Who is more dangerous, who is faster and who is stronger - a lion or a tiger? Saber-toothed tigers. Ancient saber tooth tiger Who wins the conflict

Before humans climbed to the top of the food chain, wild cats were the most powerful and successful hunters. Even today, these huge predators evoke fear and at the same time admiration in a person who is not their competitor in the hunt. And yet, prehistoric cats were much better in all respects, especially when it comes to hunting. Today's article presents the 10 largest prehistoric felines.

The prehistoric cheetah belongs to the same genus as today's cheetahs. Its appearance was very similar to that of the modern cheetah, but its ancestor was many times larger. The giant cheetah was more reminiscent of a modern lion in size, because its weight sometimes reached 150 kilograms, so the cheetah easily hunted larger animals. According to some data, ancient cheetahs were capable of accelerating at speeds of up to 115 kilometers per hour. The wild cat lived in the territory of modern Europe and Asia, but could not survive the Ice Age.

This dangerous animal does not exist today, but there was a time when xenosmilus, along with other predatory cats, headed the planet's food chain. Outwardly, it was very similar to a saber-toothed tiger, but unlike it, xenosmilus had much shorter teeth, which were similar to the teeth of a shark or predatory dinosaur. The formidable predator hunted from ambush, after which it instantly killed the prey, tearing off pieces of meat from it. Xenosmilus was very large, sometimes its weight reached 230 kilograms. Little is known about the habitat of the beast. The only place where his remains were discovered is Florida.

Currently, jaguars are not particularly large in size; as a rule, their weight is only 55-100 kilograms. As it turned out, they were not always like this. In the distant past, the modern territory of Southern and North America filled with giant jaguars. Unlike the modern jaguar, they had longer tails and limbs, and their size was several times larger. According to scientists, the animals lived on open plains together with lions and some other wild cats, and as a result of constant competition they were forced to change their place of residence to more wooded areas. The size of a giant jaguar was equal to a modern tiger.

If giant jaguars belonged to the same genus as modern ones, then European jaguars belonged to a completely different one. Unfortunately, today it is still not known what the European jaguar looked like, but some information about it is still known. For example, scientists claim that the weight of this cat was more than 200 kilograms, and its habitat was countries such as Germany, England, the Netherlands, France and Spain.

This lion is considered a subspecies of lion. Cave lions were incredibly large in size, and their weight reached 300 kilograms. Terrible predators lived in Europe after the Ice Age, where they were considered one of the most dangerous creatures planets. Some sources say that these animals were sacred animals, so they were worshiped by many peoples, and perhaps they were simply feared. Scientists have repeatedly found various figurines and drawings depicting a cave lion. It is known that cave lions did not have a mane.

One of the most terrible and dangerous representatives wild cats of prehistoric times are homotherium. The predator lived in the countries of Europe, Asia, Africa, South and North America. The animal adapted so well to the tundra climate that it could live for more than 5 million years. The appearance of Homotherium was noticeably different from the appearance of all wild cats. The forelimbs of this giant were much longer than the hind limbs, which made him look like a hyena. This structure suggests that Homotherium was not a very good jumper, especially unlike modern cats. Although Homotherium cannot be called the most, its weight reached a record 400 kilograms. This suggests that the animal was larger than even a modern tiger.

The appearance of a mahairod is similar to that of a tiger, but it is much larger, with a longer tail and huge knife fangs. Whether he had the stripes characteristic of a tiger is still not known. The remains of the mahairod were found in Africa, which indicates its place of residence; in addition, archaeologists are convinced that this wild cat was one of the largest of those times. The weight of the mahairod reached half a ton, and in size it resembled a modern horse. The predator's diet consisted of rhinoceroses, elephants and other large herbivores. According to most scholars, the appearance of the mahairod is most accurately depicted in the film 10,000 BC.

Of all the prehistoric wild cats known to mankind, the American lion ranks second in popularity after Smilodon. Lions lived on the territory of modern Northern and South America, and became extinct about 11 thousand years ago at the very end of the Ice Age. Many scientists are convinced that this giant predator was relatives of today's lion. The weight of an American lion could reach 500 kilograms. About him hunting is underway There is a lot of debate, but most likely the animal hunted alone.

