8 pound gun 1 26. Armament of armies

God of War 1812. Artillery in the Patriotic War Shirokorad Alexander Borisovich

Chapter 11 ARTILLERY OF THE GRAND ARMY

GRAND ARMY ARTILLERY

1. French artillery

French artillery in the 18th century is considered by most historians to be the best in the world. In 1732, Lieutenant General de Volliers introduced a system of guns that became the most advanced in the world. It consisted of 4-, 8- and 18-pounder field guns, 24-pounder siege guns, and 8- and 12-inch mortars.

In 1776, a new system under General Jean Baptiste Gribeauval was introduced in France, which lasted from minor changes until 1827

The length of the field guns of the Gribeauval system is 18 calibers. The gap in the channel between the wall and the core was halved - from 5 mm for aviary tools to 2.5 mm, due to which the starting speed projectile and shooting accuracy. On the other hand, reducing the gaps prevented the use of red-hot cannonballs, that is, a very effective incendiary agent of that time.

The gun barrels were cast solid to avoid shells, and then a channel was drilled into them. The Aviary decorations on the trunks have disappeared. The fuses were made in copper seed rods to save the guns from the rapid flare-up of the ignition hole. Sights and front sights, previously absent, were introduced.

Field guns of the Gribeauval system

The trunnion axis was raised slightly closer to the channel axis to reduce impacts of the breech on the carriage's lifting mechanism.

Gribeauval significantly lightened the carriages and replaced the lifting wedge with a lifting screw mechanism. The front end (without a box) is made with a drawbar (instead of the previous shaft) to make it easier for the native horses.

A team of six horses carried a 12-pounder cannon, four horses carried an 8-pounder, and a pair of horses carried a 4-pounder.

To move the gun into position, Gribeauval introduced straps for servants; for the same purpose, wooden levers were inserted into brackets in the middle of the carriage. 14–15 people were enough to move a 12-pound gun in this way, even on inconvenient ground.

Designation of the main parts of the gun barrel of the Gribeauval system

Gribeauval established the composition of the battery at 8 guns of the same caliber (4-pounder, 8-pounder, 12-pounder guns or 6-inch howitzers), considering that:

1) The battery must be divided into two or four platoons.

2) To service eight guns, one company of 120 servants, which has a reserve team in the park, is enough.

3) For carts serving eight guns, one company of convoy is enough.

4) One experienced captain can command these guns.

4-pound gun Gribeauval had a caliber of 86.4 mm and a barrel weight of 295 kg. Accordingly, the 6-pounder, 8-pounder and 12-pounder guns had calibers of 96 mm, 106 mm and 121 mm, and weights of about 400 kg, 590 kg and 870–880 kg. The greatest effective firing range of the French 8-pounder guns was: cannonball - 900 m and grapeshot - 500 m, and 4-pounder guns, respectively, 800 m and 300 m.

A few words need to be said about the system of the 11th year, that is, 1803. Let me remind you that Napoleon returned the country to the old calendar in 1805.

In 1803, a special commission was created in France under the chairmanship of the First Consul Napoleon. Its purpose was to decide whether Gribeauval’s artillery was still suitable, or whether it was time to change it in accordance with the newly developed military requirements. The commission created a new “Year XI system,” which, although not yet fully implemented in practice, influenced the further development of artillery. This system assumed the following.

Eliminate 4- and 8-pounder field and 16-pounder siege guns, 6- and 8-inch howitzers, and 10-inch mortars. Replace 4- and 8-pound calibers with 6-pound long 17 calibers weighing 130 cores, modeled on Prussian artillery. To replace the previous 6-inch howitzers, introduce a 24-pound howitzer with a bore length of 5 calibers and a weight of 600 pounds with a projectile weight of about 14 pounds. Adopt mountain artillery consisting of new short 6-pounder guns weighing 360 pounds (that is, weighing 60 cannonballs), 24-pounder light howitzers and 3-pounder guns weighing 160 pounds (that is, weighing 53 cannonballs).

Section of a 12-pound French cannon. The presence of a chamber is clearly visible

The fortress artillery was to consist of 24-, 12- and 6-pounder guns; 12-, 8-inch and 24-pound Homer mortars and a 15-inch “stone thrower”.

For special mobile siege artillery parks, a new short 24-pounder gun with a length of 16 calibers and a weight of 120 cores was designed.

Coastal artillery included 24- and 36-pound cast iron cannons, as well as 12-inch long-range mortars (charged 12 kg of gunpowder). The coastal cannons were supposed to accept explosive shells with thickened bottoms and spikes.

Field carriages were accepted with straight frames and a box on the front, tied and easily removed.

Gribeauval's charging box was replaced by another - with wheels rolling under the body, but without reducing the diameter of the wheels and without raising the body. The ammunition was located in special boxes that could be easily inserted and removed.

Howitzers of the Gribeauval system

There are three types of iron axles - for the 12-pounder gun and howitzer, the 6-pounder gun and for other carts. Three types of wheels were used. 3-pounder cannons and a special forge were adapted for packing, as were boxes of ammunition. Gribeauval's fortress and siege carriages were replaced by a new type of "boom carriage" with a trunnion axis height of 5 feet 9 inches (1.75 m).

