Which is better Canon or Nikon: all the facts. Comparison of Canon and Nikon cameras

If any of the brands really produced best cameras, the second would have simply given up and left the market long ago, unable to withstand the competition. Therefore, we cannot say that Canon is better than Nikon and vice versa. However, there are fundamental differences between the cameras of these two manufacturers, which we will discuss below. Before moving on to the comparison, it is important to understand: we are not going to compare specific models, we will be comparing systems as a whole.

You didn't know: Canon and Nikon are the only brands (unlike their competitors) that have semiconductor manufacturing practices and projects in space programs.

So, on to the comparison.

Optics

Canon and Nikon offer their customers a huge selection of optics. Canon makes EF and EF-S lenses with built-in focus motors, and they are fully supported on all EOS cameras. Nikon, on the other hand, produces lenses without a servo drive, so they are only suitable for cameras with a screwdriver (built-in motor). If we look at the pros and cons, Canon wins, because the lenses from this manufacturer are cheaper and easier to manufacture. For a lens from Nikon with almost the same parameters you will have to pay 15% more. At the same time, the quality of the lenses from both companies is very, very good.

Picture quality

The picture quality of different cameras is determined using DxOMark tests. Judging by them, Nikon systems confidently win in this case. The test evaluates the quality of a picture based on the information that can be obtained from the pictures.

In terms of image quality at low ISO, dynamic range width and color depth, Nikon is undoubtedly the leader - the first two lines belong to cameras from this manufacturer. The closest competitor is the device that is in position 30. However, in practice, unless you refer to tests, it is impossible to notice the difference in image quality, and you will have to try very hard to find this difference in quality between approximately equal models.

Autofocus

Until 2012, Nikon was a confident leader, if we take this parameter separately. It had a 51-point focusing system, which demonstrated excellent results even in difficult conditions. By shooting dynamic objects, it was possible to get 9 accurate pictures out of 10. For this reason, many photographers switched to Nikon devices.

However, Canon did not want to give in, and as a result of competition, a camera appeared on the market - a model with 61-point focusing, which automatically adapted to the behavior of the objects being photographed. And now some photographers were again forced to change their religion and switch to a camera.

Still, if we take focusing systems in general, then Nikon is still the leader. Because even inexpensive models like the D5300 use 39-point focusing. But in Canon cameras you often need to tinker with the settings.

Display

The display is such a secondary parameter that I don’t really want to compare them. They do not have any effect on the quality of the image, so the advantage of one of the companies will be very negligible in this parameter.

Canon usually installs tempered glass displays, medium or entry level They may even have rotating designs and touch controls. All of these are more marketing ploys than truly useful additions. By the way, there is one model (EOS 6D) with a screen with dull plastic display protection. For some reason, all the rest are made of tempered glass and an oleophobic coating.

Nikon makes everything more logical: it puts plastic display protection on inexpensive cameras, and tempered glass on expensive ones. Otherwise, there are no significant differences.

Video

Previously, DSLR cameras were aimed exclusively at professional photographers who used camcorders for video recording. Next, to satisfy the needs of novice photographers and finally extremely stupid questions like: “Why doesn’t he take videos?” Video recording functions have been introduced. The very first DSLR with the ability to record video was Nikon D90, however, the device did not make a splash. The real boom is the emergence Canon EOS 5D Mark II– a SLR camera that supported 1080p video recording.

Nikon D90 - the first SLR camera with video recording

By the way, the Canon EOS 5D Mark II camera was used to record famous TV series, for example, “House M.D.” And they filmed Dexter on a Nikon D800.

Both systems show excellent results in the hands of professionals, but Canon is more confidently and quickly developing video technology. New models Dual Pixel CMOS They already know how to focus during video smoothly and automatically.

Production

Oddly enough, the country of production plays a role in our comparison and partly it is not the quality that influences it. Nikon devices are made in Japan, but this only applies to flagship products. Other products are made in China or Thailand. Keono prefers his homeland, and even produces inexpensive cameras in Japan. The springboard for external manufacturing is the country of Taiwan with excellent and highly qualified employees and strict quality control.

Professional DSLRs

Professional SLR cameras are the pinnacle of the evolution of photographic equipment with interchangeable optics. They are expensive and multifunctional. If you don’t have at least $5,000, then you can’t even dream of buying such a camera.

The strength of professional Nikon DSLRs is their flash performance and perfect metering. Canon has very fast autofocus and lenses with excellent stabilization.

In 2007, Nikon introduced the world to the Nikon D3, which took high ISO image quality to new heights. Then, 7 years later, the Nikon D4s camera appeared, providing a maximum ISO of 409,600 and continuous shooting at a speed of 11 frames per second.

Canon is represented in the major league by two reporter cameras - the 18-megapixel EOS-1D X device (14 frames per second) and EOS-1D C, which “can” shoot 4K videos at 60 frames per second.

Which camera is the best among them is almost impossible to determine. They are for different tasks.

High-end mirrors

Models in this segment are worse than professional DSLRs and are cheaper. In this league, Canon and Nikon only offer full-frame models. The very first of them are Canon EOS 6D and Nikon D610. Both cameras have similar characteristics.

The D610 camera has 24 megapixels, continuous shooting at 6 frames/sec, a water- and dust-resistant body, and two slots for memory cards.

The EOS 6D device has only 20 megapixels, slower continuous shooting compared to its competitor, one memory card and fewer autofocus points. However, there are GPS and Wi-Fi modules. In addition, this camera performs a little better in low light.

Other similar cameras – Nikon D810 and Canon EOS 5D Mark III. The first camera, the D810, is a champion in resolution (36 megapixels). Canon EOS 5D Mark III– 22-megapixel, but it has 61-point focusing and excellent burst speed.

Average price range

Mid-price devices with APS-C sensors. They are distinguished by excellent ergonomics and high-quality, comfortable housings. In this category, Canon offers one of the oldest cameras, the EOS 7D, and the relatively new EOS 70D. The old EOS 7D has 19-point focusing and a shooting rate of 8 frames per second. EOS 70D is a 20-megapixel camera with phase focusing, a Wi-Fi module and a rotating screen, which is not needed at all.

There is also a camera that is close in cost to the Canon EOS 700D (from a lower segment). There is a 39-point focusing system, a rotating display and other goodies.

First level

Entry-level DSLRs are the cheapest devices with a mirror viewfinder and an APS-C sensor. To attract buyers, different companies use different techniques. For example, Canon offers the lightest DSLR in the world EOS 100D, as well as an 18-megapixel camera EOS 700D with hybrid focusing function for video recording and touch screen.

Nikon in this segment can only offer the D3300 model, which quickly gained popularity. This device has 24 megapixels, 11-point focusing and fairly fast continuous shooting with a frequency of 5 frames/sec. There is no low-pass filter, so those who like to take nature photographs with rich details will definitely appreciate it.

Mirrorless cameras

Previously, we talked about the difference between DSLR and mirrorless cameras. Canon recently introduced the EOS M model with an APS-C sensor and 18 megapixel resolution. There is even a whole line of lenses for it. However, there is poor focusing and a battery that discharges very quickly.

Nikon offers the buyer as many as 3 models, which are more aimed at amateurs. Particularly stands out Nikon 1 AW1– the camera is capable of shooting underwater, it is even protected from shock.

All devices boast very fast shooting - 20 frames per second, and have a 1 MB memory buffer. There are even 10 lenses for Nikon mirrorless cameras, which is already quite a lot. Everything seems to be fine, but there is just one big drawback - the entire line uses a tiny 1″ CMOS sensor, and in terms of picture quality it is much inferior to APS-C.

