home » Spring shoes » Be Personal Quotes. Social and personal status of the individual

Be Personal Quotes. Social and personal status of the individual

Social status is the position of an individual (or group of people) in society in accordance with his gender, age, origin, property, education, occupation, position, marital status, etc.

People have not one, but many statuses:

1) prescribed (received from birth);

2) achieved;

3) economic;

4) personal;

5) political, social, cultural.

A social role is certain actions that an individual (or group) must perform in accordance with one or another status.

Thus, if the status itself determines a person’s position in society, then the social role is the functions they perform in this position.

QUESTIONS, TASKS, TESTS.

1. Expand the content of the concepts “person”, “personality”, “individual”, “individuality”.

2. What factors influence the formation of personality?

3. What is social status personalities? What types of social statuses do you know? Describe your status set.

4. What is a social role? What social roles do you fulfill?

5.Why does a conflict of social roles arise? How is it overcome?

6. How can you confirm the presence of status-role coercion?

7. Do you agree with E. Durkheim, who believed that “the more primitive a society is, the greater the similarities between its constituent individuals?

8. Give definitions of the following concepts: “individual”, “individuality”, “personality”, “role conflict”, “social role”, “status distance”, “status symbols”, “social status”, “person”, “expectations” "(role expectations).

Literature:

1. A.I. Kravchenko “Sociology and political science” pp. 115-120.

2. I.D.Korotets, T.G.Talnishnikh “Fundamentals of sociology and political science” pp.85-109.

3. V.V.Latysheva “Fundamentals of Sociology” pp.65-86.

1. Social role is...

1) the individual’s contribution to the cause of his people;

2) a person’s awareness of the significance of his work;

3) behavior expected from a bearer of social status;

4) society’s assessment of the individual’s activities.

2. The process of assimilation by an individual throughout his life social norms and cultural values of the society to which he belongs is called:

1) education; 2) socialization; 3) integration; 4) adaptation.

3. Personal socialization lasts:

1) from the beginning of adolescence;

2) until the end of the formation of a person as an individual;

3) before entering working life.

4. Social status shows:

1) what behavior society expects from an individual;

2) what place the individual occupies in society or group;

3) in what environment the personality is formed.

5. The set of roles corresponding to a certain status is called:

1) role performance; 2) role-playing set; 3) role expectation.

6. What does the concept of “personality” mean?

1) properties that make a person different from others;

2) the same as the concept of “person”;

3) a system of social qualities of an individual.

7. Normative (basic) personality is:

1) a person who shares the same cultural patterns as the majority of members of a given society;

2) a standard, an example of a personality as the ideal of a given society (group);

3) the personality type is the most common in a given territory.

Social status- personal position or social group V social system.

Status rank- the position of the individual in the social hierarchy of statuses, on the basis of which the status worldview is formed.

Status set- a set of several status positions that an individual simultaneously occupies.

Ideas about social status

The concept of “social status” was first used in science by an English philosopher and lawyer of the 19th century. G. Main. In sociology, the concept of status (from the Latin status - position, state) is used in different meanings. The dominant idea is of social status as the position of an individual or a social group in a social system, which is characterized by certain distinctive features (rights, responsibilities, functions). Sometimes social status denotes a set of such distinctive features. In ordinary speech, the concept of status is used as a synonym for prestige.

In modern scientific and educational literature defined as: o the position of an individual in the social system, associated with certain rights, responsibilities and role expectations;

the position of the subject in the system of interpersonal relations,
defining his rights, duties and privileges;
the position of the individual in the system of interpersonal relations, determined by his psychological influence on group members;
the relative position of the individual in society, determined by his functions, responsibilities and rights;
the position of a person in the structure of a group or society, associated with certain rights and responsibilities;
an indicator of the position occupied by an individual in society;
the relative position of an individual or social group in a social system, determined by a number of characteristics characteristic of a given system;
the position occupied by an individual or a social group in society or a separate subsystem of society, determined by characteristics specific to a particular society - economic, national, age, etc.;
the place of an individual or group in the social system in accordance with their characteristics - natural, professional, ethnic, etc.;
structural element social organization society, which appears to the individual as a position in the system of social relations;
the relative position of an individual or group, determined by social (economic status, profession, qualifications, education, etc.) and natural characteristics (gender, age, etc.);
a set of rights and responsibilities of an individual or social group associated with their performance of a certain social role;
prestige characterizing the positions of an individual or social groups in a hierarchical system.

