What is known about Bigfoot. Bigfoot photo, video film about Bigfoot (Yeti, Bigfoot, hominoid)

Bigfoot - myth or reality? Billions of people on Earth want an answer to this question.

Are you interested in the topic? bigfoot photo or Bigfoot video film? This article is exactly about that! Bigfoot or, as he is also called, bigfoot, hominoid, sasquatch is a humanoid creature that is believed to be found in highland and forested areas around the world. There is an opinion that this is a mammal that belongs to the order of primates and to the genus humans, preserved from the time of human ancestors. Swedish naturalist, creator of a unified system for classifying animals and flora Carl Linnaeus identified him as Homo troglodytes or, in other words, caveman.

Descriptive Characteristics of Bigfoot

There is no exact description of Bigfoot. Some say that these are huge four-meter animals that are distinguished by their mobility. Others, on the contrary, say that his height does not exceed 1.5 meters, he is passive and swings his arms wildly when walking.

All Bigfoot researchers are inclined to conclude that the Yeti is a good creature if you don’t make him angry

According to unconfirmed reports, the Yeti differs from modern man pointed skull shape, denser build, short neck length, longer long arms, short hips and a massive lower jaw. Its entire body is covered with red, gray or black hair. The hair on the head is longer than on the body, and the beard and mustache are very short. It has an unpleasant strong odor. Among other things, he is an excellent tree climber.

There is an opinion that the habitat of Bigfoot is the snowy edge that separates forested areas from glaciers. At the same time, forest populations of Bigfoot people build nests on tree branches, and mountain populations live in caves. They feed on lichens and rodents, and they butcher the caught animals before eating them. This may indicate a close relationship with a person. In case of hunger, yetis approach people and thus behave carelessly. According to villagers, in case of danger, the humanoid savage makes a loud barking sound. But Chinese peasants say that snow people weave simple baskets, and also make axes, shovels and other basic tools.

Descriptions suggest that the Yeti is a relict hominoid that lives in married couples. However, it is possible that some people with excessively developed unnatural hair are mistaken for these creatures.

Early mentions of Bigfoot

The very first historical evidence The existence of Bigfoot is associated with the name of Plutarch. He talked about how Sulla's soldiers captured a satyr, which according to the description matches the appearance of the yeti.

In his story “The Horror,” Guy de Maupassant describes the meeting of the writer Ivan Turgenev with a female snowman. There is also documentary evidence that in the 19th century in Abkhazia there was a woman named Zana, who was the prototype of the yeti. She had peculiar habits, but this did not prevent her from successfully giving birth to children from people who, in turn, were different mighty force and good health.

In the West in 1832, reports appeared of a strange creature living in the Himalayas. Hodtson B.G., an English traveler and researcher, settled in the highlands in order to study this mysterious creature. Later Hodtson B.G. in his works he talked about a tall humanoid creature, which the Nepalese called a demon. It was covered with long thick hair and was distinguished from the animal by the absence of a tail and walking upright. Local residents told Hodtson about the first mentions of Yeti. According to them, snow people were first mentioned in the fourth century BC.

Half a century later, the Briton Lawrence Waddell became interested in the savages. At an altitude of 6,000 meters in Sikkim, he found footprints. After analyzing them and talking with local residents, Lawrence Waddell concluded that yellow predator bears, which very often attack yaks, are mistaken for humanoid savages.

Interest in Bigfoot grew in the 1920s and 1930s, when one reporter called the hairy savage the “terrible bigfoot.” In means mass media It was also reported that several Bigfoot people were caught and imprisoned, after which they were shot as Basmachi. In 1941, colonel of the medical service Soviet army Karapetyan V.S. inspected the Bigfoot caught in Dagestan. Soon after this, the mysterious creature was shot.

Theories and a film about Bigfoot

Today, scientists do not have sufficient data to make an official confirmation of the validity of one of the theories. However, scientists have voiced rather bold hypotheses about the emergence of the yeti, which have a right to exist. Their opinions are based on the study of hair and footprints, on photographs taken, audio recordings, identikit photographs of a strange creature, as well as video recordings that are not of the best quality.

For a long time, a short film made by Bob Gimlin and Roger Patterson in 1967 in Northern California was the most convincing evidence of the existence of Bigfoot. According to the authors, they managed to capture a female Bigfoot on film.

This happened in the fall, when Bob and Roger rode horses along a densely forested gorge in the hope of meeting a yeti, whose traces had been repeatedly seen in these places. At one point, the horses got scared of something and reared up, after which Patterson noticed a large creature squatting on the bank of a stream near the water. Looking at the cowboys, this mysterious creature stood up and walked away towards the steep slope of the gorge. Roger was not taken aback and, taking out a video camera, ran to the stream after the creature. He ran after the savage, shooting him in the back. However, he realized that it was necessary to fix the camera and follow the moving creature, after which he knelt. Suddenly the creature turned and began to walk towards the camera, but then, turning slightly to the left, it walked away from the stream. Roger tried to rush after him, however, thanks to his fast walking and large sizes, the mysterious creature quickly disappeared, and the film on the video camera ran out.

The Gimlin-Patterson film was immediately rejected by specialists from the most important US scientific center, the Smithsonian Institution, as a fake. American experts said that such a hybrid with a hairy chest, the head of a gorilla and human feet it simply cannot happen in nature. At the end of 1971, the film was brought to Moscow and shown to a number of scientific institutions. Specialists from the Central Research Institute of Prosthetics and Prosthetics assessed it positively and were very interested in it. After detailed study The conclusion of the film was made in writing by the professor of the Academy of Physical Culture D.D. Donskoy, who noted that the gait of the creature on the film is completely atypical for a person. He regarded it as a natural movement, in which there were no signs of artificiality, and which is characteristic of various deliberate imitations.

The famous sculptor Nikita Lavinsky also undoubtedly considered the Gimlin-Patterson film to be authentic. Based on the footage of this film, he even created sculptural portraits of a female Bigfoot.

Participants in the seminar on hominology, Alexandra Burtseva, Dmitry Bayanov and Igor Burtsev, undertook the most in-depth study of this film. Burtsev made a photographic reproduction with various exposures of frames from the film. Thanks to this work, it was proven that the head of the creature on the film was not a gorilla, as the Americans claimed, and not ordinary person, and paleoanthropa. It is also clear that the hairline is not a special suit at all, since the muscles of the back, legs and arms are clearly visible through it. The difference between the yeti and humans is also the elongated upper limbs, the absence of a visible neck, the carriage of the head and the elongated barrel-shaped torso.