Most mysterious beast of the entire list was in second place among the largest cats. This tiger is not a separate species; most likely, it is distant relative modern tiger. These giants lived in Asia, where they hunted very large herbivores. Everyone knows that today tigers are the largest representatives of the cat family, but today there are no tigers as large as in prehistoric times. The Pleistocene tiger was unusually large sizes, and according to the found remains, he even lived in Russia.

The most famous representative of the cat family of prehistoric times. Smilodon had huge teeth like sharp knives and a muscular body with short legs. His body slightly resembled that of a modern bear, although he did not have the clumsiness that a bear has. The predator's stunningly built body allowed it to run at high speed even over long distances. Smilodon died out about 10 thousand years ago, which means they lived at the same time as humans, and perhaps even hunted them. Scientists believe that Smilodon attacked prey from an ambush.

For a long time, until the moment when man became a hunter and acquired weapons, representatives of the cat family were at the top of the food chain of our planet. Of course, these were not modern lions, jaguars, leopards and tigers, but their extinct ancestors, such as Saber-toothed tiger or American lion. Let's get acquainted virtually with the prehistoric extinct American lion, or, as scientists call it, Panthera leo atrox.

Biological description

All lions, as well as jaguars, tigers and leopards are representatives (Felidae) and belong to the subfamily Pantherinae - big cats, and the genus Panthera (panther). According to the evolution of this species, it occurred about 900,000 years ago in what is now modern Africa. IN further representatives This species inhabited most of the Holarctic territory. The earliest remains of predators in Europe were found near the Italian city of Isernia, and their age was determined to be 700,000 years. The cave lion lived on the Eurasian continent approximately 300,000 years ago. Thanks to the isthmus that at that time connected America with Eurasia, part of the population of these cave predators came through Alaska and Chukotka to North America, where, due to long-term isolation, a new subspecies of lions was formed - American.

Family ties

As a result of long collaboration conducted by researchers from Russia, England, Australia and Germany, it was found that there were three species of lions on our planet. Today, the modern lion lives in a fairly small range. But before him, there were two prehistoric and extinct species today. First of all, this is (Panthera leo spelaea), which lived in western Canada and throughout almost all of Eurasia in the Pleistocene. In addition, there was also an American lion (Panthera leo atrox) that lived in what is now the United States. And also in some areas of South America. It is also called the North American lion, or the giant Naegele jaguar. As a result of studies of the genetic material of fossil animals and modern predators, it was possible to establish that all three species of lions are very close in their genome. But here's what else scientists managed to find out: the subspecies of the American lion was in genetic isolation for more than 340,000 years, and during this time it became very different from other subspecies.

Where did they come from?

Initially, lions that came from Africa populated the territory of Eurasia and only then crossed the Beringia Isthmus, which in those distant times connected North America with the Eurasian continent, and began to explore the new continent. Scientists have suggested that the emergence of two different species in North America is associated with the isolation of representatives of these two populations as a result of glaciation. According to another hypothesis different kinds: Cave and American lions are representatives of two waves of migration from Eurasia, quite distant from each other in time.

What did he look like?

Like others, the American lion disappeared approximately 10,000 years ago. At one time, it was one of the largest and most dangerous animals: its length could reach three meters or even more, and its weight in females reached 300, and in males up to 400 kg. There is still no agreement among scientists on the question of whether this animal had a mane, like its modern descendant, or not. However, they describe his appearance quite definitely: on powerful legs there was a dense, muscular body, crowned with a large head, and at the back there was a long tail. The color of the skin, as researchers suggest, was uniform, but may have changed seasonally. Ligers are the closest morphologically to the American lion - the offspring of a tigress and a lion. It is difficult to imagine from the description what the American lion looked like. Photos of the reconstruction of its appearance help to understand how similar it is to its modern “relative”.

Where did you live?