Each person in society performs certain social functions: students study, workers produce material goods, managers manage, journalists report on events taking place in the country and the world. For execution social functions The individual is assigned certain responsibilities in accordance with his social status. The higher a person’s status, the more responsibilities he has, the more stringent the requirements of society or a social group for his status responsibilities, the more Negative consequences from their violation.

Status set is a set of status positions that each individual occupies simultaneously. In this set, the following statuses are usually distinguished: ascriptive (assigned), achieved, mixed, main.

The social status of an individual was relatively stable due to the class or caste structure of society and was secured by the institutions of religion or law. In modern societies, individuals' status positions are more fluid. However, in any society there are ascriptive (assigned) and achieved social statuses.

Assigned status- this is a social status received “automatically” by its bearer due to factors beyond his control - by law, birth, gender or age, race and nationality, consanguinity system, socio-economic status of parents, etc. For example, you cannot get married, participate in elections, or obtain a driver's license before reaching the required age. Ascribed statuses are of interest to sociology only if they are the basis for social inequality, i.e. influence social differentiation and social structure of society.

Achieved status - it is a social status acquired by its bearer through his own efforts and merits. The level of education, professional achievements, career, title, position, socially successful marriage - all this affects the social status of the individual in society.

There is a direct connection between ascribed and achieved social statuses. Achieved statuses are acquired mainly through competition, but some achieved statuses are largely determined by ascriptive ones. Thus, the opportunity to obtain a prestigious education, which in modern society is a necessary prerequisite for high social status, is directly related to the advantages of family origin. On the contrary, the presence of a high achieved status largely compensates for the low ascriptive status of an individual due to the fact that no society can ignore the real social successes and achievements of individuals.

Mixed social statuses have signs of being ascribed and achieved, but achieved not at the request of a person, but due to a combination of circumstances, for example, as a result of losing a job, natural Disasters or political upheaval.

Main social status The individual is determined primarily by his position in society and his way of life.

manner of behavior. When we're talking about about a stranger, we first ask: “What does this person do? How does he make a living? The answer to this question says a lot about a person, therefore in modern society the main status of an individual is, as a rule, professional or official.

Personal status manifests itself at the level of a small group, for example, a family, a work team, or a circle of close friends. In a small group, the individual functions directly and his status is determined by personal qualities and character traits.

Group status characterizes an individual as a member of a large social group as, for example, a representative of a nation, religion or profession.

Concept and types of social status

The substantive difference between them boils down to the fact that they perform a role, but have a status. In other words, a role presupposes the possibility of a qualitative assessment of how well an individual meets role requirements. Social status - This is the position of a person in the structure of a group or society, which determines certain rights and obligations. Speaking about status, we abstract from any qualitative assessment of the person who occupies it and his behavior. We can say that status is a formal-structural social characteristic subject.

Like roles, there can be many statuses and, in general, any status presupposes a corresponding role and vice versa.

Main status - key of the entire set of social statuses of an individual, primarily determining his social position and significance in society. For example, the main status of a child is age; in traditional societies, the main status of a woman is gender; in modern society, as a rule, the main status becomes professional or official. In any case, the main status acts as a decisive factor in the image and standard of living and dictates behavior.

Social status can be:

prescribed- received from birth or due to factors independent of its bearer - gender or age, race, socio-economic status of parents. For example, by law you cannot obtain a driver's license, get married, vote in elections or receive a pension before reaching the required age;
achievable- acquired in society thanks to the efforts and merits of the individual. A person’s status in society is affected by the level of education, professional achievements, career, and a socially successful marriage. No society can ignore the real successes of an individual, therefore the existence of an achieved status carries the opportunity to significantly compensate for the low ascribed status of the individual;
private- manifests itself at the level of a small group in which the individual functions directly (family, work team, circle of close friends), it is determined by his personal qualities and character traits;
group- characterizes an individual as a member of a large social group - a representative of a class, nation, profession, a bearer of certain gender and age characteristics, etc.

