who observed the helicopter whose existence was to become important element in the statements of the White Helmets, uncritically repeated by HRW and never questioned at the UN,” the professor believes.

The Swedish NGO Physicians for Human Rights (SWEDHR) has accused the White Helmets of falsifying evidence of a chemical attack allegedly carried out by the Assad government in Syria.

In an interview with RT, the chairman of the organization, Professor Marcello Ferrada de Noli, shared his opinion about the incident, as well as the motives pursued by the White Helmets.

Previously "Russian Spring" published material Monstrous cynicism: killers in “white coats and helmets” are resuscitating dead Syrian children - investigation. It described in detail the findings of Swedish experts.

Recently, the founder of the NGO Swedish Doctors for Human Rights (SWEDHR), Professor Marcello Ferrada de Noli, said on RT that the evidence presented by the White Helmets of a chemical attack by Syrian government forces is extremely dubious, and the Helmet volunteers themselves have already been incriminated in similar fabrications in the past.

“I cannot judge the nature of this incident as there is no evidence to discuss.

There are messages that were voiced by officials in the United States, in particular in the Pentagon. What follows is the testimony given by the White Helmets, whose reliability in such cases is highly questionable.

If there is evidence of this chemical attack, it should be shown to the general public before the attack was carried out on the orders of President Trump, contrary to international law,” said Professor Ferrada de Noli.

Earlier, Professor Ferrada de Noli in his journal The Indicter stated that the events captured in the videos of the White Helmets organization were staged. Thus, SWEDHR experts noticed that in one of the previous videos one can see how the “rescuer” inserts a syringe needle into the child’s heart, but does not press the plunger, that is, nothing was injected into the boy.

Moreover, experts believe that the young patient, if not already dead at the time of filming, “could have died due to the injection procedure.”

In another video, members noted that three children who underwent "life-saving procedures" ultimately died, but the White Helmets' conclusion that they died from chlorine gas poisoning was disputed by independent medical reports.

The “victims of the chemical attack,” according to the experts’ conclusions, could have been under the influence of opiates and, in all likelihood, died slowly from an overdose of narcotic substances.

According to the founder of SWEDHR, this situation has arisen before, and its main motive is the pretext for introducing a no-fly zone in Syria.

“Previously, there were also reports of chemical attacks allegedly carried out by the Syrian government. But after studying the materials provided by the United States and Great Britain, UN experts said that it was impossible to establish the identity of these weapons. So this situation is not new. And here the constant leitmotif was the introduction of no-fly zones in Syria,” said Ferrada de Noli.

The professor noted that the new accusation of using chemical weapons was made public after government forces began a confident offensive against the positions of militants of various radical groups.

“The Syrian government is accused of using chemical weapons to create the need for political or even military action against Syria. A reason is needed, and here is the previously presented argument about the use of chemical weapons.

But there is absolutely no logic in it. The main factor in this situation is that the Syrian government has successfully attacked militant positions over the past year and a half, and Western governments have realized that those groups will not be able to resist the Syrian government. The situation needed to be reversed, and for this we need a casus belli,” the expert emphasized.

Marcello Ferrada de Noli also recalled that militants have carried out such attacks using chemical weapons in the past, and the US and UK governments are aware of this.

“No one asked British Foreign Minister Johnson where this evidence he was talking about was? There are only witness statements, as in previous similar cases. In March 2015, HRW issued a report on the Syrian government's chemical attack, which was based on the anonymous testimony of two witnesses, one of whom was a White Helmets functionary.

He said that he heard a helicopter, but did not see it. There were no videos. The only thing they showed was their video from the hospitals. We analyzed them and saw that the medical care they provided was simply staged,” the professor concluded.

Let us recall that on the night of April 7, 59 Tomahawk cruise missiles were launched from the destroyers USS Ross and USS Porter located in the Mediterranean Sea at the Syrian airbase of Shayrat in Homs province. According to some reports, nine people died as a result of the attack.

US President Donald Trump linked the missile strike to vital US national security interests and to the April 4 chemical attack in Idlib, which was blamed on Syrian government forces. At the same time, Moscow and Damascus categorically deny the very fact that Assad’s army has chemical weapons.

Roman Tikhonov

Follow us