Finally, Colonel Villantrois designed long 8-, 9- and 11-inch howitzers with a bore length of 7-8 calibers, firing large charges at large elevation angles. These howitzers were intended to protect coastal fortifications and bays intended to shelter the fleet, as well as for bombardment from long distances. The 11-inch Villantrois howitzer weighed 39 pounds (639 kg); projectile - 215 pounds (88 kg); charge - 60 pounds (24.57 kg). With these data and an elevation angle of 42°, the range was 5.8 versts (6.2 km).

As we can see, there were many reasonable ideas in the “XI year system”. The replacement of 4- and 8-pounder guns with 6-pounder ones (by drilling out the 4-pounder ones) was caused by the experience of the war. Thus, 8-pound guns turned out to be insufficiently mobile for horse artillery and required a large convoy, which lengthened the marching columns. And the 4-pounder guns were too weak and could not operate at long ranges. The 6-pound caliber was used by opponents - Austria and Prussia. By increasing their caliber a little, it was possible to prevent the enemy from using their shells, and at the same time it was possible to use the enemy’s shells. The experience of using 6-pounder guns captured by the French from the Austrians gave good results regarding reality and mobility. 6-pounder guns were introduced into the French artillery and were used in the Napoleonic Wars.

The howitzers of the Gribeauval system were too short and light, quickly wore out the carriages and had poor accuracy. Their ammunition required large quantity boxes. The 24-pound howitzers were long and more weight, fired large charges, and the accuracy of shooting from them was higher. And also, these howitzers did not damage their carriages. The same caliber as the 24-pounder guns made it possible to use the same shells as howitzers if the bombs were accepted for long guns, but in practice this turned out to be impossible at that time.

The 10-inch mortar occupied a middle position between the 12- and 8-inch mortars and could replace both of them. Mountain artillery is especially necessary when crossing mountainous terrain, for example, when crossing the Alps.

Straight carriage frames were cheaper and easier to manufacture. Front boxes were already accepted by everyone in all the armies of the world by that time. Changing the design of the charging boxes increased their maneuverability and ease of delivery of ammunition to the guns. Finally, Villantrois howitzers performed well in practice - during the bombardment of Cadiz, and began good remedy for coastal defense from long distances.

But constant wars, the inability to carry out long and serious tests new systems, as well as a number of other difficulties that arose in the process of using new projects in combat conditions, did not make it possible to accept the “XI year system” in its entirety. Only 6-pounder guns, 24-pounder howitzers and a few Villantrois howitzers were accepted. The 6- and 8-inch field howitzers were slightly lengthened, following the Prussian model. The remaining guns remained in service. So the result, instead of simplification, was an even greater variety of material.

Drawing of a French howitzer

In addition to the guns French army There were also howitzers. Moreover, they were not intended for mounted fire, as in the twentieth century, but exclusively for flat fire as reinforcement weapons.

In 1812, the Grand Army was armed with three types of howitzers: the 6-inch Gribeauval system, the 6-inch “extended” howitzer and the 24-pound howitzer of the “XI year” model. Their caliber was approximately the same - about 152 mm, and all howitzers had cylindrical chambers. The 6-inch Gribeauval howitzer of 162 mm caliber had a length of 4.75 calibers. Its barrel weight was 330–355 kg, and the carriage weighed 590 kg.

"Long" howitzers were introduced in 1795, modeled on Prussian howitzers. The length of the howitzer was 6.5 calibers. There were relatively few such howitzers in the Great Army.

The 24-pound howitzer of the “Year XI System” had a caliber of 160 mm, a barrel length of 6.75 calibers, a barrel weight of about 350 kg, and a carriage weight of 573 kg.

French howitzers were transported by four horses.

During the French Revolution, one-pound guns of the Rosten system were also used. They were intended for “light troops”, had a collapsible carriage and could be transported on packs. To the trunk of a carriage with wheels large diameter shafts were attached. The gun was transported by one horse. Its caliber is about two inches, the weight of the barrel is 4.2 pounds (68.8 kg).

Gribeauval left the siege and fortress weapons of de Volliers unchanged, removing only decorations (by turning) and small chambers that did not reach the goal and made it difficult to penetrate. A short 8-inch howitzer was introduced into the siege artillery.

During experimental shooting, Gribeauval found out that the Aviary 12-inch mortars would withstand a maximum of 100 more shots, after which they would become unusable; almost a third of the bombs fired from them would break. Therefore, he proposed a relatively weighted 10-inch mortar and bombs for it with thickened walls. With a charge of 7 pounds (2.87 kg), it threw bombs up to 1,000 fathoms (2,134 m), as did the 12-inch mortar. The mortar is sedentary, with a cylindrical chamber and a retractable seed rod. Cast iron machine. The Aviary 12-inch mortars were left in service until their bombs were completely used up, but from now on their weight was supposed to be increased by 8 pounds (131 kg).

In addition, Gribeauval adopted Homeric mortars of 12, 10 and 8 inches in caliber. A feature of these mortars, proposed in 1785, were large conical chambers, which gave a lower loading density and a more favorable gas effect. The chambers merged with a cylindrical channel. The mortars used triangular lugs that connected the trunnions to the body of the mortar (the muzzle). The 12-inch Homer mortar fired a bomb at a range of up to 1200 fathoms (2561 m).

In addition to the mortars, there were also 15-inch stone throwers, but descriptions of them could not be found.