If you are interested in mirrorless cameras, then it is better to turn to Olympus or Panasonic - the devices there are much more interesting.

Conclusion: it is impossible to compare company systems objectively and identify any of them as the best. Therefore, it is impossible to answer the question: which is better: Canon or Nikon, because... both manufacturers have specific pros and cons. Their devices are suitable for different tasks.

At the dawn of the advent of compact digital cameras, the number of megapixels was considered the main selection criterion, but since then technology has stepped far forward. The size of the matrix has long ceased to be a determining parameter.

Cameras have become much smarter, better quality, and a division into classes has appeared. For example, if size is critical to you, pay attention to ultra-thin digital cameras. But remember that compact dimensions will affect the quality of electronics, optics and battery capacity. However, most of the shortcomings are eliminated as the cost of the camera increases.

A separate niche in the market is occupied by ultrasonic cameras with a waterproof body for underwater photography. Premium segment models are suitable for connoisseurs of high-quality images: advanced digital cameras are often purchased by professional photographers for travel to replace bulky DSLRs.

But regardless of the level of knowledge in the photosphere, when choosing, you should not blindly trust the technical description. Even famous manufacturers Nikon, Canon, and Sony have more and less successful compact digital cameras. To avoid regretting spending money, check out independent ratings of the best compact digital cameras before purchasing.

The best inexpensive compact cameras

Compact cameras are good for their ease of operation and miniature size. They don't attract attention, don't take up much space and are ideal for travel. Manufacturers have endowed them with impressive technical characteristics, but the image quality will satisfy only unassuming photographers. Professionals sigh about noise, misses and slow autofocus.

3 Canon PowerShot SX620 HS

Convenient macro mode. Best Auto Mode
A country:
Average price: 12999 rub.
Rating (2018): 4.5

A convenient and practical camera for everyday use. Available in several colors: gray, black and red. This is the case when you can choose a high-quality camera by color. The highlight of the camera is its automatic mode. It is designed to respond to 32 varieties various factors and adjust the settings to suit them. This is useful for beginner photographers who still have no idea what to configure and where to click. No additional effort is required to use it. An ideal model for those who do not like to struggle with settings and people who are not inclined towards technology.

There is a good 21.1 megapixel matrix built in. And if in the previous small camera the 20x magnification is surprising, then in this device the optical zoom is 25x. To compensate for not the highest technical characteristics, a stabilizer is installed in the model. It will help improve the quality and prevent blurriness of the photo. Focal length 25 – 623 mm. The camera is suitable for any shooting - landscapes, architecture, people and so on. Thanks to the practical automatic mode, it is more convenient to use macro photography. It comes out more vibrant and of higher quality than on similar devices. The camera has built-in NFC and WLAN modules. Therefore, you will no longer need to use wires.

2 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX350

Stable camera. The most elegant. The most compact
A country: Japan (made in China)
Average price: RUB 15,606.
Rating (2018): 4.6

The model can safely be called an elegant and budget option for filming for every day. It is presented on the market in three colors: white, red, black. At the same time, the camera is small in size. It weighs 167 grams including batteries and measures only 9.6 x 5.5 x 2.6 cm. It is easy to take with you and will not get in the way. It’s nice that among the characteristics there was a 20x optical zoom with minimal camera dimensions. The camera combines convenience and practicality.

There is a built-in stabilizer against shaking hands. Matrix 21.1 MP, with aperture F3.5-F6.5. Focal length 25 – 500 mm. At first glance this may not seem like much. But considering that this is a digital camera not designed for professional photography, this figure is encouraging. The camera is designed for shooting on auto settings. Therefore, for walking, going to concerts or everyday shooting, the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX350 is better than others. The pictures come out crisp and clear, without blurring. The menu will expand the basic photography capabilities. It will provide various options: from the beach to shooting in the dark. And the “kitchen” mode will turn dishes into photo masterpieces. In addition, the camera shoots video in Full HD resolution, 50 frames per second.

1 Nikon Coolpix B500

Long working time. Simplest
Country: Japan
Average price: 16530 rub.
Rating (2018): 4.8

A universal model for those who shoot for pleasure. It will not be easy for him to compete with more expensive options and SLR cameras. But for its low price you will get everything a beginning photographer needs. Simple controls, high image quality and compact size. The B500 is a faithful friend that will easily fit into a bag, backpack and some pockets if you have them: the camera measures 11.4 x 7.8 x 9.5 cm and weighs only 542 grams. The camera runs on AA batteries. Therefore, it will become indispensable when traveling - because it does not require an outlet to recharge the battery. All you need to do is take the required number of batteries with you.

In terms of technical capabilities, the model is a confident average. The 16 megapixel matrix is ​​complemented by a high-quality F3 – F6.5 aperture and a lens with low-dispersion lenses and 12 optical elements. Shooting speed – 7.4 photos per second. Not even all more serious cameras can do this. Focal range – 22.50 – 900 mm. Equipped with 40x digital zoom. With a camera you can safely go on a photo hunt for birds. Or take high-quality pictures from a distance. You should also pay attention to the modes. There are few of them, but it is better to practice in advance before shooting to determine the most profitable and high-quality option. Through a special application it is easy to synchronize with a smartphone. The camera supports Bluetooth and Wi-Fi technologies.

The best compact cameras: price - quality

3 Nikon Coolpix B700

The most sophisticated settings management
A country: Japan (made in China)
Average price: 28890 rub.
Rating (2018): 4.5

A camera with promising characteristics. The main advantage is the price, which pleasantly pleases the eye with its capabilities. It all starts with the focal length - from 24 to 1440 mm. Therefore, the camera will allow you to take both landscape photography and macro photography. You can work with near and far objects due to the 60x optical zoom and the included optical stabilizer. Built-in high-quality 21.14 megapixel matrix. The quality and thoughtfulness of the build also ensures a comfortable grip when shooting. The body is slightly larger than a regular point-and-shoot camera - 12.5x8.5x10.7 cm. And the camera weighs up to 570 grams. But this allows you to feel the camera in your hands and focus on shooting.

The design of the model is pleasing - 13 buttons provide full access to all functions. They control both basic functions and more advanced ones. For example, saturation correction or exposure. Camera programs are designed for both beginners and professionals. Therefore, regardless of the regime, everyone will find what is convenient for them. The camera supports the native interface, so for those who are moving from another version, Nikon will not cause problems. Technologies such as NFC, Bluetooth and WLAN work. When shooting, you need to be careful about the lighting. You may need more light for good clarity.

2 Canon PowerShot SX60

Better case coverage. Maximum ease of use
Country: Japan
Average price: RUB 27,849.
Rating (2018): 4.7

The model is ideal for those who want to save money and reach new level as a photographer, but thinks it’s too early for a DSLR camera. In terms of its size, the camera cannot be called very compact. It is slightly smaller than a professional camera - 12.8x9.3x11.4 cm. And the weight of this device is 650 grams. The model compensates for its size with its convenience. It fits your hand completely, and rubber inserts will make the shooting process even more comfortable: your fingers don’t slip and don’t get tired so quickly. The camera can be equipped with an additional flash or microphone. There is also a native flash with manual control. One move and you can use it.

Matrix 16.8 megapixels with dimensions of 1/2.3 inches. Maximum size frame – 4608x3072. Focal length 21 – 1365 mm. Optical 65x zoom available. It also includes a zoom assistant: for it to work, you need to select the desired zoom zone on the screen, after which the camera will zoom in on everything on its own without unnecessary movements. There is also a drawback - it is better to use a tripod for filming. Since the stabilizer does not always cope with the load. High-quality Full HD video recording is available, up to 60 frames per second. You can also monitor the sound quality using the microphone jack. Wi-Fi module supported.