As a result of archaeological excavations, the remains of this animal were discovered over a fairly large area: from Peru to Alaska. This allowed scientists to claim that the American lion lived not only in North America, but also in certain regions of South America. Many remains of this animal were discovered near Los Angeles. Even today, despite significant advances in science, scientists cannot name the exact and specific reasons that caused the disappearance of this predator about 10,000 years ago. There are hypotheses about the depletion of feeding grounds and the death of animals that served as food for American lions due to glaciation and changes climatic conditions. There is also a version of involvement in the extermination of this formidable predator.

Food and competitors

The American lion may have once hunted the ancestors of modern wapiti and bison, as well as extinct bush oxen, western camels, and horses (Equus). At the same time, other large predators lived on the North American continent, also extinct.

To protect their prey and hunting grounds, lions could unite in groups. Defending its food and territory, the American lion fought against the saber-toothed tiger (Machairodontinae), dire ancient wolves (Canis dirus) and short-faced bears (Arctodus simus).

If you ask even a child about who the king of beasts is, the answer will be unequivocal: “Of course, a lion.” Still, there is another opinion. Many experts give the palm to the tiger, and they are confident that it will be the one who will emerge victorious from the battle of these two titans. But in order to determine who is stronger, who is faster and who is more dangerous - a tiger or a lion, it is necessary to provide the basic characteristics of these two animals.

a lion

Now lions are found only in Asia and Africa, although previously their habitat was much wider - from Europe to the Middle East. But over time, people pushed them aside, and now lions are found in the wild only in the south, east and west of Africa, as well as in India. African and Asiatic lions differ in their appearance and basic characteristics from each other: affects different environment a habitat.

These representatives of the cat family live in small groups - prides, the number of which ranges from four to thirty or more individuals. Usually a pride includes two or three males, one of which is dominant, and several females with offspring. Large dimensions do not prevent these animals from overcoming even a three-meter height. In general, jumping is their strong point. When hunting, a lion freezes in the grass, waiting for its prey, and then knocks it to the ground in one calculated leap. Although, by the way, the main breadwinner is the female, and the male is more responsible for protecting the pride territory from unwanted intrusions. It is quite easy to distinguish a lion from a lioness: the male has a lush mane, while the lioness does not.

Tiger

There are different subspecies: Amur, Bengal, Indochinese, Malay, Sumatran, Chinese. All names correspond to the habitat.

Tigers are solitary hunters. They do not live in a flock, but separately. The male occupies a territory of 700-800 square kilometers, and the female and her offspring need only 500 square kilometers.

Who is bigger - a tiger or a lion?

The weight of an adult lion ranges from 180 to 240 kg, and the body length reaches three meters. Females are slightly smaller: average weight is 140 kg, and the body length is half a meter shorter.

The length of the body of an average adult tiger is not inferior to the length of the body of a lion; on the contrary, it is slightly longer. As for body weight, here too there is a difference of 50 kg in favor of the tiger. Representatives of the Amur subspecies are even heavier: their weight reaches 350 kg.

So, who is bigger - a lion or a tiger? It turns out that the striped representative of the cat family is slightly superior to its maned relative in size.

Comparison of the strength of two predators

Who is stronger - a lion or a tiger? The answer is far from clear-cut. It depends on what is considered an indicator of strength: either the characteristics of the type, or the number of rounds won. The tiger's claws are sharper and longer (10 cm) than those of the lion (7 cm). Since a tiger is on average heavier than a lion, this means that it has more muscles. The force of compression of their jaws is approximately the same, and they kill the victim in a similar way: they dig their fangs into the neck. But the success of the fight depends not only on who is bigger - the tiger or the lion, but also on the tactics of the battle. For example, a lion's blow is more devastating. With one swing he kills a hyena or a zebra. If you take external characteristics, then the tiger is stronger than the lion. But if we take the specific results of the skirmishes of these two animals as a basis, then the king of beasts does not give up his positions and proves that he deservedly received such a title.

Who is faster - a lion or a tiger?

Here the advantage is on the side of the tabby cat. An adult tiger reaches speeds of up to 80 km/h, while a lion reaches only 60 km/h. True, both of them are unable to run at such speed over long distances.

Who is more dangerous?