In field carriages with slightly shortened and lightweight frames, the diameter of the wheels was increased, and iron axles and cast iron bushings in the hubs were adopted. To reduce the increased rollback, the beds were curved in the middle accordingly. Strong shackles and ankle straps slightly increased the weight of the carriage. To more evenly distribute the load on both axles during large movements, traveling sockets were adopted. Between the frames diverging towards the trunk there was an inserted fire monitor box for ammunition with a gable roof and hinges on the sides for inserting levers when carrying. The lifting mechanism consisted of a board rotating on a horizontal bolt (under axles), resting with its notch on the head of a screw screwed into the uterus rotating on axles. To make it easier for the servants to move the carriage, there were hooks in the frontal part at the ends of the axles and at the trunk, which were hooked onto special straps with leather loops. For the same purpose, transverse levers were inserted into special brackets on the frames. To move the carriage, 8–11 people were required for 4-pound guns and 11–15 for 12-pound guns. For horizontal aiming, two rules were used, pushed into the clips on the sides of the pivot funnel.

When retreating and transporting through ditches and rivers, a long rope was attached to the ring near the trunk - the so-called “draw”, by which the limber was pulled. In this case, the gun could continue firing.

The howitzer carriage had a wooden axle and a wedge lifting mechanism with a horizontal screw. There were no traveling nests. Knowing from experience that howitzer carriages cannot withstand firing at elevation angles greater than +20°, Gribeauval limited this angle to +18° (and –5°).

Siege carriages had a device similar to howitzer carriages, and differed little from Aviary carriages. Siege carriages did not have traveling nests, since the guns were transported separately from the carriages on special four-wheeled drays (to transfer the guns, the drogs were removed from the limbers, like the carriages).

For fortress guns, special carriages were adopted, the frames of which, consisting of several beams cut into each other, connected by bolts, had 2 wheels on the front axle and one solid, durable one - between the frames - on the rear. The front wheels rolled when rolling back along the side longitudinal bars of a special turntable; the rear wheel - along the central grooved beam of the platform, which could rotate around the front pivot. The lifting mechanism is wedge, without screw. The height of the trunnions is about 5 feet (1.52 m), instead of the previous 3?. For coastal guns, similar machines were adopted on four wheels, rolling along the beams of a wooden rotating frame (in front there was a pin; in the back there was one solid solid wheel, moving along an arced iron strip fixed on the base).

The field limbers consisted of a fork-shaped frame connected to a drawbar, a slab with a pivot above the axle, and a crossbar or slug that supported the trunk of the gun carriage. There was no box.

The siege limbers had thick wooden shafts, tightly fixed to the axle, and did not have a slug. The charging box consisted of a long box with a gable roof, mounted on a wooden frame, with its cutouts superimposed on the rear axle with high wheels and the field front axle with a slug. Wooden partitions formed nests for shells.

A field forge on four wheels with a fur, an open forge and two boxes for accessories was added to the number of carts. Triquebals and jacks were used for moving and transporting guns.

IN early XIX century, the Prussian general Scharngorst assessed Gribeauval’s artillery as follows: “French artillery, which was the first in Europe in the previous period, became again the most advanced in 1774; It is true that the basic ideas of its design and organization were borrowed from the Prussian artillery, but they were implemented in such a way that the French guns are still not inferior to any others... everything that was borrowed received the highest possible degree of perfection. The French artillery corps took the most outstanding part in the development of artillery science and technology... when in other states artillery was a craft, in France it has already become a science... French equipment and French institutions now serve as examples for all other artillery.”

The main disadvantage of the French field artillery It was impossible for servants to sit on the limbers and charging boxes, which allowed only walking.

The French army also paid great attention to horse artillery.

Initially, horse companies (six 4-pound cannons and one 6-inch howitzer) were attached to foot artillery regiments. However, by order of the War Ministry of February 7, 1794, a new branch of artillery was officially created, receiving special organization. The companies were organized into regiments of horse artillery. Each regiment had 6 companies and a depot.

On April 15, 1806, a horse artillery regiment of the Imperial Guard was formed, consisting of 6 companies.

U French guns and howitzers, the date of manufacture and the name of the craftsman were minted on the torel belt. Guns cast before 1793 bore the monograms of King Louis XIV. The crown of the French kings has eight line flowers above the hoop. Arcs rise from them, which also converge under the blossoming lily.

The cannons, cast in 1793–1803, depict the monogram of the Republic, consisting of two intertwined letters RF—Republic of France, topped with an inscription. Some cannons bear the monogram of the National Assembly - “AN”, as well as the image of the “all-seeing eye” and the inscription.

The cannons cast under Napoleon I are decorated with his initials - the letter “N” in a laurel wreath under the crown. In the crown above the hoop are eagles with wings raised high.

The cannons of the Kingdom of Italy (Northern Italy, Piedmont and a number of duchies) depict the iron crown of the Lombard kings with the motto “God gave it to me. Woe to anyone who touches her." The guns of the Italian Kingdom differed little from the French ones, fortunately, since May 1805, Napoleon I was the Italian king. And this good king sent his troops to Russia to help the French Emperor Napoleon I.

2. French Allied Artillery

A complete description of the guns of the allied countries that participated in the campaign against Russia in 1812 is a hefty volume. So I will have to limit myself to the most common systems.