1 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX 100 II

Optimal ratio of price and technical characteristics
Country: Japan
Average price: 44,990 rub.
Rating (2018): 4.9

The camera represents the best ratio of size and functionality. The durable magnesium case immediately impresses with its reliability. The digital camera is compact, the lens is almost completely hidden in the body, but at the same time Sony has decent functionality.

The practical range of focal lengths from 28 to 100 millimeters is suitable for shooting in a cramped apartment and on a spacious street. At short focal lengths, the lens demonstrates excellent aperture ratio (1.8), it is comfortable to work with in low light conditions, but in the twilight the “glass” is a bit dark for distant objects. The ISO value remains operational up to 1600, and 25-point autofocus quickly picks out the desired objects. People who are accustomed to processing photographs will be pleased with the RAW format.

A special feature of the compact camera is the built-in rotating flash: to avoid overexposure and harsh shadows, point it at the ceiling. Other features worth noting include a rotating screen, a hot shoe, NFC and Wi-Fi modules.

For compact, pocket-sized digital cameras, the Cyber-shot DSC-RX 100 II produces stunning images that will top rankings.

The best advanced digital cameras

Advanced compact cameras are purchased not only by wealthy photography enthusiasts, but also by professionals as an alternative to DSLRs. Modest dimensions do not attract the attention of passers-by and allow you to travel light. Premium cameras are different high quality pictures, coated optics, the ability to shoot in RAW format and use manual settings. For professionals, a crop factor close to 35mm film is important.

3 Canon PowerShot G5 X

Of course, this camera is a little larger than the pocket options. You can't pack it that easily. But there are more opportunities for shooting. The camera is intended for more advanced users: this is a model where everything can and should be configured manually, and not every new user can handle this. Although beginners will also be able to find something for themselves in it. Some elements of the camera protrude noticeably above the body. This is not very convenient when carried in a bag, but it will help during shooting. Due to the display, which rotates in two axes, it is easy to shoot from any chosen angle. There is a manual flash raise. Considering how flashes themselves like to appear at inopportune moments, this is more of an advantage than a disadvantage.

20.9 megapixel matrix with a size of 1 inch. Focal length – 24 – 100.80 mm. Aperture F1.8-F2.8 For those who want to shoot landscapes and small objects up close, the camera is perfect. The optical zoom will be a little disappointing, since only 4.2 times magnification is built into the model. The quality at this approach is high and increases even more due to the stabilizer. But for working with distant objects it is better to choose something else. But the camera has the best display and viewfinder in its class. And due to the high aperture of the lens, the pictures come out better than other similar models.

2 Panasonic Lumix DMC–LX 100

Best price. Shooting video in better resolution 3840x2160
Country: Japan
Average price: 50,500 rub.
Rating (2018): 4.7

In the TOP 3 of the best compact cameras in the premium segment, the DMC-LX 100 is the most compact. But the size did not prevent us from concentrating all modern technologies in a miniature model. Panasonic is attracting the attention of professional photographers looking for a compact alternative to DSLRs on vacation. The first thing that catches your eye is the advanced manual control, which is what the manufacturer relies on. The ergonomics are impressive: most of the settings are located on the body.

Technical characteristics are worthy of the leaders in the rating. Acceptable crop factor 2, support for RAW format, coated optics (F1.7 - F2.8), rate of fire 11 frames per second. The minimum shooting distance is suitable for macro and is only 3 centimeters. Nice additions include autofocus illumination, HDMI and Wi-Fi. According to reviews, ISO remains working up to 6400. The only thing that upsets us is autofocus misses when focusing at long distances.

A digital camera is perfect for recording video, including in 4K resolution. However, the picture quality is not ideal: buyers complain about jerky autofocus and flickering when zoomed in.

1 Leica Q (Typ 116)

Best shooting quality. Fixed focal length
Country: Germany
Average price: RUB 326,925.
Rating (2018): 4.9

Leica compact digital cameras traditionally impress in two ways. Firstly, the prohibitive cost: it would be enough to buy a set of equipment for professional photography. Secondly, thoughtfulness and manufacturability. The Typ 116 camera is close to perfection. Manual settings, 10 fps fire rate, flash hot shoe, 100% viewfinder, touch screen, quiet shutter...

But what makes it the best is the quality of the photographs. Despite its compact size, the camera is full-frame! The 26 megapixel matrix is ​​comparable to the electronic content of professional DSLRs. The camera is suitable for macro photography - the minimum focusing distance is 17 centimeters. Coated optics (F 1.7) will help you achieve clear images even in low light conditions and brings the model to first place in the rating.

The only thing that may upset wealthy buyers is the fixed focal length of 28 millimeters. It is impossible to zoom in/out of objects in the frame using the buttons; you will have to run around with your feet. Among the shortcomings, users note a weak battery, but the problem is solved by purchasing a spare battery.

The best digital cameras with ultrasonics

Digital cameras with ultrasonics cannot be called compact. Due to their powerful built-in optics, they resemble SLR cameras in size. The main advantage of ultrazooms is their versatility and impressive magnification. The zoom ratio is comparable to telescopes and allows you to see even craters on the moon or an airplane flying in the sky. However, quality suffers from versatility. The picture will suit the unassuming amateur, but to a professional the photographs will seem noisy and blurry.

3 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000

The best camera for video shooting
Country: Japan
Average price: 51,990 rub.
Rating (2018): 4.5

High quality and convenient camera for experienced users. The price-quality ratio of this model is pleasing. Just like her superzoom. At first glance, 16x magnification doesn't seem to get you very close. But the desired effect is achieved through a special focusing system. Its nuance is that it consists of 49 active points. This allows you to reach a different level in shooting quality. The effect is enhanced by a tripod or built-in stabilizer, which allows you to work handheld without much difficulty. Matrix resolution – 20.1 MP. The aperture setting is very good: F2.8 – F4.0. Shooting speed – up to 8 frames per second, depending on external factors: light, weather, etc. The camera is voluminous. It is made according to the best traditions of Panasonic DSLR design. Weight – 831 grams. The powerful 13.7 x 9.9 x 13.1 cm body allows you to easily and comfortably take handheld photographs. You don't have to hold your breath to get a high-quality photo.

In addition to high-quality performance of its main functions, the model is capable of replacing a good video camera. Supports Full HD resolution up to 100 fps and VGA up to 300 fps. Connectors for light and microphone will complement the overall picture of the shooting. Therefore, such a camera is a universal solution for those who are involved in both photography and video shooting. Remember - even with high technical stabilization parameters, it is better to shoot video from a tripod.

2 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX 400

The best ratio of price and functionality. Popular ultrasonic camera
A country: Japan (manufactured in China, Thailand)
Average price: RUB 29,990.
Rating (2018): 4.5

The Sony camera claims the first position in the rating thanks to its affordable price for an ultrazoom with 50x zoom. This is the best camera in its class, but the wide range of focal lengths affects the image quality. The Cyber-shot DSC-HX 400 is criticized for its lack of sharpness and noise in its images.

And although the 21-megapixel matrix is ​​comparable in size to semi-professional DSLRs, with a crop factor of 5 this parameter does not play a significant role. The disadvantages of a digital camera also include the small battery capacity. It lasts for about 300 frames, and the charging system is not very convenient.