In terms of its behavior in a fight, a tiger seems more aggressive than a lion. He immediately rushes into battle, while the lion can enter the battle as if reluctantly. Sometimes it seems like he's playing first rather than trying to hit. It's all about their social nature. The tiger is used to fighting alone; he knows that he has no one to expect help from. And a lion, who mainly hunts with members of a pride, may habitually think that he has a support group behind him, ready to join in at any moment, and therefore behaves less intimidatingly than his opponent.

Who is more resilient?

Definitely a lion. It seems that he doesn’t even care about deep wounds and pain. He will fight to the end. The tiger, as a rule, runs away after several injuries inflicted on it. In a fight, the tiger makes more active, but unnecessary movements, and as a result, its strength is quickly depleted.

Who wins the conflict?

The answer to the question “who is stronger - a lion or a tiger” requires facts and documentary evidence, and not just unfounded reasoning. There are many real videos, where the fight between two titans is captured. In a nutshell, the conclusion is this: the tiger is most likely the initiator of the conflict, but he retreats after the lion shows who is the master of the situation. The latter is more confident. And a lion has more fighting experience, because adult lions constantly fight for territory, and a tiger can only take part in a fight a couple of times in its entire life.

The fight itself at first looks as if the tiger is still inflicting more blows on the enemy, and this creates the illusion of his victory. But mostly these blows do not reach their target, because the lion manages to dodge in time. The tiger makes a lot of unnecessary movements, and this makes him tired faster. In battle he stands on two hind legs and tries to fight with the front, but at the same time it is more difficult to maintain balance. In addition, his strategy is not thought out enough: he tries to hit the neck, but the lion has a powerful mane that absorbs these blows, and they generally do not bring the lion great harm. The lion's blows are more calculated, and if he does hit, then in such a way that the tiger will surely fall. This predator strikes with one paw, standing on the other three, and tries to hit the unprotected neck or tear out a piece of skin from the sides or back, and it succeeds quite often. If the blow is strong, but not fatal, then the tiger shamefully runs away, whining like a little dog.

To be fair, it should be noted that there is also another side to the coin. Perhaps the tiger runs away not so much because he is tired or afraid, but because more than a lion he is afraid of wounds and does not see the need to fight to the death in everyday showdowns. After all, if a wounded lion needs to rest, then other members of the pride will take care of him, but the tiger can only rely on himself, and severe severe wounds doom him to hunger. Therefore, he may choose to retreat.

Fights in Ancient Rome

It is interesting that the expression “king of beasts” was assigned to the lion during Ancient Rome. About treating him as an owner enormous power evidenced by many architectural monuments where this majestic predator is depicted as a winner. The question of who is stronger, a lion or a tiger, also interested the ancient Romans. To please the spectators thirsty for bloody spectacles, various animals were pitted against each other. Very often it was the lions and tigers who had to measure their strength.

Who mostly won such fights? Almost all historical reports speak in favor of lions. For example, the preferential victories of these predators over tigers are recorded in Plato’s “Dialogues” and in the “Memoirs of Cleopatra.” Moreover, there is evidence that the lion even tore apart an elephant thanks to his grip and technique.

Another additional answer to the question of who is stronger - a lion or a tiger - are the architectural monuments of Ancient Rome. It is the lion that is depicted in the sculptures as a symbol of courage and strength. Consequently, eyewitnesses of animal fights also considered him this way. There are very few monuments where the tiger is immortalized.

Skirmishes in zoos and circuses

In nature, separate fights would never take place, because the habitats of some subspecies do not overlap. For example, an Amur tiger or a lion living in Africa would never have the opportunity to measure their strength. It’s different in zoos, where they live in neighboring cages.

You can't argue with the numbers. In most fatal cases, the victims were tigers. When they and the lions are together in a confined space, for example in an enclosure or cage, the tigers become very panicky because they have nowhere to escape. They behave rather irrationally, and this is the main reason for their defeats. Leo, on the contrary, pushes his line to the end, and the final outcome is the death of the enemy.

