6 year old boy found drunk. Breaking news about a drunk boy who was hit by a car

In the spring of this year, in the town of Zheleznodorozhny near Moscow, in the courtyard of house 39 in the Pavlino microdistrict, a 31-year-old woman driving a Hyundai Solaris knocked down 6-year-old Alyosha to death.

It is known that the child was returning from a walk with his grandfather. Grandfather carried a children's bicycle in his hands, and the boy, hurried home, ran to the entrance and got hit by a car. After the collision, the Hyundai driver dragged a few more meters under the bottom of the child, Alyosha died on the spot. Olga, the driver of Hyundai, who is rumored to be the wife of a local crime boss, did not consider herself guilty of what happened, claiming that the boy himself threw himself under her wheels.

Here is what an eyewitness writes: "I was an eyewitness to the events, the parents of the deceased boy are our neighbors, the grandfather was walking with the child, the parents were at home. , it’s very hard to drive and no one has ever driven there .. and then a non-local one arrives ... instant death. We stayed for 3 hours, all the structures arrived except for the ambulance .. the ambulance arrived only an hour and a half after the events ... "

Not so long ago, a record appeared in the case that the blood of the deceased boy contained 2.7 ppm of alcohol, that is, approximately a bottle of vodka. According to investigators, the child himself is guilty of his death, as he was very drunk and fell under the wheels himself, a criminal case has not been opened against the Hyundai driver.

The indignant relatives of little Alyosha were advised to conduct a second examination using the exhumation procedure.

In Zheleznodorozhny near Moscow, 31-year-old Olga Alisova, while driving a Hyundai Solaris, hit a six-year-old child who died on the spot from his injuries. The accident happened on April 23, but it became public only the other day, when the boy's father, Roman Shymko, was given the conclusion of forensic experts. The document says that at the time of the accident the boy was very drunk, 2.7 ppm of alcohol was found in his blood (this is about a bottle of vodka for an adult).

The accident occurred near house number 39 in the Pavlino microdistrict. By words eyewitnesses, Alisova was driving at a speed of over 50 kilometers per hour, dragging the boy from one entrance to another, although "there is a playground and a dead end, it is very difficult to drive and no one has ever driven there."

Photos from public "Our Railway! We are for the safety of citizens!"

On Friday, June 16, the Investigative Committee announced the initiation of a criminal negligence case against forensic experts who found the boy drunk:

"Based on the data already collected and the information received during a personal reception of the Main Investigative Directorate of the Investigative Committee of Russia for the Moscow Region on the fact of giving an expert opinion on the strong alcohol intoxication of a 6-year-old boy who died as a result of an accident, a criminal case of negligence was initiated (Article 293 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation) .

As established, the expert's conclusion indicated that 2.7 ppm of alcohol was found in the blood of a child who died as a result of an accident. Currently, experts are already being interrogated by investigators.

As part of the investigation of the criminal case, the investigators intend to give a legal assessment of the actions of the experts."

The criminal case against Alisova, according to the father of the child, was not initiated for about a month. As a result, the case was nevertheless initiated, according to Article 264 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (violation of the rules of the road and the operation of vehicles), Alisova faces up to five years in prison.

“Oddities began two hours after the incident,” the boy’s father, Roman Shimko, told KP. “Unfamiliar people burst at the door of eyewitnesses of the event. The next day, the records from the outdoor video surveillance cameras of the Safe City system disappeared. case. I hired a lawyer who, during this time, interviewed all the witnesses and took pictures of the scene. We provided all this to the investigator. But he told us some kind of nonsense that this was not a criminal case, but an administrative one, and that they would do the most to Alisova - they will issue a fine, despite the fact that eyewitnesses saw her rushing around the yard at breakneck speed, and even talking on the phone.”

Only on May 26, 2017, Roman was summoned to the Investigative Committee and handed a summons to open a case [against Alisova].

“During this time, the culprit of what happened only once met with us. And also, two weeks after the tragedy, she sent a check for 50,000 rubles to my name. Her lawyer asked for a meeting, said that Alisova wanted to apologize. However, no apology came out, the woman was silent almost all the time, and her defender said that she was not to blame, as the child ran out onto the road and sat down. And therefore, allegedly, she could not see him. Some kind of nonsense. "

"Komsomolskaya Pravda", June 15

Alisova, as Alexander Kurennoy, a representative of the Prosecutor General's Office of the Russian Federation, said, is now under house arrest. The expert opinion, which refers to the intoxication of the boy, was made by employees of the state budgetary healthcare institution of the Moscow region, the Bureau of Forensic Medical Examination (GBUZ MO Bureau of SME), Kurennoy added.