Based on sociological surveys, it has been established that the majority of Russians are currently more satisfied with their position in society than dissatisfied. This is a very significant positive trend recent years, since satisfaction with one’s position in society is not only an essential prerequisite for social stability, but also a very important condition for people to feel comfortable in their socio-psychological state as a whole. Among those who rate their place in society as “good,” almost 85% believe that their lives are going well. This figure depends little on age: even in the group over 55 years old, about 70% share this opinion. Among those who are dissatisfied with their social status, the picture turned out to be the opposite - almost half of them (with 6.8% of the population as a whole) believe that their life is going badly.

Status hierarchy

The French sociologist R. Boudon considers social status as having two dimensions:

horizontal, which forms a system of social contacts and mutual exchanges, both real and simply possible, that develop between the bearer of status and other individuals who are at the same level of the social ladder;
vertical, which is formed by contacts and exchanges that arise between the bearer of status and individuals located at higher and lower levels.

Based on this idea, Boudon defines social status as a set of equal and hierarchical relationships maintained by an individual with other members of society.

Status hierarchy is characteristic of any organization. Indeed, without responsibility, organization is impossible; It is precisely due to the fact that all members of the group know the status of each that the links of the organization interact. However, the formal structure of an organization does not always coincide with its informal structure. Such a gap between hierarchies in many organizations does not require sociometric research, but is visible to a simple observer, since the establishment of a status hierarchy is the answer not only to the question “Who is the most important here?”, but also to the question “Who is the most authoritative, the most competent, the most popular among employees? Real status is largely determined by personal qualities, qualifications, charm, etc.

Many modern sociologists pay attention to the functional dissonance that arises due to the discrepancy between hierarchical and functional statuses. Such a discrepancy may arise due to individual compromises, when management orders acquire the character of a “stream of consciousness,” providing subordinates with a “zone of free action.” The result can be generally positive and manifest itself in increased flexibility of the organization's response, or negative, expressed in functional chaos and confusion.

Status confusion acts as a criterion for social disorganization and, perhaps, as one of the reasons deviant behavior. The connection between violations of the status hierarchy and the state of anomie was considered by E. Durkheim and suggested that discord in the status hierarchy in industrial society takes two forms.

Firstly, the expectations of the individual in connection with his position in society and the counter expectations of other members of society directed towards the individual become largely uncertain. If in a traditional society everyone knew what to expect and what awaited them, and in accordance with this was well aware of their rights and responsibilities, then in an industrial society, due to the growing division of labor and instability labor relations the individual is increasingly faced with situations for which he did not foresee and for which he is not prepared. For example, if in the Middle Ages studying at a university automatically meant a sharp and irreversible increase in social status, now no one is surprised by the abundance of unemployed university graduates willing to take any job.

Secondly, status instability affects the structure of social rewards and the level of individual satisfaction with one’s life.

To understand what determines the status hierarchy in traditional - pre-industrial - societies, you should turn to modern societies East (except caste). Here you can find three important element, influencing the social status of the individual - gender, age and belonging to a certain “class”, which assign to each member of society his rigid status. At the same time, the transition to another level of the status hierarchy is extremely difficult due to a number of legal and symbolic restrictions. But even in traditionalist-oriented societies, the spirit of entrepreneurship and enrichment, the personal favor of the ruler influence the distribution of statuses, although the legitimation of status occurs through reference to the traditions of ancestors, which in itself reflects the weight of the ascribing elements of status (the antiquity of the clan, the personal valor of the ancestors, etc. ).

In modern Western society, the status hierarchy can be viewed from the standpoint of either meritocratic ideology as fair and inevitable recognition of personal merit, talents and abilities, or holistic sociologism as a result strictly determined social processes. But both theories offer a very simplified understanding of the nature of status, and there remain aspects that cannot be explained in the context of either of them. For example, if status is entirely determined by personal qualities and merits, then how can we explain the presence of formal and informal status hierarchies in almost any organization?