One animal trainer described the case of a lion named Sultan the First. During one performance in the circus, he challenged all the tigers. They approached him in the arena, and he defeated them all in turn. Moreover, these were only large young and strong animals. Sultan the First, like an experienced boxer, delivered false blows, bluffed, causing the tigers to miss, and then delivered a crushing blow. Defeated Tigers crawled around the arena, and the winner triumphantly finished them off. No one could take them away; all the tigers died. It was a cruel sight.

Having considered these facts, each reader can decide for himself who will perform better in a fight - a lion or a tiger. Although it would be much better if they never fought among themselves or attacked a person.

Saber-toothed tigers are formidable and dangerous predators of the cat family, completely extinct in ancient times. Distinctive feature These animals had upper fangs of impressive size, shaped like sabers. What do modern scientists know about saber-toothed cats? Were these animals tigers? What did they look like, how did they live, and why did they disappear? Let's move back through the centuries - to those times when huge ferocious cats, going hunting, confidently walked across the planet with the gait of true animal kings...

Cat or tiger?

First of all, it should be noted that the term “saber-toothed tigers,” which seems so familiar, is actually incorrect.

Biological science knows the subfamily saber-toothed cats(Machairodontinae). However, with tigers, these ancient animals have extremely little common features. The first and second have significantly different proportions and body structure, and the lower jaws are connected to the skull differently. In addition, the striped “tiger” coloring is not typical for any of the saber-toothed cats. Their lifestyle is also different from that of a tiger: paleontologists suggest that these animals were not loners, living and hunting in prides, like lions.

However, since the term “saber-toothed tigers” is used almost everywhere, and even in scientific literature, further we will also use this beautiful allegory.

Tribes of saber-toothed cats

Until 2000, the subfamily of saber-toothed cats, or Machairodontinae, united three large tribes.

Representatives of the first tribe, Machairodontini (sometimes also called Homoterini), are distinguished by exceptionally large upper canines, wide and jagged with inside. When hunting, predators relied more on striking with these devastating “weapons” than on biting. The smallest cats of the Mahairod tribe were comparable to a small modern leopard, the largest were larger than a very large tiger.

Saber-toothed tigers of the second tribe, Smilodontini, are characterized by longer upper canines, but they were significantly narrower and not as serrated as those of the Machairods. Their top-down attack with fangs was the most deadly and perfect among all saber-toothed cats. As a rule, Smilodon were the size of an Amur tiger or lion, however American look This predator is famous for being the largest saber-toothed cat in history.

The third tribe, Metailurini, is the most ancient. That is why the teeth of these animals represent a kind of “transitional stage” between the fangs of ordinary and saber-toothed cats. It is believed that they separated from other machairodonts quite early, and their evolution occurred somewhat differently. Due to the rather weak expression of “saber-toothed” characteristics, representatives of this tribe began to be classified directly as felines, considered “small cats” or “pseudo-saber-toothed”. Since 2000, this tribe is no longer included in the subfamily of interest to us.

Saber-toothed tiger period

Saber-toothed cats inhabited the Earth quite for a long time- more than twenty million years old, appearing for the first time in the early Miocene and completely disappearing in the late Pleistocene period. Over all this time, they have given rise to many genera and species, differing significantly in appearance and size. However, hypertrophied upper fangs (in some species they could reach more than twenty centimeters in length) and the ability to open their mouths very wide (sometimes even one hundred and twenty degrees!) have traditionally been their common features.

Where did saber-toothed cats live?

These animals were characterized by an ambush attack. Having crushed the victim to the ground with its powerful front paws or grabbed its throat, the saber-toothed tiger instantly cut its carotid artery and trachea. Precision bite was the main weapon of this predator - after all, fangs stuck in the bones of the prey could break. Such a mistake would be fatal for the unlucky predator, depriving him of the ability to hunt and thereby dooming him to death.

Why did saber-toothed cats become extinct?

During the Pleistocene, or " ice age", which covered the period from two million to twenty-five to ten thousand years ago, many large mammals gradually disappeared - cave bears, woolly rhinoceroses, giant sloths, mammoths and saber-toothed tigers. Why did this happen?