An attempt to hush up the case may be due to the fact that Olga Alisova was driving a foreign car. The woman herself works in a mobile phone shop in the Moscow region, but her husband is a member of an organized crime group, on account of which there are murders, kidnappings, extortion, robberies and rapes. “I have no time to talk about it,” Alisova told Life.

As a relative of Alisova later said, in fact, her husband has been under arrest for 10 years.

“Her husband really is in prison. He committed a crime as part of a group, he has been in prison for a long time, he should leave soon. He sat down at the age of 20, a young fool, there’s no other way to say it,” a relative of the woman said on the air of the radio station Moscow Speaks.

To achieve justice after receiving such results of the examination, the family of the deceased boy decided to conduct an exhumation procedure to prove the sobriety of the six-year-old boy at the time of the accident.

"Gazeta.ru", June 15

how told local residents, a few days after the accident, road signs appeared in the yards, "installed somehow." "The officials responsible for safety and compliance with traffic rules in the Pavlino microdistrict became uncomfortable in their" chairs "due to their gouging and vain receipt of a salary! Therefore, urgently, IN REVERSE (which is always undertaken by them, and through their subordinates, in order to have" excuse" for their belated initiative) prepared a special order for the installation of road signs," claim local residents.

The locals also reported about the disappearance of a video surveillance camera, which was installed above one of the entrances of the house and aimed at the scene of an accident.

June 18, 16:09 Moscow Region Ombudsman Ekaterina Semenova said that witnesses to the accident are under pressure, they were "threatened or wished for something to be said otherwise, as it happened."

"The guilty party behaved quite, from their (family's) words, extraordinary. Attempts to apologize were expressed in the fact that they made a postal order. This can be interpreted in different ways, especially from a human point of view. Those witnesses who saw the moment of the incident, they say that there were also some kind of threats or wishes addressed to them, so that something would be said differently, as it happened," Semenova told reporters after a meeting with the parents and relatives of the deceased boy.

She promised to keep the situation with the investigation of his death under control.

"We want to get acquainted with the case materials and the sequence of all procedures, the correctness of their execution, in order to form our expert opinion both from a legal and moral point of view in order to understand whether everything was done correctly in this process," the Ombudsman said. .

RIA News"

June 21, 16:50 A re-examination showed that there really was alcohol in the blood of the deceased child. The results of the examination were reported by Interior Minister Vladimir Kolokoltsev and the Department of the Investigative Committee for the Moscow Region.

According to the minister, to date, the prosecutor's office has once again confirmed that there are no complaints against the investigation.

By order of the Investigative Committee, a re-examination was carried out. It was attended by representatives of expert institutions of the Ministry of Defense, research expert institutions.

"As far as I know, the secondary result coincides with the first. But I have no right to voice this decision. This will be announced by the relevant authorities," Kolokoltsev said.

At the same time, the head of the Ministry of Internal Affairs stressed that he immediately took this case under personal control. “I have given instructions that will reach all the heads of the investigative units of the system of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, that for each fact of such a tragedy, meaning an accident involving the death of minors, a criminal case should be initiated within 24 hours and reported to a higher leader,” Kolokoltsev added. .

"Vesti.ru"

“Investigators of the regional Investigative Committee seized blood samples of the deceased with an established alcohol content and conducted a molecular genetic examination at the Main Directorate of Criminalistics of the Investigative Committee of Russia, according to which the blood belongs to a minor victim.

Investigators also examined the car of the accused in the criminal case of an accident, in the cabin of which traces of the blood of a minor victim were found and seized. According to the conclusions of the forensic chemical examination, alcohol was found in the specified blood.

As part of the investigation of the criminal case, investigators intend to establish the circumstances of the lifetime use of alcohol by the child. Currently, the production of a complex of investigative actions aimed at establishing all the circumstances of the incident is ongoing.

Office of the Investigative Committee for the Moscow Region

Earlier, a competent source told Interfax that a repeated forensic medical examination fully confirmed the presence of a high dose of alcohol in the body of the deceased child. "The results of the re-examination of the deceased child's blood unequivocally indicate that the test and control samples belong to him, and they contain a significant amount of alcohol," the agency's interlocutor said.

The already scandalous story around six-year-old Alyosha Shimko, who was hit to death by a car in Zheleznodorozhny near Moscow, 31-year-old Olga Alisova, received a new continuation. Forensic expert Mikhail Kleymenov insists that 2.7 ppm of alcohol was indeed found in the child's blood, which corresponds to a severe stage of intoxication. Earlier, he convinced the parents of the child and Life that he only took samples from the corpse, sent them for examination to Moscow and signed the finished act.