Table 12

Prussian artillery

Weapon data 12-pounder gun 6-pounder gun 3-pound cannon 10 lb howitzer 7-lb howitzer
Caliber, inch/mm 4,68/448,9 3,71/94,2 3,0/76,3 6,7/170,2 5,84/148,3
Barrel length, club 18,0 18 20 6,3 6,4
Barrel weight, pud/kg 55/901 30/491,4 14/229,2 36/589,7 25/409,5
Carriage weight, pud/kg 49/802,6 37/606 ? 49/802,6 41/671,6
Front weight, pud/kg 26/425,9 28/458,6 ? 26/425,9 28/458,6
130/2129 95/1556 ? 111/1818 104/1704
55/901 55/901 ? 55/901 55/901
Gun crew, people 13 9 ? 15 12
95 195 ? 48 85
8 6 ? 8 6
6 6 ? 6 6

The attentive reader has already noticed the discrepancy between the names of the Prussian howitzers - 10-pounder and 7-pounder - with the weight of their shells and caliber in inches. This is not a typo. The fact is that in Prussia, howitzer calibers were measured by the weight of a stone (!), and not a cast iron core.

Prussian 24-lb howitzer

The Prussian cannons, cast in Breslau in 1780–1801, depict the Prussian coat of arms - a single-headed eagle with a sword in one paw and “peruns” in the other. The eagle is crowned. Above the inscription: “For glory and homeland!”

The breech bears the monogram of King Frederick with the motto: "The King's Last Argument."

Table 13

Data Austrian guns

Weapon data 12-pound battery gun 12-pound light gun 6-pounder gun 3-pound cannon 7-lb howitzer
Caliber, inch/mm 4,66/118,4 4,66/118,4 3,72/94,5 2,99/75,9 5,87/149,1
Barrel length, club 25,0 16,0 16,0 16 6,1
Barrel weight, pud/kg 80/1310 48/786,2 23,5/385 14,7/240,8 16,8/275,2
Carriage weight, pud/kg 40/655,2 30/491,4 29,5/483,2 19,5/319,4 29/475
Front weight, pud/kg 20/327,6 20/327,6 17/278,5 17/278,5 17/278,5
Weight of the gun with the limber, pud/kg 140/2293 98/1605 70/1147 51,2/838,6 62,8/1028
Weight of charging box without ammunition, pd/kg 27/442,3 27/442,3 27/442,3 27/442,3 27/442,3
Gun crew, people 12 12 11 8 11
Number of shells carried in one charging box 90 90 176 144 90
Number of horses in a cannon harness 8 6 4 2 4
Number of horses in a charging box harness 4 4 4 2 4

It is worth noting here that the calibers of a number of Austrian cannons are expressed in the small Nuremberg scale and therefore, with the same name, are smaller than in the artillery of other countries. For example, a 12-pound Austrian is equivalent to an 8-pound French, and a 6-pound is equivalent to a 4-pound.

Since the Austrian Empire included many territories, Austrian guns were distinguished by a wide variety of coats of arms and monograms. Thus, on the cannons with the coats of arms of Bohemia, Burgundy and Lombardy, images of eagles with the order chain of the “Golden Fleece” are minted. Cannons from the time of Empress Maria Theresa adorn the coat of arms of the Duchy of Tuscany, which includes the coats of arms of Austria, Parma, Hungary, Bohemia, and Jerusalem.

The artillery of the Great Army also included English cannons. Moreover, they were not trophies of the “villain Bonaparte.” The fact is that Napoleon annexed Hanover - the personal possession of the British kings.

Accordingly, the Hanoverian cannons feature the monogram English king George VII with the chain of the Order of the Garter and the inscription: “Shame on him who thinks ill of it.”

Saxon 20-lb howitzer

The Great Army also included Dutch cannons, cast in The Hague in 1797. They depict the coats of arms of Flanders with the inscription “Watch, trusting in God.”

The cannons, cast in 1788, bear the coat of arms of Zealand - the “swimming lion”. On the shield under the ducal crown is the inscription: “I fight and fight out.”

The Polish cannons depict the coats of arms of King Stanislaw Augustus, Prince Sapieha, Prince Potocki, surrounded by a chain of the Order of the White Eagle with the inscription “For faith, law and flock.”

On the cannons with the coat of arms of Prince Sapieha there is a mantle, in the oval there is an arrow, around there are laurels intertwined with an order ribbon, and the title of Prince Nestor-Kazimir Sapieha: the chief chief of artillery of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania. The cannons are engraved with the motto “For Faith, Tsar and Law” and the inscription: “A citizen sacrificed me to the Fatherland.”

The cannons with the coat of arms of Count Potocki also depict a mantle, and on them there is an oval shield with a seven-pointed cross and the coat of arms of Pilyava. The laurels are intertwined with the mite of the Order of Stanislaus. On the oval is the inscription: “Count Theodor Potocki of the Crown Artillery, Major General.” On top are a helmet and a count's crown, and above it are ostrich feathers with the same cross as in the coat of arms. Above the coat of arms is the motto “For war, but not at all for civil” and the year “1767”.