The advantages include a rotating screen, Wi-Fi, a hotshoe for on-camera flash, manual settings for shutter speed and aperture. The camera is good for those who like to play with ultrasonics; it will allow them to learn the basics of photography, but it is definitely not suitable for those who appreciate ringing sharpness in photographs.

1 Nikon Coolpix P900

Record 83x optical zoom
Country: Japan
Average price: RUB 37,840.
Rating (2018): 4.6

The camera is rightfully considered the leader of the rating best cameras with ultrasound. Manufacturers have squeezed everything possible out of optics, and today it is difficult to imagine a more powerful magnification system. Nikon has a wide range of focal lengths: with one press of a button it turns from super-zoom to wide-angle (focal length from 24 millimeters). For lovers of wildlife and astronomy, special “moon” and “bird watching” modes are provided.

The rate of fire is 7 frames per second. Of course, when shooting at ultra-long distances you will need a tripod, but when photographing close objects handheld, the innovative vibration reduction system will help. Fans of technical bells and whistles will be pleased with the built-in Wi-Fi and GPS modules, as well as a convenient rotating display. However, professionals will be disappointed by the picture quality. According to reviews, Nikon will only take sharp photos in sunny weather at ISO 100–200

The best digital cameras with a waterproof body (for shooting underwater)

Fans of outdoor activities and travel primarily pay attention to protection from moisture. Digital cameras with waterproof casings are not afraid of sea waves, splashes of waterfalls and immersion under water. The best models continue to shoot at depths of up to 15 meters. If you take a camera specifically for such purposes, pay attention to the lens aperture or think about additional light sources.

3 Nikon Coolpix W100

The simplest and cheapest. Super protection against damage
A country: Japan (made in China)
Average price: 9664 rub.
Rating (2018): 4.5

Suitable for those who do not know which side to approach the camera from so as not to drop it. Who has to buy more than one protective case because of children, constant travel, and animals? Its main advantage is protection against water and impacts. It will be a good solution for those who are afraid of breaking their equipment or are not very careful, but want to leave a lot of memories after a walk or trip.

In terms of characteristics, the camera is inferior to the leaders in the rating. The resolution of its matrix is ​​only 14.17 megapixels with a size of 1/3.1 inches. For the current time, this is an average camera. She misses the stars from the sky. But he can easily photograph all the important moments in life. Although objectively it does not reach SLR and more serious digital cameras. But at the same time, it has many advantages for which it deserves attention. The weight of the camera is pleasing - it is so unnoticeable that you even have to double-check whether it is in place. 177 grams - and this is a whole camera that is ready to shoot at any second. There is an optical 3x zoom - not much, but for family vacation and photographing landscapes will suffice. Full HD video recording is also available. The model supports Bluetooth and Wi-Fi. Available in different colors: yellow, blue, white, green, pink.

2 Leica X-U (Typ 113)

Better picture quality. Aperture. Digital Image Stabilizer
Country: Germany
Average price: 247,000 rub.
Rating (2018): 4.7

In terms of technical characteristics, the model could take first place in the ranking of the best digital cameras with a waterproof body. The impression is spoiled only by the cost, comparable to full-frame DSLRs. The digital camera is ideal for lovers of extreme recreation: from the “does not burn in fire, does not sink in water” series. The shockproof, dustproof, sealed housing allows you to shoot in any weather and underwater. The safety margin when shooting at a depth of up to 15 meters is enough for a record 60 minutes.

Leica X-U (Typ 113) has impressive picture quality characteristics. One of the brightest compact cameras, which can shoot without additional lighting at dusk and even underwater. The crop factor of 1.5 is comparable to amateur DSLRs, the minimum focusing distance is 20 centimeters. The manufacturer managed to achieve ringing sharpness thanks to a fixed focal length of 23 millimeters. In terms of characteristics, it is closer to wide-angle ones, and the lack of zoom will seem unusual to most users.

1 Nikon Coolpix W300

The optimum ratio of price and quality
A country: Japan (made in Indonesia)
Average price: 21140 rub.
Rating (2018): 4.7

A camera that meets both land and underwater standards. The price does not bite like a shark, but swims up and pleases like a dolphin. The small size is the first thing you should pay attention to this model. It will be convenient to use such a device on the beach and at sea. You can put the strap on your hand or carry it in a beach bag - and the camera will definitely not get lost. Weight - only 231 grams with dimensions 11.2x6.6x2.9 cm.

It’s nice that there is no unnecessary sharpness when shooting – portraits come out soft. With the expectation that the camera is designed to work in different conditions, it has built-in fast focusing. The camera also allows you to easily switch between different settings, which will allow you to quickly select the right shooting mode. There is an accessible and easy menu in which you can completely customize the device for yourself.

Matrix – 16.76 MP with a size of 1/2.3. A good focal length is built in - 24 - 120mm. The optical zoom is small - only 5x. But given the operating conditions of the camera, such an increase should be sufficient. It shoots at 7 frames per second. The lack of a viewfinder may be a little disappointing, but this is more a matter of habit. Optical image stabilizer available. This helps improve the photo several times and avoid unnecessary noise. Shooting in 4K mode is also provided. Supports Wi-Fi, GPS and Bluetooth.

What should a beginner amateur photographer choose? Which brand should you prefer? Answering these questions is not so simple. People often like to compare several models from Nikon and Canon in the same price segment. Then a third player - a Sony enthusiast - can join this pair with his own view of the camera market. However, having limited their choice to a few models, novice amateur photographers look at this problem rather narrowly and do not take into account many more important factors. We will talk about them in our article.

You shouldn’t compare camera A with camera B, pitting them head-to-head.

When you compare one camera to another, one model may have a clear advantage. This is not without reason: manufacturers have never released two completely different models, endowing them with certain advantages over competitors. For example, the Nikon 5300 has a very advanced autofocus system - competitors only have this in the semi-professional segment.

And Sony cameras have a much better video mode and more various kinds of electronic features, filters, and additional functions.

All these advantages in numbers are rarely fully realized by amateurs, but can cause you to jump to a hasty conclusion and lead to a rash purchase. Before you give preference to one or another parameter, think about how important it will be for you when shooting. Remember that most of the time you will be “just shooting” without using fancy AF tracking algorithms or the many built-in filters.

About the complex Nikon menu and the small fleet of Sony optics

After comparing specific models and identifying all possible disadvantages and advantages, buyers like to appeal to opinions read on forums or heard from more experienced friends: about the number of optics in the system, about the features of camera control... There can be a lot of options! But controlling any camera is a matter of habit. In principle, this does not apply to novice photographers, since habit is acquired. It takes years to develop. So the convenience or inconvenience of the interface of a particular model should never be judged based on the opinion of another person. A novice photographer easily adapts to the control features of almost any camera.

With optics it's a little more complicated. When choosing a system, we choose lenses. Sony inherits a large legacy from Konica-Minolta, and Canon has a huge stock of old optics available on the secondary market. It is worth considering here that the matrices of digital cameras are constantly being improved, and a lens that was sharp on a six-megapixel matrix will not demonstrate all the capabilities of a sensor with a resolution of 18 megapixels or more.

Lenses, like cameras, keep up with the times. Any brand from the big three has a full line of optics for every taste and budget. Moreover, the question of whether a manufacturer has a large or small fleet of optics is very ambiguous. It makes sense to consider only lens models recent years releases that meet high modern image quality requirements. And here all manufacturers will have approximately the same set.

Thus, as in any situation, you need to have your own head on your shoulders and not take the word of people who are only slightly more experienced in the matter of choosing cameras. Many problems turn out to be far-fetched and made up out of thin air.