The arguments on which Patterson's film is based are:

• The ankle joint of the mysterious creature, captured on film, has exceptional flexibility, which is unattainable for humans. The dorsal direction of the foot is more flexible than in humans. Dmitry Bayanov was the first to draw attention to this. Later, this fact was confirmed and described in his publications by Jeff Meldrum, an American anthropologist.

• The Yeti's heel protrudes much more than a human's heel, which corresponds to the structure of the Neanderthal foot.

• The then head of the department of biochemistry at the Academy of Physical Culture, Dmitry Donskoy, who studied the film in detail, concluded that the gait of the strange creature on the film is completely not inherent in Homo Sariens, which, moreover, cannot be recreated.

• In the film, the muscles on the limbs and body are clearly visible, which in turn excludes speculation about the costume. All anatomy distinguishes this mysterious creature from a human.

• Comparison of the frequency of hand vibrations with the speed at which the film was filmed proved the rather tall growth of the hairy creature, approximately 2 meters 20 centimeters, and if we take into account the build, then its heavy weight - more than 200 kilograms.

Based on these considerations, Patterson's film was considered authentic. This was reported in scientific publications in the USA and USSR. However, if the film is recognized as authentic, therefore, the existence of living relict hominids, which are considered extinct tens of thousands of years ago, is recognized. Anthropologists cannot do this yet. Hence the endless number of refutations of the authenticity of an excellent film certificate.

Among other things, ufologist Shurinov B.A. Contrary to popular opinions, he claims that Bigfoot is of alien origin. Other researchers of the Yeti mysteries insist that the origin is connected with interspecific hybridization on anthropoids, thus putting forward the theory that Bigfoot was the result of the crossing of apes with humans in the Gulag.

Bigfoot photo is real. Yeti-Bigfoot family in Tennessee (USA)

Real photo of a frozen yeti

In December 1968, two famous cryptozoologists, Bernard Euvelmans (France) and Ivan Sanderson (USA), examined the frozen corpse of a hairy hominoid found in the Caucasus. The survey results were published in a scientific collection of cryptozoologists. Euvelmans identified the frozen yeti as a "modern Neanderthal."

At the same time, active searches for Bigfoot were carried out in former USSR. The most significant results were obtained from the studies of Maria-Janna Kofman in the North Caucasus, and Alexandra Burtseva in Chukotka and Kamchatka. Scientific expeditions in Tajikistan and the Pamir-Altai under the leadership of Igor Tatsl and Igor Burtsev ended very fruitfully. On Lovozero (Murmansk region) and in Western Siberia Maya Bykova successfully conducted the search. Vladimir Pushkarev devoted a lot of time to searching for yeti in Komi and Yakutia.

Unfortunately, the last expedition of Vladimir Pushkarev ended tragically: due to a lack of funds for a full-fledged expedition alone, in September 1978 he went to the Khanty-Mansiysk Okrug in search of Bigfoot and went missing.

Janice Carter has been friends with the Bigfoot family for decades!

IN last years interest in the yeti is being revived, new regions of distribution of modern Neanderthals have appeared. In 2002, Janice Carter, the owner of a farm in Tennessee, said in a television interview that an entire family of bigfoots had lived near her farm for more than fifty years. According to her, in 2002, the father of the “snowy” family was about 60 years old, and their first acquaintance took place when Janice was a seven-year-old girl. Janice Carter has met Bigfoot and his family many times in her life. This drawing was made from her words and clearly shows the proportions of the yeti and his peacefulness.

Recently, Russian hominologists (Bigfoot researchers) found information that in 1997, in France, in the small town of Bourganeff, a frozen body of a Bigfoot, allegedly found in Tibet and smuggled from China, was displayed. There are many inconsistencies in this story. The owner of the refrigerator truck in which the Yeti corpse was transported disappeared without a trace. The van itself, along with its sensational contents, also disappeared. Photos of the body were shown to Janice Carter, who confirmed that she does not rule out that this is not a falsification, but the real body of Bigfoot.

Bigfoot video. Speculations and falsifications on the topic of Yeti

In 1958, Ray Wallace, a resident of the American town of San Diego, published a sensation about Bigfoot, who is a relative of the Yeti living in the mountains of California. It all started when, in August 1958, an employee of Wallace's construction company came to work and saw huge footprints around the bulldozer that looked like human ones. The local press called the mysterious creature Bigfoot, and America thus received its own species of Bigfoot.

In 2002, after the death of Ray Wallace, his family decided to reveal the secret. At Ray's request, the 40-centimeter-long footprints for marking the soil were cut out of boards, after which he and his brother put the feet on their feet and walked around the bulldozer.

This prank captivated him so much for many years that he could not stop and periodically delighted the media and communities of mystery lovers with either a recording of him making sounds or photographs with blurry monsters. But the most interesting thing was that the relatives of the deceased Wallace declared that the film made by Patterson and Gimlin was falsified. Many experts assumed that the footage was genuine. However, according to relatives and friends, this filming was a staged episode in which Wallace’s wife starred, dressed in a specially tailored monkey costume. This statement was a major blow to enthusiasts who are trying to find a humanoid mysterious creature.

But back in 1969, John Green, in order to determine the authenticity of the film, consulted with specialists from the Disney film studio, who created monkey costumes for the actors. They said the creature was wearing living skin and not a costume.

I would like to note that hundreds of volumes of scientific literature are devoted to observations of the hominoid. But there is still no concrete answer to the question of its origin and existence. On the contrary, the longer the research and search last, the more pressing the questions are raised. Why can't you catch Bigfoot? Can small populations of these creatures survive in unconnected areas? And there are many more questions that have no answers yet...

I bring to your attention an excellent film about the Yeti with good video quality, dedicated to all aspects of this interesting topic, which has been exciting the minds of people around the world for many years.

MOSCOW, December 21 - RIA Novosti, Alfiya Enikeeva. For decades, enthusiasts have been trying to prove that Bigfoot exists. In addition to poor quality photos and videos, bones, teeth, hair, pieces of skin, casts of footprints and even Yeti feces are presented. Scientists carefully studied these samples and found out whose they actually were.