Within an organization, this duality refers to the discrepancy between competence and power observed in various forms and at various levels, when decisions are made not by competent and impartial experts, but by “capitalists” who are guided by the logic of personal gain, or “soulless technocrats.” Also inexplicable is the discrepancy professional qualifications and material and status rewards. Inconsistencies in this area are often denied or suppressed in the name of the meritocratic ideal of “merit status.” For example, in modern Russian society The situation of low material remuneration and, as a consequence, low prestige and status of highly educated and highly intelligent people has become typical: “The profession of physicist in the USSR in the 1960s. enjoyed high prestige, while accountants enjoyed low prestige. IN modern Russia they switched places. IN in this case prestige is strongly linked to the economic status of these occupations.”

Because systems are more complex and subject to faster evolution, the mechanism for assigning status remains uncertain. Firstly, the list of criteria involved in determining status is very extensive. Secondly, it is becoming increasingly difficult to reduce the totality of various status attributes belonging to each individual to a single symbol, as in traditional societies, where it was enough to say “this is the son of such and such” for the person’s social status, his material level, circle of acquaintances and friends. In traditional societies, personality and status were very closely linked. These days, personality and status tend to diverge. Personal identity is no longer given: she herself builds it with her own efforts throughout her life. Therefore, our perception of ourselves as individuals is split into many aspects in which our social status is manifested. Personal identity is felt not so much through connection with a fixed status, but through a sense of self-worth and uniqueness.

Another result of socialization is the acquisition by people of various statuses, that is, certain positions in society. There are social and personal statuses. * Social status- This the position of an individual (or group of people) in society in accordance with his gender, age, origin, property, education, occupation, position, marital status, etc. For example, people studying at a university have student status; those who have completed their working career due to age - pensioner status; those who have lost their jobs - unemployed status. Each status position implies certain rights and responsibilities.

People have in their lives not one, but many statuses. Thus, a person can be simultaneously a son, a husband, a father, a scientist, a mayor, a car enthusiast, a philanthropist, etc. At the same time, in the set of statuses one can single out one main status(usually an official), which is of decisive importance for a given individual.

Bright example - famous Russian economic and political figure of the 1990s. Yuri Luzhkov(born in 1936). Despite rich variety his positions in society (up to senator, honorary professor Russian Academy sciences and the author of a popular book about Moscow), after all, the position of mayor of the capital of Russia is the main social status of this person. Depending on the role played by the individual himself in acquiring his status, two main types of social status are distinguished: prescribed and achieved. Prescribed status(it is also called assigned or attributed) - this is one that is received from birth, by inheritance or by coincidence of life circumstances, regardless of the desire, will and efforts of a person. These are, in particular, those acquired from birth, or natural born statuses associated with gender (woman, man), with nationality (Egyptian, Chilean, Belarusian), with race (representative of the Mongoloid, Negroid or Caucasian racial groups), with consanguinity (daughter, son, sister, grandmother), with inherited titles (queen, emperor, baroness). Prescribed statuses also include such “involuntarily” acquired statuses as stepdaughter, stepson, mother-in-law, etc.

Unlike the prescribed achieved status (or being achieved) acquired through the individual's own efforts. It is associated ♦ with obtaining education and labor qualifications (pupil, student, worker, master, engineer), ♦ with work activity and business career (farmer, banker, director, major, general, doctor of sciences, minister, member of parliament), ♦ with any special merits ( National artist, honored" teacher, honorable Sir cities), etc.

According to Western analysts, in a post-industrial society, it is precisely achievable(rather than prescribed) status of people. Modern societies gravitate towards the so-called meritocrats, which involves evaluating people according to their merits (knowledge, qualifications, professionalism), and not according to inheritance or personal connections with VIP.