Table 14

Artillery data from Napoleon's allies

Type of gun Caliber, inch/mm Channel length, club Length without wings, mm Barrel weight, kg Projectile weight, kg Charge weight, kg
Neapolitan
6-pounder gun 3,7/94 16 1448 352 3,2 1,02
howitzer 6/152 5,3 1016 295 6 0,6
Westphalian
6-pounder gun 3,7/94 16 1626 376 3,34 0,836
Bavarian
6-pounder gun 3,7/94 18 1626 410 3,34 0,836
howitzer 6/152 5 1016 295 6,5 0,72
Saxon
4-pounder gun 3,25/83 16 1321 278 1,7 0,72
6-pounder gun 3,7/94 18 1626 376 3,33 0,83
howitzer 6/152 5 1016 295 6,5 0,72
Polish
6-pounder gun 3,7/94 18 1524 393 3,2 1,02
3-pound cannon 3176 18 1245 229 1,2 0,6
author Shirokorad Alexander Borisovich

Chapter 2 BATTLES ON THE FLANKS OF THE GREAT ARMY By the beginning of the Patriotic War, the 3rd reserve observation army under the command of cavalry general Tormasov was located in Volyn, occupying positions from Lyuboml to Stary Konstantinov with main apartment in Lutsk. Army

From the book Who fought with numbers, and who fought with skill. The monstrous truth about the losses of the USSR in World War II author Sokolov Boris Vadimovich

Chapter 7 RUSSIAN ARTILLERY IN THE DEFENSE OF FORTRESSES IN 1812 Until now, we have been talking exclusively about field artillery. Nevertheless, the French and Russian armies had fortress and siege artillery. But did siege and fortress weapons take part in the battles? If you look at the works

From the book The Vile “Elite” of Russia author Mukhin Yuri Ignatievich

From the book “With God, Faith and the Bayonet!” [The Patriotic War of 1812 in memoirs, documents and works of art] [Artist V. G. Britvin] Author's Anthology

From the book Twelve Wars for Ukraine author Savchenko Viktor Anatolievich

Criticism of the official figure of irretrievable losses of the Red Army in the Great Patriotic War. The Soviet Union and Germany suffered the greatest losses among all participants in the Second World War. Establishing the amount of irretrievable losses of both the armed forces and

From the author's book

Checking the estimate of irretrievable losses of the Red Army in the Great Patriotic War using the Memorial ODB. The figure we received for the Red Army’s losses of 26.9 million people killed can be tried to be verified using the Memorial ODB. To do this, you need to try to make a sample and estimate

From the author's book

Artillery “The Russian army went to war in 1914, having the following artillery weapons in the field troops. Each infantry division had 6 light 3-inch batteries. In addition, each army corps had 2 more batteries of 4.8-dm mortars. Taking in

From the author's book

F. P. Segur History of Napoleon and the Great Army in 1812 Grand Army approached the Neman in three separate parts... On June 11, before dawn, the imperial column reached the Neman without seeing it. The edge of the large Prussian Pilwitz Forest and the hills stretching along riverbank,

From the author's book

F. P. Segur The history of Napoleon and the great army in 1812 Napoleon himself arrived. He stopped in delight, and a joyful exclamation escaped his lips. The dissatisfied marshals had moved away from him since the Battle of Borodino, but at the sight of captive Moscow, at the news of his arrival

From the author's book

F. P. Segur History of Napoleon and the Great Army in 1812 Napoleon, having finally taken possession of the palace of the kings, persisted, not wanting to give it up even to fire, when suddenly a cry was heard: “Fire in the Kremlin!” This cry passed from mouth to mouth and brought us out of the contemplative stupor into which

From the author's book

F. P. Segur History of Napoleon and the Great Army in 1812 In the southern part of Moscow, at the outpost, one of its main suburbs adjoins two large roads; both of them lead to Kaluga. One of them, to the left, is the oldest, the other was laid later. At the first of them, Kutuzov had just

From the author's book

F. P. Segur History of Napoleon and the Great Army in 1812 Finally, on November 20, Napoleon was forced to leave Orsha, but he left Eugene, Mortier and Davout there and, stopping two miles from this city, began asking about Her, still continuing to wait for him . The same despondency reigned in

From the author's book

F. P. Segur History of Napoleon and the Great Army in 1812 Napoleon arrived in Smorgon with a crowd of dying soldiers, exhausted by suffering, but he did not allow himself to show the slightest emotion at the sight of the misfortunes of these unfortunate people, who, for their part, did not complain, to

From the author's book

Chapter 10. The war of the Russian army of General Wrangel against the Red Army and the Makhnovist army in Northern Tavria and Crimea (March - November

Fully machined, copper plated and blackened cast guns made Dmitry Shevelev, gold champion of the world and Russia in ship modeling. The author has his own outstanding style, his works are distinguished by historical authenticity, artistic taste and the effect of antiquity.

To cast the guns, a dental alloy with a melting point of 105 degrees is used, then the casting is mechanically processed on a lathe, a channel is drilled, brushed, copper-coated and only then blackened. The process is not easy, but the result is amazing. There’s no need to even stutter about historical authenticity; a mosquito won’t hurt your nose. The master model of this gun was made according to drawings from the monograph Le Cygne by the French publishing house Ancre.

Technical characteristics of the gun:

  • length 59 mm; - scale 1:48;
  • caliber 8 pounds;
  • channel diameter 2.2 mm;
  • France, 1806;
  • initial development for the Le Cygne brig model. Requires 2 pieces.
The price of the product is quite high, but these are tools for which no shame at any price. We are proud the fact that we can offer work Dmitry Shevelev.