Mysterious hominid

In 2003, the remains of a previously unknown species of ancient man, Homo floresiensis, were discovered on the Indonesian island of Flores. Based on a single skull and several of the most fully preserved skeletons, the height of the Flores people was estimated at one meter, and the brain volume at 400 cubic centimeters, which is three times less than that of modern humans.

These people were called hobbits. And the editor of Nature magazine, Henry Gee, even wrote that the discovery of relatives who lived 50 thousand years ago is quite recent from an anthropological point of view, it may testify in favor of the hypothesis of the existence of Bigfoot.

Yeti - alleged ancient look a hominid that lived (and perhaps still lives) in the mountains of Central Asia, North America and the Caucasus. It is considered similar to Gigantopithecus, the largest primate that lived in Asia nine million years ago.

They started talking about the Yeti in the early 1950s, when the first eyewitnesses appeared who claimed to have met with mysterious creature in the Himalayan mountains. Since then, several dozen scientific expeditions have been carried out, but no professional scientist has ever seen Bigfoot, and the remains of individuals provided by enthusiasts raised doubts.

Polar relatives

In 2014 international group scientists decided to put an end to this issue and performed a DNA analysis of thirty different hair samples allegedly belonging to the Yeti. From each, the researchers extracted the same short section of the genome and then compared it with corresponding parts of DNA from different mammals. Of course, there was a type for everyone.

Among those identified were dogs, antelopes, and bears. Two tufts of wool found in the Himalayas genetically match DNA extracted from fossil bone polar bear from Spitsbergen, who lived about forty thousand years ago. However, the samples under study by all indications belonged to a creature that died no more than fifty years ago.

Scientists explained this mystery this way: ancient polar bears and their brown relatives could interbreed with each other, and some of their descendants living today in the Himalayas carry a piece of the genome of their polar ancestor.

Biologists placed the obtained data and DNA samples in GenBank, a publicly accessible genetic database. Taking advantage of this, geneticists from the University of Oxford (UK) and the Danish Museum of Natural History conducted a repeat study, but did not find any matches with the polar bear genome. The samples overlapped very little with the DNA of the modern Himalayan clubfoot.

Scientists suggest that the DNA of the wool could be damaged - this often happens with ancient samples. It is possible that the sample belongs to four-legged animals, and not to a great ape.

And yet bears

In the fall of 2017, a group of American, French and Norwegian biologists again examined several dozen samples of skin, fur, bones and feces allegedly belonging to Bigfoot. This time, we conducted a phylogenetic analysis of mitochondrial DNA transmitted to offspring through the maternal line.

Scientists studied nine samples of Yeti skin, bones and fur stored in the Messner Mountain Museum (Italy) and in the collection of the Icon Film Company (USA). For comparison, 15 samples of bones, tissues and feces of Himalayan bears were taken from the Pakistani zoo.

By comparing the DNA, the researchers found that with the exception of one of the bones, which belonged to a dog, all the rest belonged to bears that lived in the Himalayan mountains.

Thus, the mystery of Bigfoot was finally revealed, and the resulting volume of data allowed biologists to solve another problem - to clarify the pedigree of brown bears (Ursus arctos). It turned out that the Tibetan variety (Ursus arctos pruinosus) separated from its relatives about 340 thousand years ago, and the Eurasian and American ones - 140 thousand years ago.

Description

Testimonies about encounters with “Bigfoot” most often feature creatures that differ from modern humans in having a denser physique, pointed skull shape, longer arms, short neck length and massive lower jaw, relatively short hips, with thick hair all over. body - black, red, white or gray. Persons dark color. The hair on the head is longer than on the body. The mustache and beard are very sparse and short. They climb trees well. It has been suggested that mountain populations of Bigfoot people live in caves, while forest populations build nests on tree branches. Carl Linnaeus designated it as Homo troglodytes(cave man). Very fast. He can overtake a horse, and on two legs, and in the water - a motor boat. Omnivore, but prefers plant foods, loves apples. Eyewitnesses described encounters with specimens of varying heights, from average human height to 3 m or more.

Ideas about Bigfoot and its various local analogues are very interesting from the point of view of ethnography. The image of a huge scary man can reflect the innate fears of darkness, the unknown, and relationships with mystical forces among different peoples. It is quite possible that in some cases snow people people with unnatural hair or feral people were accepted.

origin of name

He was named Bigfoot thanks to a group of climbers who conquered Everest. They discovered the loss of food supplies, then heard a heartbreaking scream, and a chain of footprints similar to human ones appeared on one of the snow-covered slopes. The residents explained that it was the Yeti, the abominable snowman, and categorically refused to set up camp in this place. Since then, Europeans have called this creature Bigfoot.

Existence

Most modern scientists are skeptical about the possibility of the existence of Bigfoot.

...about Bigfoot he said: “I really want to believe, but there is no reason.” The words “no basis” mean that the issue has been studied and, as a result of the study, it has been discovered that there is no reason to trust the original statements. This: is the formula of the scientific approach: “I want to believe,” but since “there is no reason,” then we must abandon this belief.
Academician A. B. Migdal From guess to truth.

The attitude of a professional biologist to the question of the possibility of the existence of “Bigfoot” was illustrated by paleontologist Kirill Eskov in a popular article:

At least, I do not know the laws of nature that would directly prohibit the existence in the mountains of Central Asia of a relict hominoid - an “ape-man,” or simply a large ape. It must be assumed that, contrary to its name, it is not connected in any way with the eternal snows (except for the fact that it sometimes leaves traces there), but should live in the belt of mountain forests, where there is ample food and shelter. It is clear that any reports about North American “bigfoot” can be thrown out with a clear conscience without reading (for there are no primate species on that continent and never have been, and in order to get there from Asia through circumpolar Beringia, as people did, you must at least have fire), but in the Himalayas or the Pamirs - why not? There are even quite plausible candidates for this role, for example, Meganthropus - a very large (about two meters tall) fossil ape from South Asia, which had a number of “human” features that bring it closer to the African Australopithecus, the direct ancestors of hominids […]
So, do I admit (as a professional zoologist) the fundamental possibility of the existence of a relict hominoid? - answer: “Yes.” Do I believe in his existence? - answer: “No.” And since we are talking here not about “I know/don’t know”, but about “I believe/don’t believe”, I will allow myself to express a completely subjective judgment on this matter, based personal experience: […] where a professional has once set foot, not a single animal larger than a rat has any one chance remain “unknown to science.” Well, since by the end of the twentieth century there were almost no places left where a professional would not have set foot at all (at least on land) - draw your own conclusions...