Achieved and prescribed statuses are two main type of status. But life, as always, is “more bizarre” than schemes and can create non-standard situations, in particular, the status of an unemployed, an emigrant (who became such, say, due to political persecution), a disabled person (as a result, for example, of a road accident), an ex-champion 4. ex-husband. Where should we include these and other similar “negative” statuses, which a person, of course, initially does not strive for in any way, but which, unfortunately, he still received? One option is to classify them as mixed statuses, since they may contain elements of both prescribed and achieved statuses.

If social status determines an individual’s place in society, then personal status determines his position among the people immediately surrounding him. * Personal status - This a person’s position in a small (or primary) group, determined by how others treat him. Thus, each employee in any work collective enjoys a certain reputation among his colleagues, i.e. has a public assessment of his personal qualities (a hard worker is a lazy person, a good person is a miser, a serious person is a dummy, a benevolent person is evil, etc.). In accordance with such assessments, people often build their relationships with him, thereby determining his personal status in the team.

Levels of social and personal status may often not coincide. So, say, a minister (high social status) can be a nasty and dishonest person (low personal status). And vice versa, a “simple” cleaning lady (low social status), thanks to her hard work and sincerity, can enjoy great respect from others (high personal status).

The concept of status in everyday life is equated to the characteristics of an individual associated with his economic capital, social prestige and the possibility of influence in certain areas of life. At the same time, the sociological interpretation of this concept is based on the special social position of a person within a group or society, determined by the specific rights and responsibilities for the individual. Status allows us to identify any person, assigning him to a group and fitting him into the social structure of society. Examples of statuses can be different: priest, leader, woman, child, client, professor, prisoner, father, mayor, etc. Each person is free to shape his own status, but he is limited by his financial situation, social relationships and national culture as a whole. Any state offers its individuals a certain set of statuses that are appropriate and possible at each historical and social stage of the development of society. Moreover, society creates a field of competition for status. The specifics of this struggle are influenced by the age, gender of the individual, his social and professional affiliation. The very concept of social status of an individual has three components: sociology (adj.: social), status and personality. · Sociology is the science of society. · Personality is an individual who is the bearer of not only biological and psychological qualities, but also socially significant characteristics. Many individuals make up a society. Personality is formed in the interaction of internal motivations and external restrictions. · Status is the social position occupied by an individual in society. Types of statuses: · Personal status is the position that a person occupies in a small or primary group depending on how he is assessed by his individual qualities. · Social status is the position a person occupies automatically as a representative of a large social group or community (professional, class, national). · A status set is a set of statuses belonging to one individual. · Prescribed status - a status that a person acquires by birth (for example: a title that is inherited) · Achieved status - a position that a person achieves through his efforts. · Natural status is a status that is based on a biological trait. (male, female) So: the social status of an individual is the position of a person in society, occupied by him as a representative of a certain social group and including a certain set of rights and responsibilities. Social status depends on: · age; · floor; · profession; · origin; · marital status; · income; · education. You should not think that everyone has one single social status. Each person can occupy several different statuses, but one of them will prevail over the others. Sociologists call this status basic. The main status dominates in a person’s consciousness, influencing his life activity and motives of behavior, and people around him perceive this status as leading for the individual. Thus, the influence of social status on a person is noticeable. Social roles have no less influence on him. Social status and social roles are interrelated concepts. Any status contains certain patterns of behavior, a culture of relationships and obligations. In other words, expected actions. It is these actions and what shapes behavior within a social status that is called a social role. In each status, it is possible to manifest several roles, which in sociology are usually called “role set.” Expected behavior associated with a particular role performs the functions of a norm and regulation of rights and responsibilities for society. The entire society is based on role relationships, which once again reinforces the socializing role of the public for each individual. For example, a woman’s social status can have many faces: wife, mother, daughter, sister, company employee, Christian, member of an organization (besides this, there are many more examples of social status). The set of these provisions is called the status set. From the above example it is clear how social status is determined: this and Family status, and religious views, and professional activities, and personal interests, etc. There are contradictions in statuses, which leads a person to discomfort, therefore, he strives for change. For example: in the USA for a long time existed racial discrimination African Americans. Over time, a representative of this race becomes the President of the United States. This means that the status system of society has changed. The ratio of prescribed and acquired statuses is reflected in social structure. In a slave-owning, feudal and caste society, prescribed statuses prevail, because they are highly valued family ties for status. In a democratic society, acquired statuses prevail. The social role of an individual is a set of requirements that are put forward in relation to a person occupying one or another social position. Aspects of the social role: · way of behavior; · formalization: a) you can communicate formally (example: lecturer-student in class); b) communication in a non-formal setting (example: the same with chance meeting on the street); · acquired roles - in childhood these are toys, but in adult life this is a conscious choice professional activity; · scale of connections - some roles require a wide circle of contacts (example: journalist), while other roles have a limited circle (example: parent based on the number of children in the family); · emotional aspect - judge, actor; · motivational aspect - interest, finances, prestige or other. Division of social roles: · individual behavior; · role expectations of others from the individual’s behavior. (Under the prism of the profession, it sounds something like what is possible for an actor, but not for a judge.) · social roles (human activity in groups); · interpersonal roles (family, friends). Socialization process. Social roles are learned through the process of socialization. A person observes those around him and then imitates them, accepting the rules. But a person has a certain degree of freedom, which should not violate the freedoms of other people and the system of society. Socialization is the process of personality formation, during which a person acquires skills, patterns of behavior and attitudes characteristic of his social role. (The individual either acts as expected of him or improves in his role). Combination in progress external factors and internal qualities of a person. Agents of socialization are members of society who influence the formation of personality. In childhood, parents, and from the age of 3, the number of socialization agents increases. Conformism is passive acceptance of the existing order. Forms of socialization: · Adaptation - passive adaptation to the environment; · Integration is the active interaction of the individual with the environment, as a result of which not only the environment influences the individual, but also the individual changes the environment. The degree of completeness of socialization is determined by: · The ability to manage finances independently of others. · The ability to provide oneself with a means of subsistence. · Ability to live separately from parents. · Ability to choose a lifestyle. Questions for self-control: 1. What does the concept of social status of an individual mean? 2. Name three components of a person’s social status. 3. Name the types of social statuses. 4. What does the social status of an individual depend on? 5. What is the essence of the concept of social role? 6. What is included in a person’s status set? 7. What are the main aspects of the social role of the individual? 8. Personal socialization, what is it?