About Us
We promise that:

  • With more than 15 years of experience, we only offer best products on the market, weeding out obvious failed products;
  • We deliver goods to our customers all over the world accurately and quickly.

Customer Service Rules

We are happy to answer any relevant questions that you have or may have. Please contact us and we will do our best to respond to you as soon as possible.
Our field of activity: prefabricated wooden models of sailing ships and other ships, models for assembling steam locomotives, trams and carriages, 3D models made of metal, prefabricated mechanical watches made of wood, construction models of buildings, castles and churches made of wood, metal and ceramics, hand and power tools for modeling, Consumables(blades, attachments, sanding accessories), glues, varnishes, oils, wood stains. Sheet metal and plastic, tubes, metal and plastic profiles for independent modeling and making mock-ups, books and magazines on woodworking and sailing, ship drawings. Thousands of elements for independent construction of models, hundreds of types and standard sizes of slats, sheets and dies valuable species tree.

  1. Worldwide delivery. (except some countries);
  2. Fast processing of received orders;
  3. The photographs presented on our website were taken by us or provided by the manufacturers. But in some cases, the manufacturer may change the packaging of the product. In this case, the photographs presented will be for reference only;
  4. Delivery times indicated are provided by carriers and do not include weekends and holidays. At peak times (before the New Year), delivery times may be increased.
  5. If you have not received your paid order within 30 days (60 days for international orders) from dispatch, please contact us. We will track the order and contact you as soon as possible. Our goal is customer satisfaction!

Our advantages

  1. All goods are in our warehouse in adequate quantities;
  2. We have the largest experience in the country on this topic wooden models sailboats and therefore we can always objectively assess your capabilities and advise what to choose to suit your needs;
  3. We offer you various ways delivery: by courier, regular and EMS mail, SDEK, Boxberry and Business Lines. These carriers can completely cover your needs in terms of delivery time, cost and geography.

We firmly believe that we will become your best partner!

Since this question, to be honest, is simply SICK of me, and there are a bunch of “experts” who very often poke me into land instructions on the firing range of guns and other similar issues, I decided to make a post to solve this problem once and for all.
First of all, a little theory - if you do not take fortress artillery, then a land cannon in battle encounters rather flimsy protection. These can be earthen fortifications, lunettes, barriers using wood or stone, but the distinctive property of these fortifications will be their relative low strength. That is, if these are wooden spears, then they are dug into the ground. If the stones are piled up, but not cemented, etc.
At sea, in linear battles (or in battles between fortresses and ships), cannon cores had to overcome quite serious protection in the form of the “armor” (hull) of the ship, and often this protection was multi-layered, as for example is clearly visible here:

This protection had a total thickness of 60 to 100 centimeters (that is, up to a meter). Most often, even the most powerful guns could not penetrate it, and shooting at ships essentially came down to maximum hits in the hull (if we are talking specifically about causing critical damage/sinking the ship). This maximum of hits gradually undermined the protection, potholes appeared somewhere, chips appeared somewhere, connections were broken somewhere, the wood gradually sagged and broke, most often in the area of ​​the upper deck or gun ports, and finally the critical moment came when " the armor" stopped holding.
If we talk about analogies, then perhaps the most accurate imitation of this explanation I came across in the film “Death Race” with Statham:

In the film, the role of armor is played by a 6-inch armor plate at the back of Statham’s car, which competitors shoot at with all types of weapons. Sooner or later, this plate receives critical damage and can no longer withstand hits. The meaning is absolutely the same.

Now let's move on to the numbers. First of all, we note that the Gribovalevsky land cannons could fire as much as 2-2.5 km, but absolutely no one used such a range. Why? Yes, for two simple things - there were no sights for such distances yet, and the dispersion of fire was very high. Therefore, in the Gribovalevsky instructions for ground artillery we see the following figures