- “Cryptukha, sir!”, article. Kirill Eskov, Computerra, 03.13.07, No. 10 (678): pp. 36-39.

Currently, there is not a single representative of the species living in captivity, nor a single skeleton or skin. However, there are allegedly hairs, footprints and several dozen photographs, video recordings (poor quality) and audio recordings. The reliability of this evidence is questionable. For a long time, one of the most compelling pieces of evidence was a short film made by Roger Patterson and Bob Gimlin in 1967 in Northern California. The film allegedly showed a female Bigfoot. However, in 2002, after the death of Ray Wallace, for whom this filming was made, evidence appeared from his relatives and acquaintances, who said (however, without presenting any physical evidence) that the whole story with the “American Yeti” was from beginning to end. the end is rigged; The forty-centimeter “footprints of the Yeti” were made with artificial forms, and the filming was a staged episode with a man in a specially tailored monkey suit.

However, it should be noted that Patterson’s film aroused genuine interest among researchers from the National Geographic Channel. In the section “Reality or Fiction” (broadcast in December 2010), an attempt was made to study and examine Patterson’s film from the point of view of the possibility of its falsification. Experienced make-up artists, a tall actor imitating a gait, special effects specialists and scientists were brought in as experts. The appearance of the creature in the film was assessed, its fur adjacent to the muscles, the proportions of the limbs, the dynamics of movement, the shooting distance was taken into account, etc. As a result, according to the unanimous opinion of the experts involved, even at the current level of development of the media industry and video effects, not to mention already about the level of 1967, it is almost impossible to achieve such a degree of realism in the plot of Bigfoot.

On the other hand, from enthusiasts of this topic one can hear accusations against “official science” that its representatives simply brush aside the available evidence. Here is a typical text of this kind:

In fact, those who say “there is no reason” simply do not even want to get acquainted with what has been “dug up” by enthusiastic researchers. “We hear countless examples of this in history.” I will give only two. When the Canadian Rene Dahinden at the end of 1971 brought us a copy of the film shot by Patterson in 1967, I personally once approached the then director of the Institute of Anthropology of Moscow State University V.P. Yakimov and offered to show the film to him and the staff of the institute, he literally put his hands forward, like would recoil from the proposal and say; "No! No need!" But this did not stop him from declaring that there was no reason...
And when at the international symposium, which he (Yakimov) chaired, Professor Astanin went to the podium to present to those present the materials of an anatomical study of the hand of the Yeti from the Pangboche monastery (Tibet), Yakimov did not allow him to speak and drove him from the podium in violation of the democratic traditions of such forums - to the protests of the participants... As a result, some of them left the symposium meeting.
And a recent example: when I came from the USA after a five-week “investigation” of the events at the Carter farm in the fall of 2004, where, according to the owner, a clan of Bigfoot lived, and I offered to speak and talk about the results in the anthropology department of the Institute of Ethnology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, its head. S. Vasiliev declined under the pretext of being busy with other issues.
At the same time, when there was a noise in the press about the existence of a “bigfoot” in the Shoria mountains (south of the Kemerovo region), the same Vasiliev stated without hesitation: “Alas, we do not have data on the existence of humanoids anywhere in the world"…
Igor Burtsev, Ph.D. ist. Sciences, Director International Center Hominology, Moscow.

The Soviet scientist B.F. Porshnev paid much attention to the topic of Bigfoot.

Commission of the Academy of Sciences to study the issue of “Bigfoot”

Commission members J.-M. I. Kofman and Professor B.F. Porshnev and other enthusiasts continued to actively search for Bigfoot or his traces.

Society of Cryptozoologists

Mentions in history and literature

Abstract drawing of Bigfoot.

There are numerous known depictions of creatures similar to Bigfoot (on art objects from Ancient Greece, Rome, Ancient Armenia, Carthage and Etruscans and medieval Europe) and mentions, including in the Bible (in Russian translation shaggy), Ramayana ( rakshasas), in Nizami Ganjavi’s poem “Iskander-name”, folklore different nations (faun, satyr And strong in Ancient Greece, yeti in Tibet, Nepal and Bhutan, ghoul-baths in Azerbaijan, chuchunny, chuchunaa in Yakutia, almas in Mongolia, ezhen (野人 ), maoren(毛人) and renxiong(人熊) in China, kiik-adam And albasty In Kazakhstan , goblin, shish And shishiga from the Russians, diva in Persia (and Ancient Rus'), chugister in Ukraine , dev And albasty in the Pamirs, shurale And yarymtyk among the Kazan Tatars and Bashkirs, Arsuri among the Chuvash, picenus among the Siberian Tatars, abnauayu in Abkhazia , sasquatch In Canada , teryk, girkychavylin, worldygdy, Kiltanya, market, arysa, Rackem, Julia in Chukotka, trampoline, sedapa And orang pendek in Sumatra and Kalimantan, Agogwe, kakundakari And ki-lomba in Africa, etc.). In folklore they appear in the form of satyrs, demons, devils, goblin, merman, mermaids, etc.

Opponents of the version of the existence of Bigfoot, which includes most professional biologists and anthropologists, point to the lack of unambiguous evidence (living individuals or their remains, high-quality photographs and videos) and the possibility of arbitrary interpretation of the available evidence. There are frequent references to a well-known biological fact: the long-term existence of a population requires a minimum size of the order of hundreds of individuals, the vital activity of which, according to critics, simply cannot be invisible and not leave numerous traces. The explanations put forward for the evidence generally boil down to the following set of versions:

Links

see also

Notes

1. K. Eskov. “Cryptuh, sir!”
2. Patterson's film
3. B. F. Porshnev Current state of the issue of relict hominoids Viniti, Moscow, 1963
4. Soviet "Bigfoot" Itogi magazine
5. Zhanna-Marie Kofman
6. see, for example, “Popular Biological Dictionary”, 1991, Ed. USSR Academy of Sciences, edited by corresponding member A. V. Yablokov
7. V. B. Sapunov, Doctor of Biology. Sciences Bigfoot in two dimensions, or an alternative to the noosphere
8. J. Kofman At the origins of a new science (To the 40th anniversary of the publication of Professor B. F. Porshnev’s monograph “ Current state the question of relict hominoids" VINITI 412 since 1963) magazine "Mediana" No. 6 2004
9. KAZAKHSTAN CHRONICLE “P” Year 1988
10. Trakhtengerts M. S. Habitat of primates of the Alamas species, journal “Natural and Technical Sciences” ISSN 1684-2626, 2003, No. 2, pp. 71-76
11. Dmitri Bayanov, Igor Bourtsev In The Footsteps of the Russian Snowman 240 pages “Pyramid Publications” 1996 ISBN 5-900229-18-1 ISBN 978-5-900229-18-8 (English)
12. B. A. Shurinov 20th century paradox « International relationships» 315 pages 1990 ISBN 5-7133-0408-6
13. A Russian biologist considers Sasquatch and other yetis to be feral oligophrenics.
14. Beiko V.B., Berezina M.F., Bogatyreva E.L. et al. Great encyclopedia of the animal world: Pop. edition for children. - M.: JSC "ROSMEN-PRESS", 2007. - 303 p. UDC 087.5, BBK 28.6, p. 285.

Big Foot

There is information about Bigfoot cohabiting with people. Of course, there is not even a hint of happiness in such a relationship. In all such legends, the desperate loneliness of Bigfoot is clearly discernible. After a night spent with Bigfoot, the woman is no longer able to return to people; it is as if he is bewitching and bewitching her.

According to the story of Mikhail Yeltsin, a researcher of relict man, in the mid-1980s he was told the story of a Soviet geologist in the mountains of Tajikistan. On a hot summer day two are easy dressed men carried out geodetic surveys for the needs of border guards. Suddenly one of them heard a scream. He rushed to the place where his colleague was, but saw only scraps of clothing. A comrade was kidnapped by a huge female Bigfoot, who mistook an adult man for a cub. After all, hominid babies are hairless. The unfortunate geologist managed to escape, or rather, the yeti themselves did not stop him, realizing that he was a stranger: all children are like children - they eat, grow and become covered with hair, but this one eats the food chewed by his mother, but does not grow or play. Returning to the people, the geologist spent the rest of his life in a psychiatric hospital.

Legends about this kind of abduction exist on all continents in mountainous and wooded areas: females abduct men, males, respectively, girls. In the Caucasian gorge Uchkulan, local residents have a legend about the daughters of Bigfoot. It is possible to see them, but coming into contact with them is dangerous - they paralyze a person’s will.

1942 - in the Murmansk region. An unusual incident occurred. In one of the villages of the Lovozero region, a boy disappeared in winter. For a week, people searched for the child in the taiga. But suddenly the child returned on his own. He said that a “big hairy man” carried him to the cave. Several more of the same “hairy” people lived there. They ate roots, and the boy also ate them. Then the child began to feel unwell, and, probably, they decided to return him to people.

In Kyrgyzstan, relatively recently there were two cases of yeti appearing in public. Hunters from the Naryn region discovered traces of a strange creature in the mountains. The dimensions of the foot were amazing: the length was 45 cm, the width was 35 cm. According to witnesses, one of the encounters with the Yeti ended tragically for the person. One day, a group of geologists was forced to stop their work in one of the mountain villages of the Kekirimtau massif (northwest Tien Shan). The reason for this was the inexplicable panic of the workers, the premonition that someone else was in the area.

During one of the expeditions, a mysterious incident occurred. In the mountains near Lake Payron (Tajikistan), researchers took turns keeping watch in a tent. One of them heard footsteps nearby and looked out of the tent - no one was there. This happened several times. Then something incomprehensible began to happen: the duty officer’s head began to pound, tingle, drowsiness washed over him, and the man lost consciousness. How long he stayed in this state, he does not know. He came to his senses because someone was stroking his cheek with something. There was a feeling of something hard, like leatherette. The researcher extended his hand and, to his horror, realized that it was a human hand, which was covered with thick fur. Screaming in horror, he lost consciousness again.

In Abkhazia, the story of Zana, a wild hairy woman who was captured in the 1860s, is well known. She lived for a long time on the estate of Prince Genaba in the village of Tkhina, Ochamchira district. It is known that she had children from local men. Zana died in 1890, and her younger son Khvit - in 1953. B. Porshnev and I. Burtsev were searching for their graves. In 1974, Khvit's remains were discovered and sent for research to Moscow. The Abkhaz warned I. Burtsev not to do this. The scientist did not listen to them and suddenly became seriously ill with mosquito fever. This disease has not existed in the Soviet Union since 1918. After recovery, friends joked: they say, this is “the revenge of the pharaohs.”

In the area of ​​Malaya Vishera, researchers in the swamps also found traces of a yeti of enormous size. There were also clear teeth marks on the tree. When laboratory tests were carried out at the Institute of Genetics, it turned out that the distance between the fangs of this strange creature is 2-3 times greater than that of a human.

St. Petersburg scientist O. Sapunov told a story from his childhood. Once while fishing, he and his friend saw a trail on the trail. bare feet. They were struck by the size: about 40 cm. After some time, they picked berries in the same places - again there were traces. Along these lines, the guys came across fish bones and heads. And then they saw the fishermen themselves - two large and two small humanoid creatures overgrown with thick fur. Without making out the way, the boys rushed away.

A man and his adult son met a strange creature in the Siberian taiga, very reminiscent of a wolf walking on its hind legs. According to the description, it was an ordinary... baboon. The whole mystery of the situation is that this species of tropical monkey is not found in the Siberian forests. The two timid men recalled the horror that gripped them at this meeting, and the incredible, extremely strange feeling, as if they had spied something forbidden. If their story is reliable, the little snowman may not only live in the Himalayas; its distribution area is wider and covers the uninhabited spaces of Central Siberia.

We also met Bigfoot in the Leningrad region. In the Priozerny district, near the village of Orekhovo, tourists have repeatedly noticed a humanoid creature covered with hair. The most interesting find is the excrement of an unknown creature. Laboratory analysis showed: they cannot belong to either a person or an animal.

American Bigfoot

In the forests and mountains of the west coast North America there is a mystery of its own. In this wilderness, two-meter hairy humanoid creatures can still be seen to this day. They were nicknamed Bigfoot (English - “big foot”). The first reports about them began to appear at the beginning of the 19th century. American President(1901–1909) Theodore Roosevelt was an avid hunter, and there is evidence that in 1903 he spoke of a Bigfoot attack on two hunters in the Salmon River region of Idaho.