Service availability

Equipment is not insured against breakdowns. Minor drops, dust, moisture, extreme temperatures - all this can cause the camera or its components to fail. In such cases, professionals have a second camera, a spare one, but for an amateur this is a luxury. Many amateur photographers have passed through service centers. It is worth finding out in advance about the availability of a service in your region or city, as well as the quality of the work they carry out. There is no point in additional megapixels or autofocus points if you cannot repair the camera if it breaks, or you can, but with great effort. However, even if there is no service in your city, there is always the possibility of sending the camera to another city. In any case, you will not be left without qualified help, it just may take more time.

Focus on friends

DSLR and now mirrorless cameras are ubiquitous. It is possible that you have a more experienced friend or acquaintance who has made his choice and has already acquired his own fleet of optics. In this case, you make your task much easier because you have the opportunity to try this or that camera or lens. Even if you don’t have them yet, you can easily find like-minded people via the Internet. Large communities of fans of this or that brand have long been formed online, and their participants hold regular live meetings. You can also try joining a local photography club by finding it through a local city forum. Oddly enough, choosing a camera “like your friends” turns out to be justified here: they will always help you with advice and let you try an interesting lens for a day or two.

Read tests and reviews

There are many tests and reviews of technology available online today. For example, in our tests we try to pay maximum attention not to instrumental comparisons, but to testing cameras in real conditions. Because we sincerely believe that the main thing is how the camera takes pictures in real life, and not at all the difference in noise or other parameters measured as a percentage.

Listen to your own taste

Even if you are armed with all our advice and have already made a choice, there is always a chance that something will go wrong. The difference between systems lies not so much in the objective field as in the subjective field. There is no one undisputed leader. Photography is subjective, and you should listen to the whispers of the heart. Whether Canon, Nikon, or Sony, they all have their own philosophy, their own perception of color and vision of this world. Look at the photos and ask yourself if you like them. This, in our opinion, is the most important. You have to like the photos. Your camera should produce “your” color in the pictures, and your optics should paint “your” picture.

— The most powerful photo enlargement – ​​83 times; 2 - Inexpensive camera with a good magnifying effect. One of the most popular models among consumers. 1 – Harmonious correspondence between price and properties; 2 – Better pictures due to increased aperture. Electronic image stabilization;

3 — Compact camera with touch screen.

When digital cameras first began to appear on the market, the number of megapixels was the determining factor. It spoke about the quality of the picture. Now the technical capabilities of the equipment have expanded, and the volume of the matrix is ​​not the main quality for a camera.

A variety of digital cameras allows you to choose a copy according to different parameters- in terms of size, functionality, and so on. The smaller the camera, the more modest the capabilities of the optics and battery will be. Buyers choose models of different classes to suit their needs. It should be taken into account that the higher the cost of the device, the higher its capabilities. Manufacturers respond to consumer demands. They produce cameras for filming underwater landscapes, for home photography and for travel. When taking a camera with you on a hike, it is important that it does not take up much space, is lightweight, and takes high-quality pictures in any weather conditions. Modern digital devices are replacing bulky mirror analogues.

To choose best model According to his requirements, the buyer needs to know the features of each instance. After all, even famous brands have more and less successful digital cameras.

Good cameras at affordable prices

Small cameras are designed for amateur photography. It is easy to use and convenient to take on a trip or on a holiday. They have sufficient capabilities for non-professional photography. Sound quality and slow autofocus are minor disadvantages of these cameras.

Score (2018): 4.6

Advantages: The highest quality zoom optics

Manufacturer country: Japan

The device was released into production in 2015 and has leadership in the quality of optical zoom. Advanced focusing capabilities make it possible to shoot indoors and outdoors with equal success. Fairly high-quality footage for amateur cameras can be obtained during the day and at night.

For non-professional reporters, it is important that the settings are set simply, and better yet, automatically. Buttons for settings are located on the body. This model is similar in shape to old SLR cameras; it is comfortable to hold in your hands while shooting due to the rubber non-slip tabs. A special case is required for transportation.

To get good, clear frames during shooting, the image is well stabilized and focused. The camera clearly captures static objects at close range. It is not entirely suitable for fast moving figures. Shooting speed – 1 frame per 2 seconds. This technique is not suitable for sports reporting.

Score (2018): 4.9

Advantages: High shooting speed performance at a low price

Manufacturer country: Japan

This model has been stable on the market for many years. It is a winner according to consumers. The stylish steel case protects the device from mechanical shocks and scratches. A special coating protects against stains. The high photosensitivity of the lens depends on the aperture being open to F2.7.

Video shooting is carried out in Full HD mode, this gives high-quality fast frames and a clear image of moving objects.

This model is not intended for professional photography; there are no manual settings for aperture and shutter speed. For a photographer, basic knowledge and skills in photography will be enough. A negative point in the characteristics of this technique is the insufficient quality of photographs during automatic shooting. Automatic cannot balance autofocus and white color. But this does not prevent the model from holding a leading position in the line of budget cameras for 5 years.

Good inexpensive high quality cameras

Score (2018): 4.5

Advantages: Improved viewfinder, combined autofocus

Manufacturer country: China

Small dimensions make the device similar to ordinary soap dishes. But the range of functions and their quality are much higher than those of the first digital cameras. It won't fit in a small purse and has a rather convex lens. The control method is more similar to film cameras. There is a button for manual image adjustment. It differs from conventional analogues in the way it is switched on. To do this, you need to rotate the lens ring. It does not completely retract into the camera body when not in use.

White color is not automatically set - overexposed images may occur. Uncharacteristic noise interference appears during shooting. The camera is sensitive to light - you can shoot in the semi-darkness of a poorly lit room and on the street at a late hour. The footage will be clear. Expanded capabilities are provided by the amplitude of focal lengths from 28 to 112 mm.

The device is affordable in the class of its capabilities. It is popular with buyers. Good video quality is ensured by high speed – 12 frames per second. Many additional functions are a bonus to the main characteristics of this model.

Score (2018): 4.9

Advantages: Balance of cost and quality characteristics

Manufacturer country: Japan

Advantages	Flaws
Rugged housing Automatic focus adjustment Rotating flash	High price

The Japanese camera is a leader in its class, despite high price. The device is small in size and contains truly Japanese quality and scope of functions. The durable, stylish body fits comfortably in your hand when working with it. The lens protrudes slightly beyond the body.

You can conduct versatile shooting without complex settings. This camera can be used both indoors and outdoors. You can shoot in any weather and time of day. This is one of the main advantages of the model. It has good photosensitivity. ISO provides operating conditions up to 1600. Focus guidance and adjustment are automatic. There is a RAW format.

To even out the balance of light and shadow, the rotating flash is directed upward. Other features include a rotating screen, hot shoe, Wi-Fi

The quality of the images for a “pocket” digital camera is excellent. A large range of settings, including automatic ones, makes this model in demand even among professionals. That's why it occupies a leading position in its class.

Leaders in the advanced digital camera class

Advanced devices are bought by experienced amateurs who know a lot about photography and professional photographers. A compact and lightweight camera does not take up much space in a traveler’s luggage, but allows you to capture all the brightest things you see in the best possible way.

These models are at the top stage of the evolution of such technology; they provide high-quality images due to the possibility of using automation and manual settings, and improved optics. The crop factor brings image quality closer to 35mm film

Score (2018): 4.6

Advantages: One of the most popular cameras of its level

Manufacturer country: Japan

The Japanese camera has a fairly high price, which is justified by the high functionality of the device. They started producing this model in 2014. It is purchased by amateurs and photographers for whom the quality of the images is of great importance.