Effective fire distances for guns of various calibers


If we open the English naval shooting manuals (for example, from 1832), we will see the following figures:
For long guns:
Maximum sighting range 500-400 meters (sorry, here and below I am simplifying the English yard to an ordinary meter; for those who need it, they will convert it into exact values)
Effective target firing range - 200 meters
Pistol range - 50 meters.
For carronades:
maximum sighting range - 200 meters
effective sighting range - 50 meters
pistol distance - 10 meters.
Why do the values ​​of land and sea systems differ so much? Really naval guns were they worse?
No, they were no worse, and sometimes even better. It’s just that the admirals laid down such values ​​because it was not about maximum, A sighting range, and secondly, from these ranges could cause damage to enemy ships. That is, in reality, naval guns could fire much further, but the accuracy of the fire and the damage from it were very bad at distances above the recommended ones. The question is - was it possible to use guns beyond the maximum effective range? The answer is why not? For example, the accuracy of a carronade over 200 meters is non-existent. But who prevents, for example, from conducting unaimed fire with carronades not on the sides, but on the sails of ships? Nobody! The area of ​​the sails is much larger than the part of the side being hit, therefore, according to the theory of probability, such fire may well be effective. Yes, the speed of the cannonball at this distance is not enough to break through a bulwark or something wooden, but tearing a sail or knocking down a yard is quite enough.
One more thing should not be forgotten - ground artillery fires from a fixed platform (ground, fortress wall, etc.) at a target that is stationary or slowly moving relative to the gun/battery. Even the galloping speed of a horse is 15-18 km/h, in sea terms - 8-8.5 knots, that is, the speed of an ordinary frigate. But most often the cavalry goes to the battery(in naval terms - in “longitudinal fire”), and does not jump along the battery(the meaning of the cavalry attack is clear - to suppress this very battery, and not to run away from its fire). The walking speed of infantry (110 steps per minute at a step of 70 cm) is significantly lower - approximately 4.6 km/h or 2.5 knots, but again - infantry goes towards the battery, not along it.
Naval artillery has a completely different task - there the enemy moves precisely along the battery, since the movement is most often parallel relative to each other, and this leaves an additional imprint on the accuracy (or, if you like, inaccuracy) of shooting and on the effective combat distance.
Oddly enough, but land artillery, operations against ships, most often used naval instructions. This is understandable - ships, especially battleships, are a very specific enemy. And here it is necessary to introduce such a concept as the probability of hitting the target, which directly depended on the number of guns firing at the target. It is clear that an airborne salvo creates a kind of “cloud” of nuclei, which covers the target. As far as I understand, in the case of long distances this probability distribution of hits is akin to Gaussian, at short distances it is linear and uniform. That is, as is the case in the movie with Statham decisive role What matters is the number of hits per unit of time.
Now let's move from theory to practice.
The first debate on this topic arose for me a long time ago, regarding Toulon of the 1793 model. Let me remind you that Bonaparte then captured the forts of Eguiet and Balaguier, located on one side of the exit to Toulon harbor. The width of the passage from the harbor itself is 1200 meters. The question is: could the guns of these forts clearly block the exit of ships from Toulon?
The answer is obvious - no, they couldn’t. And this is even though (according to Nilus) "A 12-pound core with a charge of 4 pounds at a distance of about 300 fathoms goes deep: into the ground by 7-9 feet, into a tree by 2.5 feet, into a stone by 4 inches. 300 fathoms is about 650 m; 2.5 ft. = 0.75 m." Still, the sides of the ships are clearly not land, and we will leave what kind of tree Nilus had in mind - to the author’s conscience.
The next issue of our program was my supposedly delusional ideas of shelling the brig "Mercury" with grapeshot. And again, the author of the opus about my nonsense gave a breakdown for land buckshot (the weight of one bullet is 23 grams). Well, how many times have I said - such buckshot was never used at sea!
In the same Russian fleet there were the following types of buckshot: short-range and long-range buckshot. The charge for both buckshots is 1.64 kg. The weight of the long-range buckshot was 10.9 kg, it had 48 bullets (each weighing 227 grams). The weight of the short-range buckshot is 11.2 kg, it contains 94 bullets (each weighing 119 grams). Maximum range shooting short-range buckshot - up to 400 meters, long-range up to 700. The British and French used bullets weighing 384 and 452 grams in buckshot on 32-pound and 24-pound guns! So it’s one thing to have buckshot in a bird hunting rifle, and another thing to have buckshot on a battleship. She is also on board any small ship (for example, brig) can cause quite a lot of damage, tearing sails, breaking yards, etc.

Shotgun AN-IX

French 6-pounder gun and 6-inch howitzers

However, even such a magnificent gun had drawbacks, such as insufficient reliability and a tendency to corrosion of some components. But the main thing was some difference in caliber of the guns produced and the need for individual fitting of parts. This created certain difficulties in creating and arming a mass army. Therefore, in 1801 the French adopted the AN-IX gun, which became the main one by the time of the invasion of Russia. This gun was almost identical to the gun of the 1777 model and differed from the old one by greater unification of parts and the replacement of corroded, but not load-bearing, iron parts with copper ones. In addition, it was possible to slightly reduce the weight of the gun.

Perhaps the excellent capabilities of the 1777 model gun had an effect, but less attention was paid to rifled weapons in France. The main type of rifled weapon was the "Carbine de Versailles" model 1793 in infantry and cavalry versions. It was only in 1804 that a slightly improved AN-XII carbine was developed, which differed only slightly from the Carbine de Versailles. Saturation of the French army rifled weapons was slightly lower than the Russian one. Non-commissioned officers, sergeants and sappers from light infantry and 6 riflemen in a voltigeur company were mainly armed with rifled carbines.

The characteristics of the main guns in service with the French army were as follows.

Shotgun AN-IX. Its weight (without bayonet) is 4.375 kg, length 151.5 cm (bayonet length 46.5 cm). Caliber - 17.5 mm, bullet weight - 27.2 g, gunpowder weight - 12.24 g. Maximum firing range is 300-400 steps, effective aimed shooting range (the probability of hitting a standard target is more than 1/2) - more than 100 steps.

Rifled carbine "Carbine de Versailles": Its weight (without bayonet) is 3.45 kg, length is 102.5 cm. Caliber is 13.5 mm, bullet weight is 17.5 g, gunpowder weight is 4 g. Maximum range is approximately 1 thousand steps, effective aimed shooting range (probability of hitting a standard target is more than 1/2) - more than 500 steps.

In the field of artillery, the French army held a leading position for a long time, which was not lost in the quarter century that passed after Gribeauval's reform. But Napoleon, himself an excellent artilleryman, noted the presence of excessive calibers in the Gribeauval system. For example, Napoleon pointed out that in most cases, when firing, commanders do not make a difference between 8-pounder and 4-pounder guns. At the same time, the 8-pounders are too heavy, and the 4-pounders have weak ammunition. As a result, it was decided to settle on a 6-pound gun, which should replace both calibers.