1905 - Northern California Indian Johnny Tester watched for an hour as a large male Bigfoot taught his two children to swim and fish using sharp sticks.

1924 - a team of lumberjacks from the city of Kelso, Washington, flatly refused to go to work. The reason was that in a remote area of ​​​​the forest near the Cascade Mountains, the workers were attacked by huge hairy wild people who pelted them with stones. An armed group went to the scene of the incident. The lumberjacks' hut was destroyed, and everything around was trampled with huge footprints.

1955 - an interesting story happened to hunter William Rowe. Hiding in the bushes, he sat in ambush. Suddenly, a huge animal, more than 2 meters tall, sat down next to the other side of the bush. Bigfoot did not suspect that someone could be watching him. The hunter was confused, but he had enough time to take a good look at the hairy creature. Probably, sensing someone else's scent, it looked into the gap between the branches. Their gazes met. A grimace of extreme surprise froze on Bigfoot's face. The hunter froze. The creature slowly straightened up to its full height and quickly walked away. Rowe had the opportunity to shoot after him, but he was unable to do so. “Although I call it “it,” I now feel that it was a person. And I realized that I would never forgive myself if I killed him,” this is how he later completed his story.

1970, August 19 - Early in the evening, Mrs. Louise Baxter of Skamania, Washington, USA was driving past a parking lot in Beacon Rock when her car got a flat tire. The woman changed the tire and suddenly, completely unexpectedly, she felt that someone was looking at her intently. Her feelings did not let her down, although the observer was not at all what she might have expected to see. Looking at the section of forest stretching from the side of the road, she saw with horror the huge muzzle of some brown, coconut-like, dirty creature with large rectangular white teeth and large nostrils, like those of monkeys. As might be expected, the woman screamed, jumped into her car and stepped on the gas in a panic. Looking in the rearview mirror, she saw that the creature had climbed out onto the road and froze, straightening up in full height, which, according to her, was no less than 3.5 meters. “It was just huge,” she later recalled. - Such a giant, like a monkey. Definitely bigfoot."

Although the description came from a frightened woman, the encounter related by Mrs. Baxter was not something completely unusual for the inhabitants of the state. Indeed, both in our time and in the past, there have been many reports of a creature that seems to be the most elusive of all primates on our planet.

In recent decades, Bigfoot footprints have become the object of serious study at several US universities and Canadian laboratories. They found that typical adult tracks are about 40cm long and 17-18cm wide and show a distinct lack of foot arch. At the same time, clearly distinguishable two phalanges on all fingers indicate a peculiar adaptation, acquired in the process of evolution, for carrying significant weights. And accordingly, the depth of the prints allows us to simulate a bipedal creature weighing more than 130 kg, and sometimes much more. The absence of markings that would indicate the presence of claws excludes the possibility that the prints actually belong to bears, while the existing anatomical details, such as data on skin growths on the edge of the foot, sweat pores and abrasions, would be absolutely impossible to reproduce artificially , which reduces the likelihood of fraud. More recently, a chain of more than 3,000 footprints was discovered, stretching for several miles, in a fairly deserted place.

For years, Bigfoot sightings like Mrs. Baxter's were viewed with disbelief by most American zoologists, despite supporting evidence in the form of footprints. But what happened on October 20, 1967 can safely be called a breakthrough in the hunt for Bigfoot. Cowboy and rancher Roger Patterson and his Indian friend Bob Gimlin were wandering through the woods near Bluff Creek in Northern California. Coming out into the clearing, they could not believe their eyes. A female Bigfoot was walking along the opposite bank of the stream. The movie camera captured 71 cm of stunning color footage. Then they recorded the tracks. The video, shot with trembling hands, spread all over the world, and most experts confirmed and recognized its authenticity.

Tree trunks on the ground, noticeable in the background, make it possible to fairly accurately determine the creature's height and size. Analysis of the film by experts at the biology departments of universities in London, New York and Moscow suggests that the creature was about 1.9 meters tall, with hips and shoulders clearly wider than any human, and a stride width of about a meter. Although it is not impossible that the film shows a tall, massive man dressed in a monkey skin with various artificial paddings, scientists are inclined to believe that it would be extremely difficult for any fraudster to achieve such a casual gait, gestures and other body movements. According to experts who conducted research on the film, the creature’s gait exhibits “natural movements without any signs of awkwardness that would inevitably be seen in imitation.” Clearly noticeable features - a flat face, a sloping forehead and protruding brow ridges, a clear absence of a neck and slightly bent legs when walking - give us the right to believe that the closest relative of the American Bigfoot is Pithecantropus erectus, an ape-like creature thought to have gone extinct about a million years ago.

Whatever is walking around Bluff Creek in the film, it is clear that it is definitely not a bear, as skeptics sometimes claim.

From eyewitness accounts, two types of yeti emerge. One is a huge creature, 2.5 meters and above, whose appearance has been immortalized by Hollywood designers - this is the famous “Harry the Bigfoot”. It is this picturesque image that haunts researchers. Another species is the small yeti, which resembles an ordinary monkey.

There is growing evidence of the existence wild man in the forests of North America - they come in increasing numbers from places as far apart as Florida, Tennessee, Michigan, Alabama, North Carolina, Iowa, Washington, and from the vast expanses of the northwest, where the legends of the Sasquatch were widespread also among the Indians. Although to this day no bones, no skin, no bodies of these strange creatures.

Searches in Alaska were an absolutely natural continuation of research on the northwest coast Pacific Ocean- there, in the mountains, for more than a century, residents have been passing on strange legends. Many people said that they saw with their own eyes huge monkey-like creatures, as well as their footprints - unique, larger in size than all others.

Some Alaskans are reluctant to discuss their encounters with this strange creature - fearing that they will be laughed at or called crazy. The Aleuts living on the islands of Kodiak and Afognak pass down legends about a mysterious, human-like animal from generation to generation. They call this strange creature oulakh.

1974 - four fishermen from Kodiak went fishing to Kazakov Bay (Danger), into which two rivers flow. They saw someone jump into the water from one bank of the river and rush to the other bank. One fisherman thought it was a moose and grabbed his gun. But his friend stopped him. They clearly saw the swimmer's upper torso. We saw him swimming and waving his arms - his arms were very long, up to 1.2 meters long, as the fishermen describe. They saw water dripping from the long hair that covered their arms.