The wide aperture makes it possible to work without flash in good light conditions. In bright light, a shading gray filter is activated. At five times optical zoom You can take macro photography.

Video shooting can be done in Full HD mode. There is a moving touch screen, Wi-Fi, autofocus.

One of the negative aspects is the lack of a viewfinder. It will have to be purchased additionally.

Score (2018): 4.8

Advantages: Optimal cost. The highest quality video recording

Manufacturer country: Japan

The second most popular model in its class by consumers is given to the PANASONIC LUMIX DMC–LX 100 model. This is the smallest device in size, but all the achievements are concentrated in it modern technologies for this technique. This is a high-end functional camera.

It is used by professional photographers instead of SLR devices. A distinctive feature is the manual configuration of all basic functions. This is an important property of technology for experts and professionals. All systems are configured on the model body.

The model combines the properties of a good video camera and a photo camera. You can use it to make videos and good pictures for your archive or work materials.

Score (2018): 4.9

Advantages: The highest quality shooting, optimal focus fixation

Manufacturer country: Germany

Advantages	Flaws
The ability to manually configure functions is important for professional work High video speed Built-in full view viewfinder Hot shoe Push Button Touch Screen Coated optical system Silent shutter release	Can't change focal length in settings Small powerful battery

Among professional cameras, despite the exorbitant price, Leica takes first place. There is an excuse for this. German video technology is an example of high technology. This is, in fact, the most advanced achievement in the field of video and photo production.

This device makes the highest quality pictures unattainable by competitors. Its matrix by technical parameters equivalent to a professional SLR camera. You can take high-quality photos from very close distances.

But this “sun” also has spots - the fixed focal length cannot be changed by settings. You will have to come closer to the subject or, conversely, move away from it. The battery's own reserve is small. But it can be strengthened with an additional battery.

The best cameras with ultrasonics

Digital cameras of this class cannot be miniature due to powerful optics. They are similar in appearance to mirror devices. Their main excellent feature is the strong magnification of the object. Zoom properties allow you to photograph even the craters of volcanoes on the Moon. They have the magnification power of observatory telescopes.

In this case, the picture is not very clear, but impressive. This model can be used to take long distance shots. For example, in a nature reserve when observing animals in the wild.

Score (2018): 4.6

Advantages: Inexpensive camera with good magnifying effect. One of the popular models among consumers

Manufacturer country: Japan (assembled China and Thailand)

A powerful camera at an affordable price is given one of the leading positions in the line of ultrasonic cameras. It has a 50x magnification resource. Wide focus distorts the properties of the image, and the picture turns out a little blurry.

The powerful matrix (21 megapixels) competes in versatility with professional SLR cameras.

The battery allows you to take 300 shots. It needs to be charged frequently; this is not very convenient, especially if filming is carried out in the field.

Score (2018): 4.7

Advantages: The most powerful photo enlargement – ​​83 times

Manufacturer country: Japan

The camera has impressive dimensions in width due to the protruding optical system. This is the leading model in terms of image magnification. The Japanese are the best in the field of creating optics for photography. They made a lens that was unattainable in terms of magnification.

This technique can be used by both nature lovers and scientists who photograph celestial bodies and objects moving in the sky.

Nature lovers can capture the flight of birds and distant objects that are impossible to reach. When shooting with this device, they will be clearly depicted in the photograph. Amateur astronomers can make a whole series of portraits of the Moon and stars.
To obtain a clearer image, the shooting speed is slowed down to 7 frames/sec. When working with distant objects, you will need to mount the camera on a fixed tripod.

The clearest pictures are taken on a bright sunny day.

Digital cameras for underwater photography with sealed housing

Protection from moisture penetration into the device plays an important role for those who like to relax by the water, engage in skiing, and take pictures. undersea world. The most advanced models can operate at a depth of 15 meters. This type of photography requires additional lighting.

Score (2018): 4.6

Advantages: Compact camera with touch screen

Manufacturer country: Japan (China assembly)

The waterproof housing protects the camera from weather disasters. It is in demand among lovers of extreme sports. This device easily fits in any pocket and is always at hand. Zoom – 5x. This is one of the first models of waterproof cameras. It is gradually becoming obsolete, giving way to more advanced analogues. Compared to them, the quality of the images leaves much to be desired. Photosensitivity is quite low - it allows you to shoot underwater only at the surface during daylight hours.

Score (2018): 4.8

Advantages: Higher quality images due to increased aperture. Electronic image stabilization

Manufacturer country: Germany

The price of a full-frame DSLR puts this model one step below the leader. The shooting quality is excellent, the sealed case protects the mechanism from harmful and humid environments.

In addition, there is protection from dirt and impacts. The device can shoot in any weather and in any environment, including underwater. The battery is designed for 1 hour of such shooting underwater. A big advantage is the high aperture ratio - the device takes high-quality pictures at dusk and under water. The closest shooting distance is 20 cm. Ideal sharpness is achieved with a fixed focus.

Score (2018): 4.8

Advantages: Harmonious correspondence between price and properties

Manufacturer country: Indonesia

Advantages	Flaws
Five times zoom Macro photography capability Wi-Fi and GPS Automatic aperture and shutter speed	Insufficient light sensitivity when shooting underwater

Cost plays an important role for many consumers. At the same time, everyone wants to have a multifunctional device. The Nikon model is such a compromise.

For relaxation, this is a universal solution. The protected body, small volumes and weight will appeal to extreme sports enthusiasts. This camera has a lot of positive feedback buyers. At an affordable price, it has all the characteristics of modern digital devices. You can work with it even in the cold.

January 1st, 2020 , 07:13 pm

This rating differs from many commercial reviews in that all the devices presented in the rating were actually tested in this magazine and many of them participated in comparative reviews.
Below in this article you can find a table of all the parameters taken into account, a description of the criteria for assigning a particular rating, etc. Some parameters are subjective and based on my personal experience using the device, others are obtained by calculation using the parameters of the technical characteristics of the devices.

Rating of devices in terms of the qualities most important for a novice photographer


When forming this rating, I proceeded from the fact that some functions and parameters are more important for a novice user, and some are less important. In addition, priority was taken into account the parameters of the device, which would allow a novice user to get the best quality photographs with minimal effort. In general, this rating, based on rating parameters and coefficients, is exactly the list that I would recommend to a beginning photographer. This rating also takes into account the cost factor of the device, but it is not so high that we only get cheap devices in first place. Here is a balanced list that takes into account both characteristics and cost. A novice user just needs to take the first five devices from the list and decide on the selection criteria - the cheapest option or the highest quality pictures directly from the camera, or choose the device with pictures from which you like the most.
By choosing devices from the last five items on the list, a novice user will not only spend significantly more money, but also with a very high degree of probability will receive pictures from these devices of significantly worse quality than purchasing devices in the first five. The device for a beginning photographer is the highest quality JPEG straight from the camera, a user-friendly interface, light weight and a price range from low to above average.

Rating of devices with high consumer qualities most in demand among amateurs


As in the previous rating, the result does not mean that the Sony A7 will be the best and the only choice for the amateur. Rating shows 5 best cameras, which would suit an amateur. Then the choice is up to the consumer - what kind of case the amateur is used to using, how important is price, weight, whether there are preferences for the brand, etc. For example, here the first point is the Sony A7 because it is a light and small camera with a full-frame sensor, which has characteristics that exceed those of other cameras on this list.