During the period of glacial cooling, many plants rich in proteins, which served as the usual food for giant herbivores, died out. At the end of the Pleistocene period, the planet's climate became warmer and much drier. Forests were gradually replaced by open grass prairies, but the new vegetation, adapted to the changed conditions, did not have the nutritional value of the previous one. Herbivorous sloths and mammoths gradually died out, not finding enough food. Accordingly, there were fewer animals that predators could hunt. The saber-toothed tiger, an ambush hunter of big game, found himself hostage to the current situation. The structural features of its jaw apparatus did not allow it to hunt small animals; its massive physique and short tail did not allow it to catch up with fleet-footed prey in the open area, which was becoming more and more numerous. Changed conditions meant that the ancient tigers with saber fangs did not have a chance to survive. Slowly but inexorably, all species of these animals existing in nature disappeared from the face of the Earth.

Without exception, all saber-toothed cats are finally extinct animals that did not leave direct descendants.

Mahayrods

Of all known to science Among the representatives of saber-toothed cats, it was Mahairod who most closely resembled a tiger. In nature, there were several types of mahairods, which had significant differences in appearance, but they were united by the jagged edges of long upper fangs, shaped like “mahairs” - curved swords.

These ancient animals appeared in Eurasia about fifteen million years ago, and two million years have passed since their extinction. The weight of the largest representatives of this tribe reached half a ton, and in size they were quite comparable to modern horses. Archaeologists are convinced that the Machairod was the largest wild cat of its time. Hunting large herbivores - rhinoceroses and elephants, these animals quite successfully competed with others large predators of its time dire wolves and cave bears. The Mahayrods became the "progenitors" of more perfect form saber-toothed cats - homotherium.

Homotherium

It is believed that these saber-toothed cats appeared about five million years ago at the boundary of the Miocene and Pleistocene. They were distinguished by a more slender physique, vaguely reminiscent of a modern lion. However, their hind legs were somewhat shorter than their front legs, which gave these predators some resemblance to a hyena. The upper fangs of Homotherium were shorter and wider than those of Smilodon - representatives of another tribe of saber-toothed cats that inhabited the Earth in parallel with them. Along with this, the presence large quantity The notches on the fangs allowed scientists to conclude that these animals were capable of delivering not only slashing, but also cutting blows.

Compared to other saber-toothed cats, Homotherium had very high endurance and was adapted to long (although not fast) running and walking over long distances. There are suggestions that these now extinct animals led a solitary lifestyle. However, most researchers are still inclined to believe that homotherium hunted in groups like other saber-toothed cats, since it was easier to kill stronger and larger prey.

Smilodon

Compared to other saber-toothed cats that the ancient knew animal world Earth, Smilodon had a more powerful physique. The largest representative of saber-toothed cats - Smilodon populator, which lived on the American continent - grew up to one hundred and twenty-five centimeters high at the withers, and its length from nose to tip of tail could be two and a half meters. The fangs of this beast (along with the roots) reached twenty-nine centimeters in length!

Smilodon lived and hunted in prides, including one or two dominant males, several females and young animals. The coloration of these animals could well be spotted, like a leopard. It is also possible that the males had a short mane.

Information about Smilodon is contained in many scientific reference books and fiction, he appears as a character in films ("Portal Jurassic period", "Prehistoric Park") and cartoons ("Ice Age"). Perhaps this is the most famous animal of all, which is commonly called saber-toothed tigers.

The clouded leopard is a modern descendant of the saber-toothed tiger

Today it is believed that the indirect, but closest relative of Smilodon is clouded leopard. It belongs to the subfamily Pantherinae (panther cats), within which it is classified into the genus Neofelis.

Its body is quite massive and compact at the same time - these features were also inherent in the saber-toothed cats of antiquity. Among representatives of modern felines, this animal has the longest fangs (both upper and lower) relative to its own size. In addition, the jaws of this predator can open 85 degrees, which is much more than that of any other modern cat.

Although not a direct descendant of saber-toothed cats, the clouded leopard serves as clear evidence that the method of hunting using deadly “saber fangs” can well be used by a predator in modern times.

Teetering on the brink of extinction due to destruction ecological systems and habitat loss. In the following paragraphs of the article, you will learn about 10 extinct species of tigers and lions that have disappeared from the face of the Earth over the past few thousand years.