Oulakh is also associated with superstitious screams and a smell that overwhelms everything else - this is repeatedly mentioned in evidence, this is recorded in all descriptions made in Alaska.

A family of fishing farmers living near Clam Gulch reported hearing blood-curdling, inhuman screams during July 1971. Nearby, huge footprints resembling those of a bear were discovered, without the imprints of bear claws.

Tourists from Anchorage, who stopped overnight south of the city, on a mountainside near McHugh Creek, heard noises and rustling sounds in the dark that they said could not be made by a bear or elk.

One of the most interesting testimonies comes from an Anchorage resident who owns a small house near Petersville. He and several companions were riding horseback at the foot of the mountains in the south of Mount McKinley National Park. This happened at the end of summer. Through binoculars they saw three strange creatures. A group of riders began to pursue the bigfoot, sensing a distinctive scent and noticing clear footprints similar to human ones, but with a strongly arched foot. At night, the riders heard terrible screams. This man also reported that he had apparently found the creatures' sleeping place. He does not have any remains of the hair that he found at this site; he describes it as similar to bristles, but thicker than the hair of a bear. This eyewitness also said that he saw these creatures eating berries. He claimed that they resembled the Bigfoot he had seen in the drawing, but seemed shorter and more upright.

Many myths and legends of the world closely resonate with real events and encounters that defy explanation. Bigfoot is one of the most controversial figures in history. Although its existence has not been proven, there are eyewitnesses who claim to have encountered a real Yeti.

Origin of the Yeti Image

The first mention of the existence of a huge, hairy humanoid creature living in the mountains is found in ancient Tibetan mythology. There is a record that this territory is inhabited by a humanoid creature of incredible size, possessing the instinct of survival and self-preservation.

The term “Bigfoot” first appeared thanks to people who went on expeditions and conquered the snow-capped peaks of the Tibetan mountains. They claimed to have seen huge footprints in the snow belonging to a mythical creature. Now this term is considered obsolete, because it has become known that yetis prefer mountain forests rather than snow.

While there is an active discussion among scientists around the world about who Bigfoot is - myth or reality, the inhabitants of the mountainous local eastern countries, and especially Tibet, Nepal and some regions of China, are absolutely confident in his existence and even often come out with Yeti on contact. In the middle of the 20th century. The Nepalese government has even officially recognized the existence of the yeti.

According to the law, anyone who can discover the habitat of Bigfoot will receive a large monetary reward.

Based on this, we can say that the yeti is a mythical or real humanoid animal that lives in the mountain forests of Tibet, Nepal and some other areas.

Description of the yeti's appearance

From Tibetan legends and eyewitness observations, you can learn a lot about what Bigfoot looks like. Character traits his appearance:

• Yetis belong to the family of hominids, which includes the most developed individuals of primates, i.e., humans and apes.
• The peculiarity of such creatures is their extremely large growth. The average adult of this species can reach from 3 to 4.5 m.
• The yeti's arms are disproportionately long and almost reach the feet.
• The entire body of Bigfoot is covered with fur. It can be gray or black.
• It is believed that the females of this hominid species differ so much large size chests, that when moving quickly they have to throw them over their shoulders.

The Yeti family is the American and South American Bigfoot. In some sources it is called Big-footed.

Character and lifestyle of the creature

Despite its appearance, the yeti is far from aggressive and has a relatively balanced and peaceful character. They avoid contact with people and deftly climb trees, like monkeys.

Yeti are omnivores, but prefer fruits. They live in caves, but there are suggestions that some species that live deep in the forest are able to build their homes in trees.

Hominids are capable of reaching unprecedented speeds of up to 80 km/h, which is why they are so difficult to catch. Not a single attempt to catch a yeti has been successful.

Encounters with Yeti in reality

History knows many cases of human encounters with Yeti. Usually the main characters in such stories are hunters and people leading a hermit life in forest or mountainous areas.

The Yeti is one of the main subjects of study for people interested in cryptozoology. This is a pseudoscientific direction that searches for evidence of the existence of mythical and legendary creatures. Often cryptozoologists are simple enthusiasts without a higher scientific education. They still make a lot of efforts to catch mythical creature.

The first traces of Bigfoot were discovered in the Himalayan mountains in 1899. The witness was an Englishman named Weddell. According to the eyewitness, he did not find the animal itself.

One of the official mentions of a meeting with the Yeti dates back to 2014 during a mountain expedition of professional climbers. Forwarders conquered highest point Himalayan mountains - Chomolungma. There, at the very top, they first noticed giant footprints located at a fairly large distance from each other. Later they saw a wide, hairy figure of a humanoid creature, reaching a height of 4 m.

Scientific refutation of the existence of Yeti

In 2017, Dr. biological sciences Pyotr Kamensky gave an interview for the scientific publication “Arguments and Facts”, in which he proved the impossibility of the existence of the Yeti. He used several arguments.

On this moment There are no places left on Earth that have not been explored by man. The last major primate species was discovered more than 100 years ago. The discoveries of modern scientists are mainly rare small plants, etc. The Yeti is too large to be able to constantly hide from researchers, zoologists and ordinary residents of mountainous areas. The size of the yeti population plays a big role. It is clear that in order to maintain the existence of a separate species, at least several dozen individuals must live in one area. Hiding such a number of huge hominids is not an easy task.

The overwhelming majority of evidence in favor of the existence of Bigfoot turned out to be falsification.

The image of the Yeti in popular culture

Like many other folklore and mythical creatures, the image of Bigfoot is actively used in art and various manifestations popular culture. Including literature, film industry and computer video games. The character is endowed with both positive and negative traits.

Bigfoot in literature

The Yeti character is actively used in their works by writers all over the world. The image of a huge hairy hominid is found both in fantasy and mystical novels, popular science works, and in children's books.

The yeti plays one of the main roles in the novel by American science fiction writer Frederick Brown “The Terror of the Himalayas.” The events of the book take place in Himalayan mountains during the filming of a movie. Unexpectedly, the actress who played in the film main role, is kidnapped by a yeti - a huge humanoid monster.

In the fantasy series " Flat world"By the famous British novelist Terry Pratchett, yetis are one of the main races inhabiting the magical world. They are distant relatives of the giant trolls that live in the area permafrost beyond the Ovtsepik Mountains. They have snow-white fur, can bend the passage of time, and their giant feet are considered a powerful aphrodisiac.