Rating of cameras for professionals


Making a rating for professionals is a thankless task. They know everything themselves. Here I am rather giving a rating for amateur and novice photographers on which camera to choose if they are seriously aiming to become professionals. I am a supporter of choosing a professional camera in this case because... In this case, studying will be as effective as possible - you will immediately see all your mistakes and will learn to use the professional functions of the devices.

Rating for landscape painters who go hiking or on long trips where they meet a wide variety of people weather conditions. The first rating is intended for amateurs who, for example, simply go hiking and choose a suitable camera for this.


A camera for landscape photography must have certain characteristics. For example, color is important, otherwise you may lose color scheme, dynamic range, moisture protection is important, the number of pictures that can be taken on one charge is important, weight is important. These parameters are mutually exclusive in some cases. Here in the top five there are a variety of options.

Rating for professional landscape painters


The rating turned out to be almost the same, except that in one case Canon was in first place and Nikon in second. The difference in this case is that in order to get the highest quality photos, Nikon requires the use of a tripod in most cases, but with the Canon 5D Mark III you can shoot handheld when a tripod would be required on Nikon.
In this rating, it’s not entirely clear to me why the Fujifilm X-T1 ended up at the bottom of the list. It is necessary to analyze because from my point of view, it is quite suitable for a hike.

Brief description of the devices that took part in testing:

• One of the most popular devices among professionals, amateurs and even novice photographers. The device is very well known, is one of the most popular devices on the market, has a pleasant harmonious color rendition, implements very accurate exposure metering and practically does not make mistakes with white balance. For a beginner, this device can become a model that does not require much effort when shooting, and for a professional, it is an excellent tool for a photo artist. Despite the fact that the device does not have the most outstanding dynamic range today, it is compensated by excellent performance at high ISOs


• Comparative review


• Comparative review Nikon D800 and Canon 5D mark III:


• Comparative review of Canon EOS 5D Mark III and Nikon D800:



• Canon EOS 5D Mark III Comparative Review:


• Comparative review of Canon EOS 5D Mark III and Samsung NX210:


• Comparative review of Canon EOS 5D Mark III and Panasonic G5:


• Canon EOS 5D mark III, Panasonic G5x, Leica X2, Sigma DP2 Merrill:


• Continued review: Canon EOS 5D mark III, Panasonic G5x, Leica X2, Sigma DP2 Merrill:


• Norway with Canon EOS 5D mark III, Olympus OM-D EM-5 and Canon 650D:

• The device for beginners and advanced amateurs. Pleasant color rendition, excellent exposure metering, good JPEG, excellent rotating touch screen. It is worth noting new type matrices with dual pixels, which are also phase sensors. This makes focusing in video mode much easier.


• Comparative review of Canon EOS 70D and Sony A7:


• Canon 70D Preview:

• One of the most popular amateur devices. The reason for this is the low price, pleasant color rendition, good job exposure metering and minimal time for photo editing. JPEG straight out of the camera also looks good.


• Comparative review of Canon 700D and Samsung NX300:

Fujifilm X-T1

• New waterproof device from Fujifilm. At one time, the X Pro1 made a splash in the market for compact cameras with interchangeable lenses. This time there was no success. The same technologies, the same shortcomings, the same color, the same matrix resolution. The only thing that has noticeably changed is autofocus - it is noticeably faster. The camera is not for everyone because has color rendering features, as well as not always clear extended dynamic range modes that are not so easy to use. You either really like the camera or don't like it at all. I haven't seen any other opinions about Fuji cameras. It must be said that there are quite a lot of fans of this system and there are a large number of photographs taken with Fuji cameras that could be called a work of art. In fact, the camera is good, but if you are objective, you need to take into account the shortcomings that it has.


• Comparative review of Fujifilm X-T1 and Sony A7r:

• An excellent professional device. Due to the high resolution of the matrix, its range of use is somewhat limited. Due to the high resolution of the matrix, you should shoot with this device at short shutter speeds or using a tripod. Otherwise, many pictures after the photo shoot will be rejected due to noticeable blur. The device is not at all for a beginner and I would not recommend it to amateurs. It is much easier to shoot with the Nikon D610, and you can hardly distinguish the quality of the pictures from the D610 from the shots taken from the Nikon D800. In the hands of a professional, this is an excellent tool, but in the hands of a novice user and even an amateur, it is a headache.


• Comparative review of Nikon D800:


• Comparative review of Nikon D800 and Canon EOS 5D Mark III:


• Comparative review of Canon EOS 5D Mark III and Nikon D800/B600:

• Excellent device. Excellent color rendition, excellent matrix characteristics, excellent ergonomics, affordable price. I recommend to all. Objectively one of the best, if not the best, device in its class today. I haven't tested the D610 specifically. Tests were done with a D600 device. These models are distinguished by different trigger mechanisms. In the D600 camera, vigilant photographers discovered a problem - when shooting, the shutter mechanism splashes oil on the matrix (the photographer and those around him), leaving oil stains on them. In the new device the mechanism has been changed.


• Comparative review of Nikon D600 and Pentax K-5 II:


• Comparative review of Nikon D600, Nikon D5200, Fujifilm X-E1:


• Photo Nikon D600:


• Comparative review of Canon EOS 5D Mark III and Nikon D800/B600:

Nikon D7100

• An excellent device for an amateur, a professional and even a novice user because... can meet the requirements of any user. It has excellent matrix parameters. Very comfortable ergonomics, like all Nikon devices. From my point of view, it has one drawback - being a competitor, the Canon 70D does not have a rotating screen. A rotating screen is now needed in this kind of devices and can greatly simplify the photographer’s work.

Olympus OM-D E-M1

• New Olympus model. What the company said when they released this device - they said that this was the best device they had ever made. Considering that there are practically no technological innovations in this device, we can say that previous Olympus models were bad and finally they made a good one - they finally tightened all the screws well, removed bugs from the software, and removed an unnecessary low-pass filter from the matrix. Considering the cost of the device, most likely they first applied it and then removed it, and maybe even more than once. Nevertheless, the device is very worthy for fans of the Olympus system. For those purchasing the Olympus system for the first time, I want to say that there are more worthy options, given the absolutely outrageous price of this device, provided it has a matrix with a crop factor of 2. Nowadays you can buy devices with a full-format matrix somewhat cheaper. Judging by the trend, in the foreseeable future there will also be medium-format devices that cost less than the cost of Olympus with a 4/3 matrix and other devices of the 4/3 system. It is very commendable that Olympus now has good device, but personally I would like to understand the pricing of this device. The cost of a full-format matrix, according to manufacturers, is 2 to 10 times more than the cost of APS-C matrices due to more defects and unused leftovers. I would like to understand how Olympus managed to create a matrix with a crop factor of 2 more expensive than full-format matrices, given the completely mediocre parameters of the matrix itself. This is what occupies me now much more than the device itself and the pictures that can be obtained from it. Why am I talking about the high cost of the matrix? Yes, because there are cameras on the market with much more technologically advanced and convenient bodies, and the cost of electronics and mechanics is now approximately the same for any device.


• In fact, the device is not bad. Good color rendition, very high quality housing, moisture protection. look at the pictures from this device and choose. The device will not disappoint you.

• New Pentax device. This is the most controversial device I have ever used. In some cases, the device produces an absolutely wonderful picture, and in some cases, simply miracles happen that are difficult to explain - the color of certain objects changes, the camera produces a gray, indistinct background, provided that other devices under the same conditions give a completely different picture. If you saw the test photos from London, when shooting the sunset I took 1 photo of the sunset on Nikon and I was completely satisfied with it, as you can see in the picture, and then I took 40 photos with Pentax and could not get what I was happy with. A very strange result considering that the lenses used on these cameras were equivalent. The camera produces pale colors. It would seem that this is not a big deal, but in some cases I was not able to correct the picture so that it looked the way I liked. I spent a lot of time editing pictures from this camera, even though the same scene from another camera took me no more than a few seconds. I do not recommend anyone to buy this camera yet.