Now he declares that the content of the act immediately embarrassed him, so additional examinations were appointed, including genetic ones. After that, he is absolutely sure that the blood with alcohol was from Alyosha's body. Narcologists are skeptical of this version and say that with such intoxication, the child would not be able to move. The Investigative Committee is ready to clarify this whole vague situation, but the Ministry of Internal Affairs is not eager to transfer this case to subcontractors.

Was the boy drunk?

Today, forensic expert Mikhail Kleymenov publicly announced his version of how a six-year-old child was found drunk. Just five days ago, he told Life and his parents that he had nothing to do directly with the research, but only signed the examination certificate that came to him from the State Budgetary Institution "Bureau of Forensic Medical Examination" of the Moscow Regional Research Institute named after M.F. Vladimirsky (MONIKI). Today, Kleymenov has already publicly stated that the content of the act, which referred to 2.7 ppm of alcohol in the blood of a child, immediately raised doubts in him, so he appointed additional examinations, including genetic ones. And new examinations confirmed that it was these samples from Alyosha's body that he sent to the laboratory, where a large amount of alcohol was found in them. Thus it turns out that the boy was drunk at the time of the accident.

Genetic examination was indeed carried out. During the examination of the corpse, two blood samples were taken. One was sent to the Biology Department for blood typing, and the second sample was sent to the Forensic Chemistry Department to determine the concentration of ethyl alcohol. These are different departments of the laboratory, - Mikhail Kleimenov told Life. - When the result of the study came from MONIKA, I saw that the concentration of ethyl alcohol was high, I naturally had doubts that I had to resolve. After a meeting with my immediate supervisor, I decided to order an additional molecular genetic study to compare both samples that I sent to the laboratory. These samples originated from one person with a probability of almost 100%.

According to him, now, in order to unambiguously say whether these samples belong to the boy, the competent authorities need to appoint a molecular genetic examination and compare the sample that he sent to determine ethyl alcohol with a sample of a biological object that will be taken from the mother. The expert has no doubt that the samples will be identical.

Then we will put an end to this high-profile case. I couldn't mix up the samples because I took two blood samples from the boy's corpse. Do you really think that I took my own blood? I am a state forensic expert, before each conclusion I sign a criminal article stating that I am warned of responsibility for a false conclusion. I am an adult man with more than 26 years of experience,” explains Kleimenov.

In favor of his version, he draws attention to one more detail.

I don't know if the boy was drunk or not, but acetaldehyde was also found in his blood. This indicates the breakdown of alcohol in the body under the influence of a liver enzyme. This can only happen when alcohol enters the human body during lifetime. Let's talk about the boy's condition like this: if he just took alcohol, then some time passed until the alcohol was completely absorbed into the blood. He could still be in a state of activity until the toxic effects of this substance came, - the expert explains.

At the same time, he believes that questions should be asked not to him and not to the police officers, but to the people who surrounded the child.

It is necessary to ask questions to the people who surrounded the child, - summed up Kleimenov. The expert does not exclude that the relatives simply did not know that the boy could drink alcohol.

Secrecy of the investigation

Drug experts are surprised by the version of Kleymenov and the official investigation, which is now being conducted by the Balashikha division of the Ministry of Internal Affairs.

2.7 ppm, found in the blood of a six-year-old child, is approximately equal to 400 ml of drunk vodka. If the child really drank so much, he would be in an unconscious state, would not react to anything, and he would have to call an ambulance, narcologist Oleg Stetsenko told Life. - Well, then, in the case of a child, he would theoretically not be able to drink all 400 ml, because after 200 ml he would not be able to continue drinking. That is, it turns out that alcohol was administered intravenously? Rave! Such laboratory data are questionable. The expert could sign such an opinion only without looking at it.

Life contacted the parents of the deceased baby. In their opinion, the experts are simply trying to shield themselves and avoid responsibility by any means. The fact is that the Investigative Committee has already opened a criminal case based on the results of a strange examination under the article “Negligence”. First of all, experts, as well as carriers of biological materials, can become its defendants.

According to the parents, Kleimenov's words about the examinations carried out say only one thing: "He meant: two test tubes, the main and control samples, showed alcohol, which means that two samples are crap."

Also, the child's family explained what their confidence is based on that the baby did not drink alcohol.

If the son had drunk alcohol, his trachea would have been burned and there would have been vapors of alcohol in the intestines, there are none, alcohol is only in the blood, the father said, confirming his words with the conclusion of experts.

We do not sell ours

For an objective investigation, on Saturday, the head of the Investigative Committee, Alexander Bastrykin, asked that this case be transferred to his subordinates.

If the supervisory authority at the regional level refuses to satisfy the request, the issue of transferring the criminal case will be decided with the leadership of the Prosecutor General's Office, - then the official representative of the TFR Svetlana Petrenko said.