Alberto Melis's children's science fiction novel, Finding the Yeti, describes the adventures of a team of explorers who travel to the Tibetan mountains to save Bigfoot from the ubiquitous hunters.

Character in computer games

Bigfoot can be called one of the most common characters computer games. They usually live in tundras and other icy areas. For games, there is a standard image of Bigfoot - a creature that resembles something between a gorilla and a human, of gigantic stature with snow-white and thick fur. This color helps them camouflage effectively environment. Lead predatory image life and pose a danger to travelers. In battle they use brute force. The main fear is fire.

Bigfoot and his history

Bigfoot or Sasquatch is a relative of the Tibetan Bigfoot that inhabits the forests and mountains of the American continent. The term first appeared in the late sixties thanks to the American bulldozer driver Roy Wallace, who discovered traces around his house that resembled human ones in shape, but reached enormous sizes. Roy's story quickly gained popularity in the press, and the animal was recognized as a relative of the Tibetan Bigfoot.

Almost 9 years later, Roy presented a short video to the media. In the video you can see a female Bigfoot moving through the forest. This Video for a long time was subject to examination by all kinds of scientists and others. Many recognized it as real.

After Roy's death, his friends and relatives admitted that all of Woless's stories were just fiction, and the confirmations were falsifications.

• For the footprints, he used ordinary boards, cut in the shape of large feet.
• The video showed the bulldozer driver's wife dressed in a suit.
• The rest of the materials that Roy regularly demonstrated to the public also turned out to be false.

Although Roy's story turned out to be false, this does not mean that there are no anthropoid hominids in America. There are many more stories in which the Sasquatch appears as the main character. The Indians, the indigenous inhabitants of America, claim that huge hominids lived on the continent long before themselves.

Externally, Bigfoot looks almost the same as its Tibetan relative - Bigfoot. The main differences are that the maximum height of an adult reaches 3.5 m. The color of the American bigfoot is red or brown.

Albert is captured by Bigfoot

In the seventies, a certain Albert Ostman, who worked all his life as a lumberjack in Vancouver, Canada, told his story of how he lived as a captive of a family of Bigfoots.

At that time, Albert was only 19 years old. After work, he stayed overnight on the outskirts of the forest in a sleeping bag. In the middle of the night, someone huge and strong grabbed the bag along with Albert. As it turned out later, Bigfoot stole him and took him to a cave where a female and two children also lived. The creatures did not behave aggressively towards the lumberjack, but rather treated him like people treat their pets. A week later, the guy managed to escape.

The Bigfoot Story at Michelin Farm

At the beginning of the 20th century. In Canada, unusual events took place on the Micheline family farm for some time. For 2 years they encountered Bigfoot, which eventually simply disappeared. Over time, Micheline's family shared some stories of encounters with this creature.

They came face to face with Bigfoot for the first time when they youngest daughter played near the forest. There she noticed a large, hairy creature that reminded her of a man. When Bigfoot saw the girl, he headed towards her. Then she began to scream and men came running with guns, scaring away the unknown monster.

The next time the girl saw a hominid, she was doing household chores. It was noon. She raised her eyes to the window, then collided with the gaze of that same Bigfoot, who was now closely watching her through the glass. This time the girl screamed again. Her parents came running to her aid with a gun and drove the creature away with shots.

The last time Bigfoot came to the farm was at night. There he encountered dogs that barked loudly, causing him to disappear. After this, the hominid no longer appeared at Michelin's farm.

The History of Frozen Bigfoot

One of the most sensational stories related to the meeting of man and Yeti is the story of the American military pilot Frank Hansen. In 1968, Frank appeared in a famous touring exhibition. He had an unusual exhibit - a huge refrigerator, inside of which there was a block of ice. Inside this block one could see the body of a humanoid creature covered with fur.

A year later, Frank allowed two scientists to study the frozen creature. Over time, the FBI began to show interest in Frank's exhibit. They wanted to get the frozen corpse of Bigfoot, but he mysteriously disappeared for many years.

After Hansen's death in 2012, his family admitted that Frank had kept a refrigerator containing a frozen corpse in his basement for decades. own home. The pilot's relatives sold the exhibit to Steve Basti, the owner of the Museum of Oddities.

Professional examination of the exhibit

In 1969, Frank Hansen allowed zoologists Euvelmans and Sandersen to examine the exhibit. They made up a small scientific work, describing his observations in it.

Hansen refused to say where he got the Bigfoot corpse, so zoologists initially suggested that it was a Neanderthal preserved in a block of ice from the Stone Age. It was then discovered that the creature died from a bullet wound to the head and was in the ice for no more than 2-3 years.

1. The individual was male and reached almost 2 m in height. The peculiarity was that the entire body of the hominid was covered with thick, long black hair, which is absolutely not typical for people, even in the presence of diseases of excessive hair.
2. Bigfoot's body proportions are quite close to those of humans, but are more reminiscent of the physique of a Neanderthal. Broad shoulders, neck too short, convex rib cage. The limbs were also distinguished by their prehistoric proportions: the legs were shorter than human ones, curved, and the arms were too long and almost reached the hominid’s heels.
3. Bigfoot's facial features are also more reminiscent of Neanderthals.
4. Small forehead big mouth no lips, a large nose with swollen eyebrows that are very prominent in the eyes.
5. The feet and palms are much larger and wider than human ones, and the fingers are shorter.

Confession of Frank Hansen

There he wrote that he once went hunting in the mountain forests. He followed the trail of a deer, which he had been tracking for some time, and completely unexpectedly saw a picture that shocked him. Three huge hominids, covered with black hair from head to toe, stood around a dead deer with its belly ripped open and ate its entrails. One of them noticed Frank and headed towards the hunter. Frightened, the man shot him straight in the head. Hearing the sound of the shot, the other two Bigfoots ran away.

At first, Frank wanted to leave the body of an incomprehensible creature in the forest, but he returned for it soon and placed it in an ice coffin.

Conclusion

Bigfoot is a mythical creature from Tibetan legends about huge, hairy humanoid creatures that live in the mountains. Some eyewitnesses tell stories of unusual encounters with Bigfoot. Attempts to catch a hominid still occur among cryptozoology enthusiasts. A relative of the Tibetan yeti is considered to be Bigfoot, who comes from America.