It was also decided to switch to a new howitzer with a longer barrel length and a smaller caliber. This made it possible to increase the flatness of the trajectory and more effectively use these weapons in maneuverable field battle. In addition, this made it possible to unify the ammunition with the 24-pound siege gun.

Finally, Colonel Villentroy created heavy long-range howitzers with an increased powder charge and barrel length. These howitzers had calibers of 8, 9 and 11 inches. At the same time, the most powerful 11-inch howitzer could fire at a distance of up to 5.8 versts. The 8-inch howitzer was also used in field battles. In addition to changes in the calibers used and barrel lengths, the guns of the new models were lightweight and simplified in design.

The reform was supposed to bring French artillery to a new qualitative level. In fact, it was not carried out as decisively and effectively as in Russia. The reason was the slight superiority of French artillery over the artillery of most opponents, which already existed at the time the reform began. The “patchwork” nature of Napoleon’s empire and the lack of clear management of military production also had a negative impact. Many factories of Napoleon's empire, especially in conquered territories such as the Confederation of the Rhine, produced according to old models and in the old caliber system. So, in the end, the reform not only did not reduce, as required, the number of calibers in the army, but, on the contrary, increased it. Of the new guns, only the 6-pounder gun and the 24-pounder howitzer were fired in significant quantities. The “Grand Army” entered the war with more than two dozen artillery systems.

The characteristics of the main guns in service with the French army were as follows.

12-pounder gun of the Gribeauval system:

Gun weight - 860 kg (54 pounds), system weight - 2160 kg (135 pounds), caliber - 4.76 inches (121 mm), barrel length - 16.5 calibers.

Firing range: cannonball – 2.7–3 km, grenade – about 1.2 km, buckshot – up to 600 meters.

8-pounder Gribeauval gun

Gun weight - 580 kg (36 pounds), system weight - 1760 kg (110 pounds), caliber - 4.1 inches (104 mm), barrel length - 16.5 calibers.

Firing range: cannonball – 2.7 km, grenade – about 1 km, buckshot – up to 500 meters.

4-pounder Gribeauval gun

Gun weight - 280 kg (18 pounds), system weight - 1120 kg (70 pounds), caliber - 4.76 inches (121 mm), barrel length - 16.5 calibers.

Firing range: cannonball – 2.6 km, grenade – about 1.1 km, buckshot – up to 400 meters.

6-pounder gun of the new system

Gun weight - 400 kg (25 pounds), system weight - 1440 kg (90 pounds), caliber - 3.9 inches (96 mm), barrel length - 16.5 calibers.

Firing range: cannonball – 2.3 km, grenade – about 1 km, buckshot – up to 400 meters.

6-inch extended howitzer

Gun weight - 320 kg (20 pounds), caliber - 6 inches (164 mm), barrel length - 4 1/3 calibers.

Firing range: cannonball – 3 km, grenade – about 3 km, buckshot – up to 400 meters.

24-pound howitzer of the new system

Gun weight – 320 kg (20 pounds), caliber – 6 inches (155 mm), barrel length – 5 calibers.

Firing range: cannonball – 3 km, grenade – about 3 km, buckshot – up to 500 meters.

Although in general French artillery looked worse than the Russian due to the wide variety of calibers and the large number of low-power regimental guns, it had an advantage when fighting fortifications and manpower at long distances due to the presence of large-caliber howitzers and with a steep trajectory, which made it possible to hit the enemy behind the fortifications.

When comparing the characteristics of Russian and French weapons, several need to be taken into account general points related to its use.

During the Napoleonic Wars, volley rifle and artillery fire dominated. Only rangers and voltigeurs in loose formation could fire differently. This was caused, among other things, by the black powder used. When there was a discrepancy in the salvo, the latecomers fired into the smoky cloud, which after each salvo clouded the battle formations.

The maximum rate of fire largely depended not on the characteristics of the weapon, but on the training of the soldiers. A well-trained soldier, as practical shooting has shown even today, could easily ensure a rate of fire of 3-4 rounds per minute from a smoothbore gun using a cartridge. This pace could not be maintained for long, but allowed 10–12 salvoes to be fired at a battalion column attacking briskly, 7–9 for attacking running and 2–3 for attacking cavalry at a gallop. Given the low accuracy of fire even against close battle formations, rifle fire alone was usually not able to stop the attack of battalion columns or cuirassiers.

Field artillery had a longer firing range than smooth-bore shotguns. At the same time, the field gun had a maximum rate of fire thanks to cap loading of 7–9 rounds per minute. At the same time, the accuracy of artillery fire at equal distances was also higher. Here, too, the high tempo could not be maintained for long, but it made it possible to fire 25–35 volleys of grapeshot at a battalion column attacking at a fast pace, 15–20 against an attacking run and 7–10 against a cavalry attacking at a gallop. This rate of fire was a powerful stopping force against both infantry and cavalry, provided there were a sufficient number of guns along the length of the attacked front. Such superiority of artillery usually made it possible to win a firefight with infantry even at short distances. The power of artillery on the battlefield in relation to other types of troops was, perhaps, greatest precisely at the beginning of the 19th century.

Views