• Review link:


• Photo album Pentax K-3:

Pentax K-5 II

• A lot has been written about the Pentax K-5 and Pentax K-5 II cameras. The most remarkable thing that I was able to take away from the reviews is how the shadows of these cameras stretch. I even expected the emergence in the near future of a new direction in photography, shadow-pulling or something like that, which would consist of shooting shadows and then stretching them. I don’t want to offend anyone - this model, like the Pentax company as a whole, has many fans. However, I haven't seen a Pentax color rendering that has inspired me since the Pentax K10/K20. Also, K-5 models have one common problem - blue enhancement. It appears quite often. There is nothing wrong with this and this is compensated, of course, by stretching out the shadows, but personally this caused me inconvenience.


• It is necessary to separately note the very good moisture protection of the devices. This is objectively the best implementation of moisture protection at the moment.


• Comparative review of Pentax K-5 II and Nikon D600:

Samsung NX300

• The device is at least interesting. The device has pleasant color rendering, fairly convenient controls, a small body and good Samsung optics complement the positive qualities of this device. However, at the time of testing, the device had at least 2 problems - inaccurate determination of white balance and a problem somewhat similar to the problem of the Pentax K-3. On dimly lit or highly lit objects, the device loses information about colors - the colors become gray. And I'm not talking about overexposure or overshadowing. In the middle of the illumination range everything is fine, but every step to the right a problem arises. Moreover, if you shoot a low-contrast object with another camera, everything is resolved in a few seconds - the contrast in the editor increases, the saturation and/or vibrance increases and the photo looks like new. This doesn't work with Samsung. You can see this in the test photos. The white balance is unpleasant, of course, but not at all fatal - everything is quickly corrected. Moreover, the white balance during the test was incorrect mainly only when a new prime lens was used. I think that this has already been corrected by the time this rating was written. Unfortunately, I can no longer check. In general, the device is neither particularly good nor particularly bad. No. For some reason he is not memorable at all and it’s not a pity to part with him. Despite the decent parameters of the matrix, it has not become widespread and will not be. What are the reasons to buy this device? None. There are other options for devices that make sense to pay attention to. If you need a small device, I would be better off looking at the Canon EOS M or Canon Powershot G15. If you just need a device, then you can choose a decent option from the devices presented in this rating.


• Samsung NX300 review:


• Comparative review of Samsung NX300 and Sony A55V:


• Comparative review of Samsung NX300 and Canon 700D:

• I have never been a fan of Sony's color reproduction except for the Sony A850/A900 and was initially skeptical about these devices. However, as it turned out, the color rendition of these devices is harmonious. Agree, the offer to have a full-frame camera in a compact body with excellent characteristics is very tempting. The camera has already become very popular. The only problem is the lack of optics. So far, only 3 decent lenses are available for cameras. Otherwise everything is very good in my opinion.


• Sony A7 Review:


• Comparative review of Sony A7 and Fujifilm X-T1:

• The camera is visually almost no different from the A7 camera, has the same color rendering and very similar matrix characteristics. The differences between these models lie in the resolution of the matrix - the 7r has 36.6 micropixels, and the A7 camera has 24 megapixels. There are other differences - the shutter on the A7 camera is electronic, and phase sensors are built into the matrix, which the A7r does not have. But in the A7r there is no low-pass filter on the matrix. Much of what I wrote about the Nikon D800 can be said about the A7r. With this high resolution Matrix can be lubricated. Therefore, I recommend that everyone take the A7 camera, especially since in some respects it is even more technologically advanced.


• Review link:


• Link to comparison review of Fujifilm X-T1 and A7r:

Sigma SD1 Merrill

• The device is technologically very interesting due to the use of a Merrill matrix with a resolution of 43 megapixels. However, the technology also has disadvantages, namely the result is not always predictable. Editing pictures with Sigma is quite difficult. Despite the fact that by editing a picture you can get an interesting result, the process of editing one picture can take more than 10 - 20 minutes per photo and much more, and this is no less exciting, or even more, than the shooting process itself. With the Sigma camera, the development process is more important than the shooting process itself.


• I do not recommend purchasing this device for those who need stable results. Shooting Sigma, for example, at a wedding you will get green faces, completely unimaginable colors of seemingly ordinary things and waste a whole bag of batteries. But, if you want to feel like an artist, you are not afraid of being beaten by the people you photographed; with some effort, you can get pictures that are not yet possible to get from other devices. If you're comfortable with that, then this could be your choice. However, before purchasing, look at pictures from this device not on commercial resources, but at pictures of ordinary users.


• Comparative review of Sigma SD1 Merrill and Fujifilm X-Pro1:


• Photos of Sigma SD1 Merrill:


• SD1 Merrill review:

Samsung GH3

• Another device of the 4/3 system. The standard resolution for this system is 16MP. I just recently published a picture in this magazine in which you can compare the dimensions of the device and the dimensions of the matrix of the Panasonic GH3 and Sony A7. The picture is impressive. 4/3 devices were created mainly to reduce the size of the device. Now this has become completely irrelevant. Devices with APS-C and full-format sensors have appeared, the dimensions of which are comparable and in some cases even smaller than cameras of the 4/3 system.


• Now about the device itself - an excellent body, convenient controls, that's probably all that can be said about the device. The quality of the pictures is nothing outstanding. Color rendition with the features inherent in Panasonic devices. In general, the device is not bad, but you don’t need to buy it. There are much more interesting and promising options.


• Panasonic GH3 Comparative Review:

Leica X2

• What is the main value of this device - excellent quality of pictures straight from the camera and a red dot on the body. The device really produces a beautiful picture that does not need editing. The camera is ideal if you don’t know its price - 100,000 rubles. The technical characteristics of the camera are significantly below average, the lens is fixed, the screen is the worst of all classmates on the market, there is no viewfinder. Now there is a new Leica Vario X camera with a variable lens focal length. About 5 years ago, Leica single-handedly dominated the market for high-quality compact cameras. If you needed such a camera there was one alternative - Leica. What now? And now there is Fujifilm and, most importantly, the Sony RX1 has entered the market at a price comparable to the cost of the Leica X2 and lower than the cost of the Leica Vario X. Give me one reason why I should not only buy, but simply include Leica X series cameras in my consideration list? I do not find.


• Leica X2 Comparative Review:

Addition:

To evaluate the device, a set of specific parameters was used. Some of the parameters are shown below. The parameters, as a rule, were assessed on a scale from 1 to 20. Some parameters are based on subjective assessment, for example, color rendering, ease of use of the device, and some parameters are calculated automatically based on the actual parameters stated in the technical specifications. Each of the parameters is assigned a weight - the degree of influence of this parameter on the consumer qualities of the device. Also, the device is evaluated not only from the point of view of the sum of parameters, but also from the point of view of the importance of these parameters for certain user groups. For example, the “JPEG quality from camera” parameter is important for a novice user, but is of practically no value to a professional because To get the maximum effect from the camera, any professional uses the RAW format and does not turn on the camera JPEG creation mode, not only because it is unnecessary, but also to save battery power and save space on the flash drive. Thus, the same device can be extremely interesting to a professional and not be of value to a novice amateur. Each tested device is ranked by area of ​​application. which gives a more adequate picture when choosing a device.