However, according to Life, investigators of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and prosecutors are not eager to transfer this case to the TFR, which says a lot. Either the police protect the honor of the uniform and are afraid of an objective investigation, or for some reason they are trying to shield the culprit of the accident.

If something is unclean in this case and the experts and investigators played in favor of the accused, then the participation of the ICR can end up with very serious problems for them, - one of the employees of the ICR believes. - It is easier for them to send the case to court with the conclusion that the boy was drunk, because this removes questions about the quality of the investigation, and the judge can also interpret this fact in favor of the accused.

Recall that the tragedy broke out on April 23 in the Pavlino microdistrict of the city of Zheleznodorozhny. After lunch, six-year-old Alyosha and his grandfather went to the playground. The boy walked in front, and his grandfather carried his bicycle. It was a stone's throw to the site - it was only necessary to cross the road near the house. Before Alyosha had time to step on the asphalt, he was hit by a black Hyundai Solaris.

31-year-old Olga Alisova, who was driving a foreign car, was charged under Article 264 of the Criminal Code (“Violation of traffic rules resulting in the death of a person”). For her, they chose a measure of restraint in the form of a written undertaking not to leave.

The story of a six-year-old boy who was hit by a car in the suburbs has become one of the most discussed topics of the week. The thing is that the investigators did not open a criminal case for a long time, and then they issued an examination that the child was very drunk at the time of death. The oddities were added to the incident by the media, which began to claim that the culprit of the accident was the wife of a crime boss. Medialeaks understood how this story developed.

Oddities of the case

The accident itself in the town of Zheleznodorozhny near Moscow occurred on April 23, and on May 2 journalists drew attention to it. The correspondent of Radio 1 came to the courtyard where the tragedy happened and talked with neighbors and relatives of six-year-old Aleksey Shimko, who was hit by a car.

A child with his grandfather was walking home from the playground, there was an accident. Unfortunately, grandfather did not have time to do anything, because it was impossible - the child jerked very sharply. Maybe the driver picked up too much speed in a dead-end yard, which was not equipped with any pedestrian crossings or signs. I think it is easy to accelerate from the place where the woman was unfolding to the place of the tragedy. We wanted to take the child to the hospital, but after he was run over by all wheels and dragged a few meters, it was already pointless to take him there, - said the boy's uncle Sergei Antipov.

The bicycle with which the boy was walking and the place where the car stopped after the collision

Even then, eyewitnesses said that a woman was driving the car, but the journalists did not name her. It sounded in the public “Our Railway! We are for the safety of citizens!”, where residents of the city discussed the tragedy and shared information.

This post was posted by a girl with a nickname Spring. In the video section on her page there are several stories about this incident, she is subscribed to Balashikha's publics, the most visited page is the Mash public, which will later give impetus to this story and give it wide publicity. Since the beginning of May, the girl has been actively discussing the details of the tragedy in the comments in the city public.

Three days later, on May 5, an anonymous post appeared in the public, the author of which said that he had met with the father of the deceased boy. Anonymous told from the words of his father that he allegedly received a transfer in the amount of 50 thousand rubles from Olga Alisova. Attached was a photo of a woman.

Probably, soon Alisova began to receive threats, because on May 11, the boy's father, Roman Shimko, asked "not to be led to provocations."

He confirmed the fact of the money transfer a month later in a comment to Komsomolskaya Pravda. At the same time, the man told the publication that on the day of the accident, “unfamiliar people were pounding at the door” to eyewitnesses.

The disappearance of surveillance cameras was also discussed in Zheleznodorozhny's public page. One of the residents of the house where the accident happened, Anastasia Ivaeva, told Medialeaks about it.

Residents of the house claim that a video camera was previously installed at this place.

In addition, the residents of the house noticed that road signs appeared in the yard after the accident, the marks on which say that they were installed retroactively.

In public, they constantly discussed the inaction of law enforcement officers and, as a result, they themselves held sort of like an experiment. They took the car, marked the starting point and tried to accelerate. In the very place where the child was hit, the speed reached 50 kilometers per hour.

The father complained about the inaction of the investigators and, according to messages in public, even contacted representatives of political parties so that they took control of the case. He told KP that he was summoned to the Investigative Committee and handed a summons to initiate proceedings only on May 26, that is, a month after the death of his son.

A bottle of vodka for a six year old

On June 13, a new twist appeared in the case. The father was handed the conclusion of forensic experts, according to which at the time of the accident the boy was in a state of extreme intoxication - the experts found 2.7 ppm of alcohol in his blood. It's about the same as if an adult drank a bottle of vodka.

life. she was taken by a well-known lawyer who participated in many high-profile cases.

Why does the publication call Olga Urakina, who gives comments to the media in the case of Alisova, an influential lawyer, is unclear. If you type her last name into the search engines, they only return news related to this case.