Taste is a muscle that can be trained.(NN)

The First Commandment of a Real Woman: take off your heels - quit the race. (NN)

Fashion is a matter of money. Style is a matter of individuality. (NN)

If you are struck by the beauty of a woman, but you cannot remember what she was wearing, it means she was dressed perfectly. (Coco Chanel)

Lack of attire sometimes serves best outfit. (Petronius)

A well-dressed person is one who considers himself and others. (Pierre Cardin)

There is a legend that there are women who, when opening a closet, know what they will wear. (NN)

It is just as foolish to despise fashion as it is to follow it too zealously. (Jean de La Bruyère)
***
Most people live by fashion, not by reason. (Georg Christoph Lichtenberg)
***
There are people who even dress their thoughts according to the demands of fashion. (Bertold Averbach)
***
An outfit is a preface to a woman, and sometimes the entire book. (Sébastien-Roch Nicolas de Chamfort)
***
The expression on a woman's face is much more important than her clothes. (Dale Carnegie)
***
Clothes make a person. Naked people have extremely little influence in society, or even none at all. (Mark Twain)
***
We eat for our own pleasure, dress for the pleasure of others. (Benjamin Franklin)
***
The worse things go for you, the better you should dress. ( English saying)

***
Modesty died when clothes were born. (Mark Twain)
***
Women's clothing - painting, men's clothing- sculpture. (Barnett Newman)

***
If men nowadays are more serious than women, it is only because their clothes are darker. (Andre Gide)
***
Women dress best in areas where they often undress. (Fortunat Strovsky)
***
Brevity is the soul of lingerie. (Dorothy Parker)
***
A man does not like women in cheap clothes, except his own wife. (NN)
***
A man who is about to take a decisive step thinks: “What will I say?”, and a woman: “How will I dress?” (Madeleine de Puisier)
***
If a woman looks good in slacks, she will look good in anything. (NN)
***
Judge a man not by his clothes, but by his wife's clothes. (Thomas Dewar)