Despite its name, the American cheetah had more in common with pumas and pumas than with modern cheetahs. Its slender, flexible body, like that of a cheetah, was most likely the result of convergent evolution (the tendency of dissimilar organisms to adopt similar body shapes and behaviors when developed under similar conditions). In the case of Miracinonyx, the grassy plains of North America and Africa had almost identical conditions, which played a role in the appearance of similar-looking animals. American cheetahs went extinct at the end of the last ice age, about 10,000 years ago, possibly due to human encroachment into their territory.

As with the American cheetah (see previous point), the relationship of the American lion to modern lions is much debated. According to some sources, this Pleistocene predator is more closely related to tigers and jaguars. The American lion coexisted and competed with other superpredators of the time, such as the saber-toothed tiger, the giant short-faced bear, and the dire wolf.

If the American lion was in fact a subspecies of lion, then it was the largest of its kind. Some alpha males reached weights of up to 500 kg.

As you might guess from the animal's name, the Bali tiger was native to the Indonesian island of Bali, where the last individuals became extinct only about 50 years ago. For thousands of years, the Bali tiger has been at odds with the indigenous peoples of Indonesia. However, the proximity of local tribes did not pose a serious threat to these tigers until the arrival of the first European traders and mercenaries, who ruthlessly hunted Balinese tigers for sport and sometimes to protect their animals and estates.

One of the most fearsome subspecies of lion was the Barbary lion, a prized possession of medieval British lords who wanted to intimidate their peasants. Several large individuals made their way from northern Africa to the zoo located in the Tower of London, where many British aristocrats were previously imprisoned and executed. Male Barbary lions had especially thick manes, and reached a mass of about 500 kg, which made them one of the largest lions that ever lived on Earth.

There is a high probability of a revival of the Barbary lion subspecies in wildlife by selecting his descendants, scattered throughout the world's zoos.

The Caspian lion has a precarious position in the big cat classification. Some naturalists argue that these lions should not be classified as a separate subspecies, considering the Kaispi lion to be simply a geographical offshoot of the still extant Transvaal lion. In fact, it is very difficult to distinguish a single subspecies from an isolated population. In any case, the last examples of these representatives of big cats became extinct at the end of the 19th century.

6. Turanian tiger, or Transcaucasian tiger, or Caspian tiger

Of all the big cats that have gone extinct in the last 100 years, the Turanian tiger had the largest geographic distribution, ranging from Iran to the vast, windswept steppes of Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan. The greatest damage to this subspecies was caused by Russian empire, which bordered the Caspian tiger habitat regions. Tsarist officials encouraged the destruction of Turanian tigers in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.

As with the Barbary lion, the Caspian tiger can be returned to the wild through selective breeding of its offspring.

The cave lion is probably, along with the saber-toothed tiger, one of the most famous extinct big cats. Oddly enough, cave lions did not live in caves. They got their name because many fossil remains of these lions were found in caves in Europe, which were visited by sick or dying individuals.

An interesting fact is that paleontologists classify the European lion as three subspecies: Panthera leo europaea, Panthera leo tartarica And Panthera leo fossilis. They are united comparatively big sizes bodies (some males weighed about 200 kg, females were slightly smaller) and susceptibility to encroachment and the seizure of territories by representatives of early European civilization: for example, European lions often participated in gladiatorial fights in the arenas of ancient Rome.

Javan tiger, like him close relative The Bali tiger (see point 3) was limited to one island in the Malay Archipelago. Despite relentless hunting, the main reason for the extinction of the Javan tiger was the loss of habitat due to the rapid growth of the human population in the 19th and 20th centuries.

The last Javan tiger was seen in the wild decades ago. Given the overpopulation of the island of Java, no one has much hope for the recovery of this subspecies.

10. Smilodon (saber-toothed tiger)

From a scientific point of view, Smilodon has nothing in common with modern tigers. However, given its universal popularity, the saber-toothed tiger deserves a mention in this list of extinct big cats. Saber-toothed tiger was one of the most dangerous predators Pleistocene era, capable of sinking its huge fangs into the neck large mammals those times.