***
If women only dressed for one man, this wouldn't last so long. (Marcel Achard)
***
If women dress up so carefully, it is only because a man's eye is better developed than his mind. (Doris Day)
***
Women believe that they dress up for the sake of men or for their own pleasure; but in truth, they dress up for each other. (Francis de Miomandre)
***
I dress for women and undress for men. (Angie Dickinson)
***
The dress should be tight enough to show that you are a woman, but loose enough to show that you are a lady. (Edith Head)
***
Wearing one dress for too long is harmful to the body. (Yanina Ipohorskaya)
***
What do men like most about a woman's dress? Their idea of what a woman would look like without any dress. (Brendan Francis)
***
Modern dresses are like barbed wire: they protect the territory, but allow you to explore it. (Denny Kay)
***
Cleavage is another form of matter conservation. (Tamara Kleiman)
***
Women's dress It doesn't have to be tight, but if a woman is dressed, I want to be able to see exactly where she is in the dress. (Bob Hope)

***
An unloved suit never wears out. (NN)

***
The most important thing in women's clothing- the woman who wears it. (Yves Saint Laurent)
***
There's nothing special about a skirt when it flutters on the clothesline. (Lawrence Dow)
***
Moth loves to change her wardrobe. (Antony Regulsky)
***
Fashion passes, but style remains. (Coco Chanel)
***
Fashion no longer exists. It is created for several hundred people. (Coco Chanel)
***
You can follow fashion or run after fashion. But you can only run if you are young enough. (Jeanne Moreau)
***
No ugly women- there are only women who don’t know that they are beautiful. (Vivien Leigh)
***
In everything that concerns sins, one should carefully follow fashion. (Lillian Hellman)
***
It takes twenty minutes to look like a goddess. It takes three hours to look natural. (Women's folk wisdom)
***
Beware of originality. IN women's fashion originality can lead to masquerade. (Coco Chanel)
***
Best decoration girls - modesty and a transparent dress. (Evgeny Schwartz)
***
Black shoes on flat sole worn to balding short men. (Women's folk wisdom)
***
Fashion exists for women who lack taste, etiquette exists for women who lack education. (Queen Maria of Romania)
***
All people are naked under their clothes. (Heine)
***
Many women's problems that the best psychiatrists give in to are often solved by a hairdresser of the second category. (Mary McCarthy)
***
A woman’s clothes should be moderately modest, so that they are not conspicuous, and at the same time it is noticeable that she is wearing them. (Stas Yankovsky)
***
Fashion is traditionalism squared: to be like everyone else and, moreover, to compete. (A. Kruglov)
***
Wear rich clothes - they will open all doors for you. (Fuller)
***
Every fashion looks as if it will last forever. (Georg Simmel)
***
Taking fashion too seriously is certainly stupid. (Hans Georg Gadamer)
***
The essence of fashion is that only part of the group always follows it, while the group as a whole is only on the way to it. (Georg Simmel)
***
The breaking of fashion by kings becomes fashion for their subjects. (Emil German)
***
The latest fashion statement usually echoes loudly in an empty pocket. loving man. (Eduard Aleksandrovich Sevrus (Vorokhov))
***
I love clothes and don't like fashion. (Miucia Prada)
***
The desire for novelty is a special gift that explains the absolute dominance of the French in the field of fashion. (Valerie Giscard D'estain)
***
In fashion stores, look not for a thing, but for yourself. (NN)
***
Perfume is business card. Without fragrance, a woman is anonymous. (Hubert de Givenchy)
***
Shoes are made so that even in clothes a woman appears naked.
(Christian Louboutin)
***
The value of the bag should be higher than the value of its contents. (GQ Magazine)
***
A dress has no meaning if it doesn't make men want to take it off of you.
(Françoise Sagan)
***
You can wear whatever you want, however you want, as long as it looks feminine and sexy. (Vivienne Westwood)
***
The secret to the success of our costumes is in small details that are understandable at the level of sensations.
(Cristiano Corneliani, Director of Corneliani)
***
If there are no clothes you would like to wear, create them yourself. (Hand-made principle)

***
Taste is the ability to find a way out in the most natural in different circumstances.
(Fazil Iskander)
***
I love vulgarity. Good taste is death. Vulgarity is life. (Mary Quant, inventor of the miniskirt)
***
A person's style is the voice of his soul. (Ralph Waldo Emerson)
***
Only superficial people do not judge by appearance. (Oscad Wilde)
***
A well-tied tie is the first serious step in life. (Oscad Wilde

***
A real man wears a suit, not jeans, but this suit looks as if a person slept in it. (Susan Vega)
***
She looked like she had been poured into the dress, slightly overflowing. (Palham Woodhouse)
***
Better two folds on your face than one on your stocking. (Parisian woman's commandment)
***
The person for whom she is dressing should undress a woman. (NN)
***
To be beautiful, it is not enough to be beautiful. (Paul Raynal)
***
Charm is beauty in motion. (Gotthold Lessing)
***
Very expensive clothes make you look old. (Coco Chanel)
***
youth fashion- pleonasm; There is no such thing as old fashion. (Coco Chanel)
***
I love it when fashion comes out into the streets, but I don't allow it to come from there. (Coco Chanel)
***
Nothing makes a woman look older than an overly rich suit. (Coco Chanel)
***
Fashion, like architecture, is a matter of proportions. (Coco Chanel)

To be irreplaceable, you need to change all the time. (Coco Chanel)

Fashion is something that goes out of fashion. (Coco Chanel)

People are not captivated by fashion, but by the few who create it. (Coco Chanel)

Clothes are like canvas, which different people drapes differently. (Donna Karan)

If a woman is poorly dressed, others will remember her clothes. If a woman is dressed well, those around her will remember her. (Coco Chanel)

A woman, not clothes, expresses sexuality. (GianiVersace)

Style is a person. (Buffon, French naturalist)

Fashion is what we dress ourselves in. What others wear is unfashionable. (Oscar Wilde)

What I wear is fashionable! (Coco Chanel)

Fashion lives not only in dresses, fashion is in the air, it is brought by the wind, we anticipate it, we breathe it, it is in the sky and on the road, it is inseparable from people, morals, and events. (Coco Chanel)

A well-dressed person is one who considers himself and others. (P. Cardin)

A real woman can be immediately recognized by her disobedience to fashion standards; she wears only what suits her. (I. A. Efremov)

A lover of rarities values not what is good or beautiful, but what is unusual and outlandish, what he alone has. He values what is fashionable and hard to find more than what is perfect. (J. Labruyère

The whims of women are not subject to fashion, but fashion is always in their power. (Valery Afonchenko)

Happiness is not in money, but in shopping. (Marilyn Monroe)

Bad taste is an indicator of the decline of morals.” In clothes, try to be graceful, but not dandy; the sign of grace is decency, and the sign of panache is excess. (Socrates)

Depending on your means, dress luxuriously, But not funny, rich - not colorful. Clothes speak about a person. (Shakespeare)

Elegance is more than ease, more than freedom from awkwardness and restrictions. Elegance implies inspired yet refined precision, detail and brilliance. (Garlits)

Each new generation laughs at the old fashion, switching to a new religion. (Thoreau)

The majority, lacking vanity, follows the new fashion, forgetting the old. (Hubert)

Fashion is the only attempt to transform art into form social interactions. (Oliver Wendelaer Holmes)

In any form, excess causes outrage, so every reasonable person should adhere to this rule both in dress and speech. Try to avoid foreign influences in everything, but follow, without undue haste, changes in fashion. (Moliere)

Try not to get ahead of fashion and keep up with it, and especially don’t go to its extremes. (Lavater).

Admit it, you sold your soul the first time you put on Jimmy Choo shoes! (film The Devil Wears Prada).